PhD-Course ‘Studying Public Policy Implementation in an Era of Governance’, Paris, May 6, 2015 Implementation and governance research Peter Hupe Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Branding as a strategy: New forms of Decision-Processes
Advertisements

Research Strategies: Joining Deaf Educators Together Deaf Education Virtual Topical Seminars Donna M. Mertens Gallaudet University October 19, 2004.
Discourses and Framings of Climate Change: What Literatures Do We Need to Review? To realize synergies there is a need to indentify common objectives for.
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
J. David Tàbara Institute of Environmental Science and Technology Autonomous University of Barcelona Integrated Climate Governance.
Reform and Innovation in Higher Education
Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.
What is Diffusion? The process of communicating innovation through certain channels over time through members of a social system.
Valuing evaluation beyond programme boundaries: Communicating evaluations to enhance development effectiveness globally Anna Downie
Humberto F. Martins Public Management Secretary Presidency of the Republic of Brazil Seminar I Strengthening Country Capacity to Manage for Development.
Standards for Qualitative Research in Education
GOVERNANCE IN ACADEMIC AND IN DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSE Henk Molenaar Executive Director WOTRO Science for Global Development Governance for Inclusive Development.
The role of expert assessments in international environmental affairs William Clark Global Environmental Assessment Project Harvard University
DECENTRALIZATION AND RURAL SERVICES : MESSAGES FROM RECENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE Graham B. Kerr Community Based Rural Development Advisor The World Bank.
Debating ‘inclusion’: learning from development and poverty scholarship Nina Marshall PhD candidate, School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies,
Competing Theories of the Policy Process
POLS 374 Foundations of Global Politics Introductory Lecture.
© Cranfield University 2009 Towards a Framework of Sales Performance Measurement Effectiveness Peter Kerr, Javier Marcos-Cuevas Cranfield School of Management.
Contemporary Tourism Contemporary Tourism Marketing.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
T HE NEW BIOPOWER: POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPERS AND THE OBSFUSCATION OF INTERNATIONAL COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY Celine Tan Birmingham Law School University.
Norm Theory and Descriptive Translation Studies
1 Building a Sense of Permanence into Teaching and Assessment Improvement Efforts Prepared by the National Center for Postsecondary Improvement: Project.
Assessing the effectiveness of compliance strategies in three Australian MPAs David J. Lloyd Southern Cross University R.J. Payne Lakehead University.
August 30, 2015August 30, 2015August 30, 2015Introduction to Political Science1 August 30, 2015August 30, 2015August 30, Comparative Method Frank.
Changing institutional landscapes for wind power implementation. an international comparison Aberdeen, February 21 st 2008 Seminar: “Explaining National.
DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT: AN SME PERSPECTIVE Lina Kloviene, Kaunas University of Technology, 2013.
CENTRAL ISSUES IN THE ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL RULE MAKING Frank Vibert Senior Visiting Fellow.
Professor Ewan Ferlie Dept of Management King’s College London January 2013 Presentation at NHS Confederation Event.
No One Left Behind! Essential Teacher Competences for Inclusive Education and Diversity Teaching Case Finland Suvi Lakkala Ph.D, University lecturer The.
Carlo Ruzza - University of Trento1 European Institutions and The Policy Discourse of Organised Civil Society Comparing Discourses of Civil Society Actors.
Achieved Relative Intervention Strength: Models and Methods Chris S. Hulleman David S. Cordray Presentation for the SREE Research Conference Washington,
Conducting international comparative research Chris Brewster Professor of International HRM, Henley Business School, University of Reading, UK Radboud.
 Examines the nature of culture and the diverse ways in which societies make meaning and are organized across time and space. Topics include cultural.
Recap and Synthesis of National and Regional Research MK21 Inception workshop for local research projects Yangon, June 2015.
1 Introduction to Content Alignment. 2 Objectives 1.Summarize the relationship between the Iowa Core Curriculum and the Iowa Core Content Standards and.
1 Leadership Module 3: Introduction to Content Alignment.
Adult Drug Courts: The Effect of Structural Differences on Program Retention Rates Natasha Williams, Ph.D., J.D., MPH Post Doctoral Fellow, Morgan State.
Implementation and process evaluation: developing our approach Ann Lendrum University of Manchester Neil Humphrey University of Manchester Gemma Moss Institute.
Interpretive approaches: key principles 10 March 2009 Dr. Carolyn M. Hendriks The Crawford School of Economics and Government The Australian National University.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ORGANIZATIONS, & BUSINESS PROCESSES.
Methodological Framework for the Assessment of Governance Institutions P. Diaz and A. Rojas PFRA Workshop, March 17, 2006.
KAY 386: Public Policy Lecture 4 Parsons, 1995:
Managing trust in public organisations Concepts and contradictions Researcher: Peter Oomsels Promotor: Prof. Dr. Geert Bouckaert.
Department of Geography and Environmental Science 15 November 2015 A polycentric institutional approach Dr Emily Boyd and Bo Kjellén.
 Welcome, introductions  Conceptualizing the evaluation problem  stakeholder interests  Divergent and convergent processes  Developing evaluation.
The Herts MEd in Teaching and Learning - University of Cambridge ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING Based on Research and Evidence from the MEd Which assessment strategies.
Origin and evolution of implementation research
Question-led mixed methods research synthesis Centre launch 21 June 2005 David Gough and Sandy Oliver Institute of Education, University of London.
1 The National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education is supported by a Health Resources and Services Administration Cooperative Agreement.
What is theory? What is IR?  What is theory Etymology Definition: A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based.
Contemporary Tourism Contemporary Tourism Marketing © Chris Cooper & C M Hall 2016 Contemporary Tourism 3e, Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.
Digging Deeper into Macro Social Analysis Gary Green University of Wisconsin.
Erin M. Burr, Ph.D. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D. Gary Skolits, Ed.D. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF OSLO The principle of integration and its dilemmas Hans Chr. Bugge Professor of Environmental Law University of Oslo.
CONVENTION & DESTINATION MARKETING Prepared by Yooshik Yoon, Kyunghee University
‘Back to the Future’? Curriculum Development through Pedagogical Inquiry Professor Vivienne Baumfield School of Education University of Glasgow
This training was developed under the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) Center for the Application of Prevention Technologies.
Adaptation and institutional reflexivity
The Power of Relationships: Making Transnational Collaborations Work
3. INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ORGANIZATIONS, & BUSINESS PROCESSES 3.1.
University of Groningen - International Classroom project
Outline QUIZ at start of next Tuesday’s class
From sustainability to Public Gouvernance Responsability
Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts and implications for policy and decision-making 16th- 17th.
Public - Private Dialogues and the Policy Process
Global Trends in Budgeting Reform
Karolina Lendák-Kabók Marc Vanholsbeeck
META-ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
Moshe Farjoun (1998) Strategic Management Journal
Presentation transcript:

PhD-Course ‘Studying Public Policy Implementation in an Era of Governance’, Paris, May 6, 2015 Implementation and governance research Peter Hupe Department of Public Administration Erasmus University Rotterdam Visiting Fellow All Souls College, Oxford

Introduction ‘Governance, governance everywhere.’ Source: Frederickson (2005).

Introduction Central question What implications may the governance paradigm have for the study of government?

Introduction Agenda A. The governance paradigm and its implications B. Governance research frameworks C. Assessment

Introduction Central message Implementation research goes on – although partly under different headings. Although being a ‘magic concept’, when governance is conceptualized properly it may enhance a more complete and less hierarchically biased study of the role of government.

A. The governance paradigm and its implications The age of governance Government and society Away from government centrism Role of government Inviting participation Locus vs focus Who governs? = Empirical question

A. The governance paradigm and its implications Governance as a magic concept Characteristics - Broadness - Normative attractiveness - Implication of consensus - Global marketability Source: Pollitt and Hupe (2011)

A. The governance paradigm and its implications Governance as a magic concept (II) Magic concepts may have potential explanatory functions, but only if positioned, specified, operationalized and applied in systematic ways. Source: Pollitt and Hupe (2011: 654).

B. Governance research frameworks The Logic of Governance Framework (Lynn et al. 2001: 80) O = f (E, C, T, S, M) where O = outputs/outcomes (at individual and/or organizational level) E = environmental factors C = client characteristics T = treatments (primary work) S = structures M = managerial roles and actions

B. Governance research frameworks The Multiple Governance Framework (Hill and Hupe 2014: 130) The trias gubernandi (I) Action dimensionConstitutiveDirectional Operational Action scalegovernancegovernancegovernance SystemInstitutional General rule Managing design making trajectories OrganizationDesigning Mission and Managing (inter-)organ.maintenancerelations settings IndividualInternalizationSituation-boundManaging of values and norms rule applicationcontacts

B. Governance research frameworks Explaining Government-in-Action: Clustering factors The trias gubernandi (II) Action dimensionStructureContent Process Action scale SystemContextOrientationControl OrganizationSettingTasksManagement IndividualAntecedentsHabitusBehaviour Source: see note (1).

C. Assessment Governance research. Characteristics - Differentiation of the dimensions of governing. - Attention to variety of administrative layers and their impact. - The act of management is taken seriously. - Consequence is contextualization.

C. Assessment Governance research. General implications O’Toole (2000: 276) on the study of governance: ‘(T)he broader conceptualization of governance is not antithetical to implementation research; it is designed to incorporate a more complete understanding of the multiple levels of action and kinds of variables that can be expected to influence performance.’

C. Assessment Governance research. Possible functions - Focus on action. - Operational dimensions get attention. - Who are the acting actors = empirical instead of normative question.

C. Assessment Governance research. Possible constraints - Widening of scope (cf. from government to governance) means more variables. - Chance of subsuming the practice of implementation at the street level. - Chance of defining politics and power a-symmetries away.

Conclusion Ways forward Explaining ‘horizontal’ empirical variation. Comparative research design. Agency as embedded in structure. Making connections across scholarly themes.

Notes Note (1) Source: Hupe, P.L. (2012) ‘Determinants of discretion: Explanatory approaches in street-level bureaucracy research’, unpublished working paper written during a Visiting Fellowship at All Souls College, Oxford. Based on the Multiple Governance Framework (Hupe and Hill 2006: 23; see also Hill and Hupe 2014: 130), which was inspired by the ‘three worlds of action’ (Kiser and Ostrom 1982).

References Frederickson, H.G. (2005) Whatever happened to Public Administration? Governance, governance everywhere. In: E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, Jr and C. Pollitt (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hill, M.J. and P.L. Hupe (2014) Implementing Public Policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. London: SAGE (third, revised, edition). Hupe, P.L. (2012) Determinants of discretion: Explanatory approaches in street- level bureaucracy research. Unpublished working paper written during a Visiting Fellowship at All Souls College, Oxford. Hupe, P.L. and M.J. Hill (2006) The three action levels of governance: Re- framing the policy process beyond the stages model. In: B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds) Handbook of Public Policy. London: SAGE, pp

References Kiser, L.L. and E. Ostrom (1982) The three worlds of action: A meta-theoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In: E. Ostrom (ed.) Strategies of Political Inquiry. London: SAGE, pp Lynn, L.E. Jr, C.J. Heinrich and C.J. Hill (2001) Improving Governance: A new logic of empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. O’Toole, L.J., Jr (2000) Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): Pollitt, C. and P.L. Hupe (2011) Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review 13(5):