Seminar 2 - E. Dyachuk, K. Haikonen, K. Kovi, L. Saarinen, L. Sjökvist Technology, research and ethics E. Dyachuk, K. Haikonen, K. Kovi, L. Saarinen, L.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

6-2 Solving Inequalities by Multiplication and Division Objective: Students will be able to solve linear inequalities by using multiplication and division.

Advertisements

Chapter 19 – Linear Programming

What is Technology??? What is Technology???. Is a saw an example of technology?

Workshop Negative brainstorming. Time schedule workshop round – 9.40:Introduction 9.40 – 9.45:Group division 9.45 – 9.50:Problem introduction 9.50.

*Don’t forget to sign in!* Take a story problem (not your own) and on a piece of paper (to turn in) do the following: 1.Identify the division model 2.Identify.

Motivation Lecture Master seminar, January Contents Introduction Importance of regular work Theses with programming Publishing your work Conclusion.

Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9 Homework: 1-9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics ~

Ch. 3.1 – Measurements and Their Uncertainty

Division with Exponents & Negative and Zero Exponents.

Graphing in science Compiled by Woodruff. Graphing in science Typically the x-axis represents the independent variable and the y-axis represents the dependent.

Engineering Design Process

ASPLOS 2015 Debate Onur Mutlu

INFO4990 IT Research Methods Lecture on Research Ethics (Alan Fekete, based in part on slides by Judy Kay)

Performance Improvement. 2 Steps to Performance Improvement 1. Define the Problem 2. Define Duties or Behaviors to be Improved 3. Establish Priorities.

Chapter 2 Measurement & Problem Solving. Uncertainty There is a certain amount of doubt in every measurement – It is important to know the uncertainty.

The Scientific Method. The Scientific Method The Scientific Method is a problem solving-strategy. *It is just a series of steps that can be used to solve.

* A ratio is a comparison of two quantities by division. Ratios like 1 out of 2 can be written as 1:2, ½, or 1 to 2. * When ratios compare a number to.

As we study functions we learn terms like input values and output values.

CSC Intro. to Computing Lecture 5: Boolean Logic, Gates, & Circuits.

A Bibliometric Comparison of the Research of Three UK Business Schools John Mingers, Kent Business School March 2014.

Compound Inequalities Chapter 4.8 Part 1. Definition Compound Inequalities are two inequalities joined by the words “and” or “or”.

Ratio, Rate, Proportion, and Percent. Ratio  Comparison of two numbers by division  Can be written three different ways 4 to 9 4 :

THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS. Chapter Three: The Scientific Process  3.1 Inquiry and the Scientific Method  3.2 Experiments and Variables  3.3 The Nature.

EXPERIMENT VS. CORRELATIONAL STUDY. EXPERIMENT Researcher controls all conditions Experimental group – 1 or more groups of subjects Control group – controlled.

System Construction System Construction is the development, installation and testing of system components.

Science and Engineering

Today: Authorship and Conflicts of Interest Homework #2 (due 10/13 or 14) and #3 (due 10/22 or 23) are posted.

1 Ethics of Computing MONT 113G, Spring 2012 Session 1 Digital Circuits, binary Numbers Course webpage:

Aim: How to write in Scientific Notation DO NOW: 1. WHAT DOES 10 5 MEAN? 2. WHAT IS THE VALUE OF USING YOUR CALCULATOR, CALCULATE 4.5 X 10 6.

Engineering Design Process. Agenda: November 10, 2015 ●What is STEM? ●Engineering Design Process ●Review of Marshmallow Mania DC ●Design ●Exit Pass.

Mixed Bag True or False Brainstorming Definitions 1 Definitions

Opener Imagine that all the birds around the school are dying. How might you investigate the problem? Write a brief description of your investigation.

Negative and Zero Exponents

Resources. Raw Material vs. Natural Resource A raw material is a resource that must be changed before it can be used by humans TreesWheatMetals A natural.

2001 Planning Your Future: Goal Setting The Academy of Irving ISD.

Seminar 1 - E. Dyachuk, K. Haikonen, K. Kovi, L. Saarinen, L. Sjökvist Technology, research and ethics E. Dyachuk, K. Haikonen, K. Kovi, L. Saarinen, L.

Accuracy vs. Precision. 2 minutes: Write what you think accuracy and precision mean 1 minute: discuss at your table what you think.

European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation The Purpose and Fundamentals of Statistics in Clinical Trials.

Approaches to Science and Engineering Projects OR Science Fair Prep.

Chapter 1 Section 2 Review

Seminar 2 Ethics of Technology and Science February 11, 2016 Group 2 Martin Andersson Shaohui Chen Jessica Garcia Yuanyuan Han Sofia Kontos.

Rethinking UK research funding: How does short-term research affect reproducibility, ethics and outcomes? Adisa Azapagic.

Unit 2: The scale of a map and the measuring of distance A. What is a scale?  Purpose: To fit large areas onto small sheets of paper  A ratio between.

Seminar I General research ethics Group 2 Chapter 4 – Handling of research material Ludo, Berrit, TJ, André, Yanran.

Midterm/Final Presentation Project Name Students: [Name1], [Name2] Supervisor: [SV Name] Context: Project [A/B/Special] Semester: Winter/Spring, Year Date:

Photosynthesis. What is photosynthesis? Photosynthesis may sound like a big word, but it's actually pretty simple. You can divide it into two parts: –

Engineering Design Process: Overview Created by The North Carolina School of Science and Math.The North Carolina School of Science and Math Copyright 2012.

Solving Multiplication Inequalities SWBAT solve one step inequalities by applying the division property of inequality; graph the solution set of an inequality.

Seminar 2 IP Right Between Academia and Industry Xubiao Peng Magnus Jobs Shakila Bint Reyaz José Pérez-Loya.

Before: September 21, During: Solving One- Step Inequalities Learning Target: I can solve one-step inequalities by using addition, subtraction,

These materials are prepared only for the students enrolled in the course Distributed Software Development (DSD) at the Department of Computer.

Science and Engineering

Chapter 3: Measurement: Accuracy, Precision, and Error

Ethics course seminar 1 Group 5

Assignment 1 Question 1 ER Diagram Never Stand Still

A Closer Look at Testing

Science and Engineering

Virtual Hands-on Teaching

Additive and Multiplicative Relationships

Bell Ringer What is the series of steps called that we use for experimentation in science? What is the first step in the scientific method? What.

Finding and Evaluation Information

آشنایی با توربین انبساطی و کاربرد آن‌ در نیروگاه‌های تولید برق

”How to be a good PhD supervisor ?”

Results of the 2nd year of the program Title

Results of the 1st year of the program Title

THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS

List three things you can remember about LAB SAFETY (4).

(A) Total work divided by total heat.

Presentation transcript:

Seminar 2 - E. Dyachuk, K. Haikonen, K. Kovi, L. Saarinen, L. Sjökvist Technology, research and ethics E. Dyachuk, K. Haikonen, K. Kovi, L. Saarinen, L. Sjökvist Division of Electricity Dept. of Engineering Sciences Uppsala University Sweden

An ethical problem in science PhD student at a division where a ”renewable power plant” is being developed. The student has written a paper about comparing geometrical parameters and their impact on power absorption. Total absorbed power is used for evaluation and the result is compared with experimental results from the full-scale prototype built at the division. HOWEVER! The professor of the division, also the co- supervisor, says the student can’t publish the paper. The experimental output power is only about 10 % of the rated power. The professor says the power should be normalized.

An ethical problem in science Normalizing in this case means that dividing with some quantity so that the result is shown in ”per unit” instead of kW Normalizing in the way that is commonly done at this divison will hide the output power, but also the paramaters that were studied in the paper. The student did even put some effort into criticising the method of normalization in this paper.

Alternative solutions Publish as per the true results of the student. Normalize the results before publishing as per the supervisor. A medium approach: Publish with a detailed discussion of results (including negative results if any)

Ethical problems or conflicts Conflict with the supervisor. Still not the actual result: Openness, values. Reproducibility of results

An ethical problem in science Who is affected?

Truth vs. loyality Truth and transparency To be loyal to what?