The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
Advertisements

Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Brief History of Education Reform A Move to Promote Equity and Equality.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001 Public Law
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, Title 1 Part A and the Oakland Unified School District Presented By Wilhelmena Sims, Director Department of State and.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
NCLB. Introduction Increased federal mandates and requirements on states Increased federal funding to states by almost 25% from the previous year Movement.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
No Child Left Behind Passed by Congress in 2001 A reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
FUNDING LEGISLATION FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL. CONTRIBUTIONS TO EDUCATION- 07/08 vs. 08/09  8%- Federal funds  State funds07/08  43%- State funds07/08.
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Types of Statewide Assessments Currently Used in Grades 3-8.
EDL 525 Week 4 Learning Team NCLB Title Overview To purchase this material click below link 525/EDL-525-Week-4-Learning-Team-
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Long Branch Public Schools Title I Presentation
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
No Child Left Behind.
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
EDN Fall 2002.
Presentation transcript:

The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP

When it comes to the education of our children...failure is not an option. President George W. Bush

What is it? Comprehensive reform to bridge the achievement gap between disadvantaged and minority students and their peers. Most sweeping reform of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) since it was enacted in Replaces the Improving America’s Schools Act (IASA).

The four principles of NCLB Stronger accountability for results. Expanded options for parents. Increased flexibility and local control. An emphasis on teaching methods that are proven to work.

True or False? NCLB will cut down on red tape and bureaucracy. The number of programs have been reduced. Local control has been increased. School districts can transfer almost 50% of their dollars between programs without approval.

True or false? NCLB strengthens teacher quality. Subject matter competency Preliminary credential or be enrolled in a teacher education program All teachers with paraprofessional aides at Title I schools have new standards of accountability

True or false? NCLB ensure English proficiency. LEP students will learn through scientifically based teaching methods. LEP students will be tested for reading and language arts in English after attending school in the US for three consecutive years.

True or false? NCLB creates public school choice: Parents will be able to transfer their students to a better performing school. Only in schools identified as Title I program improvement. District is responsible for transportation.

True or false? NCLB Title I dollars can now be used for tutoring, after school services, and summer school for all children. Only in Title I schools

Districts are required to submit: A Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP) outlining the integration of State and Federal programs by June 1, 2003 Annual updates and accountability

Sites are required to submit: A single plan for student achievement outlining the integration of State and Federal programs and LEAP Annual updates and accountability

How does a school become Program Improvement?

Program improvement as it applies to a school site: NCLB Academic Performance Index (API) Year one: Failure to make Academic Performance Index Growth Target – Fails AYP go to year two Year two: Failure to make Academic Performance Index Growth Target – Fails AYP go to year three Year 3: Enter Program Improvement

NCLB Year 3: Program Improvement Year 1 Revised school plan (this is a 2 year plan) Offer choice to attend another public school in the LEA that is not PI with transportation Provide written notification to parents Use 10% of funds for staff professional development LEA provides technical assistance – Fails AYP go to year four

NCLB Year 4: Program Improvement Year 2 Continue – Choice to attend another school – 10% for Staff Development – LEA Technical Assistance Add: – Supplemental Services and notify parents Fails AYP go to year five

NCLB Year 5: Program Improvement Year 3 – Corrective Action Continue – Choice – LEA Technical Asst. – Supplemental Service Add Identify school for corrective action and take at least one of the following actions on next slide:

NCLB Year 5: Program Improvement Year 3 – Corrective Action Continued – Replace school staff within current contract agreements – Implement a new curriculum and professional development – Decrease management authority at school level – Appoint outside expert – Extend school or school day – Restructure internal organization/structure of school Inform public and parents of corrective action and allow comment Fails AYP go to year six

NCLB Year 6: Program Improvement Year 4 – Corrective Action Continued Continue: – Choice – LEA Technical Asst. – Supplemental Service Add: – Develop a plan for alternative school governance – Provide notice to parents and teachers and allow comment Fails APY go to year seven

NCLB Year 7: Program Improvement Year 5 – Restructuring Implement Alternative Governance: Reopen school as charter Replace all or most of staff including Principal Contract w/outside entity to manage school State takeover

Funding Components – The High Points Title I - Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged – Part A—Basic Programs – Part B—Student Reading Skills Improvement Title II -Preparing, Training, & Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals – Part A – Teacher Quality – Part D – Technology

Funding Components – The High Points Continued Title III- Language Instruction for LEP and Immigrant Students – Part A—English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act – All schools with ELLs receive a portion of Title III for all LEP students; however, the other portion is for LEP students in the US for 3 years or less.

Funding Components – The High Points Continued Title IV - 21st Century Schools – Part A—Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Title V - Promoting Informed Parental Choice and Innovative Program – Part A—Local and State Innovative Programs – Part C—Fund for the Improvement of Education

Funding Components – The High Points Continued Title VI - Flexibility and Accountability – Part A—Improving Academic Achievement Title VII - Indian, Native Hawaiian and Alaska Native Education – Part A—Indian Education Title VIII - Impact Aid Program Title IX - General Provisions Title X - Repeals, Resignations and Amendments to Other Statues

Teachers: Don’t Leave Them Behind, Either.

Paraprofessionals Hired after January 8, 2002: – Complete two years of higher education study OR – Have an A.A./A.S degree OR – Pass some formal assessment that isn’t specified Hired before 1/8/02 Must have the above by June 2006

Teaching Continuum Single and Multiple Subjects – Intern – Preliminary – BTSA – Clear – 1500 hours Designated Subjects – 5 years of work experience with 1 year of recency within past 3 years – Preliminary – Coursework – Clear – 1500 hours

What About EL Learners, Williams and DS credentials? SDAEI – January 1999 CLAD/CTEL Integrated into Designated Subjects

“Does it work? Your input is appreciated.” Talk to your mentor and administrators Write to your representatives Get involved in the educational process at local, State, and Federal levels