Overview of Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Behavior Management in the Classroom Setting
Advertisements

Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support George Sugai US Dept. of Educ.Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education.
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Behavioral Observation Data for Individual Intervention Decision Making George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Secondary or Targeted Interventions
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of CT & OR
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Functional Behavior Assessments Adapted from work by the OSEP center on PBIS.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Group-based Behavior Interventions: Tier 2
Check In – Connect – Check Out Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director October 25, 2007.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-Based Support George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Behavior Support Planning January 31, 2013 Karen O’Brien.
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
George Sugai University of Connecticut
March 15, 2012 APBS, Atlanta, Georgia Megan Cave & Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year One RI PBIS Team & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Growing the Green: Focusing on Universal Interventions Joan Ledvina Parr PBIS Team Leaders and Coaches Meeting November 13, 2008.
Function-Based Support: Selected Topics Rob Horner & George Sugai Universities of Oregon & Connecticut Center on PBIS
Function-Based Behavior Support: Big Ideas George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on PBIS
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Tier 2 Support The Behavior Education Plan. 2 Objectives Identify the BEP and its place in SWPBS Identify daily, weekly, and quarterly features of the.
Check In – Connect – Check Out A Systematic Approach to Behavior Management for At- Risk Students Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director MTSU.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Check-In/Check-Out Introduction: CICO Point Staff An Intervention for Tier II Students.
BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Supporting Students At- risk by Implementing a SW Targeted Intervention Teri Lewis-Palmer July 10, 2008.
Strategies to Support Yellow-zone students Specialized Group-based Approach.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner and Anne Todd University of Oregon TA-Center on Positive Behavior.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Primer on Function-based Support: From Function to Plan George Sugai November Center on PBIS University of CT.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support George Sugai US Dept. of Educ.Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.
CHECK IN-CHECK OUT – A SECONDARY BEHAVIOR PLAN Elizabeth Roberds A PLAN PROPOSED FOR GRISSOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – MUNCIE, IN.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Secondary Interventions Applying Function-based Support Adapted from Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004 Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools The Behavior.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Plants, Camps, Special Education, & Prevention Science George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice Gene Thompson, Martha Wally, Brandi Simonsen, George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Practical and Effective Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner University of Oregon TA-Center on.
Principles of Behavior Basic Overview for Tier 1 Monthly Coaches’ Meeting Module P DC Name and Date Here.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
5.0 Tier Two Practice: Check-In Check-Out
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
PBIS PRACTICES.
George Sugai University of Connecticut
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut April 22,

PURPOSE Overview of practices & systems for non- responsive behavior: Secondary/Tertiary Tier Behavior Supports Review Secondary/Tertiary Tier Behavior Supports: Practices & Systems Action Planning (~11:00) Appendices

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making Integrated Elements

Classroom Evidence-based SWPBS Practices Non-classroom Family Student School-wide Smallest # Evidence-based Biggest, durable effect

SCHOOL-WIDE 1.Leadership team 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom- wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation EVIDENCE- BASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES CLASSROOM 1.All school-wide 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidence- based instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations NONCLASSROOM 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, move, interact) 3.Precorrections & reminders 4.Positive reinforcement FAMILY ENGAGEMENT 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources

RtI Response to Intervention

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ALL SOME FEW

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement SECONDARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION

Remember

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ALL SOME FEW

Examples… “Check-in Check-out” –Bethel School District, OR “Behavior Education Program” –Fern Ridge Middle School, OR “H.U.G.” –Tualatin Elementary School, OR “Social Skills Club” –Missouri “Think Time” –University of Nebraska

RTI & Secondary Intervention in classroom Fairbanks, Sugai, Guardino, & Lathrop (2007, EC)

RTI Increasing intervention intensity based on responsiveness to effective interventions “Check In/Out” at classroom level

GOALS:8:309:3010:3011:3012:301:30 1. RESPECT OTHERS MANAGE SELF SOLVE PROBLEMS RESPONSIBLY Name____________________ Date ____________ Rating Scale 2 = Great 1 = Ok 0 = Goal Not Met Goal _____ Pts Possible _____ Pts Received_____ % of Pts _____ Goal Met? Y N Check In/Out Pt Card

School Days Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior Class B Results

School Days Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior Class B Results + Compos ite Peers Peer

Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior Study 2 Results School Days

Summary Statement of Problem Behavior Contingencies across Students Setting Events AntecedentsBehavior(s) of Interest Consequences MarcellusN/A(a) Easy unstructured activities (b) Difficult math and writing tasks (a) Out of seat & making faces (b) Talk outs, out of seat, &work not completed (a) Peer attention (b) Escape work BlairN/AIndependent work time Out of seat & talking to peers Peer & adult attention BenN/ATeacher-led instruction When given direction. Non-compliance, talk outs, making jokes Peer & adult attention OliviaThinking about the loss of her sibling During teacher- led instruction Playing with things, not looking at teacher, & not following directions Teacher attention

School Days Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior Peer Study 2 Results + Compo site Peer

FRMS Behavior Education Plan (BEP) (Hawkin, Horner, & March, 2002) Weekly BEP Meeting 9 Week Graph Sent Program Update EXIT BEP Plan Morning Check-In Afternoon Check-In Home Check-In Daily Teacher Evaluation Referral, Assessment, & Orientation

Basic BEP Cycle Morning check-in Prior to each period, give BEP to teacher End of day check-out –Points tallied & reward Copy of BEP form taken home & signed Return signed copy next morning

Behavior Education Plan Daily Progress Report

Identification & Referral Multiple office referrals Recommendations by –Teacher –Parent Time to action = 30 min to 7 days

Contract Agreement to succeed –Student –Parent –BEP coordinator –Teachers Written (pref.) or verbal contract

Organization & Structure BEP Coordinator –Chair BEP meetings, faculty contact, evaluation BEP Specialist –Check-in, check-out, meeting, data entry, graphs –Coordinator + Specialist = 10 hrs/wk

BEP meeting 40 min/wk –Coordinator, specialist, sped faculty, related Services All staff commitment & training Simple data collection & reporting system.

Data Collection for Decision- Making Monitor BEP points earned each day Office discipline referrals Regular data use by BEP team

Daily Data Used for Decision Making

Importance of Functional Assessment in BEP

HUG: Hello, Update, Goodbye Pam Hallvik, Nancy Ferguson, & Sally Helton Tigard-Tualatin Schools

Name: ____________________________ Date: ________________ Please indicate whether the student has met the goal during the time period indicated: Meets = 2 pts So, so = 1 point Doesn’t meet = 0 pts HUG Daily Goal _____/_____HUG Daily Score _____/_____ Teacher Comments: Please state briefly any specific behaviors or achievements that demonstrate the student’s progress. Goals AM to Recess AM Recess AM Recess to Lunch Lunch RecessPM Be Safe  Be Kind  Be Responsible  Total Points Teacher Initials Parent’s Signature ___________________________________ Parent’s Comments _________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ H.U.G. (Hello, Update, Goodbye)

H.U.G. Program WHAT AND WHY? The H.U.G. Program is a means to respond positively to students who need extra support with their behavior. On a daily basis, staff can teach them appropriate behaviors and provide them with opportunities to practice as they move from activity to activity. Additionally, the H.U.G. Program provides for reinforcement and positive attention from adults. The H.U.G. Program also provides for daily communication between a student and his/her teacher and between the school and parents. Additionally, data is collected to determine whether the program is successful or whether changes need to be made. The H.U.G. Program was designed to facilitate positive interactions between at-risk students and significant adults, teach good behavior skills, and provide a means for home-school communication. The H.U.G. check-in creates a safe space for these students; they come to trust and respect the adults who are consistently there for them. The program does not include negative consequences or punishment, just encouragement and positive attention. Parents are asked to provide reinforcement at home when the H.U.G. goal is met and consistently offer feedback and encouragement to their sons or daughters. HOW? The H.U.G. Program consists of a plan and process that allow students to: Check-in with a significant adult before school Carry a tracking form Ask their teacher to rate their behavior Check-out at the end of each day Take the form home to parents Return the H.U.G. form the next morning

“Hello” - Morning All H.U.G. students will check in at counselor’s office between 8:00 & 8:30 each morning. At that time they will receive following: Positive, sincere greeting Check to see if they are prepared for day (lunch ticket, materials, etc.) Check to learn how they are feeling (any morning conflicts?) Collection of returned H.U.G. form signed by parents Verbal reinforcement for returning signed form possibly accompanied by sticker or small reward New H.U.G. form

“Update” - During Day Student: give H.U.G. form to his or her teacher on arrival to class Teacher will rate student’s behavior at times indicated on form & offer brief, positive comment to student about rating. Adults in other setting, such as PE, Music, & recess, etc., will complete ratings for time period they have students.

“Goodbye” - End of Day Students will return with their H.U.G. forms to counselor’s room at 2:25 each day: Students will again receive positive, sincere greeting Counselor or H.U.G. assistant will check to see whether student met his/her goal. –If so, student will receive small reward. –If not, student will receive encouragement to try again tomorrow along with problem-solving discussion of what they might do differently. Students will put their H.U.G. forms into their backpacks to take home to share with their parents. Parents are asked to also give positive feedback to their children. Parents then sign form & put it in student’s backpack for return to school.

H.U.G. Participant Responsibilities H.U.G. Coordinator Sign H.U.G. Contract Agreement. Facilitate the check-in and check-out process. Provide H.U.G. participants with positive, constructive feedback and small tangible rewards. Instruct involved staff members on the use of the HUG form. Collect, summarize, and report H.U.G. data each week. Teachers Sign H.U.G. Contract Agreement. Accept H.U.G. Report Form daily from students. Evaluate student behaviors and complete the form. Offer constructive and positive feedback to students. Parents of H.U.G. Participants Sign H.U.G. Contract Agreement. Review H.U.G. Progress Report with child daily. Provide positive and constructive feedback. Communicate with the school when there are concerns or celebrations regarding the student’s behavior. H.U.G. Student Participants Follow all H.U.G. Program Guidelines. Sign H.U.G. Contract Agreement. GIVE IT YOUR BEST!!!!

H.U.G Program Contract Agreement I have read the H.U.G. Team Members’ Responsibilities Form. I understand that my signature indicates that I am willing to participate in the H.U.G. Program and fulfill all my responsibilities. Student signature: ___________________ Date ______ Parent(s) signature(s): _________________ Date ______ Teacher signature: ____________________ Date ______ Administrator signature: ________________ Date ______ H.U.G. Coordinator signature: _____________Date ______ Copies will be given to all H.U.G. participants. Thank you for your participation and support!!!

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ALL SOME FEW

Behavior Support Elements Problem Behavior Functional Assessment Intervention & Support Plan Fidelity of Implementation Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle Team-based Behavior competence *Response class *Routine analysis *Hypothesis statement *Alternative behaviors *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions *Implementation support *Data plan *Continuous improvement *Sustainability plan

Function-based Logic

Only 2 Basic Functions Pos Reinf Neg Reinf Existing aversive condition identified

Ingram, Lewis-Palmer, & Sugai, 2005

Function-based support is all about… Re-design & improvement of learning & teaching environments –Attention to environment & function –Not re-design of individuals –Change in behavior of plan implementers

Non-examples of Function-Based approach “Function” = outcome, result, purpose, consequence “Lantana, you skipped 2 school days, so we’re going to suspend you for 2 more.” “Phloem, I’m taking your book away because you obviously aren’t ready to learn.” “You want my attention?! I’ll show you attention,…let’s take a walk down to the office & have a little chat with the Principal.”

What is FBA? A systematic process for developing statements about factors that –contribute to occurrence & maintenance of problem behavior, & –more importantly, basis for developing proactive & comprehensive behavior support plans.

Necessary FBA elements 1.Clear & measurable definition of problem behavior classes/sets 2.Complete testable hypothesis or summary statement (antecedents-behaviors- consequences) 3.Data (direct observation) to confirm testable hypothesis. 4.Contextually appropriate behavior intervention plan based on testable hypothesis

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior Testable Hypothesis “Basic Unit” “Best guess” about behavior & conditions under which it is observed Represents basic working unit of FBA Directly guides development of BIP

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior Testable Hypothesis “Basic Unit” Following events that maintain behaviors of concern Preceding events that trigger or occasion Set of related behaviors of concern Infrequent events that affect value of maint. conseq.

Setting eventAntecedentResponseConsequence WRITE TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS: As Veloce is walking, other kids look at him & say “what’s up?” He looks back and says: “Who ya lookin’ at?!” “Ya want some of this?!” “Ya talkin’ to me?!” Kids shake their heads & all him “weirdo.” ??Look at him. “What’s up!” “Who ya lookin’ at?” “Ya want Some?” “Ya talkin’ to me? Kids shake heads & call him “weirdo”

When Sequoia misses her 12:30 medication & teachers present multiple task demands, she makes negative self-statements & writes profane language on her assignments. Teaching staff typically send her to the office with a discipline referral for being disrespectful. Setting eventAntecedentResponseConsequence Misses 12:30 medication Teachers make multiple task demands Sequoia makes negative self- statements & writes profane language Teacher sends Sequoia to office for being disrespectful What function? Avoid difficult tasks

Setting eventAntecedentResponseConsequence Caesar is teased several times about his hair by his friends before class His teacher stares at his hair in class Caesar asks his teacher what she’s staring at His teacher sends him to in-school detention Caesar has dyed his hair three colors & is teased several times by his friends before class. When he enters the class, his teacher stares at his hair. Caesar immediately says “what are you staring at?” His teacher immediately sends him to in- school detention. What function? Escape adult & peer attention

Setting eventAntecedentResponseConsequence Cleo is new to the 6th grade, & English is her second language. When another student approaches & says something to her in English, Cleo turns away. The other student walks away. This happens several times during the day. New studentStudent approaches & speaks in English Cleo turns away Other student walks away What function? Escape peer attention

Setting eventAntecedentResponseConsequence When his teacher asks him what the capitol city of a country is, Napoleon gives the correct answers. His teacher praises his correct answer, & tells him he may work by himself or a friend on the rest of the assignment. None Teacher asks what capitol city of country is Napoleon give correct answer Teacher gives verbal praise & time to work with a friend What function? Access peer & adult attention

Setting eventAntecedentResponse Consequence As Veloce is walking, other kids look at him & say “what’s up?” He looks back and says: “Who ya lookin’ at?!” “Ya want some of this?!” “Ya talkin’ to me?!” Kids shake their heads & all him “weirdo.” ??Look at him. “What’s up!” “Who ya lookin’ at?” “Ya want Some?” “Ya talkin’ to me? Kids shake heads & call him “weirdo” What function? Access OR escape peer attention? How do you know? Assess?

TE is “best guess.” What if testable hypothesis is incomplete or inaccurate? Review what you know Collect more information Change hypothesis statement Test/confirm new hypothesis statement

TE1 for Hillary: "When Hillary sits next to Bill, Hillary whispers in his ear. Bill laughs." Test manipulation? –Put Al in Bill’s seat. Effect: –Hillary whispers in Al’s ear. Develop new TE!

TE2: “When Hillary sits next to boys, she whispers in their ears. The boys laugh.” Test manipulation? –Put Monica in Bill’s seat. Effect: –Hillary does not whisper.

FBA LEVELS 1.Informal  Archival Review  Problem Solving Meeting 2. Indirect  Checklist  FA Interview  Routine Analysis 3. Direct Observation  A-B-C  Structured, Planned Observation 4. Planned Manipulation  Experimental or Functional Analysis MORE INFORMAL EASIER SIMPLE INDIRECT MORE DIRECT COMPLICATED DIFFICULT FORMAL

Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers “FACTS” STEP 1: Student/ Grade: _____Clarence/5th grade_____Date: ____January 11___________ Interviewer: ___________Sugai________Respondent(s): ____Thomas_____ STEP 2: Student Profile: Please identify at least three strengths or contributions the student brings to school. C. has leadership potential. Peers listened to him, and he can be very convincing and sincere. He’s academically competent and seems to be moving smoothly and successfully through the school curriculum. STEP 3: Problem Behavior(s): Identify problem behaviors ___Tardy_X Fight/physical Aggression ___ Disruptive___ Theft___ UnresponsiveX Inappropriate Language_X__ Insubordination___ Vandalism___ Withdrawn_X__ Verbal Harassment____Work not done___ Other __________ ____X _ Verbally Inappropriate___ Self-injury Describe problem behavior:C. may have one of the shortest fuses I’ve seen. One little tease by a peer, and he quickly and predictably escalates through a behavioral sequence that begins with passive in subordination (non response), moves to a mild protest, shifts to harassment and name calling, increases to property damage and even to physical aggression. Its interesting that he seems to “enjoy” the reactions he gets from peers that he aggresses toward, and from peers who look up to him for his aggressiveness.

Routine Analysis Schedule (Times) ActivityLikelihood of Problem BehaviorSpecific Problem Behavior 8:00Waiting to enter building Low High See escalation described above 8:15Advisory & Planning Mostly teasing and touching property of others. Doesn’t escalate much further 9:15Language Arts Occasional name calling/teasing 10:15Recess See escalation described above 11:30Math Occasional teasing 12:00Lunch See escalation described above 12:35Earth Science Minor verbal harassment 1:15Art or Phy Ed See escalation described above 2:00Reading Rarely a problem 2:50Waiting for bus See escalation described above

Fundamental Rule! “You should not propose to reduce a problem behavior without also identifying alternative, desired behaviors person should perform instead of problem behavior” (O’Neill et al., 1997, p. 71).

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior Desired Alternative Acceptable Alternative Typical Consequence Summary Statement

Setting Event Manipulations Antecedent Manipulations Consequence Manipulations Behavior Manipulations

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior Lack of peer contact in 30 minutes. Do difficult math assignment. Noncompliance, profanity, physical aggression, Avoid task, remove from class. Desired Alternative Typical Consequence Points, grades, questions, more work. Do work w/o complaints. Summary Statement Acceptable Alternative Ask for break, ask for help. Why is function important? Because consequences compete!! Function

Function-based Logic

Setting Event Manipulations Antecedent Manipulations Consequence Manipulations Behavior Manipulations Teach options to problem behavior: 1. Ask for break 2. Ask for help 3. Turn in assignment as is. Teach missing math skills Arrange for peer interaction before math class Provide positive adult contact Sit with preferred peer Introduce review type problem before difficult tasks Remind of alternative behaviors Do first problem together Immediately reinforce entering class. Provide reinforcer w/in 1 min. of starting task (3 min., 5 min., 10 minutes) Give break & help Sit with preferred peer when done

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior Rides city bus Teacher corrects peers Profanity Verbal protests Teacher attention Desired Alternative Typical Consequence Delayed teacher attention. Ignore & problem solve later Summary Statement Acceptable Alternative Discuss in private Why is function important? Because consequences compete!! Function

Setting Event Manipulations Antecedent Manipulations Consequence Manipulations Behavior Manipulations Teach J. how, when, & where to express verbal protest, & how to walk away from problem situations in transitions. On days city bus ridden, check in with counselor to review days schedule & walk with counselor to classroom Give >3 positive acknow- ledgements per min. to peers during transitions. Give private & quiet corrections to peers. Remind J. of acceptable & desired replacement behaviors When J. engages in problem behavior immediately disengage from him, & engage peers. When J. engages in replacement behaviors provide adult attention (discussion)

On Mondays and/or when up all of the night before. Daily nongraded quiz on previous night’s homework Verbal protests, slump in chair, walks out of room. Avoids doing quiz & homework discussion. Do quiz without complaints. Discussion about answers & homework. Turn in with name & sit quietly w/o interrupting.

On Mondays and/or when up all of the night before. Daily nongraded quiz on previous night’s homework Verbal protests, slump in chair, walks out of room. Avoids doing quiz & homework discussion. Do quiz without complaints. Discussion about answers & homework. Turn in with name & sit quietly w/o interrupting. + Give time to review homework. + Give quiet time before starting. + Give easy “warm- up” task before doing quiz. + Precorrect behavior options & consequences. + With first sign of problem behaviors, remove task, or request completion of task next period. + Remove task based on step in task analysis (STO). + Provide effective verbal praise & other reinforcers. Teach options to problem behavior: 1. Turn in blank 2. Turn in w/ name 3. Turn in w/ name & first item done. 4. Turn in w/ name & 50% of items done.

Neutralize/ eliminate setting events Add relevant & remove irrelevant triggers Teach alternative that is more efficient Add effective & remove ineffective reinforcers

Behavior Support Elements Problem Behavior Functional Assessment Intervention & Support Plan Fidelity of Implementation Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle Team-based Behavior competence *Response class *Routine analysis *Hypothesis statement *Alternative behaviors *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions *Implementation support *Data plan *Continuous improvement *Sustainability plan

Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., & Lynn, N. (2006). School-based mental health: An empirical guide for decision makers. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. Louis De la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child & Family Studies, Research & Training Center for Children’s Mental Health. Crone, D. A., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavioral assessment. New York: Guildford Press. Crone, D. A., Horner, R. H., & Hawken, L. S. (2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program. New York: Guilford Press.

Attention Please 1 Minute If primary tier is in place, what % of your students could benefit from sec/tert tier supports? How do you currently screen for students needing sec/tert tier behavior supports? Who in your school has behavioral expertise to develop & implement sec/tert level behavior supports? Secondary/Tertiary Tier Supports (8 min)