Vancouver May 22, 2013 19/9/2015. TAP CVB Clients Western Zone Albuquerque Calgary* Denver Hawaii* Los Angeles Palm Springs Phoenix Portland Sacramento.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Owns/ manages income-producing commercial real estate Payout > 90% of Income in Dividend No corporate taxes > 75% of Assets Real Estate >100 Shareholders.
Advertisements

WEEK 6: GLOBALIZATION AND THE CITY. READ: CHAPTER 4 (CHANGE TO MEGAPOLITAN AREAS, READ HANDOUT) WEEK 7: TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE CITY. READ: CHAPTER.
National Association of Steel Pipe Distributors 30 th Anniversary Pictures.
Witten Market Advisory Services Market insights for apartment owners, developers, investors and lenders Market-Smart Investment Decisions Advisors October.
Greater Columbus Georgia Chamber of Commerce September 26, 2013.
Robert E. Martínez Norfolk Southern Corporation Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis November 14, 2006.
Presented by Economic and Tax Revenue Outlook Mark Zandi Economy.com, Inc.
Recent Economic and Value Trends for the U.S. Lodging Industry Presented by: Stephen Rushmore, MAI, CHA President and Founder HVS International
Regions of the united States. Today – April 27th Today we are going to begin learning about the regions and physical features of the United States of.
Exploring trends in youth homicide with cluster analysis: new methodological pathways to policy tools Emily k. Asencio University of Akron Robert Nash.
Glenn R. Mueller, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University Real Estate Institute Director, Capital Markets & International Programs & Legg Mason, Inc. Real Estate.
University of Denver Dividend Capital Research
Vancouver October 19, /17/2015. TAP CVB Clients Western Zone Albuquerque* Denver Los Angeles Palm Springs* Portland Reno Sacramento Salt Lake*
Presented by © 2003 Economy.com Slide 1 Economic Outlook Mark Zandi Economy.com, Inc.
Portland State University’s Center for Real Estate 0 Property & Portfolio Research, Inc. Trends, Opportunities, and Risks in Commercial Real Estate
Next T-Mobile Confidential & Proprietary Information - Not for Customer Distribution. October, 2011.
2015.
Created by Debbie Doebler 2002 The 50 United States 50 States, Capitals, Largest Cities & Regions.
Maps of the USA AlaskaHawaii. Alabama Birmingham Montgomery.
1 Real Estate Analysis and Investor Presentation.
REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. PLAY WORK LIVE Metro Milwaukee 4 County Region.
Vancouver June 5, /9/2015. TAP CVB Clients Western Zone Albuquerque* Denver Hawaii* Los Angeles Palm Springs Phoenix Portland Reno Sacramento Salt.
This presentation contains statements that are forward looking in nature and, accordingly, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could.
AGA 2013 Sectional Leadership Meeting Los Angeles, California April 18 –
Speed and Acceleration. Vocabulary DefinitionIllustration 3 Examples3 Non-examples VocabularyWord SpeedSpeed VelocityVelocity AccelerationAcceleration.
Peaking phase Falling phase Rising phase Bottoming phase Q U.S. office clock (overall) Source: Jones Lang LaSalle Los Angeles, Miami Dallas, San.
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION CENTER ON URBAN AND METROPOLITAN POLICY Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy Audrey Singer, Visiting Fellow The Brookings Institution.
Doc.: IEEE /0489r0 Submission March 2011 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 1 Wideband PHY Channel Availability Date: Authors:
Global Research and Consulting Econometric Advisors CBRE Econometric Advisors Client Conference 2012 October 2, 2012 Global Research and Consulting Econometric.
Marketing Segmentation Cluster analysis U.S. Cities.
Navigant Consulting, Inc. One vision, one strategy, one company.
Geography of the United States the-united-states-of-america ?op=1.
Growth Solutions Strategies and Asset Classes Well-Positioned for Capital Appreciation.
Current Events Vocabulary American Sign Language II.
2009 Calendar & Important Dates Religious Holidays FEBRUARY Ash Wednesday - Lent begins - Christian MARCH Purim-Jewish 17-St.
Navigant Consulting, Inc. One vision, one strategy, one company.
National Air Space System Planning Dave Bushy, VP – Flight Operations JetBlue Airways.
The United States 4 Key Regions Of the Country. The 48 connected states are called the CONTINENTAL states.
The CHRO Network. 2 Goals of Engaging Senior Executives We are engaging senior HR executives with one another and with SHRM to: > Build their peer networks.
The Role of a Supplier in a Disaster or Emergency Craig Hodges March 6 th 2012.
STR Hotel Data Dashboards. STR Dashboards – Hotel data These are interactive Tableau dashboards. Members can select: – year (2007 to 2014 YTD) and month/s.
Institute for Urban Policy and Research Analysis, Professor Tang November 19, 2013 Ryan Robinson City Demographer Planning & Development Review Department.
TAP - Trends Analysis and Projections HAV Meeting May 2013.
The most valuable natural resource in the 21st century is brains. Forbes Magazine Revision
Where We Stand 7th Edition The Strategic Assessment of the St. Louis Region IDOT Planning Conference October 16, 2015.
 Graphs  Paths  Circuits  Euler. Traveling Salesman Problems.
Staffed Location Future Satellite Location Satellite Location.
1 Navigant Consulting, Inc. One vision, one strategy, one company Kelley School of Business X420 SCOOP Presentation January 20, 2005 Brian Pratt & Ben.
Taylor Swift Red Tour Emma Skrypchuk. Taylor’s Tour Dates!!! March 13 & 14 Omaha, Nebraska March 18 & 19 St. Louis, Missouri March 22 Charlotte, North.
The Urban Institute USING INFORMATION FOR COMMUNITY ACTION National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership Kathy Pettit, The Urban Institute Baltimore City.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board 2009 Texas Higher Education Leadership Conference Accelerating Closing the Gaps: Making Opportunity More Affordable.
Visit Seattle CONFIDENTIAL STIA Subset - Transient March YTD Occupancy Comparison STIA Subset - Transient March YTD ADR Comparison STIA Subset - Transient.
Maps of the USA. Birmingham Montgomery Anchorage Fairbanks Juneau.
0 US Cities and Physical Features Myers Social. 1 Name this city.
Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill /Irwin 4-1 Chapter Four The Federal Reserve System, Monetary Policy,
1. Planned Back to School Spending 2 Source: Source: NRF Monthly Consumer Survey A18+, July 2016.
Vancouver June 17, /3/2017.
Demographic Snapshot of Austin’s African American Community
An Example of Analyses of a Distance Matrix
Identifying Regional IP Clusters 3D Printing Case Study
Palatine Cardiss Collins Boston Manchester Mid Island South Hackensack
Trends and Forecasting of Tourism:
Who is in Field…. 75 Autism Speaks Field Staff 85 Walks and WNFAS Committees 10 Chapters and Local Board of Directors Individuals and families looking.
Presented by Neutral Tandem John Butz Neutral Tandem Work:
New Orleans Hospitality Outlook
Unit 3 Lesson 5: Regional Cities
Survey Recipients Albany County Airport Authority
Southern California Hotel Performance
AutoZone Business Development - Regional Sales Alignment
Portland Economic Update Assn. of Financial Professionals
Presentation transcript:

Vancouver May 22, /9/2015

TAP CVB Clients Western Zone Albuquerque Calgary* Denver Hawaii* Los Angeles Palm Springs Phoenix Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco San Jose Seattle Spokane Vancouver Central Zone Arlington Austin Chicago Dallas Des Moines Fort Worth Houston Kansas City Madison Memphis Milwaukee Minneapolis Nashville New Orleans Oklahoma City Omaha Overland Park San Antonio St. Louis Eastern Zone Atlanta Baltimore Birmingham Charlotte Chattanooga Cincinnati Cleveland Detroit* Fort Lauderdale Grand Rapids Indianapolis Jacksonville Lexington Louisville Northern Kentucky Orlando Ottawa Philadelphia Pittsburgh Quebec City* Providence Puerto Rico Richmond Tampa Toronto Virginia Beach Washington DC * Cities in start up phase

Vancouver Convention Industry Trends North America Pace/Market Share Reports Strategic Market Positioning Vancouver Room Night/Event Metrics Convention Center TAP Report 2013 Monthly Detail STR Data Comparison To Tourism Vancouver Activity Vancouver Peer Set Reports 39/9/2015

Vancouver Convention Industry Trends 49/9/2015

Convention Industry Trends Double Digit RevPar Growth Improving Transient Segments Competing With Group New Infrastructure Growth Chicago-San Diego-Phoenix-San Antonio-Vancouver-San Francisco Convention Centers Texas, Indianapolis, Orlando, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Gaylord Factor, North America Pace Unprecedented Pent Up Demand Short Term Long Term Pace Presents Revenue Management Challenge Most Markets Positioning Future Bids Based On Current Conditions U.S. Government Segment Woes 59/9/

Convention Industry Trends Economic Indicators Continue To Fluctuate Meeting Planners Appear To Be Waiting It Out Less Meetings/Less Rooms Per Meeting Mid-Size/Smaller Markets Feeling Most Pain Three Specific Time Periods/Strategic Planning Convention Center Booking Policies Convention Booking Incentives Free Convention Centers/Transportation/Rebates/Cash 69/9/

North America TAP Reports Period Ending March 31, /9/2015

TAP CVB Clients Western Zone Albuquerque Denver Calgary* Vancouver* Los Angeles Palm Springs Phoenix Portland Sacramento Salt Lake* San Diego San Francisco San Jose Seattle Spokane Vancouver Central Zone Arlington Austin Chicago Dallas Des Moines Fort Worth Houston Vancouver Madison Memphis Milwaukee Minneapolis Nashville New Orleans Oklahoma City Omaha Overland Park San Antonio St. Louis Eastern Zone Atlanta Baltimore Birmingham Charlotte Chattanooga Cincinnati Cleveland Detroit* Fort Lauderdale Grand Rapids Indianapolis Jacksonville Lexington Louisville Northern Kentucky Orlando Ottawa Philadelphia Pittsburgh Providence Quebec City* Puerto Rico Richmond Tampa Toronto Virginia Beach Washington DC * Cities in start up phase

9 Report Region: North America Market Period Ending: March 31, 2013 Total Room Nights Total Definite R/N 23,196,00416,384,70812,950,9789,952,6817,532,7735,915,1224,313,4963,433,36883,679,130 Pace Targets 22,908,61318,325,71315,060,64412,179,4279,615,3077,450,1445,834,2494,614,24195,988,338 Consumption Benchmark 24,987, ,898,880 Pace Percentage 101%89%86%82%78%79%74% 87% New Infrastructure Pace% 97%85%81%76%73%74%69% 82% Total Demand 88,857,29968,563,19156,276,34439,218,81427,169,81625,389,51014,790,77012,264,267332,530,011 Lost R/N 65,661,29552,178,48343,325,36629,266,13319,637,04319,474,38810,477,2748,830,899248,850,881 Total Events Definite Events 17,4915,1862,4321, ,219 Pace Targets 16,3225,9973,2511,9621, ,404 Consumption Benchmark 23, ,336 Pace Percentage 107%86%75%69%63%62%59%58%93% Total Demand Events 42,62317,8609,5175,1642,7001, ,027 Lost Events 25,13212,6747,0853,8101,9321, ,808 9/9/2015 Note: Using increased Benchmarks pace percentage drops 7%-10% which is what CVB’s are being measured against

10 Report Region: North America Market Period Ending: March 31, 2013 Total R/N /31/13 101%89% 12/31/12 103%99%91% 9/30/12 103%95%88% 6/30/12 103%94%89% 3/31/12 102%92%86% 12/31/11 101%93%87% 9/30/11 99%91%85% 6/30/11 96%90%85% 3/31/11 93%87%84% Total Events 3/31/13 107%86% 12/31/12 106%105%88% 9/30/12 107%99%85% 6/30/12 106%93%82% 3/31/12 105%86%78% 12/31/11 102%87%82% 9/30/11 97%84%78% 6/30/11 92%80%76% 3/31/11 84%76%72% 9/9/2015

11 Report Region: North America Market Period Ending: March 31, 2013 Total Room Nights Total Pace Percentage 3/31/13 101%89%86%82%78%79%74% 87% Pace Percentage 12/31/12 103%99%91%90%84%82%84%82%93% Pace Percentage 9/30/12 103%95%88%84%80%78%79%82%90% Pace Percentage 6/30/12 103%94%89%85%83%80%79%80%90% Pace Percentage 3/31/12 102%92%86%84%82%78% 81%89% Pace Percentage 12/31/11 101%93%87%86%87%84%81%93% Pace Percentage 9/30/11 99%91%85%86%82% 80%92% Pace Percentage 6/30/11 96%90%85%87%83%82%80%91% Total Events Pace Percentage 3/31/13 107%86%75%69%63%62%59%58%93% Pace Percentage 12/31/12 106%105%88%79%73%67% 65%99% Pace Percentage 9/30/12 107%99%85%75%70%64%63% 98% Pace Percentage 6/30/12 106%93%82%74%70%64%62%64%95% Pace Percentage 3/31/12 105%86%78%69%68%60%59%57%92% Pace Percentage12/31/11 102%87%82%74% 68%64%97% Pace Percentage 9/30/11 97%84%78%73%68%62%58%96% Pace Percentage 6/30/11 92%80%76%73%70%63%59%93% 9/9/2015

12 Report Region: West Region Period Ending: March 31, 2013 Total Room Nights Total Definite R/N 5,458,7024,042,8553,303,2952,707,7972,031,9771,616,9281,488,4301,244,67921,894,663 Pace Targets 5,379,1964,450,3833,769,8603,216,9532,729,5782,300,4571,946,4681,631,97125,424,866 Consumption Benchmark 5,821,360 46,570,880 Pace Percentage 101%91%88%84%74%70%76% 86% II Pace Percentage 101%91%87%83%74%70%76% 86% Total Demand 22,512,12019,764,54215,098,01513,046,7708,963,7446,432,1396,457,0114,396,93896,671,279 Lost R/N 16,676,82714,949,08511,282,4099,832,2776,451,7614,494,8454,915,6902,884,66271,487,556 Total Events Definite Events 4,6731, ,553 Pace Targets 4,3761, ,135 Consumption Benchmark 6,122 48,976 Pace Percentage 107%92%73%68%57%56%53%59%93% Total Demand Events 11,1724,5632,3211, ,983 Lost Events 6,4993,1191, ,430 9/9/2015

Vancouver Convention Bureau Convention Center Hotels Strategic Market Positioning 9/9/201513

Hotels Convention BureauConvention Center Three Major Participants Need To Agree On Optimal Year For Vancouver….. 3/11/0914

Hotels Convention Center Convention Bureau What % Group Mix? What Size/How Many Convention Events? What Market Segment Mix? 153/11/0915

Strategic Alignment Hotels Ownership Asset Manager Operations Sales Financial Regional Corporate Operations Sales Revenue Manager Financial Executive Committee General Manager Controller DOS Revenue Manager Sales Managers Convention Bureau City Government City Council City Manager Board of Directors Convention Committee General Public Various Stakeholders Hotels Restaurants President VP Finance VP Marketing VP Sales Director of Sales Sales Managers Convention Center City Government City Council City Manager Private Mgmt? Labor Leadership General Public Various Stakeholders Hotels Restaurants Contractors Executive Director Finance Sales Leadership Sales Managers

Vancouver Room Night/Event Metrics 9/9/201517

18 Vancouver Pace Report (4/30/13) Consumption Benchmark is average TV production last 36 months/updated every month/rolling average

19 Vancouver Pace Report (4/30/13) Pace Targets calculated using 5 years of history and 8 Years of future bookings/pattern analysis algorithm How many room nights needed on the books today to achieve Consumption Benchmark in each future year?

20 Vancouver Pace Report (4/30/13) Definite Room Nights comparison to Pace Targets

21 Vancouver Pace Report (4/30/13) Tentative Room Nights/what is in the pipeline?

22 Report City: Vancouver Period Ending: April 30, Year Average Benchmark Compared to TV Benchmark TV R/N 3 Yr Bench Total Definite Room Nights 223,770215,476234,123135,63531,96251,42743,91420,166956,473 Pace Targets 269,140216,933160,81298,15558,30537,07420,3439,610870,372 Variance (45,370)(1,457)73,31137,480(26,343)14,35323,57110,55686,101 Consumption Benchmark 282,362 2,258,896 Pace Percentage 83%99%146%138%55%139%216%210%110% Total Demand R/N 902,093719,832734,116463,100189,128241,71875,638257,9843,583,609 Lost Room Nights 678,323504,356499,993327,465157,166190,29131,724237,8182,627,136 Conversion Percentage 25%30%32%29%17%21%58%8%27% Tentative Room Nights 9,10382,27961,12258,613114,83663,28225,95552,292467,482 TV R/N Higher Benchmarks Definite Room Nights 223,770215,476234,123135,63531,96251,42743,91420,166956,473 Pace Targets 315,690254,457209,586127,92175,99248,31826,51412,5201,070,998 Variance (91,920)(38,981)24,5377,714(44,030)3,10917,4007,646(114,525) Consumption Benchmark 331, ,000 2,870,400 Pace Percentage 71%85%112%106%42%106%166%161%89% Total Demand R/N 902,093719,832734,116463,100189,128241,71875,638257,9843,583,609 Lost Events 678,323504,356499,993327,465157,166190,29131,724237,8182,627,136 Conversion Percentage 25%30%32%29%17%21%58%8%27% Tentative Room Nights 9,10382,27961,12258,613114,83663,28225,95552,292467,482 9/9/2015

23 Report City: Vancouver Period Ending: April 30, 2013 Vancouver R/N Total Definite R/N 223,770215,476234,123135,63531,96251,42743,91420,166956,473 Pace Targets 315,690254,457209,586127,92175,99248,31826,51412,5201,070,998 Variance (91,920)(38,981)24,5377,714(44,030)3,10917,4007,646(114,525) Consumption Benchmark 331, ,000 2,870,400 Pace Percentage 71%85%112%106%42%106%166%161%89% Total Demand 902,093719,832734,116463,100189,128241,71875,638257,9843,583,609 Lost R/N 678,323504,356499,993327,465157,166190,29131,724237,8182,627,136 Conversion Percentage 25%30%32%29%17%21%58%8%27% Tentative R/N 9,10382,27961,12258,613114,83663,28225,95552,292467,482 Vancouver Events Definite Events Pace Targets Variance 1820(7)7(2)64262 Consumption Benchmark 198 1,584 Pace Percentage 112%128%121%144%78%300%400%200%122% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 42%40%32%31%27%35%67%15%38% Tentative Events /9/2015

24 Report City: Vancouver Convention Center TAP Report Period Ending: April 30, 2013 Vancouver R/N Total Definite R/N 134,741151,596179,239125,09030,66246,62743,91420,166732,035 Pace Targets 184,372170,824141,42291,11557,72237,89820,7139,552713,618 Variance (49,631)(19,228)37,81733,975(27,060)8,72923,20110,61418,417 Consumption Benchmark 186,489 1,491,912 Pace Percentage 73%89%127%137%53%123%212%211%103% Total Demand 641,225533,706608,089423,779177,477221,65175,638257,9842,939,549 Lost R/N 506,484382,110428,850298,689146,815175,02431,724237,8182,207,514 Conversion Percentage 21%28%29%30%17%21%58%0%25% Tentative R/N 052,79226,24640,872101,83457,30022,89052,292354,226 Vancouver Events Definite Events Pace Targets Variance 06(4) Consumption Benchmark Pace Percentage 100%130%73%178%150%700%400%200%132% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 26%33%18%32% 67% 28% Tentative Events /9/2015

25 Report City: Vancouver 2013 Monthly Detail Period Ending: April 30, 2013 Vancouver R/N 2013JanFebMarAprMayJun Definite R/N 13,6074,4141,84923,17921,91047,054 Pace Targets 12,9669,47617,60939,65442,49244,551 Variance 641(5,062)(15,760)(16,475)(20,582)2,503 Consumption Benchmark 12,9669,47617,60940,29943,61646,282 Pace Percentage 105%47%11%58%52%106% Total Demand 44,05649,29356,566121,48894,202119,805 Lost R/N 30,449 44,87954,71798,30972,292 72,751 Conversion Percentage 31% 9%3%19%23% 39% Tentative R/N ,456 Vancouver Events 2013 Definite Events Pace Targets Variance 41(5)0(6)6 Consumption Benchmark Pace Percentage 167%110%64%100%71%129% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 53%52%28%31%33%45% Tentative Events /9/2015

26 Report City: Vancouver 2013 Monthly Detail Period Ending: April 30, 2013 Vancouver R/N 2013JulAugSepOctNovDec Definite R/N 31,8379,80242,98517,0199, Pace Targets 41,29432,34225,42231,03316,5092,342 Variance (9,457)(22,540)17,563(14,014)(7,190)(1,547) Consumption Benchmark 43,44334,65327,66334,14318,3872,662 Pace Percentage 77%30%169%55%56%34% Total Demand 109,38455,44483,504124,12635,3108,915 Lost R/N 77,54745,642 40, ,10725,9918,120 Conversion Percentage 29%18% 51% 14%26%9% Tentative R/N 2631, , ,230 Vancouver Events 2013 Definite Events Pace Targets Variance Consumption Benchmark Pace Percentage 136%100%153%120%100%150% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 45%35%50%28%40%25% Tentative Events /9/2015

279/9/ JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Total Year Def TV R/N 7,0618,28013,50230,01794,58122,76241,83630,19436,27421,35814,1761,195321,236 Demand R/N 50,34754,07983,66788,524170,347110,94286,37099,462121,228134,34143,69210,975 1,053,97 4 Lost R/N 43,28645,79970,16558,50775,76688,18044,53469,26884,954112,98329,5169,780732,738 Occ. % JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Total Year Def TV R/N 4,15310,89819,72651,59337,97510,46332,2159,37116,58836,8814,1225,528239,513 Demand R/N 74,66050,22944,583109,264107,05289,101178,08483,884104,474109,81868,3745,5941,025,117 Lost R/N 70,50739,33124,85757,67169,07778,638145,86974,51387,88672,93764, ,604 Occ. % Vancouver Convention Center Hotels Occupancy Compared to Tourism Vancouver Activity

Vancouver Peer Set Reports 9/9/201528

29 Report City: Vancouver Period Ending: April 30, 2013 Vancouver Data Total Definite R/N 223,770215,476234,123135,63531,96251,42743,91420,166956,473 Pace Targets 315,690254,457209,586127,92175,99248,31826,51412,5201,070,998 Consumption Benchmark 331, ,000 2,870,400 Pace Percentage 71%85%112%106%42%106%166%161%89% Total Demand R/N 902,093719,832734,116463,100189,128241,71875,638257,9843,583,609 Lost R/N 678,323504,356499,993327,465157,166190,29131,724237,8182,627,136 Conversion Percentage 25%30%32%29%17%21%58%8%27% Tentative R/N 9,10382,27961,12258,613114,83663,28225,95552,292467,482 Peer Set Data: Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto Definite R/N 768,850680,508638,149378,904328,612150,334101,939122,6663,169,962 Pace Targets 1,020,489760,925600,073439,481318,671234,895150,783106,5683,631,885 Consumption Benchmark 1,115,966 1,152,766 9,148,528 Pace Percentage 75%89%106%86%103%64%68%115%87% Total Demand R/N 3,010,7932,327,3312,261,1161,463,005942,649726,146332,271663,41311,726,724 Lost R/N 2,241,9431,646,8231,622,9671,084,101614,037575,812230,332540,7478,556,762 Conversion Percentage 26%29%28%26%35%21%31%18%27% Tentative R/N 144,638353,805237,759404,110349,082417,494214,047153,6342,274,569 9/9/2015

30 Report City: Vancouver Period Ending: April 30, 2013 Vancouver Data Total Definite Events Pace Targets Consumption Benchmark 198 1,584 Pace Percentage 112%128%121%144%78%300%400%200%122% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 42%40%32%31%27%35%67%15%38% Tentative Events Peer Set Data: Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto Definite Events ,317 Pace Targets ,291 Consumption Benchmark 1,025 8,200 Pace Percentage 104%100%96%116%98%72%85%113%102% Total Demand Events 1, ,117 Lost Events ,800 Conversion Percentage 48%39%35%37%38%26%38%24%42% Tentative Events /9/2015

Vancouver Sample Strategic Planning Calendar 9/9/201531

Vancouver 2013 R/NJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDECTOTAL Definite Room Nights 13,6074,4141,84923,17921,91047,05431,8379,80242,98517,0199, ,770 Pace Targets 12,9669,47617,60939,65442,49244,55141,29432,34225,42231,03316,5092,342315,690 Consumption Benchmark 12,9669,47617,60940,29943,61646,28243,44334,65327,66334,14318,3872,662331,199 Pace Percentage 105%47%11%58%52%106%77%30%169%55%56%34%71% Total Demand Room Nights 44,05649,29356,566121,48894,202119,805109,38455,44483,504124,12635,3108,915902,093 Lost Room Nights 30,44944,87954,71798,30972,29272,75177,54745,64240,519107,10725,9918,120678,323 Conversion Percentage 31%9%3%19%23%39%29%18%51%14%26%9%25% Tentative Room Nights , , , ,2309,103 Peer Set R/N: Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto Definite Room Nights 41,06218,42139,25875,26094,109104,209120,41161,40396,52676,51434,4937,184768,850 Pace Targets 34,19527,15863,306104,975139,720166,120151,37792,03886,518103,37045,7855,9271,020,489 Consumption Benchmark 34,19527,15863,306107,359146,128178,273167,392104,545101,339123,51755,4757,2791,115,966 Pace Percentage 120%68%62%72%67%63%80%67%112%74%75%121%75% Total Demand Room Nights 156,316164,693164,673334,255300,981397,489392,459222,610276,664408,554163,67528,4243,010,793 Lost Room Nights 115,254146,272125,415258,995206,872293,280272,048161,207180,138332,040129,18221,2402,241,943 Conversion Percentage 26%11%24%23%31%26%31%28%35%19%21%25%26% Tentative Room Nights 00013,67229,91411,88214,5457,98715,40825,62014,64810,962144,638 Vancouver 2013 Events Definite Events Pace Targets Consumption Benchmark Pace Percentage 167%110%64%100%71%129%136%100%153%120%100%150%112% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 53%52%28%33% 48%50%35%54%33%47%75%42% Tentative Events Peer Set Events: Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto Definite Events Pace Targets Consumption Benchmark ,025 Pace Percentage 109%98%61%103%105%108%95%114%119%125%105%125%104% Total Demand Events ,537 Lost Events Conversion Percentage 56%51%42%46%54%50%41%42%49%44%49%53%48% Tentative Events

Vancouver 2013 R/NJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUN Definite Room Nights 13,6074,4141,84923,17921,91047,054 Pace Targets 12,9669,47617,60939,65442,49244,551 Consumption Benchmark 12,9669,47617,60940,29943,61646,282 Pace Percentage 105%47%11%58%52%106% Total Demand Room Nights 44,05649,29356,566121,48894,202119,805 Lost Room Nights 30,44944,87954,71798,30972,29272,751 Conversion Percentage 31%9%3%19%23%39% Tentative Room Nights ,456 Peer Set R/N: Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto Definite Room Nights 41,06218,42139,25875,26094,109104,209 Pace Targets 34,19527,15863,306104,975139,720166,120 Consumption Benchmark 34,19527,15863,306107,359146,128178,273 Pace Percentage 120%68%62%72%67%63% Total Demand Room Nights 156,316164,693164,673334,255300,981397,489 Lost Room Nights 115,254146,272125,415258,995206,872293,280 Conversion Percentage 26%11%24%23%31%26% Tentative Room Nights 00013,67229,91411,882 Vancouver 2013 Events Definite Events Pace Targets Consumption Benchmark Pace Percentage 167%110%64%100%71%129% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 53%52%28%33% 48% Tentative Events Peer Set Events: Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto Definite Events Pace Targets Consumption Benchmark Pace Percentage 109%98%61%103%105%108% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 56%51%42%46%54%50% Tentative Events

Vancouver 2013 R/NJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDECTOTAL Definite Room Nights 31,8379,80242,98517,0199, ,770 Pace Targets 41,29432,34225,42231,03316,5092,342315,690 Consumption Benchmark 43,44334,65327,66334,14318,3872,662331,199 Pace Percentage 77%30%169%55%56%34%71% Total Demand Room Nights 109,38455,44483,504124,12635,3108,915902,093 Lost Room Nights 77,54745,64240,519107,10725,9918,120678,323 Conversion Percentage 29%18%51%14%26%9%25% Tentative Room Nights 2631, , ,2309,103 Peer Set R/N: Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto Definite Room Nights 120,41161,40396,52676,51434,4937,184768,850 Pace Targets 151,37792,03886,518103,37045,7855,9271,020,489 Consumption Benchmark 167,392104,545101,339123,51755,4757,2791,115,966 Pace Percentage 80%67%112%74%75%121%75% Total Demand Room Nights 392,459222,610276,664408,554163,67528,4243,010,793 Lost Room Nights 272,048161,207180,138332,040129,18221,2402,241,943 Conversion Percentage 31%28%35%19%21%25%26% Tentative Room Nights 14,5457,98715,40825,62014,64810,962144,638 Vancouver 2013 Events Definite Events Pace Targets Consumption Benchmark Pace Percentage 136%100%153%120%100%150%112% Total Demand Events Lost Events Conversion Percentage 50%35%54%33%47%75%42% Tentative Events Peer Set Events: Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto Definite Events Pace Targets Consumption Benchmark ,025 Pace Percentage 95%114%119%125%105%125%104% Total Demand Events ,537 Lost Events Conversion Percentage 41%42%49%44%49%53%48% Tentative Events

The TAP Report For more information please contact: Jeff Eastman Trends Analysis Projections LLC West 125 th Terrace Overland Park, KS Telephone: Cell: /9/2015