Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Case of Middle Bank Magda Matczak and Jacek Zaucha Maritime Institute in Gdańsk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BlackSea Region Meeting Varna National Reports on Spatial Planning for Coastal Zones and Maritimes Areas Terms of Reference.
Advertisements

Maritime Spatial Planning Angela Schultz-Zehden PlanCoast Coordinator sustainable projects.
RECOMMENDATIONS from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports GAPS OPPORTUNITIES and the resulting.
PlanCoast Guidelines and Key Messages First Findings and Ideas Angela Schultz-Zehden PlanCoast Coordination Office 21 st November 2007 Berlin.
Formatvorlage des Untertitelmasters durch Klicken bearbeiten
PlanCoast Meeting Constanta, 31 May – 2 June, 2007 ICZM experience in the EU with special reference to the role of spatial planning by Irene Lucius EUCC.
Conference on Marine Spatial Planning – Supetar, Croatia, September 2007 This project is co-funded by the European Union Conference on Marine Spatial.
Partner Meeting 4th July 2007 The Transnational PlanCoast Study: A closer look at structure and content Presentation 4th July 2007 / Schwerin Kira Gee.
HELCOM, Integrated Approaches and MSP Hermanni Backer HELCOM Secretariat First Annual Forum of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Thematic Discussion.
Jacek Zaucha Maritime Institute in Gdańsk
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Towards an MSP governance framework in the Baltic Draft report.
09A_MBM41_EurAqua_powerpoint This is the (draft) default presentation of EurAqua. Question 1: Does it meet your demands? What should be changed? Question.
Division Of Early Warning And Assessment MODULE 4: MANAGING THE ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING PROCESS.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) WP 3 Pomeranian Bight Case Draft work plan Region Skåne (PP7)
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Handbook on multi-level stakeholders process in MSP J. Zaucha, M. Matczak MIG.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission, the Civil Protection Financial Instrument, – Directorate General for Humanitarian.
“Building Effective Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context” in Bulgaria Institute for Ecological Modernisation.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
This project is supported by the European Union 1 BIM - Baltic Income and Mobility: Baltic Social Dialogue on Mobility in the Baltic Sea Region Hamburg.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g WORK PACKAGE 2- FINAL RESULTS WP2 Seminar / Baltic Master II Partner Search The 19th of Dec., 2007 Prepared by Jakub.
Prof. dr. F. Maes – Maritime Institute – Ghent University International Examples of Authorization for Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) Prof. dr. F. Maes UNESCO.
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF. O Transnational strategy for „Airport City‟ development,
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri Comitato tecnico per la promozione di iniziative volte al rafforzamento e all’internazionalizzazione delle classi.
PartiSEApate OVERVIEW I Background, Outputs, Activities Riga, 6th Sept 2012 Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund)
ICZM in Europe Anne Burrill
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Model case Pomeranian Bight Pilot / Arkona Basin Combined Grid Solution and Baltic.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Zoning in MSP – Examples from Germany and Pilot Project Pom. Bight Click to add.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) PartiSEApate Multi-Level-Governance in Maritime Spatial Planning Background, Outputs,
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG IIC Community Initiative concerning Transnational Co-operation on Spatial Planning
Presentation by Andrzej Cieślak and Jacek Zaucha COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Research Workshop “Enhancing Research for Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) “Maritime Spatial Planning - Shipping and Ports in the Baltic Sea” Pan-Baltic.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Offshore Energy / Grid Planning and MSP in the Baltic Sea Region Pan-Baltic stakeholder.
“ BIRD Project“ 1 Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Project Description Ulrich.
RIA: Communication – building credibility Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public Administration Quality Ministry of Interior, Czech Republic.
European Virtual Seminar on sustainable development.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat 2 December 2013 Palanga PartiSEApate Partners.
Peer Learning Event on national Lifelong Guidance Policy Forums 4th-5th of June 2008, Thessaloniki With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Handbook on „MULTI” MM+JZ+JP Bergen
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) LT – MSP implementation: consultations Project Partner Meeting December,
Part-financed by the European Union Investments in projects, strategic projects and extension stage Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar,
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Model case Pomeranian Bight Pilot / Arkona Basin Examples of transnational cooperation.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) LT – MSP Model Case, “state of the game“ 2 nd PartiSEApate Project Partner Meeting.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g. Baltic Master II  Lead partner: Region Blekinge - Sweden  Political initiative  Builds on Baltic Master I (voted.
WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Overall aim: to engage national bodies, sectors and researchers in dialogue.
VASAB Ministerial Conference Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat 8-9 September 2014 Bergen PartiSEApate Partners Meeting PartiSEApate Partners Meeting.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat Björn Grönholm / Head of Secretariat / UBC EnvCom WELCOME !! KICK OFF MEETING New Bridges – Strengthening.
East-West Forum for sustainable development in the Baltic Sea Region State of the art. And necessary support Helsinki 29 CSD/BSR meeting.
Implementation of the European code of conduct on partnership Findings of a survey by ETUC, BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME Structured dialogue 12 November 2014.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Maritime Spatial Planning as Tool for Underwater Cultural Heritage management.
Part-financed by the European Union From application to implementation – the procedures Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar for 1st application.
WORKING DOCUMENT FOR WORKING GROUP 3 „SEA USE CONFLICTS AND POTENTIALS” Main Messages Baltic Sea as our common resource shall become a playground of the.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) PartiSEApate Project Indicators How to measure our success !?! 2. PP Meeting,
Introduction to Maritime Spatial Planning and BaltSeaPlan, Dr. Nico Nolte, BSH.
Part-financed by the European Union Investitionsbank Schleswig-Holstein Baltic Sea Tourism Center Operational structures for improved tourism communication.
BS NGO Forum 2016 – possibilities for cooperation with Union of the Baltic Cities PhD Magda Leszczyna-Rzucidło.
Part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund and European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument Baltic Sea Region Programme.
RIA: Communication – building credibility
Urban Agenda Partnership on Circular Economy
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Basic Project Information
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENT
Presentation transcript:

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Case of Middle Bank Magda Matczak and Jacek Zaucha Maritime Institute in Gdańsk Rostock January 2013

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) MSP Stakeholder approach should be implemented as a course of separate actions in PL and SE with light involvement of the other partners: SWAM will work on its stakeholder process in the Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) without mixing Middle Bank test (pilot) to this work. However, inviting representatives of MoG to some meetings might be considered but cannot be determined in advance. MoG will work in Poland in awareness rising among PL stakeholders. SE experience will be used as a starting point. MIG should work on Boundary GIS application asking SWAM for their expectations, clarifying issue of compatibility etc. and offering final product. MSP Stakeholder approach

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Jointly (under MSP Planners Group line of actions) the partners will: discuss the state of the art in terms of stakeholder involvement methods (general discussions about stakeholder involvement, their role both from a national perspective and a transboundery perspective and to clarify differences in national and transnational processes), examine currently existing opportunities (structures and forms through HELCOM, Espoo convention, RAC (Regional Advisory Consul within fishery), environmental, transboundery groups such as WWF, CoalitionClean Baltic etc, groups and organizations that are coming together based on interest and demands and working in collaboration with formal structures), come up with an assessment of the existing opportunities and necessary changes in terms of the stakeholder involvement in the MSP in the areas of partners jurisdiction, the assessment will be worked out in structured discussions. MSP Stakeholder approach

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Outcomes as the result of the action line “MSP Stakeholder approach”: Boundary GIS as a tool of cross-border MSP consultation with manual of its use in English (MIG, MoG). List of relevant SE stakeholders if Poland starts MSP (prepared by SWAM) and list of relevant PL stakeholders if Sweden starts MSP(prepared by MoG) – with focus on existing structures and opportunities to involve stakeholders. MSP Stakeholder approach

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Planners Group MSP Planners Group should become a joint PL-SE Forum serving as a platform for useful exchange of remarks and discussing MSP practicalities, thus preparing ourselves to the joint future work. The Region Skane will be invited as well, at least to the meeting in Hamburg, Gothenburg and Szczecin.

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Planners Group First meeting in Hamburg (resp. MIG): discussing the draft plan of the Middle Bank prepared by Poland and on that basis differences in the planning culture and routines between Pl-SE => the result: a short note where we can easily meet and what requires further work discussing what we know and what information is missing => the result: a short note on possible synergies from information exchange, main hindrances in terms of knowledge availability for MSP Second meeting in Gothenburg (resp. SWAM) discussing state of art in MSP in each country: legal provisions and practicalities (e.g. legends) => the result: a list of ideal minimum content of MSP plans in both countries, discussing approach to involvement of stakeholders [ in both countries => the result: a short note on possible ways how PL can involve SE stakeholders and how SE can involve PL stakeholders

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Planners Group Third meeting in Gdańsk – discussing concrete cross-border MSP tools (resp. MIG): boundary GIS and its possible PL-SE application, possibilities of using a digital model as a stakeholder communication tool (tbc) cross-border planning zones in the EEZ, cross-border application of SEA (in practical terms), => the result: informal choice of the most suitable tools for SE-PL, data model produced by BaltSeaPlan => the result: inventory what data are available, what are missing, on what data we should work together and how relevant is that data model to the SE-PL case.

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Planners Group Fourth meeting in Szczecin (resp. MOG): simulating situation that PL starts real MSP of its waters and how SE should be involved at each stage, and what entities, simulating situation that SE starts real MSP of its waters and how PL should be involved at each stage, and what entities, discussing relevance of minimum requirement report produced by Plan Bothnia to the SE-PL case => the result: practical and informal fine-tuning of possible planning procedures in each country, recommendations for possible formal changes.

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Planners Group Outcomes as the result of the action line “MSP Planners Group”: trust between PL and SE civil servants responsible for MSP, stock-taking on what is available now in terms of the stakeholder process (methods, institutions, experience) and recommendations how to make use of it and improve existing stakeholder processes, opinion on data model and minimum requirements on transnational MSP perhaps also two papers about stakeholder perspective (tbc) 1) Common good and stakeholders: Who is defending / speak on behalf of the see? Who has the right to represent the see? 2) What is a stakeholder conflict?: A discussion about what a stakeholder conflict can be. Sorting out what’s behind the conflict, misunderstanding, lack of knowledge, real conflict what are the core?

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Thank you