International Standards and Best Practices in election dispute resolution KOSOVO How to improve Electoral Justice? Pristina, November 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MECHANISMS
Advertisements

Access to Public Information in Georgia Presentation of research project results Tbilisi, 22 June 2010.
Methods of governance. The « community » method Initiative of the Commission Majority voting in the Council Participation of the Parliament (co-decision)
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
Right to an Effective Remedy:
The fundamentals of EC competition law
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
Module 7 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 7 Enforcement.
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
Observation of e-enabled elections Jonathan Stonestreet Council of Europe Workshop Oslo, March 2010.
© 2006 Rule of Law and Fair Trial Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Austria Rule of Law and Fair Trial.
EU responses to hate crimes and support to the victims Linda Maria Ravo DG Justice – European Commission Unit C1.
Implementing article 33 of the Convention: cases, positions and lessons Linnéa Arvidsson Regional Office for Europe UN Human Rights.
Jasminka Dzumhur, Ombudsperson of BiH “Role of national human rights institutions” Ljubljana, 1. December 2014.
CHAPTER 1 The sources and institutions of employment law.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 7.
The Law of the European Union Information and Communication.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
1 China-EU Forum Beijing, 9 – 10 July, 2010 The protection of employees Forth section.
Legal Aid: A Right or a Privilege?. 2 + Sources of international law right to legal aid Scope of international law right to legal aid Canada’s duty to.
Course: Law of the European Union [5] Administrative and judicial procedures in the European Union Filip Křepelka,
Article 9, paras.1 and 2 of the Aarhus Convention: overview “IMPLEMENTING THE AARHUS CONVENTION TODAY: PAVING THE WAY TO A BETTER ENVIRONMENT AND GOVERNANCE.
Development of establishment of the Environmental Court Rungravee Sokhuma,Chief Judge in the Research Justice Environmental Division The Supreme Court.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Developing Administrative Simplification: Selected Experiences.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Women’s Participation in Elections: The Impact of Electoral Systems Kristin van der Leest OSCE-ODIHR 30 June 2011.
Electoral Justice in Kosovo. Legal Framework Primary Kosovo Constitution Law on General Elections Law on Local Elections Criminal Code Law on the Courts.
Trade Union Training on Social Security and Social Protection INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS Turin, 5 May 2004.
1 Ensuring the protection of bidders’ rights.  The Federal Law of № 94-FZ "On placing orders for goods, works and services for state and municipal.
INTRODUCTION TO THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS (ILS) SYSTEM Trade Union Training on Occupational Safety, health and the Environment, with Special Attention.
Towards improvement: Institution of appeal in public procurement – topical procedural and evidentiary issues Kyiv, April , 2012 Oleksandr Voznyuk.
1 Paulyn Marrinan Quinn S.C. Ombudsman for the Defence Forces Presentation to Athlone. 18 th October 2010 “ The Case for an Ombudsman in providing resolution.
Trade Union Training on Economic and Financial Analyses of Enterprises INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS: PROCEDURES AND SUPERVISION Turin, 9 August 2005.
SEYCHELLES EXPERIENCE Hon. Nichole Barbe, PAC Member, Seychelles.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
1. common courts military courts administrative courts tribunals The Supreme Court The Supreme Administrative Court The Constitutional Tribunal and The.
© International Training Centre of the ILO Training Centre of the ILO 1 International Labour Standards (ILS) and their.
European Labour Law Institutions and their Competencies JUDr. Jana Komendová, Ph.D.
Doc.JUDr.Soňa Skulová, Ph.D. Principles of Good Governance.
Regional Conference on Money in Politics February, 2016 Tbilisi, Georgia Discussion on the challenges to women participation in politics, on the.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial Control Bilateral screening:
© International Training Centre of the ILO International Labour Standards and the ILO Supervisory System: tools to defend workers’ rights Geneva,
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
Evaluation of judges in Republic of Croatia Duro Sessa Justice of Supreme Court of Republic of Croatia President of Association of Croatian Judges.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
The European Court of Justice EU Institutions The European Commission The European Parliament The Council of the European Union The European Court of.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Gail Davidson. Approved unanimously by the UN General Assembly on December 10,  Article 19 Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
EU Sanctions on Individuals
Institutions Acting in the Social Policy and their Competencies
Parliamentary Election in Belarus Special Co-ordinator Kent Härstedt
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Simonas Nikartas Law Institute of Lithuania
Filip Křepelka, Masarykova univerzita
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Monitoring the Funding of Political Parties & Electoral Campaigns
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
European Labour Law Institutions Acting in the Social Policy and their Competencies JUDr. Jana Komendová, Ph.D.
Right to an Effective Remedy:
The Optional Protocol Module 8.
THE RIGHT TO GOOD ADMINISTRATION
The European Anti-Corruption Report
Right to an Effective Remedy:
International Training Centre of the ILO
The right to access to justice between EU Charter and ECHR
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
Georgiana Iorgulescu Executive Director Center for Legal Resources
Presentation transcript:

International Standards and Best Practices in election dispute resolution KOSOVO How to improve Electoral Justice? Pristina, November

Hierarchy of Norms Constitution & International Treaties and Conventions -Kosovo Constitution states direct applicability of international instruments (Articles 16 (3) & 19 Constitution): UDHR, ICCPR, ECHR and its Protocols, Convention on Elimination of all forms of racial discrimination and discrimination against women Primary Legislation e.g. Law on General Elections; Criminal Code; Local Elections Law Secondary Legislation: Regulations and Procedures Guidelines, instructions, directives Code of Conduct Jurisprudence of courts should be taken into consideration *Member of Venice Commission since 13 June

International Standards  Right to an Effective Remedy: UDHR, art. 8; ICCPR art. 2(3) (“(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; (b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; (c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.”); Eur. Convention HR, art. 13.  Right to a Fair Hearing: UDHR, art 10 (“Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations […]”); UN HRC General Comment no. 25 para 11 and 20; Eur. Convention HR, art. 6 (1).  Right of appeal: ICCPR, art. 14 (5)  Equality before the courts: ICCPR, Article 14, § 1: “Equal before the courts and tribunals.”  Independence and impartiality: ICCPR General Comment 31 (“…Administrative mechanisms are particularly required to give effect to the general obligation to investigate allegations of violations promptly, thoroughly and effectively through independent and impartial bodies.” 3

International Standards  Proportionality of sanctions: ICCPR Article 4 and General Comment 29, paragraph 4  Genuine Elections: UN HRC General Comment no. 25 para 20  Free Expression of Will: ICCPR art. 25(b); UN HRC General Comment no. 25 para 11  Code of good practices in electoral matters, Venice Commission, 2002, paras. 68, 92: “68. Only transparency, impartiality and independence from politically motivated manipulation will ensure proper administration of the election process, from the pre- election period to the end of the processing of results. 92. If the electoral law provisions are to be more than just words on a page, failure to comply with the electoral law must be open to challenge before an appeal body. This applies in particular to the election results: individual citizens may challenge them on the grounds of irregularities in the voting procedures. It also applies to decisions taken before the elections, especially in connection with the right to vote, electoral registers and standing for election, the validity of candidatures, compliance with the rules governing the electoral campaign and access to the media or to party funding. 96. The procedure must also be simple, and providing voters with special appeal forms helps to make it so.40 It is necessary to eliminate formalism, and so avoid decisions of inadmissibility, especially in politically sensitive cases.” 4

A practitioner’s tool: IFES Guidelines for Understanding Adjudication and Resolution of Disputes in Elections* 1.The Right of Redress 2.A Clearly Defined Regimen of Election Standards and Procedures 3.An Impartial and Informed Arbiter 4.A System that Judicially Expedites Decisions 5.Established Burdens of Proof and Standards of Evidence 6.Availability of Meaningful and Effective Remedies 7.Effective Education of Stakeholders * IFES, A practitioners’ guide to Understanding, Adjudicating, and Resoling Election Disputes (GUARDE), Chad Vickery (May 2011) Other publication on EDR: International IDEA Electoral Justice Handbook (2010) ; OSCE/ODIHR Resolving Election Disputes in the OSCE area (2000). 5

Comparative examples Depending on the country, the court system, government agency, independent commission, special tribunal, parliament may be involved in electoral complaints adjudication – there is no standard on the type of body:  Courts: Ireland, Germany, Moldova, Poland, New Zealand, Macedonia (appeal), Bosnia and Herzegovina (appeal); Croatia (appeal), France  Election commissions: Sweden, Austria, Albania (1 st instance), Montenegro (1 st instance), Macedonia (1 st instance), Bosnia and Herzegovina (1 st instance); Croatia (1 st instance), Philippines  Special commissions with quasi judicial authority: Kosovo, Afghanistan  Special Electoral Tribunal/Panel: Mexico, Pakistan (election results)  Legislative body: Jordan, Germany 6

Comparative examples 7

Kosovo Context 8 Legislation Law on General Election LGE, Code of Criminal Law, ECAP Procedure, court proceedings Actors and bodies ECAP; CEC; Judicial Council; Criminal Court; Court of 1 st instance; Supreme Court Duties Review, investigate, decide on complaints What Types of complaints? Candidate nomination and political party registration; accreditation of observers; voter list; campaign related violation; election results; election crimes; OoC vote. Who can file? Any person, legal or natural When to file? - Request on VL to Court of 1 st instance: within 40 days before the E-day and decide within 5 days of receipt of request. - Complaints to ECAP : 24 hours and decide within 72h (Art ) - Appeals to ECAP from CEC decisions: 24 hours and decide within 72h (Art. 122) - Appeals to Supreme Court: within 24hours and decided within 72 h (Art ) What types of Remedies? Fines; remedial action; nullify results and re-polling; recount; deregistration; disqualification of candidates; referral to AGO and criminal sanctions (imprisonment); exclusion or addition to the voter list Appeal - Appeal from CEC decision to ECAP - Appeal from ECAP decisions to Supreme Court

Best practices: Elements for consideration Clarify role and responsibility of all relevant institutions to ensure cooperation Clearly define jurisdiction: Clear and simple procedures Efficient Tracking system and proper archive of complaints filed Design effective prioritization/triage process to ensure that investigators are able to pursue legitimate claims, and prioritize most important complaints affecting the results Consideration for timelines: short deadlines for filing a complaint/appeal, responding or making decision. Collection of evidence, type of evidence, evidence should not have been tampered with: guarantee proper storage and security for sensitive materials Burden and standard of evidence Recommendation for decision and sanction by investigators to the judges Consistent investigation proceedings and decisions Complaints in bad faith and with malicious or negligence: intent Accountability of staff Balance of rights, e.g. fair justice v. speedy adjudication 9

Best practices: a step by step Complaint Process 1.Receiving a complaint, allocating case number, and maintaining the record 2.Data-entering the information related to complaint 3.Read the complaint and attached documents/evidence and check that all required elements for valid complaints are present 4.Give opportunity to complainant to correct if missing information and to respondent to present his/her defence 5.Collection of evidence; type of evidence; standard of evidence 6.Hold public hearing: presentation of arguments and evidence 7.Provide legal analysis 8.Recommendation for Decision and Punishment 9.Decision by the arbiters / judges 10.Notify parties involved in the case 11.Publication of the decision 12.Appeal process (if applicable) 10

SUCCESSES Informed and competent arbiters: trained and experienced judges Pre-determined: rules of procedures Speedy adjudication: met strict deadlines for a high number of complaints Investigation on its own initiative when justified allegation brought to its attention Public hearing by ECAP Transparency: Publication of decisions on website Memorandum of Understanding between ECAP, Kosovo Police, Judicial Council, Prosecution Office and the CEC on September 2013: task force; Priority to election crime for courts; arrests on E-day and criminal cases opened with potential severe sanctions. Public awareness campaign on task force on adjudication of election crimes for 2013 elections. 11

Challenges Strict deadlines potentially put in jeopardy the quality of adjudication (deadline for filing and for adjudication) Limited point of entry for filing complaints Quality of the complaints filed Collection and assessment of evidence; expert’s opinion Open hearing at all level Need of clarification of appeal mechanism against CEC decisions Sustainability of the ECAP structure Clear division of function between ECAP judges and legal officers and strengthen capacity of legal officers 12

Challenges (2) Remedies: (1) Strengthen standard for re-polling or cancellation of an election; (2) Collegial sanctions put in jeopardy the principle of proportionality of sanction; (3) election crimes and need for prosecution to deter future violations. Cooperation between relevant institutions e.g. enforcement of remedies and collection of evidence; referral to Prosecutors Lack of information on complaints process: All stakeholders and the public should be informed about how to file a complaints, the deadlines, type of evidence, the adjudication process. Access to justice: fees? 13

Steps Forward/Opportunity for Improvement Independence and impartiality (qualification, appointment, accountability)? Review of legal framework & simple and clear procedures Clear jurisdiction to avoid overlap and ensure smooth cooperation? Complaints Process: case management/tracking, from receipt to notification of decision? Fair and effective investigation, taking into consideration standard of evidence and burden of proof and holding a public hearing ? Reasoned and published decisions ? Transparency of the complaints process at all levels? Enforcement of remedies? EDR Structure? Independence v. part of the judiciary? Education/information of election stakeholders? 14