The momentum effect on estimating the cost of equity capital for property-liability insurers Jennifer L. Wang (National Chengchi University) Joseph Tien.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Impact of R&D on Innovation and Productivity Professor Derek Bosworth Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia Melbourne University.
Advertisements

Pricing Risk Chapter 10.
Evidence from REITS Brent W. Ambrose (The Pennsylvania State University), Shaun Bond (University of Cincinnati), & Joseph Ooi (National University of Singapore)
CHAPTER 09 Cost of Capital
Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (Chapter 9)
Insurance Institutions. I. Introduction A. Type of Insurance 1. Social Insurance 2. Private Insurance American System –Life Insurance –Property/Casualty.
Capital Investments and Stock Returns Sheridan Titman K. C. John Wei Feixue Xie (Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39, 2004, pp )
LECTURE 9 : EMPRICIAL EVIDENCE : CAPM AND APT
Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrary Pricing Theory
J. K. Dietrich - GSBA 548 – MBA.PM Spring 2007 Risk and Investment Decisions April 23, 2007 (LA), or April 12, 2007 (OCC)
Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line
Empirical Evidence on Security Returns
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Capital Markets and the Pricing of Risk.
FIN639 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Asset Pricing Theory (chapter 5)
CORPORATE FINANCIAL THEORY Lecture 2. Risk /Return Return = r = Discount rate = Cost of Capital (COC) r is determined by risk Two Extremes Treasury Notes.
Small is good? Small cap investing Aswath Damodaran.
Investing on Hope? Growth Investing & Small Cap Investing Aswath Damodaran.
Complementary Information How do Equity Markets Complete? Seminario Desarrollo del Mercado Bursátil en Chile SVS-ICARE-UAI Junio 2008.
A Comparison of Property-Liability Insurance Financial Pricing Models Stephen P. D’Arcy, FCAS, MAAA, Ph.D. Richard W. Gorvett, FCAS, MAAA, Ph.D. Department.
Insurance Companies Chapter 2
What Did We Learn? Conclusions from the Risk Premium Project Presentation made at the 2005 Casualty Actuarial Society’s Ratemaking Seminar March 2005 New.
Class 12 Financial Management, Discount rates.
CHAPTER 13 Investments Empirical Evidence on Security Returns Slides by Richard D. Johnson Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk, Cost of Capital, and Capital Budgeting Chapter 12.
Empirical Evidence on the Role of IT Innovation Capability on Value Creation During the Recession of Early 2000s Changling Chen Jee-Hae Lim Theophanis.
Size Effect Matthew Boyce Huibin Hu Rajesh Raghunathan Lina Yang.
Chapter 10 Capital Markets and the Pricing of Risk.
Risk Premium Project Phase III: Final Report Academic InvestigatorsIndustry Investigators J. David Cummins University of Pennsylvania Richard A. Derrig.
Chapter 10 Capital Markets and the Pricing of Risk
Pricing Risk. Outline Short Class Exercise Measuring risk and return – Expected return and return Variance – Realized versus expected return – Empirical.
ACCOUNTING- AND FINANCE-BASED MEASURES OF RISK. Introduction An important objective of the analysis of financial statements in general and that of ratios.
Bodie Kane Marcus Perrakis RyanINVESTMENTS, Fourth Canadian Edition Chapter 10.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Empirical Evidence on Security Returns.
1 Nonspecialized Strategy versus Specialized Strategy : Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry Lih-Ru Chen National Chengchi University.
Copyright © 2011 Thomson South-Western, a part of the Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
What Did We Learn? Conclusions from the Risk Premium Project Presentation made at the 2005 Casualty Actuarial Society’s Ratemaking Seminar March 2005 New.
Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Multinational Cost of Capital and Capital Structure
Chapter 9 CAPITAL ASSET PRICING AND ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY The Risk Reward Relationship.
Chapter 9 The Cost of Capital. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.9-1 Learning Objectives 1.Understand the concepts underlying.
1 FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF ADOPTING IASs Dr. Mohammad Al-Shiab
Slide 1 Cost of Capital, and Capital Budgeting Text: Chapter 12.
CAPM Testing & Alternatives to CAPM
Chapter 12 Estimating the Cost of Capital. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved The Equity Cost of Capital The Capital.
Appendix 9A Empirical Evidence for the Risk-Return Relationship (Question 9) By Cheng Few Lee Joseph Finnerty John Lee Alice C Lee Donald Wort.
CHAPTER 9 Investment Management: Concepts and Strategies Chapter 9: Investment Concepts 1.
ALTERNATIVES TO CAPM Professor Thomas Chemmanur. 2 ALTERNATIVES TO CAPM: FACTOR MODELS FACTOR MODEL 1: ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY (APT) THE APT ASSUMES.
1 Risk Changes Following Ex-Dates of Stock Splits Shen-Syan Chen National Taiwan University Robin K. Chou National Central University Wan-Chen Lee Ching.
Chapter 14 – Risk from the Shareholders’ Perspective u Focus of the chapter is the mean-variance capital asset pricing model (CAPM) u Goal is to explain.
International portfolio diversification benefits: Cross-country evidence from a local perspective Authors of the Paper: Joost Driessen Luc Laeven Presented.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Risk and Return: Capital Market Theory Chapter 8.
Insurance Companies. Chapter Outline Two Categories of Insurance Companies: Chapter Overview Life Insurance Companies Property-Casualty Insurance Companies.
Behavioral Finance Fama French March 24 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
1 Arbitrage risk and the book- to-market anomaly Ali, Hwang and Trombley JFE (2003)
Negative underwriting loss turning into positive profit — Explore the role of investment income for U.S. Property and Casualty insurers Shuang Yang Department.
Asset Pricing of Financial Institutions: The Cross-Section of Expected Insurance Stock Returns (joint work with M. Eling & A. Milidonis) Early stage paper.
The Value Premium and the CAPM
The Financial Services Industry: Insurance Companies
Pricing Risk.
What Factors Drive Global Stock Returns?
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW MODELS
Leverage, Financial Distress and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Journal of Economics and Finance(2017) 41:311–329
Empirical Evidence on Security Returns
Over-investment in corporate R&D, risk, and stock returns
Capital structure, executive compensation, and investment efficiency
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Presentation transcript:

The momentum effect on estimating the cost of equity capital for property-liability insurers Jennifer L. Wang (National Chengchi University) Joseph Tien (Tamkang University) NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Outline (1) Introduction: Motivation and Literature (1) Introduction: Motivation and Literature (2) Data Resource and Empirical Model (2) Data Resource and Empirical Model (3) Empirical Results (3) Empirical Results (4) Conclusions (4) Conclusions NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Motivation(1/2) Cost of capital estimation is becoming important for insurers especially after financial crisis in Cost of capital estimation is becoming important for insurers especially after financial crisis in Moreover, insurers need more equity capital if International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is executed. Moreover, insurers need more equity capital if International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is executed. More applications of financial models are used in pricing, reserving, ALM for insurance companies. More applications of financial models are used in pricing, reserving, ALM for insurance companies. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Motivation(2/2) Fama-French(1997) suggest that the cost of capital varies across industries due to heterogeneity of the risks facing in various sectors of the economy. There is a significant factor for insurance. Fama-French(1997) suggest that the cost of capital varies across industries due to heterogeneity of the risks facing in various sectors of the economy. There is a significant factor for insurance. The supervisor needs the reasonable cost of capital to enact the regulations. The supervisor needs the reasonable cost of capital to enact the regulations. Few literature discussed how to estimate costs of capital for insurers with different business line compositions. Few literature discussed how to estimate costs of capital for insurers with different business line compositions. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Literature Process S(1964),L(1965), B(1972) -- CAPM Refining Beta Estimation Most Results support CAPM Adding different possible factors to explain returns Fama-French Three Factor Model Possible reasons to explain Size, B/M and Momentum Global market, Different industries Jegadeesh and Titman(1993) -- Momentum NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Literature(1/2) Cummins and Harrington(1985) suggest that beta of property-liability insurers were unstable and conformed to the CAPM in the 1980 ’ s but not in the 1970 ’ s. Cummins and Harrington(1985) suggest that beta of property-liability insurers were unstable and conformed to the CAPM in the 1980 ’ s but not in the 1970 ’ s. Cummins and Lamm-Tennant(1994) figure an additional factor, leverage, for empirical models. Their results suggest that the long-tail commercial lines of property-liability insurance tend to have higher costs of capital than short-tail lines. Cummins and Lamm-Tennant(1994) figure an additional factor, leverage, for empirical models. Their results suggest that the long-tail commercial lines of property-liability insurance tend to have higher costs of capital than short-tail lines. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Literature(2/2) Lee and Cummins(1998) propose that APT and the Wei(1988) model perform better than the CAPM in forecasting the cost of capital for insurers. Lee and Cummins(1998) propose that APT and the Wei(1988) model perform better than the CAPM in forecasting the cost of capital for insurers. Using the Fama-French model, Cummins and Phillips(2005) suggest the cost of capital for insurers are significantly higher than estimation based upon the CAPM. Using the Fama-French model, Cummins and Phillips(2005) suggest the cost of capital for insurers are significantly higher than estimation based upon the CAPM. Wang et al. (2008) use Rubinstein-Leland (RL) model to improve the cost of equity estimates of insurance companies due to the highly skewed and heavy-tailed distributions associated with the insurance claims process. Wang et al. (2008) use Rubinstein-Leland (RL) model to improve the cost of equity estimates of insurance companies due to the highly skewed and heavy-tailed distributions associated with the insurance claims process. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Purposes (1) To test whether the momentum factor plays the significant role in estimating the cost of equity capital for PL insurers. (1) To test whether the momentum factor plays the significant role in estimating the cost of equity capital for PL insurers. (2) Moreover, we further use FIB method to calculate the capital cost for different lines of business. (2) Moreover, we further use FIB method to calculate the capital cost for different lines of business. (3) Finally, the sum-beta approach is adopted to adjust the infrequent trading. (3) Finally, the sum-beta approach is adopted to adjust the infrequent trading. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Data and Sample Selection(1/3) To select property/casualty insurance (NAICS code ) sample by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). To select property/casualty insurance (NAICS code ) sample by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The stock return of insurance companies were obtained from CRSP. The stock return of insurance companies were obtained from CRSP. To follow Fama-French’s(1992,1997) screening rules To follow Fama-French’s(1992,1997) screening rules (a) To eliminate firms didn’t have at least 36 consecutive months of return information during estimation period (a) To eliminate firms didn’t have at least 36 consecutive months of return information during estimation period (b) The beta coefficients greater than 5 in absolute value. (b) The beta coefficients greater than 5 in absolute value. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Excess return data for market systematic risk, size, financial distress (B/M ratio), and momentum factor were obtained from Kenneth French ’ s website. Excess return data for market systematic risk, size, financial distress (B/M ratio), and momentum factor were obtained from Kenneth French ’ s website. Consequently, we obtained data on insurance revenue by product lines from the NAIC annual statement CD-ROMs. Consequently, we obtained data on insurance revenue by product lines from the NAIC annual statement CD-ROMs. Data and Sample Selection(2/3) NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Data and Sample Selection(3/3) Estimate betas Period: Estimate betas Period: We abstracted monthly return data from CRSP and use excess return data for market systematic risk, size, financial distress (B/M ratio), and momentum factor to proceed the regression. We abstracted monthly return data from CRSP and use excess return data for market systematic risk, size, financial distress (B/M ratio), and momentum factor to proceed the regression. Estimate the cost of equity: Estimate the cost of equity: NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Estimation Methodology (1/4) -- CAPM Method : the return on stock I in period t : the risk-free rate in period t(30-day Treasury bill yield) : the returm on the market portfolio in period t : the CAPM beta coefficient for firm i : overall beta estimate for firm i : net premiums weight for firm I in business lines k : full-information beta of type j for business line k NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Estimation Methodology (2/4) -- FF3F Model : the market risk premium for firm size in period t : the market risk premium for financial distress in period t : overall beta estimate of type j for firm i , j=m, s, v : full-information beta of type j for business lines k , j=m, s, v : net premiums weight for firm I in business lines k NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Estimation Methodology (3/4) -- Momentum Model : the momentum factor in the period t : overall beta estimate of type j for firm i , j=m, s, v, mo : full-information beta of type j for business lines k , j=m, s, v, mo : net premiums weight for firm I in business lines k NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Estimation Methodology (4/4) -- Sum-Beta Approach In order to correct for the bias created by infrequent trading, we utilize the sum-beta approach that has become standard in this type of analysis ( e.g., Scoles and Williams(1977), Dimson(1979)) Adding the lagged value of variable in model: The estimated sum beta coefficient is NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

= estimated beta coefficient in first regression for firm i, = the cost of capital of CAPM for firm i, = the expected return of the risk-free asset, the expected return on the market portfolio, excess return on NYSE/AMEX/Nasdaq stocks from 1926 until June of 2001 To Estimate Cost of Equity (1/2) NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

= the expected excess premium for size factor, = the expected excess premium for financial factor, = the expected excess premium for momentum factor To Estimate Cost of Equity (2/2) NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Empirical Results of Beta Estimations (1/2) Empirical Results of Beta Estimations (1/2) (1) The quartile results do not show that large insurers consistently have smaller beta than small insurers. (2) The sum-beta estimates are constantly than the ordinary beta coefficients because infrequent trading. than the ordinary beta coefficients because infrequent trading. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Empirical Results of Beta Estimations (2/2) (3) The market beta estimated in FF3F is larger than in CAPM. (3) The market beta estimated in FF3F is larger than in CAPM. (4) The market beta estimated in momentum model is larger than in FF3F. (4) The market beta estimated in momentum model is larger than in FF3F. (5) Generally, the market beta or B/M beta is larger than the size beta, the momentum beta is smallest. (5) Generally, the market beta or B/M beta is larger than the size beta, the momentum beta is smallest. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Empirical Results Overall cost of equity (1/2) Empirical Results Overall cost of equity (1/2) Risk freeMarket premium SMBHMLMomentum Factor Cummins (2005) Our Paper NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Empirical Results Overall cost of equity (2/2) The cost of equity estimated with sum-beta adjustment is larger than without sum-beta method. The cost of equity estimated with sum-beta adjustment is larger than without sum-beta method. The cost of equity estimated from FF3F is larger than from CAPM. The cost of equity estimated from FF3F is larger than from CAPM. (CAPM:10.5%, FF3F:16.3%) (CAPM:10.5%, FF3F:16.3%) The cost of equity estimated from momentum model is larger than from FF3F. (Momentum:22.56%) The cost of equity estimated from momentum model is larger than from FF3F. (Momentum:22.56%) NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Comparing with Cummins and Phillips (2005) Financial distress betas are substantially larger than the parameters in the Fama- French all industry average. (0.02) Financial distress betas are substantially larger than the parameters in the Fama- French all industry average. (0.02) Financial distress factor is significant in estimating the cost of equity for property- liability insurers. Financial distress factor is significant in estimating the cost of equity for property- liability insurers. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Our New Findings Although the momentum beta could be the smallest of all beta estimations, the momentum effect still plays a significant role in estimating cost of equity. Although the momentum beta could be the smallest of all beta estimations, the momentum effect still plays a significant role in estimating cost of equity. The estimations of beta and cost equity are dropped sharply in The estimations of beta and cost equity are dropped sharply in NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Empirical Results for different lines of business (1) Long-tail and Short-tail (1) Long-tail and Short-tail (2) Commercial and Personal (2) Commercial and Personal (3) Workers ’ Compensation, Automobile Insurance and All Other Property-Liability Insurance (3) Workers ’ Compensation, Automobile Insurance and All Other Property-Liability Insurance NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Results of Long-tail and Short-tail Long-tail – other liability, products liability (occurrence, claim made), private passenger auto liability, aircraft, commercial auto liability. Long-tail – other liability, products liability (occurrence, claim made), private passenger auto liability, aircraft, commercial auto liability. Short-tail – fire, allied lines, homeowners, multiperil, automobile physical damage, accident and health coverage, fidelity, surety, mortgage guaranty. Short-tail – fire, allied lines, homeowners, multiperil, automobile physical damage, accident and health coverage, fidelity, surety, mortgage guaranty. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Empirical Results of Commercial and Personal (1/2) Personal Line- Personal Line- Homeowner, Framowner, Earthquake, Personal Auto Liability, Homeowner, Framowner, Earthquake, Personal Auto Liability, Personal Auto Damage Personal Auto Damage Commercial Line- Commercial Line- All other lines of insurance are considered commercial lines. All other lines of insurance are considered commercial lines. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Empirical Results of Commercial and Personal (2/2) Generally Speaking, equity cost in commercial lines is larger than in personal lines. Shareholders ask more risk compensation for operating the commercial line products. Generally Speaking, equity cost in commercial lines is larger than in personal lines. Shareholders ask more risk compensation for operating the commercial line products. CAPM CAPM FF3F FF3F Momt Momt Personal Line Commercial Line NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Results of Workers ’, Auto and All other (1/2) CAPM FF3F Momentum Automobile insurance Workers ’ compensation All other P&L lines of insurance NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Results of Workers ’, Auto and All other (2/2) (1) The equity cost of worker compensation is slightly larger than automobile. But the equity cost of other P&L is largest among these three categories. (1) The equity cost of worker compensation is slightly larger than automobile. But the equity cost of other P&L is largest among these three categories. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Conclusions (1/2) (1) The cost of equity capital estimation based the FF3F (mometum) method is significantly higher than the estimation based on the CAPM (FF3F). (1) The cost of equity capital estimation based the FF3F (mometum) method is significantly higher than the estimation based on the CAPM (FF3F). (2) It is important to adjust infrequent trading when estimating betas for PL insurers. (2) It is important to adjust infrequent trading when estimating betas for PL insurers. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010

Conclusions (2/2) (3) The cost of equity capital varies significantly by line of insurance. (3) The cost of equity capital varies significantly by line of insurance. (4) Financial distress factor is significant in estimating the cost of equity for property- liability insurers. (4) Financial distress factor is significant in estimating the cost of equity for property- liability insurers. NTUICF, 10/DEC/2010