Strategies for Defending Conspiracy Claims in Mass Tort Litigation Wynn M. Shuford Lightfoot, Franklin & White, LLC Birmingham, Alabama.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 6 REVIEW Let the Games Begin
Advertisements

Q3 LAW NOTES 1 TORTS.
 Chapter 10 Faceoff (Young Offender or Adult)  Folder time  Folders being Checked Tomorrow.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 4Slide 1 The Complaint: General Points The Purpose of the complaint under the federal system and many state systems is.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved Law A body of regulations that govern society and that people are obligated to observe Sources.
Legal Issues Final Review. Multiple Choice What is the situation in which a lawyer sues another lawyer for a serious error that caused a client to lose.
A [Drunk] Wolfe at the Door (handling covered combined with uncovered claims) Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, LLP Peter J. Speaker, Esquire Joshua J. Bovender,
Criminal and Civil Court
PRETRIAL. Prosecutorial Review After arrest, prosecutor reviews case to decide what charges to make against arrestee Decide if there is enough evidence.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Chapter 4 Preparatory Activity Offenses Criminal Law Ninth Edition.
Chapter 5 Inchoate Offenses.
A guilty state of mind: means that the prohibited act was done intentionally, knowingly, or willingly. When lawyers discuss the requirement for a guilty.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Chapter 5 Test Review Test Friday.
Torts and Cyber Torts Chapter 4.
Alaska Mock Trial Glossary of Terms. Laws Rules created by society to govern the behavior of people in society. Among other things, the laws are one formal.
Characterization. substance/procedure Grant v McAuliffe (Cal. 1953)
1 Chapter 6 - The role of the Judiciary Part II. State Secrets 2.
Civil vs Criminal and Juries
CIVIL LAW 3.2 TYPES OF TORTS. Types of Torts  There are three categories of torts:  Intentional Wrong  Negligence  Strict Liability.
 1. Duty-The accused wrongdoer owed a duty of care to the injured person  2. Breach of Duty- the defendant’s conduct breached that duty  3. Causation-defendant’s.
Business Law. Your neighbor Shana is using a multipurpose woodcutting machine in her basement hobby shop. Suddenly, because of a defect in the two-year.
Section 2.2.
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
Evidential and Legal Burdens. What are they? The evidential burden of proof is a preliminary matter to be decided by the TOL. It is a question of law.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
Chapter 5 The Court System
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Options Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
You Decide: A Jury Simulation Amendment Unit P.S. 3.
Chapter 4 Criminal Law. Categories Business Related.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Criminal & Civil Law Chapter 15. Where do our laws come from? The Constitution – Constitutional Law The Legislature – Statutory law The Decisions of Judges.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
Law 12 MUNDY  A person is still considered a danger to society if she/he intends to commit a criminal act, but is caught before committing it 
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
1.A guilty state of mind: means that the prohibited act was done intentionally, knowingly, or willingly. 2.When lawyers discuss the requirement for a.
Torts A.K.A. civil law. What’s a Tort? Torts more or less means “wrongs” Refers to civil laws Based on both common law (decisions made by judges) and.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
 Crime – _______________________________ _______________________________________  Elements of a Crime: › A duty to do or not to do a certain thing ›
Court Systems and Practices. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked.
Tues. 2/2/16. characterization substance/procedure.
Crime-Tort Jeopardy Business Related Crimes Elements of a Crime Classify Defenses Elements of a Tort Types of Torts Civil Procedure $100100$100100$100100$100100$100100$100100$
COURTS, JUDGES AND THE LAW Key Terms on Judicial Branch.
TUTORIAL #4 Attempt, Impossibility, Accomplice liability, Conspiracy.
Unit 5 Law and You Laws are often created to ensure the rights and protections of individuals. Sets up a limited government The people have power The government.
In My Defense Prove This! Make Me Better Who Says? Tort Me
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
Law for Business and Personal Use © Thomson South-Western CHAPTER 4 Criminal Law and Procedure 4-1 Criminal Law 4-2 Criminal Procedure.
Do now pg 57 1.Which situation is an example of civil law? Murder or Divorce? 2.Give me 2 examples of civil cases.
Wish I had the Doink, Doink sound clip!.  1yxw 1yxw  Hope it works…
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 22/23 DISCOVERY IV.
Trial Procedures Business Law Chapter 6. Trial Procedures Civil Cases are brought by individuals Civil Cases are brought by individuals Injured party.
Elements of a Crime Chapter 2.
Criminal law 1. Ahmed T. Ghandour..
Chapter 6-1 Lesson Objectives
Jury System.
Civil Vs. Criminal People vs People Tort/lawsuit No punishment
Chapter 6 Test Review Questions.
"Seasoned" Superior Court Judges
Chapter 6-1 Lesson Objectives
Law For Personal And Business Use
"Seasoned" Superior Court Judges
Character Evidence Rules - In General
Lesson 6-1 Civil Law (Tort Law).
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
Civil Law 3.5 Defenses to Torts
Differences and similarities
Attempt, Conspiracy & Parties to an Offence
Presentation transcript:

Strategies for Defending Conspiracy Claims in Mass Tort Litigation Wynn M. Shuford Lightfoot, Franklin & White, LLC Birmingham, Alabama

Strategies for Defending Conspiracy Claims in Mass Tort Litigation Wynn M. Shuford Lightfoot, Franklin & White, LLC Birmingham, Alabama

Why Do Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Love Conspiracy Claims?

Creates Therapeutic Opportunities to Leave Leaving Threatening Voic s for Defense Counsel

Therapeutic Voic s Voic to Wynn “… And let me assure you of one thing, the fact that ya’ll have accomplished a couple little things, don’t think that’s not goin’ go without some retribution, son.”

Therapeutic Voic s Voic to Wynn “… And let me assure you of one thing, the fact that ya’ll have accomplished a couple little things, don’t think that’s not goin’ go without some retribution, son.”

Allows Plaintiffs Counsel to Use The “Word of the Day” in Correspondence Words used to refer to me by plaintiffs’ counsel in mass torts cases:

Allows Plaintiffs Counsel to Use The “Word of the Day” in Correspondence Words used to refer to me by plaintiffs’ counsel in mass torts cases: Mendacious Disputatious Audacious Nefarious Disengenuous

Why Do Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Love Conspiracy Claims? Creates Therapeutic Opportunities to Leave Leaving Threatening Voic s for Defense Counsel Admissions of Co-conspirator Exception to the Hearsay Rule

Why Do Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Love Conspiracy Claims? Creates Therapeutic Opportunities to Leave Leaving Threatening Voic s for Defense Counsel Admissions of Co-conspirator Exception to the Hearsay Rule Broadens the Scope of Defendants that Can Be Sued

Conspiracy Law Basics Under the law of most states, liability for civil conspiracy depends upon the existence of an actionable, underlying tort. Most states agree that a negligence cannot be the underlying tort.

Concealment as the Underlying Tort In most states, there is no cause of action for concealment from the public. Rather, there must be a duty to disclose in order to have liability for fraudulent concealment.

Cool Hand Luke Defense [C]laims that a cigarette manufacturer has not warned of known product dangers are generally not cognizable as fraudulent concealment claims under Kansas law. Rather, they are cognizable as failure to warn claims. To hold otherwise would convert all product manufacturer's duty to warn claims into fraud claims. We do not believe Kansas courts would intend such a result. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 397 F.3d 906, 913 (10 th Cir. 2005).

Does a Plaintiff Have to Prove the Elements of an Underlying Tort Against Each Defendant? YES - Chavers v. Gatke Corp., 107 Cal. App. 4 th 606 (2003). NO - Nicolet v. Nutt, 525 A.2d 146 (Del. 1987).

Proof Required of Conspiracy “[M]ere presence at the commission of a wrong, or failure to object to it, is not enough to charge one with responsibility for conspiring to commit the tortious act.” “[I]f circumstantial evidence supports equal inferences of lawful action and unlawful action, then the claim of conspiracy is not proven.” Evidence of conscious parallel conduct is not enough to prove conspiracy.

Practical Application to Proof Normally Offered Similar warnings not enough to prove conspiracy Presence at a meeting does not prove conspiracy Ambiguous evidence does not prove conspiracy

Why Do Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Love Conspiracy Claims? Creates Therapeutic Opportunities to Leave Leaving Threatening Voic s for Defense Counsel Admissions of Co-conspirator Exception to the Hearsay Rule Broadens the Scope of Defendants that Can Be Sued Puts the Focus on the Conduct of the Defendant, Rather Than On the Plaintiff

Why Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Want to Direct Attention Away From the Individual Plaintiff

Jury Research: Knowledge and Control Jurors compare plaintiffs and defendant’s knowledge and control. When a defendant is perceived to have had more knowledge and control than the plaintiff, the plaintiff is seen as more deserving and the defendant more blameworthy… It may seem counterintuitive, but knowledge and control contribute more to jurors’ decisions to punish than sympathy for the plaintiff, inflammatory documents, and poor witness behavior at trial.

Strategies for Defending Conspiracy Claims Early Dispositive Motion

Strategies for Defending Conspiracy Claims Early Dispositive Motion Smoke Out the Conspiracy Allegation Early

Strategies for Defending Conspiracy Claims Early Dispositive Motion Smoke Out the Conspiracy Allegation Early It's Not a Small World After All

Strategies for Defending Conspiracy Claims Early Dispositive Motion Smoke Out the Conspiracy Allegation Early It's Not a Small World After All Focus on the Scene of the Crime

The Distribution of Information BASFGreen MountainSub-Technical USM

Just Because You Are a Defendant Doesn’t Mean You Always Have to Be on the Defensive “The best defense is a good offense.” - Vince Lombardi