The Theory/Observation connection lecture 3 the (non-linear) growth of structure Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course III. Structure Formation in the Non-Linear Regime Chris Power.
Advertisements

Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course
Dark Matter-Baryon segregation in the non-linear evolution of coupled Dark Energy models Roberto Mainini Università di Milano Bicocca Mainini 2005, Phys.Rev.
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.
Cosmology Zhaoming Ma July 25, The standard model - not the one you’re thinking  Smooth, expanding universe (big bang).  General relativity controls.
Press-Schechter Formalism: Structure Formation by Self-Similar Condensation Jean P. Walker Based on Press & Schechter’s 1974 Paper.
Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?
The Galaxy Formation Paradigm Paradigm R. Giovanelli Astro620/Spring ‘07 Remember to mention.pdf file.
Universe Eighth Edition Universe Roger A. Freedman William J. Kaufmann III CHAPTER 26 Cosmology Cosmology.
THE STRUCTURE OF COLD DARK MATTER HALOS J. Navarro, C. Frenk, S. White 2097 citations to NFW paper to date.
Large Scale Structure of the Universe. Evolution of the LSS – a brief history Picture credit: A. Kravtsov,
The Statistical Properties of Large Scale Structure Alexander Szalay Department of Physics and Astronomy The Johns Hopkins University.
Impact of Early Dark Energy on non-linear structure formation Margherita Grossi MPA, Garching Volker Springel Advisor : Volker Springel 3rd Biennial Leopoldina.
Black hole production in preheating Teruaki Suyama (Kyoto University) Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto University) Bruce Bassett (ICG, University of Portsmouth)
MATTEO VIEL STRUCTURE FORMATION INAF and INFN Trieste SISSA - 28, th February/ 3 rd March 2011.
Galaxy bias with Gaussian/non- Gaussian initial condition: a pedagogical introduction Donghui Jeong Texas Cosmology Center The University of Texas at Austin.
Emergent Universe Scenario
Lecture 3 - Formation of Galaxies What processes lead from the tiny fluctuations which we see on the surface of last scattering, to the diverse galaxies.
Cosmological Reconstruction via Wave Mechanics Peter Coles School of Physics & Astronomy University of Nottingham.
The formation of galactic disks An overview of Mo Mao & White 1998 MNRAS
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 1 the standard model Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Dark energy fluctuations and structure formation Rogério Rosenfeld Instituto de Física Teórica/UNESP I Workshop "Challenges of New Physics in Space" Campos.
Academic Training Lectures Rocky Kolb Fermilab, University of Chicago, & CERN Cosmology and the origin of structure Rocky I : The universe observed Rocky.
Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) 1 [In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine,
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
PREDRAG JOVANOVIĆ AND LUKA Č. POPOVIĆ ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY BELGRADE, SERBIA Gravitational Lensing Statistics and Cosmology.
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 2 perturbations Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Astrophysics ASTR3415: Homework 4, Q.2. Suppose there existed Velman cosmologists who were observing the CMBR when the light we now see from the supernova.
University of Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Galaxy clusters.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity collaborated with Elcio Abdalla.
IX ème Ecole de Cosmologie, Cargese, November 3, Structure formation as an alternative to dark energy Syksy Räsänen University of Geneva Syksy.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 10.
 SIM-Lite: 6 m baseline optical interferometer in space for precision/deep astrometry.  Pointing mode not survey (spinning).  SIM concept is finishing.
Effects of correlation between halo merging steps J. Pan Purple Mountain Obs.
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
E  L Comma galaxies. The Cosmic Runner (Park et al. 2005; Choi et al. 2010)
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 10; May
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Selecting a mass function by way of the Bayesian Razor Darell Moodley (UKZN), Dr. Kavilan Moodley (UKZN), Dr. Carolyn Sealfon (WCU)
Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood.
Holographic Dark Energy and Anthropic Principle Qing-Guo Huang Interdisciplinary Center of Theoretical Studies CAS
Dark Energy in the Early Universe Joel Weller arXiv:gr-qc/
Taka Matsubara (Nagoya Univ.)
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
Large Scale Structure of the Universe. Evolution of the LSS – a brief history Picture credit: A. Kravtsov,
We created a set of volume limited samples taken from the 2dFGRS (Colless 2001) that contains about 250,000 galaxies with accurate redshifts, is relatively.
Initial conditions for N-body simulations Hans A. Winther ITA, University of Oslo.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
Study of Proto-clusters by Cosmological Simulation Tamon SUWA, Asao HABE (Hokkaido Univ.) Kohji YOSHIKAWA (Tokyo Univ.)
The Fate of the Universe. The fate depends on the rate of expansion and the density Density greater than critical value – gravity will halt expansion.
MEASUREING BIAS FROM UNBIASED OBSERVABLE SEOKCHEON LEE (KIAS) The 50 th Workshop on Gravitation and Numerical INJE Univ.
N-body Simulations and Gravitational Lensing with Dark Energy Beyond Einstein Meeting, May 13, 2004.
Sam Young University of Sussex arXiv: , SY, Christian Byrnes Texas Symposium, 16 th December 2015 CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF PRIMORDIAL BLACK.
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
3D Matter and Halo density fields with Standard Perturbation Theory and local bias Nina Roth BCTP Workshop Bad Honnef October 4 th 2010.
2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ¼ M galaxies 2003
Primordial Black Hole Formation
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
The influence of Dark Energy on the Large Scale Structure Formation
Probing the Dark Sector
Large Scale Structure of the Universe
Semi-Numerical Simulations of
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
Cosmology: The Origin and Evolution of the Universe
Presentation transcript:

The Theory/Observation connection lecture 3 the (non-linear) growth of structure Will Percival The University of Portsmouth

Lecture outline  Spherical collapse – standard model – dark energy  Virialisation  Press-Schechter theory – the mass function – halo creation rate  Extended Press-Schechter theory  Peaks and the halo model

Phases of perturbation evolution Inflation linearNon-linear Transfer function Matter/Dark energy domination

Linear vs Non-linear behaviour z=0 z=1 z=2 z=3 z=4 z=5 linear growth non-linear evolution z=0 z=1 z=2 z=3 z=4 z=5 large scale power is lost as fluctuations move to smaller scales P(k) calculated from Smith et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341,1311 fitting formulae

Spherical collapse  homogeneous, spherical region in isotropic background behaves as a mini-Universe (Birkhoff’s theorem)  If density high enough it behaves as a closed Universe and collapses (r  0)  Friedmann equation in a closed universe (no DE)  Symmetric in time  Starts at singularity (big bang), so ends in singularity  Two parameters: – density (  m ), constrains collapse time – scale (e.g. r 0 ), constrains perturbation size

The evolution of densities in the Universe Critical densities are parameteric equations for evolution of universe as a function of the scale factor a All cosmological models will evolve along one of the lines on this plot (away from the EdS solution)

Spherical collapse Contain equal mass collapsing perturbation Radius a p Background Radius a Set up two spheres, one containing background, and one with an enhanced density

Spherical collapse For collapsing Lambda Universe, we have Friedmann equation And the collapse requirement Can integrate numerically to find collapse time, but if no Lambda can do this analytically t coll apapapap  p is the curvature of the perturbation

Spherical collapse Problem: need to relate the collapse time t coll to the overdensity of the perturbation in the linear field (that we now think is collapsing).

Spherical collapse Problem: need to relate the collapse time t coll to the overdensity of the perturbation in the linear field (that we now think is collapsing). At early times (ignore DE), can write Friedmann equation as Obtain series solution for a For the background, Different for perturbation  p So that

Spherical collapse Can now linearly extrapolate the limiting behaviour of the perturbation at early times to present day Can use numerical solution for t coll, or can use analytic solution (if no Lambda) If  k =0,  m =1, then we get the solution, for perturbations that collapse at present day Problem: need to relate the collapse time t coll to the overdensity of the perturbation in the linear field (that we now think is collapsing).

Evolution of perturbations top-hat collapse limit for collapse evolution of scale factor W m =0.3, W v =0.7, h=0.7, w= - 1 virialisation

Spherical collapse Cosmological dependence of  c is small, so often ignored, and  c =1.686 is assumed

Spherical collapse: how to include DE? high sound speed means that DE perturbations are rapidly smoothed DE DM on large scales dark energy must follow Friedmann equation – this is what dark energy was postulated to fix! low sound speed means that large scale DE perturbations are important DE DM quintessence has ultra light scalar field so high sound speed The effect of the sound speed provides a potential test of gravity modifications vs stress-energy. If DE is not a cosmological constant, its sound speed controls how it behaves

Spherical collapse: general DE cosmology equation depends on the equation of state of dark energy p = w(a)  homogeneous dark energy means that this term depends on scale factor of background “perfectly” clustering dark energy – replace a with a p can solve differential equation and follow growth of perturbation directly from coupled cosmology equations For general DE, cannot write down a Friedmann equation for perturbations, because energy is not conserved. However, can work from cosmology equation

Evolution of perturbations top-hat collapse limit for collapse evolution of scale factor W m =0.3, W v =0.7, h=0.7, w= - 1 virialisation

Evolution of perturbations top-hat collapse limit for collapse evolution of scale factor W m =0.3, W v =0.7, h=0.7, w= - 2/3 virialisation

Evolution of perturbations top-hat collapse limit for collapse evolution of scale factor W m =0.3, W v =0.7, h=0.7, w= - 4/3 virialisation

 Real perturbations aren’t spherical or homogeneous  Collapse to a singularity must be replaced by virialisation  Virial theorem:  For matter and dark energy  If there’s only matter, then comparing total energy at maximum perturbation size and virialisation gives

virialisation The density contrast for a virialised perturbation at the time where collapse can be predicted for an Einstein-de Sitter cosmology This is often taken as the definition for how to find a collapsed object

Aside: energy evolution in a perturbation in a standard cosmological constant cosmology, we can write down a Friedmann equation for a perturbation for dark energy “fluid” with a high sound speed, this is not true – energy can be lost or gained by a perturbation the potential energy due to the matter U G and due to the dark energy U X

Press-Schechter theory  Builds on idea of spherical collapse and the overdensity field to create statistical theory for structure formation – take critical density for collapse. Assume any pertubations with greater density (at an earlier time) have collapsed – Filter the density field to find Lagrangian size of perturbations. If collapse on more than one scale, take largest size  Can be used to give – mass function of collapsed objects (halos) – creation time distribution of halos – information about the build-up of structure (extended PS theory)

The mass function in PS theory Smooth density field on a mass scale M, with a filter Result is a set of Gaussian random fields with variance  2 (M). For each location in space we have an overdensity for each smoothing scale: this forms a “trajectory”: a line of  as a function of  2 (M).

The mass function in PS theory For sharp k-space filtering, the overdensity of the field at any location as a function of filter radius (through  2 (M) ), forms a Brownian random walk We wish to know the probability that we should associate a point with a collapsed region of mass >M At any mass it is equally likely that a trajectory is now below or below a barrier given that it previously crossed it, so Where

The mass function in PS theory Differentiate in M to find fraction in range dM and multiply by  /M to find the number density of all halos. PS theory assumes (predicts) that all mass is in halos of some (possibly small) mass High Mass: exponential cut-off for M>M *, where Low Mass: divergence

The mass function The PS mass function is not a great match to simulation results (too high at low masses and low at high masses), but can be used as a basis for fitting functions Sheth & Tormen (1999) Jenkins et al. (2001) PS theory - dotted Sheth & Toren - dashed

Halo creation rate in PS theory Can also use trajectories in PS theory to calculate when halos of a particular mass collapse This is the distribution of first upcrossings, for trajectories that have an upcrossing for mass M For an Eistein-de Sitter cosmology,

Creation vs existence Formation rate of galaxies per comoving volume Redshift distribution of halo number per comoving volume

Extended Press-Schechter theory Extended PS theory gives the conditional mass function, useful for merger histories Given a halo of mass M 1 at z 1, what is the distribution of masses at z 2 ? Can simply translate origin - same formulae as before but with  c and  m shifted

Problems with PS theory   Mass function doesn’t match N-body simulations   Conditional probability is lop-sided f(M 1,M 2 |M) ≠ f(M 2,M 1 |M)   Is it just too simplistic? MM1MM1 MM2MM2 M

Halo bias  If halos form without regard to the underlying density fluctuation and move under the gravitational field then their number density is an unbiased tracer of the dark matter density fluctuation  This is not expected to be the case in practice: spherical collapse shows that time depends on overdensity field  A high background enhances the formation of structure  Hence peak-background split

Peak-background split Split density field into peak and background components Collapse overdensity altered Alters mass function through

Peak-background split Get biased formation of objects Need to distinguish Lagrangian and Eulerian bias: densities related by a factor (1+  b ), and can take limit of small  b For PS theory For Sheth & Tormen (1999) fitting function

Halo clustering strength on large scales

Bias on small scales comes from halo profile N-body gives halo profile: r = [ y(1+y) 2 ] -1 ; y = r/r c (NFW) r = [ y 3/2 (1+y 3/2 ) ] -1 ; y = r/r c (Moore) (cf. Isothermal sphere r = 1/y 2 )

The halo model M=10 15 M=10 10 linear non-linear bound objects galaxies large scale clustering small scale clustering Predicts power spectrum of the form Simple model that splits matter clustering into 2 components small scale clustering of galaxies within a single halo large scale clustering of galaxies in different halos

Further reading  Peacock, “Cosmological Physics”, Cambridge University Press  Coles & Lucchin, “Cosmology: the origin and evolution of cosmic structure”, Wiley  Spherical collapse in dark energy background – Percival 2005, A&A 443, 819  Press-Schechter theory – Press & Schechter 1974, ApJ 187, 425 – Lacey & Cole 1993, MNRAS 262, 627 – Percival & Miller 1999, MNRAS 309, 823  Peaks – Bardeen et al (BBKS) 1986, ApJ 304, 15  halo model papers – Seljak 2000, MNRAS 318, 203 – Peacock & Smith 2000, MNRAS 318, 1144 – Cooray & Sheth 2002, Physics reports, 372, 1