Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment types and activities
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
Parents as Partners in Education
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
Table of Contents Summative Assessments Formative Assessment Why Teachers Use Assessments Definitions You may browse through this book by using the arrows.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
Effective Intervention Using Data from the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI-5) Developed by the authors of the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI) -5,
Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading aligned to the Language Arts Florid Standards FAIR-FS Purpose Presented by Mrs. DeSousa.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Formative Assessment Lessons General Information.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Assessment Literacy Series
Session Materials  Wiki
IEP Training Module Two Data. Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D. Purpose of Training The purpose of these training modules is to refine and expand your current.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
Data Driven Instruction Developmental Reading Grades 7-8.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Looking At Your Assessment System: A Graphical Perspective Michigan Educational Research Association Fall Conference 2012 Monday, November 19, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 3.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
EDU 385 EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN THE CLASSROOM
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Assessing Student Learning
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 1 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 1.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Module 3: Unit 3, Session 1 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 3, Session 1.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
Assessment and Differentiation of Instruction. Assessment for Learning.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Creating a Standards-Based Classrooms An Overview of Adapting and Adopting Research Based Instruction to Enhance Student Learning.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Literacy Assessments Literacy Workgroup Marcia Atwood Michelle Boutwell Sue Locke-Scott Rae Lynn McCarthy.
Mathematical Literacy Roland O’Daniel, Jo Ann Mosier KCTM October 2007.
Chapter 7 Table of Contents Introduction Guidelines for Monitoring and Assessment Guidelines for Monitoring and Assessment Types of Monitoring and.
Monitoring and Assessment Presented by: Wedad Al –Blwi Supervised by: Prof. Antar Abdellah.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Wilkinsburg School District Literacy Development Framework May 2011.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
Evaluation and Assessment Evaluation is a broad term which involves the systematic way of gathering reliable and relevant information for the purpose.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Interim Assessment Information Hope Allen Director of Assessment 4/12/15.
NEEDS ANALYSIS.
Professor of Education
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Presentation transcript:

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Session 2 Questions & Objectives  Session 2 Key Questions  What is literacy assessment?  What are the elements of a balanced assessment model for the school and for the classroom?  How can I begin to enhance my use of assessment in the classroom?  Session 2 Objectives  Participants will understand the elements of a balanced assessment model and examine their own assessment practices from this point of view.  Participants will consider ways they can enhance their uses of assessment in the classroom. 2

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Activity Think What are two or three aspects of assessment that you’ve been thinking about since last session? Talk Share these with the person next to you. Write Write three questions you have about assessment at this moment. 3

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 What is Literacy Assessment?  Literacy Assessment is an umbrella term that refers to a variety of assessments used to gauge students’ knowledge of and skills in understanding and using language. 4

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 The Literacy Assessment Umbrella Basic Literacy Receptive Language: -Listening -Reading comprehension Expressive Language -Speaking -Reading fluency -Writing Disciplinary Literacy Receptive Language: -Disciplinary vocabulary and text structure comprehension -Disciplinary thinking Expressive Language: -Disciplinary speaking and writing conventions Specific Areas and Causes of Learning Difficulty Neurological, Psychological, Social, Physical, etc. 5

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Why We Assess Literacy Assessing Disciplinary Literacy Guides us to identify and effectively instruct in the modes of thinking, reading, and communicating in the academic disciplines Assessing Basic and Intermediate Literacy Guides us to identify and remediate language weaknesses that impede effective listening, speaking, reading and writing skills 6

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Aiming for Proficiency Targeted instruction and accommodations and modifications empower students to access the curriculum and gain disciplinary literacy. Remediation of basic language skills empowers students to learn independently. GOALGOAL 7

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Activity  Systematic use of assessment data is a key part of a district’s literacy action plan.  Discuss within your group what you know about the components of your district’s plan if they have or are developing one.  Complete the self-assessment survey about current comfort/knowledge level about assessment. 8

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 A Balanced Assessment System Formative Assessment for Learning Summative Assessment of Learning Achievement 9

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Definitions Assess learning as it occurs. Improve knowledge and skills efficiently and effectively. Formative Assessment Measures progress for learning Assess achievement after instruction to document proficiency. Summative Assessment Measures achievement from learning 10

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Screening Assessment  DEFINITION  Brief measures administered school-wide  Usually reading, sometimes writing and math  PURPOSE  Identify which students are at risk of difficulty in meeting proficiency standards  TYPE  May be standardized screenings or curriculum- based measures 11

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Summative Assessments  DEFINITION  Measures of goal achievement  PURPOSE  Identify levels of student achievement at a particular point in time  TYPE  Standardized (MCAS, NWEA, interim/benchmark)  Classroom-based (tests, projects, portfolios, etc.) 12

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Formative Assessment  DEFINITION  Measures of progress toward achievement  PURPOSE  Guide instructional decision making during learning  Improve achievement as a result  TYPE  A PROCESS, not a particular tool  Students must be aware of the teachers’ goals and be part of monitoring progress.  Some summative assessments can be adapted to formative use. 13

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Diagnostic Assessment  DEFINITION  Measures of student performance and achievement in particular domains  PURPOSE  Identify specific strengths and difficulties (and their causes)for the purpose of guiding instruction  TYPE  Standardized/professionally administered (e.g., psycho- educational, neuropsychological, speech-language evaluations)  Classroom-based (e.g., analysis of reading errors) 14

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Assessment Type Overview Assessment Purpose Gather baseline data in order to determine “big picture” instructional needs. Screening Formative Gather data related to targeted instruction in order to inform future instruction. Progress Formative or Summative Gather data related to instruction in order to evaluate “end” performance. Achievement Summative Gather in-depth data in order to determine the specific cause(s) of poor performance. Diagnostic Formative 15

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Balanced Assessment  Balanced assessments are based on a clear set of goals for listening, speaking, reading, and writing—the core language skills that underlie both basic and disciplinary literacy.  These goals (and the discrete learning targets)are shared by all in the school/district (teachers and students).  The goals and targets are measureable.  Both progress and achievement are assessed. 16

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Activity  Try out a screening activity  A maze passage estimates comprehension  Text is drawn from course material (so performance related to reading and studying in the course is predictable).  After the first sentence, every seventh word is replaced by a choice and distractor item from which the reader must choose.  Scores provide a baseline against which progress can be monitored. 17

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Keep in Mind  “Assessments should provide us, the instructors, and the students with evidence of how well the students have learned (or are progressing toward) what we intend them to learn. What we want students to learn and be able to do should guide the choice and design of the assessment.” --Carnegie Mellon University 18

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Five Keys to Quality Assessment 1.Clear purpose 2.Clear learning targets 3.Sound assessment design 4.Effective communication of results 5.Student involvement in the assessment process 19

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Activity  Based on reading “The Quest for Quality”  Divide into five groups, each of which will focus on one “Key to Quality.”  Each group will discuss:  In relation to your group’s “key,” what do you see as the strengths and needs of the assessment activities in your classes/schools/districts? 20

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Activity  When thinking like an assessor, we ask different types of questions than those we generally ask ourselves when planning units and lessons.  This habit of thinking about curriculum through an assessment lens facilitates responsible assessment practices. 21

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Activity  The purpose of any assessment is to gather data to inform a decision about action. We must be able to frame a specific question about what data we need, prior to designing an assessment.  All of us, consciously or not, ask questions before we teach, while we teach, and after we teach.  Brainstorm questions you ask before, during, and after teaching. 22

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Activity  Ask participants to recall the main points from the readings, “Reliability, Validity, and Fairness of Classroom Assessments,” and “Principles of Effective Literacy Assessment.” 23

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Include Students in the Process  All adolescents want to feel and be independent.  Including them in goal-setting, assessment design, scoring and interpretation, and data- driven decision making provides a scaffold from which they can strengthen the executive skill that is so difficult to teach— self-monitoring effective progress toward a goal. 24

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Use the Data  The data from assessments—even from summative assessments—should never be an end point.  Assessment is only useful insofar as it points us and our students in the specific direction we should go to improve learning.  There are hundreds of ways to track data from classroom assessments, and identifying and using a system is essential! 25

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 Activity  Examine assessments you use with students.  Pair up and take turns interviewing your partner using the Interview Questions handout in the Participant’s Resource Packet. 26

Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 For Next Time  Engage in an activity that includes students in the assessment process in some way.  See suggestions for activities in the Participant’s Resource Packet:  Standards discussion  Discussion of models  Test analysis 27