Promising Practices in Policy Making Michael Morris Chair, Educational Leadership Team (ELT)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
Advertisements

The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Morris Community High School Systematic Approach to Implementing RtI (Response to Intervention)
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
Knowledge Pathways in IT
Using Data to Support Statewide initiatives centered on Student Achievement A look at publically available data for use by RSA’s, Districts, and schools.
Annual Parent Informational Meeting Presenter Date Location 1.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
Monitoring Accommodations in Florida Karen Denbroeder Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
Curriculum Leadership The Central Figure is the Principal.
A Model for Developing AT Competencies for Education Professionals Brian W. Wojcik George R. Peterson-Karlan H Phillips Parette SEAT Center, Illinois State.
SB 504 Nevada Department of Education Summary Report to Legislative Committee on Education July 15, 2014.
Empowering All Learners with Accessible Technology-based Instructional Products Maryland Regulations Sponsored by: The Maryland State Department of Education.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice from Federal Compliance to Accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network November 20-21, 2008 Sacramento,
Technology Leadership
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
“Every Child a Graduate” Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction SPECIAL EDCATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Life-long learning and continuous.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Building State Capacity: Tools for Analyzing Transition- Related Policies Paula D. Kohler, Ph.D., Western Michigan University National Secondary Transition.
Your Elementary School September  Title I is short for the Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Reauthorized.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Melinda Jones Ault University of Kentucky Technology Innovators’ Conference Washington D.C. November 16, 2004 Working with Schools: Innovative Research.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Debra Brockway, Beth McGrath, Mercedes McKay Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Analysis of a Statewide K-12 Engineering Program:
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
By: Nickie, Heather, and Melody. It is the vision of our district to infuse technology into our curriculum in such a way that will maximize the student’s.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Regional Technology Services Regional Technology Services Specialists (RTS)  Our network’s goal is....  to use the Florida Assistive Technology.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  Each year schools from our district are selected to participate in the.
NC Elements Web-based instructional management for planning, implementing, and improving instruction.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Strategic Agenda We want to be connected to the internet……… We may even want to host our own web site……… We must have a secure network! What are the.
2006 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 31, 2006 Pip Campbell Tracy Gray Chuck Hitchcock Preston Lewis.
C HAPTER 5 Individuals With Disabilities EDAD 859 By: Group 2.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
Including all Students in FSL FSL educators, Special Education teachers, school administrators.
Jamie McCarthy This powerpoint will provide personal and professional information about my qualifications in regard to the TRT job position opening for.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Five Required Elements
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Instructional Coaches District BE/ESL Department
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
For: AP Solis Middle School Donna ISD, Texas By: Kari Knisely
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Instructional Coaches District BE/ESL Department
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Presentation transcript:

Promising Practices in Policy Making Michael Morris Chair, Educational Leadership Team (ELT)

I.Policy - What and why?

What is Policy?  Establishes a standard for performance.  Sets clear expectations for students, parents, teachers, and administrators.  Provides a framework for consistent actions regardless of district or school in a region or statewide.

Why is Policy Important?  Federal and state laws set a policy framework for use of technology in schools.  States and school districts are required to have technology plans.

II.Beyond Compliance

Beyond Compliance  To benefit from classroom instruction, students with disabilities need to be able to: 1.Operate a computer; 2.Participate in online discussions; 3.Access all information on a website; 4.Access curricula presented using multimedia.

Beyond Compliance  Technology policy and plans set standards for educational environments where usable, pervasive, and ubiquitous IT resources support teachers, students, and other educational professionals to reach academic goals and objectives.

Beyond Compliance  Kentucky law requires: “that is equivalent to the access provided individuals who are not disabled”.  All school districts to ensure that the information technology it uses will provide students with disabilities with access “that is equivalent to the access provided individuals who are not disabled”.

Beyond Compliance  Kentucky Assistive Technology Services Network (KATS) in collaboration with the Kentucky Department of Education developed a multipart strategy to improve awareness, knowledge, policy development and implementation.

Beyond Compliance  Successful Strategies included: 1.Annual Survey of School Districts to:  Gauge awareness,  Identify policy and practice changes; 2.Development of sample language for IT accessibility policies related to:  Procurement and use to be used by individual school districts; 3.Development of web accessibility standards; 4.Implementation of training and technical assistance activities to:  Improve knowledge of the purchase and use of educational technology products that meet accessibility requirements.

Lessons Learned from III. Lessons Learned from Kentucky Experience

Lessons Learned  Power of collaboration at a state and local level.  Importance of leadership at district and state level.  Creation of a team with general and special educators and technology specialists to be charged with review of current plans and policies.

Lessons Learned  Importance of a team at local level to assess: 1.Teacher and student needs; 2.Web access policies; 3.Procurement policy regarding accessible IT; 4.Access policies related to online learning and educational software.

Lessons Learned  Importance of involvement and investment of decision makers to support: 1.Policy development; 2.Training and education for teachers and information technology (IT) specialists; 3.Policy implementation; 4.Allocation of resources; 5.Measurement of change;