Distance Education: Hybrid Courses CIO Conference October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Advertisements

Copyright © Ben Hambelton and Kevin S. Wilson, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Program Overview and tips for Student Success Gretchen Hayden Director, CT Virtual Learning Center Director, School Partnerships CT Distance Learning Consortium.
PANORAMA SCHOOL Colville School District Staff: We are sending this information to each of you, so you know what we do at Panorama School. If any.
Campus Collaboration to Build a Series of Information Competency Workshops Nancy Getty and Deborah Moore Glendale Community College LOEX 2007.
1 Classroom Expectations – Guiding Students to Succeed.
NASULGC-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning.
So, you’re thinking about taking an online class? Here’s what you need to consider! Welcome to online learning at NSCC. This short tutorial is designed.
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2010 – 2011 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
From a Distance: Library Services for Distance Learners Joseph Dobbs University of Texas at Austin.
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2008 – 2009 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
Blended classes are an exciting way to learn. Their convenience and scheduling appeals to many students, but they are not for everyone. Students drop-out.
Building web-based delivery systems Rapid movement by colleges and universities into web-related course delivery Lack the necessary faculty support.
1 A Comparison of Traditional, Videoconference-based, and Web-based Learning Environments A Dissertation Proposal by Ming Mu Kuo.
Innovative Instruction Transformation Team Jeffrey Bartkovich, Monroe Community College Kim Scalzo, SUNY Center for Professional Development Carey Hatch,
The New Learning Technologies. 2 Learning Delivery Systems What are they? –Means by which educators deliver critical content and concepts to students.
Online Education Transforming the traditional classroom Eddie Elfers Office of Teaching and Learning Technologies March 14, 2002.
Three Approaches to Distance Learning Support Services New River Community College College of Health Sciences Virginia Tech Copyright Bridget Moore and.
Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
Migrating Courses to an Online Format Lee Allen, Ed.D Assistant Professor, Instructional Design & Technology Special Assistant to the Instruction & Curriculum.
Using Lecture123 in an English Hybrid Course David Buck, English Instructor Burlington County College 10 March 2006.
Distance Education: An Opportunity for the Future Kenneth L. Esbenshade Associate Dean and Director of Academic Programs February 2008.
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
Does Technology Belong in the Classroom? Presented by: Molly Carlson.
Module 2.4.  Understand strategies for tutoring online students.  Become familiar with strategies for online tutoring.  Learn about Smarthinking/eTutoring.
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
TBA Compliance Training Long Beach City College Developed & Presented by Bob Rapoza LBCCD Internal Audit Manager TBA Compliance Training Long Beach City.
Blackboard 201 Communication Workshop Barbara Cooper. OCC Faculty Online Coordinator.
Florida Distance Learning Consortium John Opper Executive Director May 31, 2012 Distance Learning Update.
Math TLC Tutor Lab Overview: All sections of Math 010 and 110 are taught in a single, dedicated, technology-enhanced classroom that is adjacent to a.
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 PARALLEL PATHS: DISTANCE EDUCATION ADVANCED Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Dolores.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Tammy Muhs General Education Program Mathematics Coordinator University of Central Florida NCAT Redesign Scholar Course Redesign: A Way To Improve Student.
Course Delivery Options. Course Delivery Comparison Traditional Meets two days a week for full semester Course material delivered mainly in classroom.
Welcome to Triton College Educational Technology Resource Center Online Student Orientation – Part #1.
Online Teaching: Strengths and Weaknesses
The 4-Year College Plan College Academic Vocabulary.
Teaching and Learning with Technology  Allyn and Bacon 2002 Distance Education: Using Technology to Redefine the Classroom Chapter 11 Teaching and Learning.
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2004 – 2005 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
Nonviolent Crisis Intervention HYBRID Overview. Certified Trainer Moira Erwine ESCLC ext 1156.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Learning Pod Course Like working on your own? Need a course with flexible attendance? Want an online math course, but need some personal instruction, too?
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Course Management System Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools.
Distance Education and Learning Technologies Overview.
1 Strategies for Enrollment Enhancement September 24, 2007 Andreea M. Serban, Ph.D. Vice Chancellor, Technology and Learning Services SOCCCD Richard McCullough,
Online and Hybrid Course Design. Define Terms Traditional course Web Enhanced course Hybrid course Online course.
What are some of the instructional technologies available at MDC? ANGEL Interactive PowerPoint LMS Turnitin Video Resources Web 2.0 Lecture Capture.
2004 ASCCC Leadership Institute Curriculum and Technology Bob Grill, College of Alameda Mark Lieu, Ohlone College Academic Senate for California Community.
EDUCATION FOR THE FUTURE THOMAS E. DAY AET 515 JULY 30, 2012 MARTHA KENNEDY.
Increasing Success Rates in Online Learning Kathy Coleman, Chattahoochee Technical College.
Supporting Part Time Faculty with Online Learning Presented by Beverly Hartford, Susan Learney, Michael Crawford Seneca College of Applied Arts & Technology.
Maintaining a Quality Distance Education Program Andrea Henne, EdD Dean, Online and Distributed Learning District Instructional Services & Planning December.
Teaching and Learning with Technology lick to edit Master title style  Allyn and Bacon 2002 Teaching and Learning with Technology lick to edit Master.
Faculty Perceptions of Readiness to Teach Online.
Web-Based Delivery of the First Course in Power Electronics Amman – Jordan December Issa Batarseh School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
Integration of Distance Education to Support Learning.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Teaching and learning online: Perceptions of UAF Rural Campus Instructors Victor and Natalia Zinger UAF.
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
College Credit Plus Welcome Students and Parents to: Information Session.
1 Designing the HyFlex World Dr. Brian Beatty Instructional Technologies San Francisco State University AECT 2006.
Using Canvas Resources to manage REC, RSI, LDA, SLO
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Distance Learning Benchmarking
Carlos Lopez, Moreno Valley College, CIO
Presentation transcript:

Distance Education: Hybrid Courses CIO Conference October 2005

FOUR METHODS OF APPORTIONMENT FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION Weekly Census Regularly Scheduled, Coterminous with Primary Term Advantages: No positive attendance tracking; maximizes apportionment Disadvantage: Not compatible with “by arrangement” nature of DE courses Daily Census Regularly Scheduled, Not Coterminous with Primary Term Advantages and disadvantages: Same as for Weekly Census Positive Attendance Not Regularly Scheduled Advantage: Compatible with “by arrangement” nature of DE Disadvantage: Need to track and report online hours for students Independent Study Advantage: No need to track hours Disadvantage: Collects one WSCH per unit of credit

TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED INSTRUCTION Web-Enhanced Course is scheduled on campus; instructor uses web or Internet to post syllabus, class assignments. Not considered DE for apportionment Online Essentially all instruction is online; may be occasional campus meetings Considered DE for apportionment Hybrid Courses At least 51% instruction is online; remainder on campus Considered DE for apportionment

SCHEDULING HYBRID COURSES Fixed day/time for classroom component By arrangement hours for online component WC or DC apportionment methods: not possible because of online “by arrangement” hours PA: not practical to collect hours (unless web system permits online tracking) IS: will permit a fixed day/time component + by arrangement component

SCHEDULING FOR HYBRID COURSES (Lecture Courses Only) Apportionment Method: Distance Ed/Independent Study Collects one WSCH per Unit Credit.

SCHEDULING FOR HYBRID COURSES (Lecture Courses Only) Apportionment Method: Distance Ed/Independent Study Collects one WSCH per Unit Credit.

SCHEDULING FOR HYBRID COURSES (Lecture Courses Only) Apportionment Method: Distance Ed/Independent Study Collects one WSCH per Unit Credit.

ADVANTAGES OF HYBRID COURSES For Students Most DE students are local; work/family commitments require more flexibility Reduces student time on campus For Instructors Smaller commitment than a full DE course: encourages instructors to try distance education Provides classroom time for testing, face-to-face interaction Facilities Assists in room scheduling

SCHEDULE NARRATIVE (Ad) SAN DIEGO MESA COLLEGE Highlighting Computer Technology Many courses at San Diego Mesa College require students to use computer technology. These courses fall into three major categories.  Regular Campus-based Courses Courses taught on-campus where students write papers and/or carry out homework assignments using computer software or the web, and/or access the course syllabus and assignments online.

 Online Courses Courses taught online where the majority of instruction is provided via the web and/or SDCCD Online. The course may also have some irregularly scheduled meetings on campus for orientation, tests, etc.  Hybrid Courses Courses taught by blending on- campus meetings with online instruction. This type of course requires students to attend regularly scheduled meetings on-campus as well as receive instruction via the web and/or SDCCD Online. SCHEDULE NARRATIVE (Ad)

Hybrid courses having a majority of course work completed online are listed under the Online heading in the printed class schedule. These courses may also be found in the online schedule at under the choice of On- Line/Distance Education Classes. Students considering taking an online or online hybrid course are advised to take the Online Learning Readiness Assessment and to review the Online Student Orientation ( prior to registering to determine if they have the necessary technical and student skills to succeed with online learning. SCHEDULE NARRATIVE (Ad)

ISIS Comment for Hybrid Courses CRN XXXXX utilizes online instruction and regularly scheduled on-campus meetings. Online course instruction will be available at on the first day of class. Contact Prof. John Doe at for additional information. SCHEDULE NARRATIVE (Ad)

ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY 56 INSTITUTIONS REPORTED 53 campuses offer DE 50 do not target marketing of DE

FACULTY TRAINING Own initiative51 Flex sessions42 Accessibility training34 CVC regional center training18 DE Development manual16 Released time12 Funded Education ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY

COLLABORATION WITH OTHER COLLEGES No31 Yes ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY

DE STUDENTS COMMUNICATE WITH INSTRUCTORS VIA 55 Voice mail53 Face to face52 Internet52 Telephone49 Other ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY

RANKED MOST IMPORTANT FOR DEVELOPING, TEACHING AND DELIVERING DE COURSES #1 Student learning #2 Faculty training #3 Curriculum development / approval #4 Technical support Regular personal contact: student/faculty ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY

LOWER RANKED WERE Compensation Teaching load Articulation/Transfer State apportionment formula Institutional funding Equipment/facility Scheduling Class size Copy right/intellectual property right Help desk ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY

Faculty Selection Process For DE Same as campus-based courses54 Different 2 Cost-benefit Analysis Formal28 Informal28

ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY Start-Up Costs And Continuing Costs Same or Higher Equipment Technology support Faculty Development Curriculum/Course development (for Start Up) Course production Same Faculty salary Instructional supplies

ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY Degree Or Certificate in DE in No 37 Yes19

ANNUAL DISTANCE EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL SURVEY Implementation Cost For $10,000 or less in all categories Equipment replacement/upgrade Technology support Faculty development Instruction supply Curriculum/Course development On-line conversion Course production

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Type of Distance Education Class On-line301 Telecourse 26

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Majority Have taught an equivalent classroom-based class Have taught online 1-5 years Have taught this class online 1-5 years Training Self-study270 On-campus workshops255 On-line training219 Informal training from peer209

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Primary reasons they teach a DE class Convenience to students264 Expand students learning opportunities213 Challenge of new technology168 Media enhances learning105

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 One-on-one communication with DE More frequent Two-way Interactive communication Less frequent

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Primary types of materials Textbooks323 Syllabi309 Instructor-designed lessons280 Web-based materials268 Originally developed material227 Prepackaged lessons123

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 How satisfied with reliability of technology Very satisfied154 Mostly satisfied156 Satisfied 31 Dissatisfied 9 Very dissatisfied 2

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Barriers to implementation of effective distance education at your college Significant barriers Inadequate faculty compensation for development Insufficient time for development

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Barriers to implementation of effective distance education at your college Somewhat of a barrier Resistant faculty Technical support for students Technical support for faculty Compensation for teaching Unclear class size limits Disproportionate work load Insufficient technical training Insufficient pedagogical training Insufficient number of instructional technology designers

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Barriers to implementation of effective distance education at your college Little or no barrier Inadequate technology infrastructure Cost of technology Unresolved copyright/intellectual property issues

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Barriers to Student Success Significant barriers Self-motivation Time management skills Reading/writing skills

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Barriers to Student Success Somewhat of a barrier Technology skills Technology support Online student services Lack of face-to-face interaction Computer access at home Learning styles

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Compensation for online Yes 35 No317 Part of load246 Hourly adjustment 45 Release time 4 Combination 11 Other 11

FACULTY SURVEY STATEWIDE, SPRING 2005 Compensation for development Yes 88 No264 Release time 21 Part of load 14 Combination 8 Hourly stipend 2 Other 8