WTO, FTAs: Instruments of imperialist domination Launching Forum of NO DEAL! MOVEMENT AGAINST UNEQUAL AGREEMENTS Quezon City November 9, 2007 IBONFoundation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Globalization of Industrial Production : The case of the Electronics Industry and Its Environmental Impact Thanpuying Suthawan Sathirathai, Ph.D. Good.
Advertisements

Development Denied: JPEPA within AJCEPA IBON Foundation December 8, 2009.
Creation of WTO investment rules in the new round We strongly urge that investment rule negotiations be launched at the Fifth Ministerial in September.
Trade Agreements Unit 2 Activity 10. GATT - General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Each agreement was called a round Geneva Annecy Torquay Geneva II Dillon.
Trade Implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for ASEAN and Other Asian Countries Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan.
International and Regional Agreements Affecting Trade.
1 Chutima Bunyapraphasara Deputy Director-General Department of Trade Negotiations Free Trade Successes & Thailand Automotive Industry.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright  2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Five C h a p t e rC h a p t e r The Political Economy of International.
Short courses on key international economic issues for delegates from permanent missions in Geneva Trade agreements between developed and developing countries.
The Growth of Globalization  Since the end of WWII, world trade has grown much faster than world output  Openness Index = (Exports + Imports)/GNP  The.
التكتلات السياسية والإقتصادية العالمية والإقليمية
Regional Economic Integration in East Asia and Japan’s FTA Policy March, 2010 Shujiro URATA Waseda University.
Robert E. Scott Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Research Economic Policy Institute TRADE, JOBS AND U.S. MANUFACTURING The Effects of U.S. Trade.
The Political Economy Of Foreign Direct Investment
Country Study: China. An Overview Until recently, a fastest-growing economy in Asia (10%) After 1978, China opened its ‘iron door’ for market- oriented.
How Economic Integration Can Promote Inclusive Growth Lao PDR's Experience 12 November 2014 Leeber Leebouapao(Ph.D) Director Genral National Economic Research.
Latin America & East Asia Compared Lecture # 12 Week 6.
Free Trade Agreements  As the name indicates, this is an International Agreement to facilitate Free Trade among the countries signing the FTA.  Many.
The Political Economy of International Trade
THE WORLD BANK World Bank Group Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency 1 Investment Policy, Legal Framework, & Promotion Investment Facilitation Sector.
How can trade contribute to growth and jobs? The role of EU trade policy Signe Ratso Director Directorate General of Trade European Commission.
What Role for Peer Review in Fostering Regional Integration? - Comments - 1 st OECD - Southeast Asia Regional Forum Jakarta January 2007 Ki Fukasaku.
AUSTRALIA’S DOHA ROUND AGENDA. TODAY’S DISCUSSION  briefly, the WTO and Australia  what was decided at Doha  what has happened since Doha  Australia’s.
Free Trade Agreements: Helping U.S. Businesses Export.
Australia. Angus M Robinson Chief Executive, AEEMA WEF Panel on Trade 10 th World Electronics Forum, Washington DC 22 September 2004.
Services Negotiation in JTEPA and RCEP
1b. Emergence of modern SE Asian economies 0. 1 Overview Comparisons: the region in 1970 and 2008 Big events and their growth implications Growth and.
September 28, 2012 Expanding Market Opportunities Through Trade Policy: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Sushan Demirjian Deputy Assistant U.S.
ECIPE PRESENTATION » Natalia Macyra Trade Policy Analyst, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) Implications of the Transatlantic.
The Multilateral Trade System Lecture 17. Snapshot of U.S. Trade How Much? 1998: $1,587.4 Billion Imports and Exports of Goods and Services 1998 GDP $8,760.0.
1 U.S. and the WTO: overview Washington, DC, February 13,
Japan’s FTAs/EPAs with APEC Economies Nobuhiko Sasaki Deputy Director-General APEC Senior Official METI Japan March 2006.
Brazil-Japan: Roadmap for an Economic Partnership Agreement Keidanren
Chapter 6: The United States in the Global Economy
ICTSD/IDRC Symposium ‘Rationalising Regional Arrangements In The South – Before and After Hong Kong’ Towards A Framework For Amalgamation Of East Asia.
U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement Launched in November 2002, most important formal advance in U.S.- Australian relations since ANZUS Treaty Bush/Howard.
The Global Economic Environment Global Marketing.
National Seminar on Intellectual Property and its Impact on Economic Development The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting International Trade and.
Globalization, Trade, Investment, and Environment Session Objectives: l Debate risks and opportunities of economic globalization l Identify SD requirements.
Future Development of Asian Electronics Industry May 17, 2004 Japan Electronics & Information Technology Industries Association.
Mega FTA in East Asia for Regional Economic Integration: RCEP and TPP
1 Lecture 2 International Trade Hyun-Hoon Lee Professor Kangwon National University.
Dynamic Economic Growth in the Asia Pacific Region
International Trade - Basics. Why trade? All trade is voluntary People trade because they believe that they will be better off by trading Allows for Specialization.
1 Regional Integration Regional trade agreements (RTAs) References Hill, C W “International Business” (6th edit., 2007), Chapter 9 Ball, D et al. “International.
Policies Aimed at Raising the Income of the Poor Text extracted from: The World Food Problem Leathers & Foster, 2004
Risks of New Global Downturn: Impact on Asia and Response  Lim Mah Hui (Michael)  State of the Global Economy, and Reflections on Recent Multilateral.
Europe in the World economy. Europe in the world economy The EU is the world’s largest trading block in 2014 for both goods and services. BUT European.
Chapter 10: International Cooperation Among Nations International Business, 4 th Edition Griffin & Pustay.
UNIT 7 REVIEW GAME International Trade Basics Free Trade & Protectionism Globalization Issues The United Nations & Internationalism
European business in a global context – the developed world.
MONTENEGRO  Population (census 2011)  Surface km2  Border length 614 km (coast length 293 km)  Administrative Capital Podgorica (185.
Trade Agreements. Free Trade Vs. Protectionism Free Trade: when government put in place policies that allow producers from overseas nations to freely.
WAN WADRINA WAN ABDUL WAHAB MINISTRY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INDUSTRY MALAYSIA RCEP 1 IMPACT ON EAST ASIA INVESTMENT.
EU-Indonesia Trade Cooperation Facility Module 2: EU as a negotiating partner Trends of EC trade negotiations 29 September
Economic Growth and Development in South Korea Key Macro Data (2015) Latest annual GDP Growth (%) 3.7% GDP or GNI per capita (US $, PPP) $33K Inflation.
Economic Cooperation between Taiwan and the Philippines – State of Play and Prospects The 22nd Joint Meeting of Chinese-Philippine & Philippine-Chinese.
LEGABEX 2 ND Term SY DLS – St. Benilde.
10-1 Chapter 10: International Cooperation Among Nations International Business, 4 th Edition Griffin & Pustay.
Korea-EU FTA - Implications for Global Businesses - - Implications for Global Businesses Korea-EU FTA - Implications for Global Businesses - -
“…global multinationals have … viewed developing Asia [countries]…as an offshore-production platform. The offshore- efficiency solution is still an attractive.
International Investment Law (12) ZHANG Jiao
Research Center For China-EU Economic Cooperation (CCEEC), UIBE
International Trade Theories
Global Manufacturing – India
International Trade, Foreign Capital Flow and Aid in Development
The Political Economy Of Foreign Direct Investment
Will membership in TPP really help Japan?
7.5 Analyze the economic indicators of the business cycle
2019 ASSA Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA. January 4-6, 2019
Presentation transcript:

WTO, FTAs: Instruments of imperialist domination Launching Forum of NO DEAL! MOVEMENT AGAINST UNEQUAL AGREEMENTS Quezon City November 9, 2007 IBONFoundation

Philippine poverty and backwardness Widespread poverty Worsening inequality Agricultural and industrial backwardness Overly reliant on cheap labor export, foreign capital- and debt

Filipinos aspire and struggle for development For: –true agrarian reform –genuine national industrialization Against: –imperialist domination of the economy exploiting cheap labor, plundering natural resources and dominating our markets –exploitative international economic deals multilateral WTO agreements bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs), regional trade agreements (RTAs), economic partnership agreements (EPAs) Go far beyond just “trade”Go far beyond just “trade”  also investment, services, competition policy, intellectual property rights, labor, govt procurement, dispute settlement…

(1) FTAs deny us essential policies for development To build domestic economy we need: Trade protection against imports  to give local producers the opportunity to develop –Tariff/non-tariff barriers… Foreign investment controls  to ensure benefits from FDI –Equity requirements, domestic content, local hiring, technology transfer…

(1) FTAs deny us essential policies for development Policies affirmed by historical experience: Used by all First World countries when they were developing –Britain, France, Germany, US, Japan… (19 th century-1950s) Used by handful of Third World countries which made any sort of economic progress –South Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia… (1960s-1980/90s) Used by Socialist countries –Russia (1917+), China (1949+)

(2) FTAs impose policies that have already severely damaged the economy Philippines has been actively liberalizing trade and investment since the 1980s/90s –IMF-WB impositions, WTO agreements… Arguably the most liberalized country in Southeast Asia… and also one of its poorest performing

(2) FTAs impose policies that have already severely damaged the economy Trade doubled as percentage of GDP : –52% (1980)  105% (2005) Foreign investment quadrupled as percentage of GDP: –4% (1980)  14% (2005) YET: Record sustained joblessness : –Unemplt 8% (1980)  ~11% ( ) –12 million Filipinos looking for work/additional work (2006)  OFW export De-industrialization and shrinking manufacturing –Share in GDP: 26% (1980)  23%(2005) –Share in employment (11%  9%) Falling food production per capita, rising agricultural trade deficits

JPEPA is unequal, defeatist and destructive 1.Grossly unequal –Backward Philippines gives up much more than advanced Japan –Philippines’ deal worse than negotiated by Malaysia and Indonesia Protected trade products Protected investment sectors Japan239 items16 sectors Philippines2 items5 sectors Malaysia (2005)38 items17+ sectors (plus Bumiputera policy) Indonesia (2007)835 items40+ sectors

JPEPA is unequal, defeatist and destructive 2.Defeatist –Surrenders Philippine policy sovereignty, prevents support for Filipino producers National Treatment, Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) Treatment, prohibition of “performance requirements” on investments –Unprecedented protection for Japanese investors. “Investment” = FDI, portfolio investment + intellectual property, contractual rights, tax breaks (“taxation as expropriation”) –Note: JPEPA includes “Singapore Issues” already rejected at WTO for being anti-developmental

JPEPA is unequal, defeatist and destructive 3.Destructive –JPEPA drastically restricts the Philippines’ policy options: precedent-setting vis-à-vis Japan and sets a dangerous benchmark for other FTAs Note: Handful of FTAs makes WTO virtually redundant, where Japan + EU + US + Greater China + ASEAN = ~90% of country’s intl trade and investment –Job losses in auto/auto parts assembly and iron/steel sectors, fisheries… toxic waste imports… commodification of nurses/careworkers… –+ Millions of jobs that will never be created because of stifled domestic development

NO Deal! stands for democratic governance, economic sovereignty and building the national economy NO Deal! supports economic relations based on equality and mutual benefit NO Deal! rejects all unequal trade agreements which further undermine our already devastated economy –JPEPA, EU-ASEAN, RP-US, RP- China…

Maraming salamat!