Cross Town Improvement Project. Performance Metrics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Advertisements

Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
CROSS TOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Randy Butler – FHWA.
New Orleans Intra-City Truck Freight Study Talking Freight Seminar April 19th 2005 Karen Parsons New Orleans Regional Planning Commission Eulois Cleckley.
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Freight Advanced Traveler Information Systems and Cross Town Improvement Project Randy Butler January 18, 2012 Freight Dynamic Mobility Applications.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Cross Town Improvement Project Randy W. Butler Transportation Specialist US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Freight Transportation in the Upper Midwest Transportation Border Working Group Calgary, Alberta Mr. Travis Gordon Midwest Regional University Transportation.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. C-TIP Evaluation Results and Lessons Learned Talking Freight.
Cross Town Improvement Project Michael P. Onder Team Leader, Freight Operations and Technology US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
CHRIS GUTIERREZ President KC SmartPort, Inc. December 8, 2009.
Detroit Intermodal Freight Terminal Michigan Department of Transportation Gloria J. Jeff, Director Michigan Department of Transportation.
1. 2 A Smarter Supply Chain Using Information & Communications Technology to Increase Productivity in the Australian Transport & Logistics Industry Rocky.
Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.
Electronic Freight Manifest Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Kate Hartman Technical Lead: Mike Onder, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
1 IFTWG Overview Project Selection and Cost Benefit Analysis Michael P. Onder, Team Leader Office of Freight Management and Operations USDOT-FHWA CVFM.
Talking Freight April 15, General Themes Seen in Reauthorization Proposals/Positions Defining a federal role in freight and goods movement given.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
GeoResources Institute Spatial Technologies for Freight Transportation Efficiency, Planning, and Safety Chuck O’Hara, Ph.D. Associate.
Kansas City Cross Town Improvement Project (C-TIP) Summary A Public Private Partnership June 21, 2006 IFTWG Intermodal Freight Technology Working Group.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Cross-Town Improvement Project Project Update Ron Schaefer January 20, 2009.
Dark Light Dark Light Accent Accent Accent Accent
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
1 C-TIP Real Time Traffic Monitoring (RTTM) and Dynamic Route Guidance (DRG) Talking Freight Seminar November 17, 2010 Paul Belella In association with:
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
The Crescent Corridor Intermodal Freight Project Improving Lives and Livelihoods IN & AROUND DC Washington, DC December 16,
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
© 2012 Veritec Solutions Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. Potential Synergies from Positive Train Control Bruce Patty Vice President – Transportation.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Cross Town Improvement Project Randy W. Butler Transportation Specialist US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight.
Traffic Monitoring Guide 2012 Update May 9, 2013 DBP Roadway Transportation Data Business Plan presented to Data Palooza U.S. Department of Transportation.
Talking Freight Presentation C-TIP Vantage Overview November 17, 2010.
Security and the National ITS Architecture ITS America 2003 Session 19: The State of the Practice: ITS and Homeland Security May 19, 2003 Minneapolis,
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
FHWA Office of Freight Management Freight Technology Assessment Tool.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Project Overview I – 70 Dedicated Truck Lanes Update: 3/19/2008 For FHWA Talking Freight Webinar Keith J. Bucklew Indiana Dept. of Transportation.
Cross Town Improvement Project Randy W. Butler Transportation Specialist US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight.
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
Congestion Mitigation Through Improved Freight Efficiency: Partnering with Business for a Positive Solution Paul A. Belella Principal Delcan Corporation.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
Cross-Town Improvement Project (C-TIP) Ron Schaefer Program Manager Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
USDOT’s IntelliDrive Program Smart Roadside Initiative – How it Fits.
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Driver Violation Notification Study Presentation to: ITS America CVFM Homeland Security SIG Presented by: Jeff Secrist Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
State of ITS Industry in a Time of Change Session Annual Meeting of TRB Christine M. Johnson.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
ITS P ROGRAM O VERVIEW JEFFREY F. PANIATI ITS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE.
AASHTO CV/AV RESEARCH NCHRP (98) NCHRP
C-TIP Real Time Traffic Monitoring (RTTM) and Dynamic Route Guidance (DRG) January 20, 2010 Paul Belella In association with:
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to ITS Virginia Annual Meeting presented by Dan Krechmer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 19, 2016 Los.
University of Wisconsin – Madison Memphis Overview Dan Pallme, Acting Director Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute University of Memphis 10/26/2012.
MAP 21 Freight Talking Freight December 14, 2011 Leo Penne AASHTO.
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Presentation transcript:

Cross Town Improvement Project

Performance Metrics

Cross Town Improvement Project (C-TIP) Problem Statement The inefficiency of cross-town rubber tire interchanges creates conditions that adversely impact: –Congestion –Efficiency of the transportation network –Safety of the motoring public –Environment of neighboring communities –Energy consumption

Cross Town Improvement Project (C-TIP) Background Truck-borne “rubber tire” interchanges are used: –When steel wheel rail-to-rail interchanges are not possible –To save time (steel wheel rail-to-rail interchanges often take 2-3 days) –When service criteria for cutoff connection not met –When railroads have car shortages or don’t want to relinquish scarce assets Interchange of this traffic must occur, often in metropolitan areas –Truck to rail (near ports) –Rail to truck to rail (rail interchanges)

Cross Town Improvement Project (C-TIP) Goal To develop and deploy an information sharing / transfer capability that enables the coordination of moves between parties to Maximize loaded moves and Eliminate unproductive moves.

6 C-TIP Congestion Mitigation Because C-TIP is intended to reduce empty trips, it will be an important congestion mitigation tool A travel demand management analysis conducted for Kansas City indicates C-TIP has the potential to: –Reduce intermodal freight trips by 40% –Provide benefits that are equivalent to removing nearly 300,000 personal vehicle trips annually –Reduce annual truck VMT by more than 3.7 million In the Chicago metropolitan area C-TIP could result in a reduction of nearly 2 million truck trips annually, with a passenger car equivalent of an annual reduction of 5.85 million trips

7 Current Cross-Town/Local Delivery Worst Case: 1 delivery requires 6 trips Trip 1: Truck 1 from Truck Terminal 1 to Rail Terminal 1 (bobtail); Trip 2: Truck 1 from Rail Terminal 1 to Rail Terminal 2 OR Local Delivery (loaded); Trip 3: Truck 1 from Rail Terminal 2/Local Delivery to Rail Terminal 1 (bobtail); Trip 4: Truck 2 from Truck Terminal 2 to Rail Terminal 2 (bobtail); Trip 5: Truck 2 from Rail Terminal 2 to Rail Terminal 1 (chassis repositioning); and Trip 6: Truck 2 from Rail Terminal 1 to Rail Terminal 2 (bobtail).

C-TIP Performance Metrics Potential Weekly Trip Reductions 8 Trucking Company Weekly Cross- Town Loads Moved Current Weekly Trips Required 1 (80 percent bobtail to Terminal) Total Weekly Trips Post-C-TIP 2 (50 percent bobtail to Terminal) Percent Change: Pre- versus Post-C-TIP Trip Reduction – percentage of total trips reduced Truck Trips Eliminated per Week Greer % 144 Mid Cities % 60 ITS % 36 Total %240 Weekly Local Deliveries Current Weekly Trips Required 1 (80 percent bobtail to Terminal) Total Weekly Trips Post-C-TIP 2 (50 percent bobtail to Terminal) Percent Change: Pre- versus Post-C-TIP Trip Reduction – percentage of total trips reduced Truck Trips Eliminated per Week 1,4004,4802, %1,680 Cross-Town Trips Local Delivery Trips

C-TIP Performance Metrics Potential Congestion Mitigation 9 Total Trip Reduction VMT Reduction Weekly Cross- Towns Trips Eliminated Weekly Local Delivery Trips Eliminated Total Weekly Trips Eliminated Total Annual Truck Trips Eliminated Annual Passenger Car Trips Eliminated (using passenger car equivalent) 2401,6801,92099,840299,520 Total Annual Truck Trips Eliminated Total Annual VMT Reduction Annual Passenger Car VMT Eliminated (using passenger car equivalent) 99,8401,248,0003,744,000 Estimates based on: One-way Trip Length = 12.5 mile average trip length (ref: C-TIP baseline data, 2005) Trip Equivalent = 3 car trips/truck trip (ref: Highway Capacity Manual)

Benefit-Cost Analysis

Cost/Benefit Analysis Work in process… Functional requirements are being defined Reengaging stakeholders Technical design underway Cost/Benefit analysis to be defined

Technology Overview

C-TIP Components Intermodal Move Exchange (IMEX) –Facilitate exchange of load data and carrier availability –Provide collaboration between railroads, terminal operators and trucking companies Wireless Drayage Updating (WDU) –Provide the distribution of information to drivers regarding load assignments, delivery instructions, traffic congestion, etc. –Supports two-way communications and incorporation of location-based services

C-TIP Components (cont.) Chassis Utilization Tracking (CUT) –Track/manage use of intermodal chassis equipment –Facilitate chassis pool management –Maintain usage statistics Real-Time Traffic Monitoring (RTTM) –Provide up-to-the-minute roadway conditions, travel speeds, predicted travel time, etc. –Incorporate use of KC Scout system of roadway sensors for traffic status information to support dispatch and driver decision processes

C-TIP Status Completed Activities –Mapping of “AS-IS” business processes complete –Technology assessment complete –Partner Operation Coalition complete –Concept of Operations Completed –Case Study on how C-TIP will effect Congestion Mitigation Completed –Funding secured

C-TIP Application Development Status Initial prototype application being redeployed into EFM architecture –Complete in December ’08 –Leveraged/reused some CEFM pilot code –Data exchange information flowing from UP, BNSF, and NS C-TIP functional requirements and use cases completed in December ’08 for all components First deployment of IMEX module expected in July ’09 Future C-TIP components deployed through 2010

C-TIP Functional Architecture

Methodology for Commercialization

Methodology to Commercialization Define business model Identify support roles for technology provider Install/implement Registry and Enterprise Service Bus Leverage existing pilot software and services Locate business partners/customers for implementation Determine ongoing support roles for technology provider and business partners

C-TIP Project Partners Mid-America Regional Council (MPO) Kansas DOT, Missouri DOT Kansas City Scout 4 Class I Railroads - UP, BNSF, NS and KCS 3 Trucking (drayage) firms. Kansas City SmartPort, Inc. Intermodal Freight Technology Working Group (IFTWG)

C-TIP Support “The Mid-America Regional Council recognizes the significant benefits that CTIP, in concert with Kansas City SmartPort and other strategic freight management initiatives, offers the Kansas City region. These include improved truck safety, better traffic flow and air quality while enhancing our region’s economic competitiveness as national freight distribution center. Through a rigorous and competitive application process, MARC selected CTIP for an award of $200,000 from the 2009 Congestion Mitigation Air Quality program. – Ron Achelpohl, Assistant Director of Transportation, MARC.”