Update on DOE’s National Waste Disposition Plans Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Logistics and Waste Disposition Enhancements Office of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation of the Record of Decision for Low-Level and Mixed Low-Level Waste Presentation to the National Governors’ Association Federal Facility Task.
Advertisements

1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Progress on Cleanup of the INL Site for the INL Retired Employees Association Bob Iotti, President and CEO September 2008.
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
1 GAO Study on Radioactive Waste Management Scenarios Ric Cheston US Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Safety  performance  cleanup  closure M E Environmental Management National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Role in DOE’s Transformation Barb Beller, Project.
National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Meeting April 14, 2009 Stephen O’Connor, Director Office of Packaging and Transportation.
Making a Difference American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Thursday, February 25, 2010 Thomas Johnson, Jr. Deputy Director, EM Recovery Act Office of Environmental.
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
TRU Waste Processing Center Culture and Successful Implementation of an ISO Certified Environmental Management System Presented at the DOE ISM Conference.
Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Disposition Discussion Meeting of the National Governors’ Association April 12, 2001 U. S. Department of Energy.
Capabilities & Competencies An Introduction to EnergySolutions September 19, 2007 Scott Baskett Erik Vogeley.
Overview of a Developing Data System and Future Data Call Needs Douglas Tonkay Office of Commercial Disposition Options June 22, 2005.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
1 presented to National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force National Transportation Program: A Policy Perspective J. Kent Hancock, Director.
National Low-Level/Mixed Low-Level Waste Disposition Strategy Christine Gelles Director, Office of Commercial Disposition Options Office of Environmental.
One Project. One Team. One Goal.
Current DOE Efforts in Nuclear Materials Management Patrice M. Bubar Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Integration and Disposition (EM-20)
Waste Management Working Group CTMA Point Clear, AL W. T. (Sonny) Goldston EnergySolutions Working Group Chair July 6 - 9, 2015.
1 Roger Butler Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Planning, and Budget August 25 & 27, 2003 Office of Environmental Management FY2004 Budget Office.
1 Avoiding Gridlock: Obstacles to Waste Disposition Intergovernmental Group Meeting with DOE Hilton Crystal City – Arlington, VA December 9, 2004 Prepared.
1 Idaho Cleanup Project Extension Work Transportation Accomplishments M. Shawn Tigue July 2015.
M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure The U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Intergovernmental Meeting.
Update on Procurement Opportunities and Acquisition Process
An Update on the EM Waste Disposition Christine Gelles Office of Disposal Operations Office of Regulatory Compliance Office of Environmental Management.
National Cleanup Workshop Managing Large Capital Projects Ken Picha Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material.
Office of National Transportation Update Presented to: Spent Fuel Project Office Presented by: Gary Lanthrum, Director Office of National Transportation.
Retrieval and Treatment of Problematic MLLW Streams Renee Echols Senior Vice President CTMA Partners in Progress, July 7, 2015.
EM Budget--- Past/Present/Future Mark W. Frei U.S. Department of Energy October 14, 2005.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science The Office of Science Role in Environmental Cleanup Dr. James.
INL SNF PROGRAM presented to National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Technical Exchange Meeting November 8 - 9, 2005 Washington, DC presented by R. O. Ramsey.
LLW/MLLW National Disposition Strategy Gary R. Peterson, P.E. U.S. Dept. of Energy.
Environmental Management Review of Corporate Projects.
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Program Status National Governors’ Association Meeting May 17, 2002 Alton D. Harris, III.
Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order Workshop 26 February, 2003.
Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Compliance Environmental Management May 23, Federal Facility Task Force Meeting Update.
Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Compliance Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management.
FIMS/Real Estate Workshop Palm Springs, CA June 2-6, 2008 DOE Oak Ridge Office Rebecca Whitehead.
DOE’s “New” National Strategy for Waste Management Christine Gelles Director, Commercial Disposition Options, EM-12 Office of Environmental Management.
 closure E M Environmental Management  cleanup  performance safety STRATEGY MEETING NATIONAL SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL PROGRAM Bringing Innovation to Spent.
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
The Yucca Mountain Repository for Nuclear Waste June Edward F. Sproat III Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department.
Waste Management Working Group FY2016 EFCOG Winter Workshop Renee Echols Perma-Fix Environmental Services Working Group Vice Chair Jan 26, 2016.
Update to National Governors’ Association Patty Bubar Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Integration and Disposition May 16, 2002.
The Challenge of Getting What You Asked For Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented By: Patrice McEahern HNF
Program Manager’s Review Joe Christy September 19, 2005.
November 8, 2005 Mark Arenaz Headquarters SNF/HLW Integration Meeting.
1 Energy Communities Alliance Meeting WIPP Recovery and Greater-than-Class C Disposal Update February 17, 2016.
February 26 – March 1, 2012 ♦ Phoenix, Arizona Session # 90 Long–Term Stewardship at DOE’s Hanford Site Abstract #12575 Authors & Affiliation : Rick Moren:
Federal Facilities Task Force Meeting, June 21-22, 2005 EM BUDGET UPDATE Mark Frei, DAS Business Operations Safe for the Workers, Protective of.
August 28, Waste Inventory Records Keeping Systems United States of America Douglas Tonkay U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC Office of Commercial.
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Office of Environmental Management Presentation to Regulators March 6, 2009 Cynthia V. Anderson, EM Recovery Act Program.
Savannah River Site Watch Columbia, South Carolina
Waste Management Working Group FY2016 EFCOG Annual Meeting Sonny Goldston Atkins Global Working Group Chair June 7, 2016.
State of the DOE’s Environmental Management Program Update on DOE’s Waste Disposition Strategy Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of.
Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Disposition at the
Transportation in Environmental Cleanup
Shipping to WIPP Travis R. Myers 5/24/17 GV ppt.
Overview of Waste Disposition Activities Spring 2017 LLW Forum Meeting
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
Overview of Waste Disposition Activities Fall 2017 LLW Forum Meeting
Nuclear Waste Storage Current Status and Plans
Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Update
Waste Disposition 2006 Intergovernmental Meeting with DOE
West Valley Demonstration Project Status Update
Status of Disposal Capabilities for Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste Theresa J. Kliczewski GTCC EIS Document Manager Office of.
U.S. Department of Energy Perspectives on Waste Classification
Presentation transcript:

Update on DOE’s National Waste Disposition Plans Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Logistics and Waste Disposition Enhancements Office of Environmental Management 2005 Intergovernmental Meeting with DOE November 8, 2005

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer Discussion Outline  DOE Waste Management Policy, Plans and Assets  National Disposition Strategies  Program Updates

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer Overview of DOE Disposition Efforts  Majority of waste disposition efforts within DOE are responsibility of Environmental Management (EM) — Major waste management facilities managed by EM — Planned transfer of cleanup activities at NNSA sites will not occur in FY 2006  EM project is well defined with controlled scope, cost and schedule  EM scope includes remediation and processing of approximately: – 25 tons of plutonium – 108 tons of plutonium residues – 88 million gallons of radioactive liquid waste – 2,500 tons of spent nuclear fuel – 137,000 cubic meters of transuranic waste – 1.3 million cubic meters of low-level waste – 324 nuclear facilities, 3,300 industrial facilities, hundreds of radiological facilities

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer DOE/EM Waste Management Policy (DOE Order 435.1)  LLW and MLLW:  If practical, disposal on the site at which it is generated  If on site disposal not available, at another DOE disposal facility  At commercial disposal facilities if compliant, cost effective, and in best interest of the Department  TRU waste:  If defense TRU, disposed at Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, New Mexico  If non-defense TRU, safe storage awaiting future disposition  HLW and SNF  Stabilization, if necessary, and safe storage until geologic disposal is available

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer  Multiple onsite disposal cells (mostly CERCLA) for site- specific remediation wastes  Two regional LLW/MLLW disposal facilities – Hanford and Nevada Test Site (NTS)  Hanford currently limited to onsite LLW and MLLW  NTS currently limited to regional LLW operations; regional MLLW disposal operations to begin in FY 2006  National repository for defense TRU waste – WIPP (Carlsbad, NM)  TSCA Incinerator (Oak Ridge, TN)  However, EM also disposes of large volumes of LLW and MLLW at commercial facilities DOE’s Waste Management Assets

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer  Ensure disposition paths are identified for all EM waste and materials  Provide and coordinate disposition resources  Optimize operations of DOE’s waste management facilities  Improve EM’s transportation infrastructure and ensuring all shipments are completed safely and compliantly  Identify opportunities for acceleration and efficiency  Respond to dynamic circumstances  Address “gridlock” and obstacles National disposition strategies

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer  Provide discipline, formality, and structure  Document, at a complex-wide level, the scope, schedule and cost of waste disposition efforts  Built for each major waste type — LLW/MLLW (includes Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) and by- product material) — Transuranic waste (TRU) — Spent nuclear fuel (SNF) — High level waste (HLW) — Special nuclear materials (SNM) — Other waste types  Details tailored for each type, according to project complexity and risk National strategies are project management tools

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer Integration is focus of the EM-10 organization  Developing national strategies – business cases – for transportation and waste/material disposition  Integrating sites’ parallel efforts to accelerate cleanup  Enabling and improving on baseline plans Deputy Asst. Secretary for Logistics and Waste Disposition Enhancements Frank Marcinowski Transportation Dennis Ashworth Federal Disposition Options Cynthia Anderson Commercial Disposition Options Christine Gelles TRU, SNF, HLW, SNM, GTCC, LLW, MLLW, 11e2 Most wastes/materials

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer Disposition accomplishments in FY 2005  Significantly increased volumes disposed while reducing transportation incident rate — Transportation incident rate 35% below FY 2004 rate! — Record volumes of LLW disposed at DOE and commercial facilities  Completed TRU waste and MLLW shipments from Rocky Flats  Completed TRU waste shipments from Mound (to SRS)  Completed removal of all legacy TRU waste from Brookhaven National Laboratory and U.S. Army Material Command  Resolved large quantities of “orphan wastes” at closure sites –Identified commercial receiver sites for Fernald Silo residues –Identified alternative receiver site(s) for remaining TRU waste at Battelle Columbus Laboratory

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer  In FY 2004, EM had 23 reported off-site incidents. — Most significant incident was the release of radioactive material onto road surfaces at Oak Ridge (penalties assessed against subcontractor) — Other areas of concern -- load securement and shipping paper violations  In FY 2005, EM had 16 reported incidents — Each incident is reviewed — Corrective actions and lessons learned shared among sites Transportation safety is critical – and is improving!

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer Program Updates  Off-site waste shipments to Hanford remain suspended  LLW shipments to Nevada Test Site continue, and MLLW shipments expected to begin in early 2006  TRU waste shipments to WIPP continue — Panel 2 recently closed — Most resources support shipments from Idaho National Laboratory — Nevada Test Site TRU shipments to complete by end of calendar year 2005 — Savannah River Site shipping 2 to 4 per week — Hanford shipping 3 to 4 shipments per week — LANL currently making 2 to 3 shipment per week — Inter-site shipments (to Savannah River Site) — Shipments of Battelle Columbus began last month — Mound rail shipments completed in August 2005

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer Program Updates  HLW vitrification continues at Savannah River Site; construction of the Waste Treatment Plant at Richland continues  Several waste determinations (per Section 3116 of the National Defense Authorization Act) are in NRC review or development  Spent nuclear fuel remains in consolidated, safe storage at three sites  EM’s inventory of excess special nuclear materials safely stored awaiting future disposition decisions

BACKUP INFO

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer EM transportation performance is monitored vigilantly  EM monitors many aspects of transportation –Any suspected or confirmed Hazmat spill –Any injury (either outpatient, first aide, minor injury, hospitalization, or fatality) –Any property damage to the transport vehicle or package –Any fines or violations –Any package damage or load securement problem –Any route deviation (for TRANSCOM-monitored shipments) or security breach –Any road closure or public evacuation –Any local or national media coverage

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer WIPP Accomplishments to Date  Since March 1999, approximately 32,763m 3 ) of contact-handled TRU waste shipped and disposed at WIPP.  Over 4,052 truck shipments from 8 sites to WIPP — RFPO, SRS, INL, LANL, RL, ANL- E, LLNL, NTS  Thirteen small quantity sites completed (Teledyne-Brown, ARCO, Energy Technology Engineering Center, Missouri University Research Reactor, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, U.S. Army Material Command, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Mound Site, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory-Nuclear Fuel Systems (TN), Fernald Closure Project; for Argonne National Laboratory-East and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, removed legacy TRU only Information as of Departure of Final RFETS Shipment

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer Total Transuranic (TRU) Waste Shipments By Site Total shipments as of 11/07/05 2, ,013 4,

Office of Environmental Management Safe for the Workers, Protective of the Environment, and Respectful of the Taxpayer DOE’s Waste Disposal Facility Configuration Hanford Pantex Plant Rocky Flats Brookhaven Knolls Princeton (PPPL) Savannah River Oak Ridge ITRI General Atomics ETEC Sandia SLAC LBNL LEHR LLNL Ames RMI ANL-E Fermi Portsmouth Paducah Mound BCL Bettis Kansas City ANL-W NTS INL CERCLA Disposal Facility Fernald Regional Disposal Facility DOE Generator Site (no on-site disposal facility) LLW Operations Disposal Facility MLLW Operations Disposal Facility MLLW Operations Disposal Facility (currently on-site waste only) Legend Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) LANL Sandia WIPP West Valley Planned geologic repository

Major DOE Radioactive Waste Transfers (includes commercial facilities) Shipment lines do not portray actual transportation routes. This map is not inclusive of all past or planned shipments. DOE Generator Site (no on-site disposal facility)DOE Offsite Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (NTS and Hanford are also generator sites and dispose of some waste onsite) DOE Offsite Radioactive Waste Treatment Facility Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (Note: Envirocare also treats waste) DOE Onsite Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Nevada Test Site Lawrence Livermore Hanford Yucca Mtn (proposed) Envirocare Rocky Flats Idaho National Lab Waste Control Specialists Savannah River Los Alamos West Valley Brookhaven Oak Ridge Paducah Portsmouth Mound Fernald To Nevada Test Site To Envirocare To Yucca Mtn To Hanford Transuranic Waste Disposal ShipmentLow-Level Waste/Mixed Low-Level Waste Disposal ShipmentSpent Nuclear Fuel/High-Level Waste Disposal Shipment Commercial Radioactive Waste Treatment Facility Permafix To Oak Ridge Treatment Low-Level Waste/Mixed Low-Level Waste Treatment Shipment Permafix Pacific EcoSolutions Argonne Transuranic Waste Processing/Storage ShipmentSpent Nuclear Fuel Storage, Treatment, or Repackaging Shipment Columbus To Waste Isolation Pilot Plant To Permafix From Naval Reactor sites located in several states Stanford Linear Accelerator Princeton Fermi

Major DOE Radioactive Waste Transfers (includes commercial facilities) Waste exports from DOE Generator Sites are shown in the incoming shipment boxes for the treatment and disposal facilities. This map is not inclusive of all past or planned shipments. Incoming Waste Shipment Outgoing Waste Shipment EXHIBIT B Lawrence Livermore National Lab (LLNL) Stanford Linear Accelerator Lab (SLAC) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Nevada Test Site (NTS) Hanford MLLW/LLW from ANL-E, BNL, Fermi, Hanford, INL, Naval Reactor Sites, Paducah, Portsmouth, PPPL, RF, SLAC, and SR for disposal [Naval Reactor sites are located in several states and are not shown on map] TRU from Columbus for processing/storage SNF and HLW to Yucca Mtn for disposal SNF to INL for storage TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW to PEcoS, Permafix, and OR for treatment SNF from Hanford, OR, and WV, and D/FRR for storage, treatment, or repackaging M/LLW from INL for disposal HLW, SNF, and D/FRR to Yucca Mtn for disposal TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW/LLW to Envirocare, Hanford, and NTS for disposal MLLW to PEcoS, Permafix, and OR for treatment Yucca Mtn (proposed) HLW and SNF from Hanford, INL, SR, and WV, and D/FRR for disposal Envirocare MLLW/LLW from ANL-E, BNL, Columbus, Fermi, Fernald, INL, LANL, LLNL, Mound, Paducah, Portsmouth, OR, RF, SLAC, SR, and WV for treatment and/or disposal Rocky Flats (RF) Idaho National Lab (INL) MLLW to OR for treatment TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW/LLW from ANL-E, Fernald, INL, LANL, LLNL, Mound, NTS, Paducah, Portsmouth, PPPL, OR, RF, SR, and WV for disposal TRU from ANL-E. BNL, Hanford, INL, LANL, LLNL, NTS, OR, RF, SR, and WV for disposal Waste Control Specialists MLLW from RF for treatment SNF from OR and D/FRR for storage, treatment, or repackaging TRU from Mound for processing/storage LLW from SR and Naval Reactors for disposal HLW and SNF to Yucca Mtn for disposal TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW/LLW to Envirocare, Hanford, and NTS for disposal MLLW to OR for treatment Savannah River (SR) Los Alamos National Lab (LANL) West Valley (WV) Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) MLLW from Fernald, Hanford, INL, LLNL, NTS, OR, Paducah, Portsmouth, RF, and SR for treatment MLLW/LLW from OR for disposal SNF to INL and SR for storage, treatment, or repackaging TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW/LLW to Envirocare and NTS, for disposal Oak Ridge (OR) Paducah Portsmouth Mound Fernald Argonne National Lab-East (ANL-E) Pacific EcoSolutions (PEcoS) MLLW from Hanford, INL, and RF for treatment MLLW from INL and RF for treatment Permafix MLLW from Hanford, INL, LLNL, RF, and SR for treatment DOE Generator Site (no on-site disposal facility)DOE Off-site Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (NTS and Hanford are also generator sites and dispose of some waste on-site) DOE Off-site Waste Treatment Facility DOE On-site Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility Low-Level Waste (LLW) Mixed Low-Level Waste (MLLW) High-Level Waste (HLW) Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF)Domestic/Foreign Research Reactor Fuel (D/FRR) Transuranic Waste (TRU) Commercial Radioactive Waste Treatment Facility Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (Note: Envirocare also treats waste) Columbus Princeton Plasma Physics Lab (PPPL) Fermi National Accelerator Lab