LESSON PLANNING: COMMON CHALLENGES Saturday April 14, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
Sue Sears Sally Spencer Nancy Burstein OSEP Directors’ Conference 2013
More is not better… Better is better
Pennsylvania Department of Education Get R. Pennsylvania Department of Education Presented By: June Tran, IRF Kirkbride School December 6, 2010.
Placement Workshop Y2, Sem 2 Professional Practice Module (PPM)
January 29, Today’s Goals/Objectives  Identify clear learning goals and instructional procedures  Explain and interpret your comprehension of.
Measuring Information Literacy from Third Grader to College Senior Carolyn Radcliff, M.L.S., SAILS Project Director Julie Gedeon, Ph.D., TRAILS Assessment.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Wynne HARLEN Susana BORDA CARULLA Fibonacci European Training Session 5, March 21 st to 23 rd, 2012.
Sam Lopez, NPD Program Manager, OELA
Activity 3a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Objectives PLC March 5, 2015.
FALs and MDC. Before the Collaborative Activity: Meet as a grade level to collaboratively plan in advance the administration of the pre- assessment As.
Aligning Assessments to Ohio Social Studies Standards Teaching American History Grant Presentation.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Understanding by Design designed by Grant Wiggens and Jay McTighe.
Putting the Pieces Together…. Understanding SLOs.
EDU 550 Assignment 7.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
To enter the CTSEF all projects must be reviewed (the review dates are listed on the CTSEF website). All projects must be approved before experimentation.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
A Conversation Across the Disciplines to Integrate Literacy into Middle & Secondary Classrooms Drs. Pixita del Hill Prado, Ellen Friedland, & Jevon Hunter.
Learning Contracts. Objectives : Define learning contracts. Why use learning contracts? Important components of learning contracts. How to assess using.
Agenda for New Teacher Induction Brief overview of Formative Assessment Brief Overview of Differentiated Instruction Standards Aligned System-
Professional Experience Middle and Secondary Schooling Liaisons Meeting 9/07/12 Shane Pill Sally.Cole
Agenda New Teacher Induction
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
NTeQ: Designing an Integrated Lesson
Lesson Planning for Learning Best Practices ~ 2014.
Core Content Coaching Social Studies Grade 6
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Write To Learn Stephanie Needham J Glenn Edwards Elementary/ Lee County Schools April 25, A Race to the Top Initiative.
USD 457 August C.O. You will gain insight into the definitions and rationale for utilizing content and language objectives. L.O. You will listen.
GPAEA is joining the Through the VAST Center at GWAEA.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Visual Art and Theatre District-Wide In-service District Learning Day Memphis College of Art General Session Part I 8:30am-9:30am.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
The Lesson PlanningProcess The BLaST IU17 Liberty Fellowship September 20, 2011 Dr. Fran Macko
Academic Practicum Seminar1 Work Sample Seminar: Overview of Work Sample & Work Sample Seminar Elementary and Secondary Special Educator Program Portland.
Instruction and Technology November 24, First… Sign attendance sheet. 2. Place name tent on CPU 3. Open class wiki at
Teaching Integrated Literacy Lessons by Aligning Reading and Writing Standards and Incorporating Reciprocal Processing Strategies to Improve the Writing.
Session 6 Achievement Testing Pre-Test Training Spring 2016 AIMS Science Testing.
From July 9 Feedback A Message from Karen Hi, Everyone! Every other day, I will address the Needs you have and give you what we hope.
+ Introduction Compare the two test to find a problem missed by both students, then look at the answer key and select the Standard for that problem. Write.
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
Class of 2016 Senior Advisory 2/17/16. What’s next?
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Chapter 11 Effective Grading in Physical Education 11 Effective Grading in Physical Education C H A P T E R.
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
An Introduction to NETS*T
Collaborative Instructional Strategies Inquiry
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Your SLO.
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
Presentation transcript:

LESSON PLANNING: COMMON CHALLENGES Saturday April 14, 2012

Lesson Plan Data 7 total received Most arrived on due date, one was the next day Most were written on topics covered in 3/31/12 session; one on another topic Most came in already compiled, some did not Acceptable plans will be posted on grant website, so all FL teachers can use © Susan M. Butler,April 20122

Identifying Information Challenges Length None submitted © Susan M. Butler,April 20123

Motivation Challenges Diagnostic (pre-test) not present Diagnostic and formative (post-test) do not align; hard to measure student growth Insufficient details to facilitate duplication © Susan M. Butler,April 20124

Needed Materials & Set-Up Challenges Room set-ups missing Ordering information for videos missing Amounts of supplies unclear (Whole group? Per student group? Size of student groups missing Documents/materials listed in Presentation section were not in Needed Materials* Insufficient details for duplication © Susan M. Butler,April * Documents from websites may be blocked by districts

Outcomes Challenges Abbreviations used Content Literacy or Dimension standards missing SLOs missing parts (condition, measurable action verb, criterion) No higher-order SLOs (check Critical Thinking flip-chart for ideas) No explanation for sharing SLOs with students Activities listed as SLOs © Susan M. Butler,April 20126

Presentation & Participation Challenges Instructional strategy categories missing Needed pre-teaching preliminary to student activity not described Insufficient details for duplication © Susan M. Butler,April 20127

Questions Challenges None submitted One question that requires students to “explain and justify” is missing Higher order verbs not utilized © Susan M. Butler,April 20128

Reflection Challenges Not submitted Pre- and post-test poorly aligned so that student growth can’t be clearly documented How students receive feedback not described © Susan M. Butler,April 20129

Safety Challenges Not submitted All concerns not addressed How safety reminders are conveyed to students is missing © Susan M. Butler,April

Transformative Challenges Two specific special needs students not listed or Separate accommodations for each student not given © Susan M. Butler,April

Utilize Challenges Not submitted Potential or actual weaknesses not deduced from student data © Susan M. Butler,April

Next Steps Read challenges identified on Feedback sheet Revise lesson plan to address these – Due date is Monday, April 23 rd (same day as 2 nd lesson plan due) – Only two reviews per lesson plan, so this is last chance for “acceptable” rating – To earn inservice points, acceptable ratings in all categories are needed © Susan M. Butler,April