Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Advertisements

How To Spot Price Fixing Merril Hirsh Partner Troutman Sanders LLP Washington, DC.
REDUCING A COMPANY’S RISK OF BEING A CARTEL VICTIM Brian R. Henry Senior Counsel Venturing and Emerging Brands and North America Competition Counsel The.
2012 ICN Cartel Workshop Panama City, Panama, Thursday, October 4 th, 2012 Lisa M. Phelan Chief of the National Criminal Enforcement Section (NCES) United.
Bid Rigging and Collusion in Government Contracts.
Public Procurement Seminar 16 th & 17 th June 2010 Savannah Hotel Fair Trading Commission Detecting Bid Rigging.
Darren A. Craig COOPERATION, COLLABORATION, OR COLLUSION? ENHANCED ANTI-TRUST SCRUTINY January 9, 2014.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations John Terzaken, Assistant Chief U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Scott D. Hammond Deputy Assistant Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Detroit, Michigan February 15, 2013.
CARTEL CASE STUDY John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice
Powerpoint Templates The fight against bid rigging- NACC experience Bridget Dundee Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2013.
Ten Strategies For Winning The Fight Against Hardcore Cartels Scott D. Hammond Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Criminal Enforcement Antitrust Division,
The Patriot Act And computing. /criminal/cybercrime/PatriotAct.htm US Department of Justice.
John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief, New York Field Office Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice Judicial Training Program Moscow, Russia July.
Time Share Fraud Investigations
Responding to Cybercrime in the Post-9/11 World Scott Eltringham Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section U.S. Department of Justice (202)
Antitrust Does Google have monopoly power? Microsoft? On what? Why? Why Not? Is that bad? Why? Can you name monopolies in other industries? Is Monopoly.
IMPACT OF PRICE FIXING ONCOMMUNITIES NANDI MOKOENA: COMPETITION COMMISSION, SOUTH AFRICA.
Cracking Cartels With Leniency Programs Scott D. Hammond Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Criminal Enforcement Antitrust Division, U.S. Department.
POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP ORIGINAL IDEAS. UNCOMMON SOLUTIONS. U.S. INTERNATIONAL CARTEL ENFORCEMENT Presented by Neil R. Ellis Vienna, Austria.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Collusion in Department of Transportation Contracts.
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF EVIDENCE
Criminal Investigation Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (Accountants with Guns) Andrew T. Hromoko, Jr. Special.
Virginia Association of Governmental Purchasing March 12, 2008 Richmond, Virginia.
Criminal Antitrust Practice Donald C. Klawiter J. Clayton Everett, Jr. Jennifer M. Driscoll.
KEEPING IT LEGAL James A. Calderwood, Attorney Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP (o)
Corruption in the United States Introduction Federal Bureau of Investigation Public Integrity Section of Dept. of Justice Overview –Jack Abramoff –U.S.
 TRAINING FOR TRADE PRACTICE INVESTIGATION COMMISSION (TPIC) MAY 2008 ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA  PRESENTED BY: Peter G. Kanyi - Monopolies and Prices Commission.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Patricia L. Jannaco, Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division.
1 Chapter 15 Search Warrants Search Warrants. 2 Search Warrants Search warrants fall under the 4 th Amendment Search warrants fall under the 4 th Amendment.
Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department.
INSPECTIONS AND SEARCHES PREPARATION AND RESPONSE Richard E. Glaze, Jr. Balch & Bingham LLP Atlanta, GA AWMA August 3, 2011.
WHEN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE KNOCKS DOJ Enforcement Trends: What to Expect and How to Respond Jacqueline Arango Shareholder Akerman Senterfitt.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
© FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 2005 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the TITLE MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. Ten Simple Rules.
Develop A Foundational Knowledge Of Pricing To Understand Its Role In Marketing 3.04.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 22 Criminal Law and Procedure in Business.
1 Antitrust Division Criminal Enforcement Program Presentation on Antitrust Violations & Prosecutions Michelle Pionkowski Trial Attorney U.S. Department.
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Planning & Conducting Investigations Markus H. Meier Assistant Director African Competition Forum March 25, 2013.
Bid Rigging as Provided for under the Fair Competition Act, 2003 and the Proposed Amendments Presenter: Grace Freedom Nicholas Investigation Department.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Debra C. Brookes, Esq. Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust.
Chapter 4 Billing Schemes.
 Terms and Procedures  Constitutional Issues  Specific Crimes  Conclusion.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Legal Environment for a New Century. Click your mouse anywhere on the screen when you are ready to advance the text within each slide. After the starburst.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations John Terzaken, Assistant Chief U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Nat’l Criminal.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
The 4 Market Structures  Competition among producers and sellers leads to more choices, improved quality, and lower prices as producers seek to attract.
Price fixing and the Commerce Act 1986
New York State Attorney General’s Office Antitrust Bureau
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Adaption of antitrust compliance program
The Criminal Law And Business
ICN Cartel Working Group SG 1 Call Series Linda Plumpton
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
THE RULES OF THE GAME: Intro to Antitrust Law Robbyn Wysocki
Presentation by the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
The Antitrust Laws: Detecting Bid Rigging, Price Fixing, and Other Types of Collusion The views expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily represent.
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division
Abigail Smith Assistant Attorney General
Presentation transcript:

Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice

Today’s Topics Overview of U.S. Cartel Enforcement Detecting Cartels Investigative Tools & Evidence Gathering

“Per Se” Criminal Antitrust Violations Agreements among Horizontal Competitors to: Fix Prices Rig Bids Allocate Markets

“Per Se” Criminal Antitrust Violations Price Fixing –Raise, fix or otherwise agree on prices –This includes: Agreeing on discounts Eliminating discounts Fixing credit terms Maintain certain price differentials between different quantities, types or sizes of products Others

“Per Se” Criminal Antitrust Violations Bid Rigging –Bid rotation or allocation –Complementary or “cover” bids –Bid suppression

“Per Se” Criminal Antitrust Violations Allocation agreements –Specific customers or types of customers –Geographic territories –Type of product

Elements of a “Per Se” Antitrust Crime General Intent Agreement is the Crime No Overt Act No Proof of Price Impact

U.S. Penalties For offenses committed on or after June 22, 2004 Individuals - 10 Years in jail & $1 million fine Corporations - $100 million fine Alternative Fine = Double Gain or Loss

Other Crimes Committed By Antitrust Defendants & Prosecuted By the Antitrust Division Mail & Wire Fraud Conspiracy Tax Evasion Perjury & False Statements Obstruction of Justice

DETECTING CARTELS Nature of Crime — Secret Conspiracy Hidden from Law Enforcement and Victims

DETECTING CARTELS Conditions Favorable to Collusion Few firms Standardized products High entry costs Products do not have close substitutes Bidding process may be involved Seasonality

DETECTING CARTELS Sources of Leads Amnesty & amnesty plus applicants Cooperators in unrelated crimes Other geographic areas Dissatisfied employees Competitors Customers Referrals from other agencies Civil cases Newspapers

Key is Proactive Outreach Efforts –Make sure they know who you are Law firms Other agencies & investigators Educate those working directly in the marketplace DETECTING CARTELS

What do we tell these groups to look for? –Suspicious statements –Suspicious bid patterns –Suspicious pricing patterns –Suspicious conduct

DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious Statements –A customer or territory “belongs” to a supplier –“We don’t sell in that area” –It was a supplier’s “turn” to win –Reference to industry or association price list –Advance knowledge or prediction of a competitor’s prices

DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious bid patterns –Same company always wins –Sellers take “turns” winning –Few competitors submit bids –Bids are much higher than previous bids by the same supplier –Bid prices appear to drop whenever a new or infrequent bidder submits a bid

DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious pricing patterns –Suppliers charge identical prices –Suppliers increase prices at same time without cost justification –Suppliers are charging higher prices to local customers than to distant customers –Suppliers eliminate discounts

DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious conduct –A bidder appears in person to submit bid & also submits a competitor’s bid –A successful bidder repeatedly subcontracts work to competitors that submitted higher bids –Competitors regularly socialize together –Competitors hold meetings or otherwise get together in the vicinity of the procurement offices shortly before bid deadline

DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious conduct –Company submits bid for work it can’t do –Bids contain last minute changes –Similar irregularities on bid form

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Recordings Documents Interviews

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Recordings –Consensual Telephone calls Body wires Video taping –Non Consensual Wiretapping – new legislation

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Documents (including computers) –Search & seizures –Subpoenas

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Search & seizures –Warrant signed by a judge –Probable cause

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Search & seizures: what & where to search –Offices –Homes –Brief cases –Computers

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Search & seizures: what to seize – with competitors –Correspondence with competitors –Calendars –Meeting notes –Bid documents –Pricing documents

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Subpoenas –If no search: same documents with competitors Correspondence with competitors Calendars Meeting notes Bid documents Pricing documents

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Additional documents –Corporate structure –Information on officers & those with pricing authority Personnel file Wages Calendars & address books Name of secretaries –Financial statements –General ledger, cash disbursements, sales journals –Cancelled checks –Telephone records –Trade association

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Form of documents –Originals –In original order –In original folders –Electronic data

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Document control –Custodian –Log –Chain of custody Create databases Review promptly Compliance

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Interviews –Who –Circumstances

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Who to interview –Informants/amnesty applicants –Former employees –Competitors –Customers –Subjects Least culpable companies Lowest level employees

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Circumstances of interviews –No notice: drop in interviews –Voluntary: no lawyer –Voluntary: informal immunity, with lawyer –Compelled: formal immunity –Proffer?