A Conceptual Framework for Co- Occurring Disorders within a Behavioral Health Care System Reference: National Dialogue on Co-occurring Mental Health and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Beacon Health Strategies, LLC August 2005.
Psychologists within Maternity and Child Health Care Infant and Child Mental Health in Primary Care.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Guernsey Mind Guernsey Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy
Complexities of Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE June 24, 2004 Renata J. Henry, M.Ed.
A MERICAN P SYCHOLOGICAL A SSOCIATION 7. Interventions I.
Assessment and eligibility
CONNECTICUT SUICIDE PREVENTION STRATEGY 2013 PLANNING NINA ROVINELLI HELLER PH.D. UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 35Seriously and Persistently Mentally Ill, Homeless, or Incarcerated Clients.
THE IMPORTANCE OF PEER SUPPORT
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
PCCYFS 2012 Annual Spring Conference Moving Toward Early Intervention in Adolescent Substance Abuse Presented by: Rachel Baker, MA, CAADC Molly Stanton,
Presented by: John. J. Campbell, M.A. John M. Morrow, Ph.D. Optimizing Federal Funding Streams to Support COD Services.
Our Mission Community Outreach for Youth & Family Services, Inc. is dedicated to improving the quality of life for both the youth and adult population.
A MERICAN P SYCHOLOGICAL A SSOCIATION 11. Forensic Issues II.
Community-based Falls Prevention Falls Preconference Session August 20, 2007 Pam Van Zyl York, MPH, PhD, RD, LN Minnesota Department of Health.
Scope of Nursing Lecturer/ Hanaa Eisa Rawhia Salah
Griffith Youth Forensic Service From treatment to prevention : Working with Queensland remote Indigenous communities Sue Rayment-McHugh Manager Griffith.
Policy Setting. Issues facing the Addiction Treatment Sector 2009/10 Growing number of people experience alcohol and other drug addictions and gambling.
Service Delivery Models and Inclusive Practices in Speech-Language Pathology: Challenges and Solutions Connecticut Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
“Shaping the Future Agenda for Behavioral Health Policy” What are the possible or probable futures emerging from various themes? Health care is a basic.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE AND THE 7 SCHOOL TURNAROUND PRINCIPLES Dale Gasparovic, MSed., Administrator Student Assistance Center at Prevention First
Continuing Care for Adolescents with Substance Use Disorders: Opportunities for Health Services Research Thomas M. Brady, Ph.D. Division of Epidemiology,
Outcomes of Public Health
Integrated Care in Practice Laura Galbreath, MPP Director, Center for Integrated Health Solutions May 15, 2013.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
ORIENTATION SESSION Strengthening Chronic Disease Prevention & Management.
The Mental Health, Alcohol and Other Drug Services Plan The community managed mental health sector response.
Children’s Mental Health Access & Treatment Services presented to Province-wide Health Advisory Council Saturday, October 13, 2012.
New Pathways, New Connections: Tobacco and Behavioral Health Frances M. Harding, Director SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse Prevention National Conference.
The Business Case for Bidirectional Integrated Care: Mental Health and Substance Use Services in Primary Care Settings and Primary Care Services in Specialty.
Janice Berry Edwards, PhD, LICSW, LCSW-C, BCD, ACSW
MAXIMIZING MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS Doreen Bradshaw, Executive Director Shasta Consortium of Community Health Centers.
Medicaid and Behavioral Health – New Directions John O’Brien Senior Policy Advisor Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Substance Use Disorders Integral Care Community Forum June 17, 2014.
June 11, IOM, Reducing Suicide, 2002 Statement of Task w Assess the science base w Evaluate the status of prevention w Consider strategies for studying.
Mental Health Recovery Overview. History 1993 Mental Health dialogues/forums were held around the state with consumers, family members, providers, and.
Improving care for people with intellectual disabilities across the life span The ACI Intellectual Disability Network: Maxine Andersson Agency for Clinical.
Recommendations and a Plan for Preventing Preterm Birth Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality (SACIM) August 10, 2015.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 32Clients with a Dual Diagnosis.
SCREENING BRIEF INTERVENTION AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) 1.
Dave neilsen Deputy Director. Commitment, Knowledge and Services… The Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP) is committed to providing excellent.
Introduction Results and Conclusions Categorical group comparisons revealed no differences on demographic or social variables. At admission to treatment,
National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care June 15, 2011 Kana Enomoto Director Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.
M eaningful Quality Measures for Children with Behavioral Health Conditions Discussion with the NYS Conference of Local Mental Health Hygiene Directors.
Overview of Integrated Care Sheila A. Schuster, Ph.D.Advocacy Action Network
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs The Substance Abuse Research Consortium Semi Annual Meeting Improving the Quality, and Effectiveness.
1 Center Mission Statements SAMHSA ? CSAT Improving the Health of the Nation by Bringing Effective Alcohol and Drug Treatment to Every Community CMHS Caring.
Behavioral Health INTEGRATION Recent literature, conceptual frameworks & options for next steps October 16, 2013 Mark Gibson Director Center for Evidence-based.
The Maryland Early Intervention Program “A collaborative for the early identification and treatment of mental illness with psychosis”
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Behavioral Health Services 2013 and Beyond Integrating Mental Health and Addiction Treatment in Maryland Tuerk.
Dr Marja Anttila, SWG Chair Finland 11 th Partnership Annual Conference, Berlin, NDPHS Strategy 2020 and Action Plan.
CRISIS RESOLUTION / HOME TREATMENT - DEFINITION
Beaver County Behavioral Health
Florida Institute on Homelessness & Affordable Housing Input Session
AspireMN Member Meeting
Texas Homeless Network Conference
Livingston County Children’s Network: Community Scorecard
Information for Network Providers
Fall 2018 NAMD Conference The Future of behavioral health integration in Medicaid November 14, 2018 Washington Hilton, Washington, D.C. Brian M. Hepburn,
National Association of Medicaid Director’s Fall Conference
Primary Care Milestone 15
Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion
School Nursing Today PUBLIC HEALTH SCHOOL NURSING PRIMARY CARE
Public/Population Health Approach to Substance Abuse Prevention & Treatment Determine the Burden of Substance Abuse and Service Barriers to Develop Plan.
Behavioral Health Identification, Treatment & Referral in Primary Care
Presentation transcript:

A Conceptual Framework for Co- Occurring Disorders within a Behavioral Health Care System Reference: National Dialogue on Co-occurring Mental Health and Substance Abuse Disorder, June 16-17, 1998, Washington, DC

The conceptual framework expands on the New York model and represents a new paradigm for considering both the needs of individuals with co- occurring substance abuse and mental health disorders and the system characteristics required to address these needs. Unique features of this approach include the following: The revised framework is based on symptom multiplicity and severity, not on specific diagnoses, and uses language familiar to both mental health and substance abuse providers. As such, it encompasses the full range of people who have co- occurring substance abuse and mental health disorders. In addition, it points to windows of opportunity within which providers can act to prevent exacerbation of symptom severity. The framework permits discussion of co- occurring disorders along several dimensions, including symptom multiplicity and severity, locus of care, and degree of service coordination. It permits a number of key decisions to flow from it, including the level of service coordination required and the best use of available resources. The framework accommodates different levels of service coordination rather than specifying discrete service interventions. It represents a flexible approach that can be adopted or adapted for use in any service setting. The framework identifies two levels of service coordination–consultation and collaboration–that do not require fully integrated services. It points to the fact that individuals can be appropriately served with interventions that do not require full service integration. This is important for those service settings in which integration is not feasible or desirable, and for those individuals whose needs can be addressed with a minimum amount of system change. The Revised Framework

New York State generic model of locus of care based on severity of mental illness and alcohol and drug dependencies III Locus of care: Alcohol and other drug systems I Locus of care: Primary health Care settings II Locus of care: mental health system Alcohol and other drug abuse Mental Illness IV Locus of care: “No man’s land Jount alcohol and Mental health systems Low Severity High Severity High Severity

Co-Occurring Disorders By Severity Regardless of specific diagnoses, individuals with co- occurring disorders fall into one of four major categories based on the severity of their mental health and substance abuse disorders: Category I. Less severe mental disorder/less severe substance disorder. Category II. More severe mental disorder/less severe substance disorder. Category III. Less severe mental disorder/more severe substance disorder. Category IV. More severe mental disorder/more severe substance disorder. This is a simplified categorization that permits further discussion. Individuals at various stages of recovery from mental health and substance abuse disorders may move back and forth among these categories during the course of their disease. While individuals in categories II and III may be receiving some level of care in the substance abuse and mental health systems, respectively, category I – those individuals whose disorders are not severe enough to bring them to the attention of the mental health or substance abuse treatment systems at this time–is largely ignored. This group is of particular concern because it includes many children and adolescents at risk for developing more serious disease. Providers may have the greatest impact in minimizing future disease by providing appropriate prevention and early intervention strategies for people in category I. Members of category IV – those with more severe mental health and substance abuse disorders– are more likely to be found in inappropriate settings (e.g., jails, homeless), to use the most resources, and to have the worst outcomes. This group includes those with severe, chronic disease who may be the most difficult to serve. Because those in category IV consume the bulk of a system’s resources, attention to people in this group may help reduce treatment costs and produce better consumer outcomes. Using the revised framework, States can decide how best to direct their mental health and substance abuse efforts. For example, the framework encourages States to respond to the needs of those individuals who fall into category I by expanding their prevention and early intervention efforts. By the same token, States may choose to reduce expenses and improve outcomes associated with serving persons in category IV by diverting them from inappropriate and more costly treatment settings. In general, the framework supports State- directed efforts to work toward meaningful integration of services for these persons with the most severe mental health and substance abuse disorders.

Co-Occurring Disorders by Severity III Less severe mental disorder / more severe substance abuse disorder I Less severe mental disorder / less severe substance abuse disorder II More severe mental disorder / less severe substance abuse disorder Alcohol and other drug abuse Mental Illness IV More severe mental disorder / more severe substance abuse disorder Low Severity High Severity High Severity

Primary Locus of Care By Severity Based on the severity of their disorders, people with co- occurring mental health and substance abuse disorders currently tend to receive their care in the following settings (see Figure 3): Setting I. Primary health care settings, school- based clinics, community programs; no care. Setting II. Mental health system. Setting III. Substance abuse system. Setting IV. State hospitals, jails, prisons, forensic units, emergency rooms, homeless service programs, mental health and/or substance abuse system; no care. As with categories of illness, the use of such clearly delineated settings is for ease of discussion. In reality, there is a great deal of overlap between and among these settings; individuals with different combinations of severity are served in all of the systems highlighted above. In addition, individuals may move back and forth throughout the system of care based on their level of recovery at any given time.

Primary Locus of Care by Severity III Substance abuse System I Primary health care settings school-based clinics, community programs No care II Mental Health System Alcohol and other drug abuse Mental Illness IV State hospitals jails/ prisons emergency rooms, homeless shelter mental health and/or substance abuse system No care Low Severity High Severity High Severity

Service Coordination by Severity Based on the severity of their disorders and the location of their care, the following levels of coordination among the substance abuse, mental health and primary health care systems is recommended to address the needs of individuals with co-occurring mental health and substance abuse disorders (see Figure 4): Level I. Consultation. Those informal relationships among providers that ensure both mental illness and substance abuse problems are addressed, especially with regard to identification, engagement, prevention, and early intervention. An example of such consultation might include a telephone request for information or advice regarding the etiology and clinical course of depression in a person abusing alcohol or drugs. Levels II/III. Collaboration. Those more formal relationships among providers that ensure both mental illness and substance abuse problems are included in the treatment regimen. An example of such collaboration might include interagency staffing conferences where representatives of both substance abuse and mental health agencies specifically contribute to the design of a treatment program for individuals with co- occurring disorders and contribute to service delivery. Level IV. Integrated Services. Those relationships among mental health and substance abuse providers in which the contributions of professionals in both fields are merged into a single treatment setting and treatment regimen.

Service Coordination by Severity III Substance abuse System I Primary health care settings school-based clinics, community programs No care II Mental health System Alcohol and other drug abuse Mental Illness IV State hospitals jails/ prisons emergency rooms, homeless shelter mental health and/or substance abuse system No care Low Severity High Severity High Severity Consultation Integrated Services Collaboration