Best Practices in Wine Regulation Introduction to the World Wine Trade Group Robert G. Kalik World Wine Trade Group, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement - Salient Features
Advertisements

WTO, Trade and Environment Division
SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY HARMONIZATION
WTO - TBT Committee Ana Maria Vallina, PhD Coordination Among Regulatory Bodies: The Chilean Experience Ana Maria Vallina PhD Head of Foreign Trade Department.
KEI and IQsensato panel Proposal for a WTO Agreement on the Supply of Knowledge as a Public Good Presentation by Shandana Gulzar Khan Legal Affairs Officer.
THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND AGREEMENTS Tony Battaglene General Manager, Strategy & International Affairs Winemakers Federation of.
Regional IPPC Workshops 2014 WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation (ATF)
UOttawa.ca CETA – A New Model for Regulatory Cooperation, Transparency and Coherence? Presentation by: Professor Debra Steger University of Victoria European.
WORLD WINE TRADE GROUP AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL ACCEPTANCE OF OENOLOGICAL PRACTICES AGREEMENT ON THE REQUIREMENTS FOR WINE LABELLING BRIEFING TO THE SELECT.
Technical Requirements, WTO Rules and Trade
The Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures Lecture 37 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Non-tariff Barriers BASM530, John Ries. WTO dispute resolution The WTO offers dispute resolution when one member believes another member is violating.
Presentation 4.2 CODEX STANDARDS ON SAFETY Section IV Food Quality and Standards Service (ESNS) Food and Nutrition Division. FAO.
International Food safety Sanitary, Phytosanitary and Regulatory Framework.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council January 30, 2012 Washington D.C
AUSTRALIA’S DOHA ROUND AGENDA. TODAY’S DISCUSSION  briefly, the WTO and Australia  what was decided at Doha  what has happened since Doha  Australia’s.
Standards experts. Accreditation solutions. Andrea Spencer Coordinator, WTO/NAFTA Enquiry Point (Canada) TBT Special Meeting on Procedures for Information.
GMOs and the WTO Rules Mark Halle Minsk, 24 October 2008.
1 Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade and the IV Triennial Review II International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro 10 December 2006.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
The International Task Force on Harmonization and Equivalency in Organic Agriculture (ITF)
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE LIQUOR PRODUCTS AMENDMENT BILL LIQUOR PRODUCTS AMENDMENT BILL.
CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT FOR THOSE WHO DID NOT ATTEND CA CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT (CA) PROCEDURES INCLUDE: SAMPLING AND TESTING INSPECTION CERTIFICATION.
Japan’s FTAs/EPAs with APEC Economies Nobuhiko Sasaki Deputy Director-General APEC Senior Official METI Japan March 2006.
SPS ISSUES IN THE NAFTA REGION
Designed by CPersad Supporting the Food and Beverage Sector Through Conformity Assessment Activities.
Trade Remedies in the Era of FTA: The Brazilian experience in Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade 2006 Seoul Forum on Trade Remedies Seminar.
Brazil-Japan: Roadmap for an Economic Partnership Agreement Keidanren
Professional Services and the GATS Impact of the WTO multilateral liberalization of trade in services on professional services Hamid Mamdouh, February.
The Impact of the TTIP on Europe’s Investment Arbitration Architecture Dr. Roland Kläger10. DAJV Fachgruppentag - 21 March 2014.
The Road Transport harmonisation Project Group (RTHP) 21 st APEC TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP MEETING RTHP Phase 5 Stage 3 Workshop 24, September,2002.
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE GENERAL European Commission 1 PECAs David Eardley DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission Tel: 032 (2)
WTO Today: A New Negotiating Round Thomas Cottier Professor of Law of Counsel, Baker&McKenzie Santiago de Chile
Challenges and Impact of Private Standards Delilah A. Cabb Ayala B.Sc. M.Sc. Belize Agricultural Health Authority 19 October 2009.
International Standards and the TBT Agreement Ludivine Tamiotti WTO, Trade and Environment Division Legal Affairs Officer
The WTO SPS Agreement and its relevance to international standards
UNICE Eco-Label Information Day, 24 June 2002 Trade implications of eco-labelling schemes 1 Contents I.Introduction II.Eco-labelling and the WTO III.Potential.
WTO-WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. FOUNDATION WTO is an international organization which was founded on The WTO was born out of the GATT(General Agreement.
Selected WTO Legal Aspects of UNECE Report "Regulatory and Procedural Barriers to Trade in Kyrgyzstan: Needs Assessment" Jan Bohanes Senior Counsel, Advisory.
Standards & Standardization: From a Trade Perspective Alice Pham Vientiane, 17 December 2013.
Private Standards and the WTO SPS Agreement Brussels Rural Development Briefings Meeting Food Safety Standards: Implications for ACP agricultural exports.
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council TBWG Fall Plenary November,
Regulatory coherence in wine regulation and trade: the example of the World Wine Trade Group Dr. John Barker General Counsel New Zealand Winegrowers.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
1 Commodity Agreements Sugar, Coffee, Cocoa, Coconut New York, May 2004 Lynne Moorhouse.
PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON LAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS LIQUOR PRODUCTS AMENDMENT BILL LIQUOR PRODUCTS AMENDMENT BILL.
1 Mutual Acceptance of Conformity Assessment Results - Japan ’ s Experience and Observation - 16 March 2006 Shinji FUJINO Director International Standards.
1 REDUCING TRADE BARRIERS THROUGH GOOD REGULATORY PRACTICE FOR STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS by Anthony Kleitz Acting Deputy Director Trade Directorate,
Update on Multilateral Trade Negotiations “The July Package” PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE 09 November 2004.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) ADVANCING GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS.
1 The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade Basic Concepts and Member Obligations.
Workshop on “EU Enlargement: Regulatory Convergence in Non-acceding Countries” Athens 7 – 8 November 2003 Regulatory Convergence and Technical Standards.
Introduction to GATT and WTO The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established to govern international trade. It was found on 1 st January, 1995 and headquartered.
T Mr.Willy Musinguzi, EAC. .Overview of EAC SQMT Infrastructure How EAC standards are Harmonized and Implemented How EAC Quality Infrastructure relates.
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT. Lesson 39 Word Trade Organization (WTO.
The Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures
66 items – 70% of circulated products
TBILISI STATEMENT PRINCIPLES
Package of agreements annexed to the WTO Agreement
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
The EAC Quality Infrastructure and WTO TBT Agreement.
Standards convergence and consumers interest: the case of wine
CURRENT SITUATION OF STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES IN MONGOLIA & TBT
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
Workshop of the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI)
Draft Model Wine Standard
The WTO-TBT-Agreement
Workshop of the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI)
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices in Wine Regulation Introduction to the World Wine Trade Group Robert G. Kalik World Wine Trade Group, USA

What is the World Wine Trade Group? The World Wine Trade Group (WWTG) was formed in early1999, consisting of like-minded wine producing countries working together with a mutual interest in facilitating worldwide trade in wine. Present members include Argentina, Chile, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, United States and Georgia. The WWTG is a unique plurilateral body that is structured by the participating members as an informal group which brings together industry, trade negotiators and government regulators with its principal focus to negotiate agreements and to coordinate government activities to reduce unwarranted trade and regulatory barriers to international wine trade.

WWTG Trade Priorities: Recognize Recognize the role of the WTO and its agreements including TRIPS, TBT and SPS. Establish Establish clarity that there is a fundamental difference between the necessity of governments to regulate wine in order to protect the health and safety of consumers and regulatory requirements over non-health related production methods of how wine is made. Strive Strive to have all wine producing and consuming countries accept that differences in wine-making practices should not be used as a barrier to trade. Monitor, Monitor, by exchanging information, regulatory developments in non WWTG economies thereby helping to establish where these pose unnecessary costs or WTO inconsistent barriers.

Understanding Regulatory Structures for Domestic Wine Production and in International Trade A primary focus of the WWTG is to understand the different regulatory structures of its Members and its Members trading partners: ◦ How does each local wine producing industry and regulatory structure compare with other participant countries; ◦ How the members regulatory systems compare with other wine producing systems such as the European Union; ◦ How non-wine producing economies regulate the importation of wine.

WWTG Accomplishments  Successfully negotiated trade treaties on winemaking practices and wine labeling that reaffirm the importance of health and safety protections related to wine but reduce unnecessary testing and labeling restrictions for the wine trade.  Developed a cross-cutting framework for regulatory coherence that has proven to dramatically increase wine exports while protecting heath and safety concerns, preventing consumer deception and advancing the goals of the WTO.  Resides as an example to APEC and TPP  Through success of WWTG, the wine industry has struck a balance between reducing technical barriers to trade and maintaining health, safety and intellectual property protection.

The Mutual Acceptance Agreement on Oenological Practices (MAA). Entered into force December 1, 2002 The MAA marks the first plurilateral equivalence agreement, in any sector, fully compliant with the TBT Agreement section 2.7; All signatory countries to the MAA accept the winemaking regulations/practices of the exporting signatory, thus eliminating the need for testing of imported wines. Consumer health and safety protections are outside of the Agreement. These are governed by each signatory’s domestic regulations. To summarize the agreement in a single sentence: If a wine sold in the domestic market meets health and safety/good manufacturing requirements of that market, when exported, the importing authorities do not need additional detail and testing as to how the wine was produced.

Notable Provisions Mutual Acceptance Permit the importation of wine produced in the territory of another Party in conformity with the exporting Party's requirements relating to oenological practices and the mechanisms to regulate them. Multilateral Obligations Nothing in the Agreement shall limit the rights or obligations of the Parties under the WTO Agreement. Labeling Regulations related to labeling shall be transparent, non-discriminatory and issued in accordance with the WTO, SPS and TBT measures. Council of the Parties A Council in which each Party has equal representation is established. Committee of Experts The Parties shall establish a list of four experts in the field of oenological practices.

Notable Provisions cont. Dispute Settlements If a Party considers a measure by another Party to be inconsistent with this Agreement, the Complainant may request, in writing, consultations with the Respondent. The Parties to the dispute shall, within 20 days of receipt of the request, consult one another with a view to resolving the issue. If not resolved, the Committee of Experts from non-disputing members are available to resolve the dispute. Transparency The laws, regulations and requirements relating to oenological practices for each Party shall be incorporated in a Schedule. Amendment Any Party may propose amendments to the Agreement or Annex, the text shall be submitted to the depositary, which shall promptly communicate it to all Parties prior to consideration by the Council. Withdrawal A Party may withdraw from this Agreement by written notification to the depositary.

Agreement on the Requirements for Wine Labeling Signed January 23, 2007 Canberra Agreement Goal: To enable wine exporters to sell wine into WWTG markets without having to redesign their principal label for each individual market, thus significantly reducing costs for the exporter. Notable General provision: Allows placement of the principle four items of mandatory regulatory information, generally required by governments, anywhere on a wine bottle label provided they are presented in a single field of vision: country of origin, product name, net contents and alcohol content Still allows for the importing authorities to require local mandatory information and in local language or multiple languages on the container.

WWTG Ongoing Work MOU limiting certification requirements Phase II Labeling Negotiations Exploratory Work on Sustainability Labeling: Exploratory Work on Sustainability Labeling: Rely on notification and trust among members to verify particular sustainability standards are achieved. WWTG Regulators Forum WWTG Regulators Forum: Regulatory representatives from member countries meet concurrently with WWTG’s biannual meetings to share updates and exchange views on developments in wine trade regulations. APEC Subcommittee on Standards and Conformance (SCSC): APEC Subcommittee on Standards and Conformance (SCSC): WWTG remains an active participant where it has established a Wine Regulators Forum to address non-tariff barriers in the wine trade.