 starter activity The Christian Institute requested a judicial review into the BBC’s decision to screen Jerry Springer the Opera in January 2005 on the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 starter activity What do we mean by parliamentary sovereignty? What are the constraints on parliamentary sovereignty?
Advertisements

Lesson Objectives: I will be able to explain the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy I will be able to consider limitations on the doctrine of parliamentary.
Essential Standard 1.00 Understand concepts of the legal system, trial procedures, and ethics. Unit A Business Law.
Constitutional and Administrative Law
 starter activity Preambles
The European Convention on Human Rights Please turn off your mobile Raise your hand if you have a question At the start of the lesson - STUDENTS SHOULD.
Democracy Legal Studies Year 12 VCE.
Equality and Human Rights Commission. Overview of the Morning EHRC – What we do Human Rights Inquiry Making sense of Human Rights Table sessions.
Impact of the Human Rights Act in the UK Rabinder Singh QC.
Human Rights and Council of Europe Joy Johnson
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Parliament and the Courts: the role of judicial review in the UK © Dr Nigel Forman CPS Seminar 15th March 2012.
 starter activity What do judges do? Make a list of as many roles of judges as you can think of.
THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND THE UK POLICE SERVICE Click on slide-show icon When completed exit PowerPoint programme to return to the CD- ROM content.
Democracy: accountability & administrative law ACMA Legal Branch International Training Program Melbourne, 4 September 2006.
Human Rights Act 1998 The European convention on human rights The European convention on human rights The Convention rights The Convention rights How does.
 starter activity The Christian Institute requested a judicial review into the BBC’s decision to screen Jerry Springer the Opera in January 2005 on the.
Lecture 9 Politics and the Judiciary Dr Tom Quinn GV204 – The New British Politics 2 December 2008.
Identifying Human Rights The protections offered by the ECHR and the Human Rights Act 1998 Brayne & Carr: Law for Social Workers: 10e Chapter 3.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Human rights for Australians: Towards a Human Rights Act NSW Geography Teachers’ Association Conference NSW Parliament House 7 August 2009 Edward Santow.
JUDGES AND CIVIL LIBERTIES By Mr. N. Scott – edited by Mrs W Attewell.
The Meaning of ‘Judicial Independence’ Sarah, Nicki, Mike.
Announcements -Final Study Guide will be posted the beginning of next week. -Thursday, May 31 class will be a review session.
Difference between criminal and civil law Learning Objectives Describe the difference between criminal and civil law and identify key features Explain.
The Constitution (cont’d). Features Uncodified – the British constitution is n ot contained in one book, it has a variety of sources to include, statues,
Northern Ireland Act 1998 The Human Rights Act 1998 Government of Wales Act 1998.
SOURCES OF LAW A (very) BRIEF OUTLINE. SOURCES Common Law Equity Legislation – from UK and EU.
Judicial Control of Public Authorities. Judicial Review Judicial Review – the power of a court to review a statute, or an official action or inaction,
WEEK 12: Human Rights and Council of Europe. Key texts Morrison p King, The British Constitution Bingham, The Rule of Law, ch7 2.
The Federal Courts Unit 6 – Chapter 20 “Without them (federal judges) the Constitution would be a dead letter” Alexis de Tocqueville.
 starter activity What does the arrest of an 82-year-old man under anti-terrorism laws tell us about the way parties run conferences today? 
Equinet Legal Training Lessons Learned and Practical Experiences from Northern Ireland.
 starter activity Two-thirds of constitutions now in existence were drawn up since the end of WWII. Do you think the British constitution is too old-fashioned.
BRITISH LAWS Fundamental rights Individual Freedom and their protection.
LOOKING AT LAW AN INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCING….. Legislation Cases & how they work Civil Law & Criminal Law A contrast in attitudes to e.g. protection of.
Parliamentary Supremacy/Sovereignty. What is Parliamentary Supremacy (sovereignty)? Established in Bill of Rights 1689 Explained by Dicey (1885) – as.
Chapter 10 The Criminal Process. A.k.a. Procedural criminal law Two most essential elements of Canadian Criminal Process are: - Truth - Justice.
Business Law 1 Lecture Two Sources of Law - Legislation.
Unit 34. The Judiciary vs. The Executive Courts vs. Public authorities  New Brunswick Parents Request Judicial Review of FSL (French Second Language.
What rights do I have? Duncan Bunce Presentation by Duncan Bunce Edited by Dr Peter Jepson Read & Précis: Chapter 3, Issue 2, pages
Judicial Control of Public Authorities. Judicial Review  Judicial Review – the power of a court to review a statute, or an official action or inaction,
 starter activity What stops Prime Ministers from becoming dictators? Who is more power in our system PMs or MPs?
Rights in the Community Public Law and the Human Rights Act JUSTICE Student Network Conference March 2016 Angela Patrick, Director of Human Rights.
DELEGATED DELEGATED LEGISLATION. DIFFERENT TYPES OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION Parliament passes a PARENT ACT The act gives the right to create one of the.
Health and Social Care Mental Health Act 2007 Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (MCA / DoLS) What is Depriving a Person’s Liberty?
Law LA1: European Union Institutions European Union Institutions AS Level Law: Unit 1.
Law LA1: Human Rights European Convention on Human Rights & the Human Rights Act 1998 Unit 1 AS.
Judicial Review and the Impact of Europe Lower 6 Politics.
Introduction to Human Rights The Human Rights Act and Human Rights Based Approaches.
The Human Rights Act. Stephen Lawrence Lesson Objectives To describe what a right is. To identify the main contents of the Human Rights Act, To.
Miss Christian 12E F9 Lesson #1
Human Rights in Complaints Handling and Inquiries: Perspectives from the Equality and Human Rights Commission Jonathan Timbers – Policy Manager, Equality.
The rules and theory of human rights law Human Rights Act 1998
Objectives Explain and apply the main provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998 and relevant cases, with particular reference to sections 2,3,4,6,7 and.
Sources of Law: Statutes and Delegated Legislation
Objectives Discuss the European Convention on Human rights and the various Articles. Explain the role of the European Court of Human Rights. Explain the.
European Union Institutions Law Making
SOURCES OF LAW A (very) BRIEF OUTLINE.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The rules and theory of human rights law Bill of Rights
UK Constitution Vs US Constitution.
The debate relating to the protection of human rights in the UK The need for a United Kingdom Bill of Rights.
The Human Rights Act FDLD/FDHS 1203.
Parliamentary and European Law Making Institutions of the European Union Notes:
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
What is a constitution and why do we have them?
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Presentation transcript:

 starter activity The Christian Institute requested a judicial review into the BBC’s decision to screen Jerry Springer the Opera in January 2005 on the grounds it was blasphemous. Eventually the High Court overturned the appeal.

Are judges too powerful? To find out what is meant by ‘judicial review’ To examine reasons for growing number of cases of judicial review in recent years  Aims

 Your task What is meant by ‘judicial review’? What is meant by ‘judicial review’? In what circumstances can judges initiate a judicial review? In what circumstances can judges initiate a judicial review? List the problems associated with the judicial review process List the problems associated with the judicial review process

Judicial review Process where judges decide whether public bodies (including govt) have acted lawfully Process where judges decide whether public bodies (including govt) have acted lawfully

Process Judicial review is granted on three grounds Judicial review is granted on three grounds If a public authority has exceeded its statutory powers, (ultra vires,) If a public authority has exceeded its statutory powers, (ultra vires,) Where there has been a procedural impropriety Where there has been a procedural impropriety Where an action was ‘irrational’ Where an action was ‘irrational’

Problems The willingness of judges to intervene in matters of public policy The willingness of judges to intervene in matters of public policy Unelected judges making judgements on elected bodies Unelected judges making judgements on elected bodies Are judges sufficiently trained? Are judges sufficiently trained? Difficult for individuals to initiate the process Difficult for individuals to initiate the process Only 1/3 of actions reach final hearing Only 1/3 of actions reach final hearing Only 1 in 6 cases succeed Only 1 in 6 cases succeed Enormous cost Enormous cost

 Your task Read Watts, p and list as many examples as you can of successful judicial review cases against the government. Read Watts, p and list as many examples as you can of successful judicial review cases against the government.

Judicial review in action Michael Howard (Cons, Home Sec): several cases including exclusion of Rev Moon from UK due to financial irregularities Michael Howard (Cons, Home Sec): several cases including exclusion of Rev Moon from UK due to financial irregularities Michael Howard Michael Howard David Blunkett (Lab, Home Sec): over Nationality, Immigration & Asylum Act (2002) David Blunkett (Lab, Home Sec): over Nationality, Immigration & Asylum Act (2002) David Blunkett David Blunkett Anti-Terrorism Act (2001): detention without trial unlawful, as were ‘control orders’ Anti-Terrorism Act (2001): detention without trial unlawful, as were ‘control orders’ Anti-Terrorism Act Anti-Terrorism Act Prague Airport (2004) – activities of immigration officers contravened 1951 Refugee Convention Prague Airport (2004) – activities of immigration officers contravened 1951 Refugee Convention Prague Airport (2004) Prague Airport (2004) Belmarsh (2004) – 9 prisoners held without trial Belmarsh (2004) – 9 prisoners held without trial Belmarsh (2004) Belmarsh (2004)

Plenary Plenary Do you think judicial review gives judges too much power or is it an essential part of British democracy? Discuss this point with your partner and write a judgement paragraph. Do you think judicial review gives judges too much power or is it an essential part of British democracy? Discuss this point with your partner and write a judgement paragraph.

 Your task Read p. 178 and note 5 key articles of the HRA. Read p. 178 and note 5 key articles of the HRA. Why did Labour decide to pass a British Human Rights Act in 1988? Why did Labour decide to pass a British Human Rights Act in 1988? Read pp and create a scales chart listing evidence that the HRA has been a force for good or not. Read pp and create a scales chart listing evidence that the HRA has been a force for good or not.

Key articles Right to life Right to life Freedom of though, conscience and religion Freedom of though, conscience and religion Freedom of expression Freedom of expression Freedom from discrimination Freedom from discrimination Right to privacy Right to privacy Can you see any potential problems in enforcing some of these rights?

Reasons for HRA (1998) Need for British Human rights Act Need for British Human rights Act Cost: £30,000 per case on average Cost: £30,000 per case on average Time: 5 years to go to court Time: 5 years to go to court Parliamentary sovereignty: European Court challenging decisions of UK govt. Parliamentary sovereignty: European Court challenging decisions of UK govt. CCTV footage showing the moment when Jamie Bulger was led off by his attackers

HRA - positive Reducing time & cost of cases Reducing time & cost of cases Upholding sovereignty of UK Parliament Upholding sovereignty of UK Parliament Clarity – EU convention enshrined in UK law Clarity – EU convention enshrined in UK law UK judges able to apply human rights law to UK legislation UK judges able to apply human rights law to UK legislation Judges cannot overturn laws – rule they are ‘incompatible’ Judges cannot overturn laws – rule they are ‘incompatible’

HRA - negative Broad brush approach to judgements Broad brush approach to judgements Empowering & politicising judges still further Empowering & politicising judges still further Controversial cases, e.g. rights of criminal protected Controversial cases, e.g. rights of criminal protected Insufficient: calls from Cameron for a British ‘Bill of Rights’ and scrapping of HRA Insufficient: calls from Cameron for a British ‘Bill of Rights’ and scrapping of HRA Growth of ‘compensation culture’ Growth of ‘compensation culture’compensation culturecompensation culture

Plenary Plenary Is there a case for scrapping the HRA? Are we living in a society of too many rights and no responsibilities? Has the HRA given too much power to judges? Is there a case for scrapping the HRA? Are we living in a society of too many rights and no responsibilities? Has the HRA given too much power to judges?