Delivery mechanism in Leader – LAG level Jela Tvrdonova 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnerships for Health Reform Public Sector Contracting of NGOs to Deliver HIV/AIDS Services: Case Studies from Brazil and Guatemala XIII International.
Advertisements

BUDGETING Training Unit 13.2 Principles and financial rules of mobility.
DOs and DONTs Joan-Anton Carbonell Kingston University EC External Expert TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Financing of OAS Activities Sources of cooperation Cooperation modalities Cooperation actors Specific Funds management models and resources mobilization.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Estonian public sector quality award pilot project 2003 Learning state agency Karin Närep Ministry of Finance of Estonia Rome 2003 Rahandusministeerium.
Karelia ENPI CBC Opening seminar for the first call Henna-Mari Helenius
1 Eurostat Unit B1 – IT Systems for Statistical Production IT outsourcing in Eurostat – our experience Georges Pongas, Adam Wroński Meeting on the Management.
PPOA CORPORATE PROFILE. Who we are The Public Procurement Oversight Authority is the organization responsible for overseeing the implementation of the.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
The New TNI Laboratory Accreditation Standards Requirements for an Accreditation Body.
Seminar on community-led local development Keeping it simple Brussels, 6 February
Facilitate by: Mr. Ok Libounna Director for Financial Affair, Church World Service (CWS)
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
Implementation of Leader Axis measures by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Country Support Programme (CSP) GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 1 to 3 November 2011 Cape Town, South Africa.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
The MCH Proposal Development and Critique. The MCH Proposal: Development and Critique Introduction Donor vs foundation funding Funding resources Funding.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Federico Milani European Commission March 2004 – Part2 eContent European Digital Content on the Global Networks.
1 Ministry of Education Budget Execution March 28, 2010 As of.
Technical Assistance Strategy Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Operational Programme Technical Meeting&Joint Approval Committee, Bucharest,
“Implementation of the bottom-up approach under Axis 4. LEADER - Main conclusions and key elements from Extended report “ by Mr. Panayiotis PATRAS, ELARD.
Guidelines for the administration of axis 4 LEADER 17th July 2014, Nitra Mgr. Veronika Korčeková, MA Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Eastern and Southern Africa Sandton, South Africa, 3-4 November 2010 Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
1 This project is co-financed by the European Union and the Republic of Turkey VERIFICATION OF SERVICE CONTRACTS Inception Reports Interim Reports.
Transnational Cooperation or how to implement Local Development Strategy efficiently through the Leader measure 421 Matej Štepec Rural Development Division.
Croatian Experience with Management of EU Funds Nataša Mikuš, Deputy State Secretary Central Office for Development Strategy and Coordination of EU Funds.
South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme Bologna, 15° June 2009 Kick-off meeting of project SARMa SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
The local development strategy content Jela Tvrdonova, 2012.
UN-REDD – QUICK OVERVIEW. The UN-REDD Programme. What it is? Since part of you may not have heard about the UN-REDD Programme, I have thought it could.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Important Points For Applicant Organizations’ Self- Assessment Philippine Council for NGO Certification (PCNC)
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
EEA grants Conference in Bergen Norway, Bergen, April April 2012 Slovak National Focal Point – the Government Office of the Slovak Republic.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Country Support Programme GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND TREASURY Aid Coordination and Effectiveness activities in DCF Meeting Sarajevo, 24 February 2009.
Grant Proposal Writing
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
The Tutor Teacher. Is this how it feels? Which way now???
Leader approach in 2007 – 2013 in SR Jela Tvrdoňová.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
KZN Global Fund Programme Overview and Progress Update Mr. S Magagula
The 3 rd model of the typology of LEADER implementation: The Greek Model (Global Grant schemes) Intervention Areas of LEADER In Greece.
ASEM Annual Review Meeting Brussels, June 28, 2006 ASEM PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS The Government of Indonesia.
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT for the CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM for CAMBODIA (CD4CDM-CAM) National Workshop on Capacity Development for the Clean Development.
An Integrated Approach to the Future Role of the RCARO in Support of the RCA Programme.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Country Support Programme (CSP)
Cambodia National Work Plan
11th meeting of the Monitoring Committee of the Operational Programme Research, Development and Education Prague, 12th October 2017 (2nd day)
Objectives of the Training
Country Support Programme GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Drafting the Guidelines for applicants
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
Rahandusministeerium
Opening seminar of the project
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Human resource and Work flow of the Research Office, RUPP
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Country Support Programme (CSP)
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Delivery mechanism in Leader – LAG level Jela Tvrdonova 2015

Content of the presentation  What is delivery mechanism  Overall organisation of delivery  Call for proposals  Projects evaluation, selection, approval  Project implementation  Monitoring

What is delivery mechanism?  Local development strategy is the programme document based on the global grant  Resources allocated in the global grant are expected to be implemented in line with the strategy intervention logic  Delivery mechanism is the set of procedures enabling implementing planned resources in expected manner

Overall organisation of the delivery  Clear implementation rules  All parties involved in delivery mechanism properly informed about rules  Implementation rules accessible and sufficiently explained to general public/beneficiaries  Effective mechanism for feedback from public/ beneficiaries established

Calls for proposals  calls clearly formulated containing all necessary details  information on calls accessible by public/beneficiaries  clear conditions/rules provided by the Paying Agency in setting up call for proposals by LAG  Paying Agency consult LAGs in setting up rules for call for proposals

Consultation to beneficiaries  Office of the LAG provides consultation  Various forms nof consultation, suitability  Office of the LAG provide consultancies also in the field  Type of consultancies is provided

Registration of applications  enough time allocated for registration  deadlines for registration applications are realistic  separate staff member responsible for registration

Project evaluation Members of project evaluation committee are  familiar with LDS objectives, measures, activities  familiar with rules and procedures of the project evaluation  flexible in time, so the evaluation can take place when planned and does not threaten the project selection procedure  professionally well prepared to evaluate various projects Project evaluation criteria are announced and known by member of project evaluation committee

Project selection Members of the LAG board are  familiar with LDS objectives, measures, activities  familiar with rules and procedures of the project selection  flexible in time, so the selection can take place when planned and does not threaten the project approval Project selection criteria are announced and known by LAG board members

Project approval  Paying Agency/Body is prepared well to approve projects  Lenght of projects approval  Paying Agency is prepared to consult failures/mistakes  Paying Agency provides training to LAG staff in preparation of project document

Contracting beneficiaries  Lenght of time from project approval to signing the contract with beneficiaries  Contracts are followed by both parties  Condition under which the contract can be cancelled are transparent and known by beneficiaries

Project implementation  Projects are implemented as planned  Time for projects implementation and its connection to the type of project  Consequences if project is not implemented – for beneficiary, for donor  Promotion of implemented projects

Requests for payment  Rules for request for payment are accessible and known for beneficiaries  The registration of the request is simple  The lenght of administration of the request  The control on the spot is the condition for payment  The lenght for execution of the payment

Evaluation of project implementation  Implemented projects are evaluated  Implemented projects are promoted

Monitoring  How is the monitoring organised  Beneficiaries participate in monitoring  Types of data submitted by beneficiaries  Etc...