Ethical Dialogue and Argumentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESEARCH PROPOSAL DR.URJA MANKAD.
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Moral Reasoning Making appropriate use of facts and opinions to decide the right thing to do Quotations from Jacob Needleman’s The American Soul A Crucial.
The Art of Argumentation
Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Chapter Three McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reading Literacy l Theoretical framework » Interactive models of reading » Social models of reading.
The Sunrays. notes from our communication and preparation of the IP Sustainable Enlightment Educate and prepare our students for the limits of our environment.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Paragraph Quiz Answer True or False.
Ethical Responsibility in Human Communication Johannesen, Valde, & Whedbee.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Conducting Effective Meetings The purpose of this module is to enhance participants’ knowledge and skill in observing team meetings.
The purpose of this workshop is to introduce faculty members to some of the foundation issues associated with designing assignments for writing intensive.
Critical Thinking Skills for all Subjects
Arguments What are we talking about?. What do we mean? An argument is not a fight or a quarrel. An argument is not a fight or a quarrel. It can be a pleasurable.
How to Observe Classrooms Bridget K Hamre, Ph.D. Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning (CASTL)
ETHICS IN COMMUNICATION The first means of persuasion discussed by Aristotle is "Ethos," or ethical proof. Sometimes described as persuasion by the moral.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
California State University East Bay
Connections paper Route J – Religious Ethics with New Testament 2792 About the paper & exam questions.
Tutorial Methods of Instruction Assessment and Feedback Adapted from a presentation at PBL2002 by Dr. Bill Galey, University of New Mexico, School of Medicine.
Today’s Quote Use soft words and hard arguments English Proverb.
Introduction to Business Ethics. Overview of the Course Introductions Syllabus Text and other readings Assignments Expectations Questions?
Can You Reach the Standard? a “test your knowledge” quiz Directions: Click on the button below the correct answer for each question. If you are right,
9-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved CHAPTER NINE Ethics In Negotiation.
 Organizing and Presenting a Persuasive Message.
RESEARCH ESSAYS Research, Think, Write 1. Lecture Outline 1. Research Proposal Feedback 2. Thinking, Planning, and Research 3. Thinking, Writing, and.
Chapter 2 The Ethics of Public Speaking By A. Chulamani Chantarawandi A. Autcha Sudhankitara (A.Jig) CA2003 Presentation Technique The course material.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This website reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be.
Writing the Persuasive Essay. Following the Prompt To begin a persuasive essay, you must first have an opinion you want others to share. The writer’s.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano
THE PROCESS OF PLANNING The “Back Story” for teachers…..
Trauma Informed Courts: Principles and Practices ► Integrating trauma-informed care, SAMHSA recovery principles, and procedural fairness to achieve improved.
Debates Grade 11-SB13C Plants in the Natural Environment Period-75 minutes.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Debate Lesson Do Now Watch the following clip: x2YSnpkhttps:// x2YSnpk Write.
Central Core CD Unit B 2-5 Employability in Agriculture/Horticulture Industry.
The Value in Formative Assessment Prepared By: Jen Ramos.
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Turan ÖZCERİT.  What is moral values  What is Ethics  What is engineering ethics You will learn: 2.
University of North Alabama
Ethics of Persuasion “If you’ve got em’ by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow” General George S. Patton.
Writing at Work Proposing a Solution to a Problem.
Writing in Your Discipline Writing the Research Proposal.
1 Technical Communication A Reader-Centred Approach First Canadian Edition Paul V. Anderson Kerry Surman
Re-Cap NGSS. Assessment, Evaluation, and Alignment.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Persuasive Speaking. The nature of persuasive speeches Persuasive Speeches attempt to influence audience members Speakers want to: –have audience adopt.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
What is the focus in Sweden? Steering system Laws and regulations- Goals Inspection framework Inspection instruments Reporting system and consequences.
Summary of the lesson: 1. Relationship between Strategic Planning, Social Responsibility and Business Ethics. 2. Strategic Planning issues. 3. Social Responsibilities.
Dr. Diane Villa Assistant Faculty In Residence Department of Psychology 1.
RESEARCH PAPER WITH STRONG BODY PARAGRAPHS USING EVIDENCE TO PROVE ASSERTIONS.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Planning MATHEMATICS Years 1 to 10.
Copyright National Center for State Courts, Center on Court Access to Justice for All Access to Justice for the Self Represented Litigant Module.
Chapter 7 Selecting a Topic and Connecting to the Audience.
LD Debate Study Information
Guide to moral decision making
Ethical Decision Making
Thinking with Technology Course Module 9
Writing Position Papers
English 12 Argument: Debating the Issues
Ask yourself why... This session will teach you how to explain points well, using the ‘why’ model of analysis. The first ‘E’ is the most important part.
Aspects of Science 1 The body of all knowledge and understanding of the way the Physical and Natural World work 2 The application of that knowledge - Technology.
Chapter 16 Persuasive Speaking.
BIG question: is aggression human nature?
Introduction to Reflective Writing
Aspects of Science 1 The body of all evidence based knowledge and understanding of the way the Physical and Natural World work 2 The application of that.
Presentation transcript:

Ethical Dialogue and Argumentation Quote of the Day: “Ethical Judgments focus more precisely on the degrees of rightness and wrongness, virtue and vice, and obligation in human behavior.” Richard Johannesen, Ethics in Human Communication

Three Dimensions The End: Intended outcome of the act The Means: the action, mechanism, technique by which the end was achieved The Motive: reason or justification for the act

Two Levels Content Level Relational Level Claims Evidence Goals Enhanced or diminished

Persuasion as Love True or Noble Lover Seducer Abuser Harasser Other centered argument Seducer Argument as game, truth as pleasure Abuser Power is more important than truth Harasser Mix of negative and neutral aspects

Reflection & Discussion What past or current public figures are examples of each of these approaches to persuasion? Noble lover? Seducer? Abuser?

Application Break into 6 groups Take the ethical standard you are assigned and prepare to teach it to the class. Summarize/Clarification of meaning Example(s) from society (positive or negative) Apply to our class

Ethical Standards Argumentation in public decision making is more ethical when honest evidence is used. Summary Example(s) Application to this class

Ethical Standards Argumentation in public decision making is more ethical when opposing sides make their best cases, which requires knowledge of how to do argumentation. Summarize/Clarification of meaning Example(s) from society (positive or negative) Apply to our class

Ethical Standards Argumentation in public decision making is more ethical when both sides have an opportunity to be heard. Summarize/Clarification of meaning Example(s) from society (positive or negative) Apply to our class

Ethical Standards Argumentation in public decision making is more ethical when parties in the argument do not deceive or intentionally manipulate. Summarize/Clarification of meaning Example(s) from society (positive or negative) Apply to our class

Ethical Standards Argumentation in public decision making is more ethical when decision makers pay attention to the arguments. Summarize/Clarification of meaning Example(s) from society (positive or negative) Apply to our class

Ethical Standards Educational argumentation is more ethical when evidence is available to all. Summarize/Clarification of meaning Example(s) from society (positive or negative) Apply to our class

What Will Make a Good Debate Topic? Appropriate breadth and scope Timeliness Availability of support material Quality/Sustainability Interest Balance Adapted from NFHS website

Let’s here a few of your topics . . .

Next Time Quiz on Readings so far We decide on topics and break into topic groups—key class!! Come in with good topics