Trends and developments at EU level on access to justice from the perspective of granting interim relief by national judges in the environmental field.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU LEGISLATION ON NATURE PROTECTION European Commission COOPERATION WITH NATIONAL JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN THE FIELD OF EU ENVIRONMENTAL LAW WORKSHOP.
Advertisements

Introduction to basic principles of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 Sophie Louveaux María Verónica Pérez Asinari.
EDUCATION Directive 2002/14/EC of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community.
Prof. Jan H. Jans EU and Aarhus Jurisdictional Cmpetition?
Methods of governance. The « community » method Initiative of the Commission Majority voting in the Council Participation of the Parliament (co-decision)
The fundamentals of EC competition law
EU LAW AND THE AARHUS CONVENTION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS WITH A PARTICULAR FOCUS ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ADAM DANIEL NAGY, G OVERNANCE, I NFORMATION.
Columns Picture here Aarhus Convention & Irish Environmental Law: Key Points & Potential Impact Áine Ryall Dublin, 4 February 2014.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
The Court of Justice European Law in the Making. Terminology Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Venue Venue Standing Standing Chambers Chambers Plenary Session.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE Counsellor, docent, Dr Tuomas Pöysti1 The Constitutionalisation and Evolution of Penal Law and Control Policy in the European.
Columns Picture here Environmental Justice in Ireland: Problems & Prospects Áine Ryall.
A ARHUS C ONVENTION AND THE EU : PARTICIPATORY AND PROCEDURAL RIGHTS PARTICIPATORY AND PROCEDURAL RIGHTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Trier, 4-6th March 2015.
Jerzy Jendrośka The EIA Directive in the case law of CJEU INTERACTION BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND THE NATURE DIRECTIVES ACADEMY OF.
Access to Justice in the Public Participation Context Aarhus Convention, Article 9(2) Áine Ryall School of Law, University College Cork, IRELAND Warsaw,
PROBLEMS AND QUESTIONS OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN HUNGARY AND THE CEE REGION Csaba Kiss EMLA, Justice & Environment 19 October 2012, Budapest, Hungary.
The relevance of EU Law and the procedures of the CJEU for the domestic judge Workshop on EU Law on Industrial Emissions Budapest, 3 June 2013 Trier, 11.
European Ombudsman Access to environmental information Task Force on Access to Information Geneva, 4 December 2014.
The Law of the European Union Information and Communication.
A ARHUS C ONVENTION AND THE EU : A GENERAL OVERVIEW PARTICIPATORY AND PROCEDURAL RIGHTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Warsaw, 4-6th March 2015.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
Competences of the “Union” and Sex Equality: A Comparative Look at the European Union and the United States Barbara Havelkova Dubrovnik; April 2009.
European Commission Taxation and Customs Union Brussels, 10 November Taxation of International Artistes and Community Law European Commission
EC Study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in the EU Presentation at the 5th meeting of the Task Force on Access to.
Habitats Directive - lessons from case-law of Court of Justice of European Union since 1999 European Commission, DG Environment.
The Aarhus Convention and Access to Justice in Ireland Where are we now? Michael Ewing Coordinator of the Environmental Pillar
Legal instruments for site protection in the EU Boris Barov, BSPB/BirdLife Bulgaria.
Article 9, paras.1 and 2 of the Aarhus Convention: overview “IMPLEMENTING THE AARHUS CONVENTION TODAY: PAVING THE WAY TO A BETTER ENVIRONMENT AND GOVERNANCE.
Introduction to EU Civil Judicial Cooperation Dr. Francesco Pesce Assistant Professor in International Law Università degli Studi di Genova (IT)
1 LAW OF THE EU WEEK 7 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY LAW.
Recent developments on access to justice and mediation Rome Adam Daniel Nagy Compliance promotion, governance and legal issues, Unit A2 – Directorate.
Documentary holdings of the European Union law AL.
Michael Fruhmann Dr. Michael Fruhmann EBRD Project Ukraine 29/30th March /31/ Procedural fairness and the EU Remedies Directive – an overview.
Cyprus, April 2011 Direct effect of EU (VAT) Directives.
Seminar on EC case-law Bedanna Bapuly Brno, 2007 October 15th.
Jurisprudence Prepared by: Aphrodite Smagadi Mariah Kennedy.
Access for Whom? The issue of Legal Standing Carol Hatton Solicitor, WWF-UK “Opening the doors to justice: the challenge of strenghthening public access”
The Principles Governing EU Environmental Law. 2 The importance of EU Environmental Law at the European and globallevel The importance of EU Environmental.
Court of Justice of the European Union
Effective Justice? - Synthesis report in EC study on implementation of Art. 9.3 and 9.4 of the AC in 17 of the Union’s Member States; 2012 Presentation.
Access to Justice The Hungarian story Starting point: Article administrative, judicial review where access to information is refused 9.1 administrative,
CRIMINAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 April 2015 THE LISBON TREATY AND CRIMINAL LAW Dr. sc. Zoran Burić Department of Criminal Procedural Law University.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
Doc.JUDr.Soňa Skulová, Ph.D. Principles of Good Governance.
Cases C-401 to 403/12 and C-404 to 405/12: No review of legality in light of the Aarhus Convention Dr. Mariolina Eliantonio, LL.M. Prof. Chris Backes Maastricht.
Participatory Environmental Governance : Role of Communities in Europe and Asia Jona Razzaque Reader in Law Bristol Law School, UWE, Bristol, UK Bristol.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
European Law in the Case- law of the Constitutional Court of Latvia Kristine Kruma.
ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION presentation JOHN HONTELEZ, SECRETARY GENERAL EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL BUREAU Seminar Dublin 26 February 2010.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
Compatibility of ICS in CETA with EU law Presentation by: Laurens Ankersmit GUE CETA conference 31/5/2016.
The EU Accession to the ECHR after Opinion 2/13: Reflections, Solutions and the Way Forward Dr Sonia Morano – Foadi and Dr Stelios Andreadakis European.
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
Introduction ‘Trends In The Design Of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Included In The European Union’s Trade And ​Investment Agreements ​Towards Judicialization.
EU Legislative Powers: Principles and Procedures
European Union Law Law 326.
JUDr. Michal Maslen, PhD. University of Trnava, Faculty of Law
The EU and International Environmental Law
Aarhus, EU and Access to Justice in Environmental Decision-making
Private and Public law lesson 4 The European integration process and the European legal order (overview)
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
European actions.
National remedies and national actions
Private and Public law lesson 4 The European integration process and the European legal order (overview)
Academic Year Prof. Pietro Boria
Article 9 of theAarhus Convention: overview
Presentation transcript:

Trends and developments at EU level on access to justice from the perspective of granting interim relief by national judges in the environmental field Compliance promotion, governance and legal issues, Unit A2 – Directorate-General Environment

Access to justice in the EU - an overview  General concept of access to justice - Treaty, Charter, Aarhus Convention, secondary law  Implementation of the Aarhus Convention (Convention) into EU law  CJEU jurisprudence on access to justice and injunctive relief

Access to justice – and the Treaties  Recent changes in the Treaties regarding access to justice:  Article 6 (ex-article 6 TUE) Lisbon Treaty  the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union has the same legal value as the Treaties.  Charter of Fundamental Rights Art 37 and Art 47.  high level of environmental protection  effective judicial protection  legal aid  Article 19 TUE  (…)Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law.  This is based on a well-established case-law of the CJEU (Case 33/76 Rewe, Case C ‑ 312/93 Peterbroeck, Case C-268/06 Impact, C-240/09 etc.)

EU and the Aarhus Convention – A special approach to environmental matters  Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters  3 pillars concept  The Convention is part of EU law (decision 370/2005/EC)  It is necessary to protect the nature that cannot protect itself...  As AG Sharpston put it in Trianel (C-115/09): „The fish cannot go to Court.”

Aarhus Convention and EU law - the three pillars  The 3 pillars have been implemented by secondary law  Regulation 1367/2006 for the Institutions  a Proposal for a Directive on access to justice in environmental matters of the European Parliament and of the Council [24 October 2003 COM(2003) 624COM(2003) 624  Directive 2003/4/CE on access to information  Directive 2003/35/CE on public participation (EIA and IPPC)

EU and the Aarhus Convention – access to justice in secondary law  The „guarantee” pillar implementing Art. 9 (2), (4) access to justice as regards public participation of the Aarhus Convention reference made to injunctive relief  Standing for individuals whose rights are impaired or have a sufficient interest  Special status for NGOs promoting environmental objectives (See AG Sharpston opinion in C-115/09)  Scope of review by the judge: not only procedural but in a substantial sense as well  Aim to provide wide access to justice  Procedures should be fair, timely, not prohibitively expensive

Injunctive relief in the context of the Aarhus Convention - the definition Art 9(4): "(…)provide adequate and effective remedies, including injunctive relief as appropriate, and be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive." What is injunctive relief? As the Aarhus Implementation Guide indicates, main elements of the definition to avoid/mitigate irreversible damage authorities' power to order to stop or to undertake certain action order called an “injunction” and the remedy achieved by it is called “injunctive relief”.

Stepping stones for reaching injunctive relief in the ECJ (now CJEU) jurisprudence Effective judicial protection (as also reinforced by TUE 19 and the Charter) – Principle of loyal cooperation – MS duty to ensure effective protection of rights derived from EU law Procedural autonomy – Ms duty (discretion) to set up effective protection mechanisms » 2 principles to be observed in the national context of remedies (effectiveness and equivalence) » Where it is uncertain if an action under national law safeguards respect of rights derived from EU law, interim relief should be granted Linking the Aarhus Convention and the jurisprudence of the CJEU approach involving all considerations

Principles of access to justice and effective judicial protection in the EU legal order  Effective judicial protection is strongly linked to the effectiveness and equivalence principles of EU law (C-222/84, Johnston (para 18, 19); C ‑ 268/06 Impact, C-431/93 van Schijndel, Unibet C- 432/05, Case C ‑ 268/06 Impact etc.)  2 main conditions for judicial protection  Rights guaranteed by EU law need to be protected the same way as the rights derived from the national rules (principle of equivalence)  Principle of effectiveness (practice of rights not excessively difficult or impossible)  Natural procedural autonomy applies (see Safalero C-13/01, para 49), detailed arrangements are to be determined by the domestic legal order to safeguard rights

Injunctive relief in the jurisprudence of the CJEU (1)  Factortame C-213/89 - para 21  Nature of the dispute: compatibility of national rules with Community rules  "(…) the full effectiveness of Community law would be just as much impaired if a rule of national law could prevent a court seized of a dispute governed by Community law from granting interim relief in order to ensure the full effectiveness of the judgment to be given on the existence of the rights claimed under Community law. It follows that a court which in those circumstances would grant interim relief, if it were not for a rule of national law, is obliged to set aside that rule.„  Other case: Zuckerfabrik joined cases C-143/88 and C-92/89,

Injunctive relief in the jurisprudence of the CJEU (2)  Unibet C-432/05 – falling into the category of the Factortame case  Preliminary reference on Swedish rules on Lotteries - promotion of gaming activities  AG Sharpston's Opinion – emphasizing procedural autonomy – as the case concerned damages, she concluded that the interim action does not correspond to the principal action  Ruling: Effective interim judicial protection of rights, subcategory of effective judicial protection – 2 main conditions - effectiveness and equivalence (Rewe C-33/76. para 5, Peterbroeck C-312/93, para 12),  Interim relief (if necessary) should be possible, until judgment is delivered on compatibility of national rules with EU rules, to ensure full effectiveness of EU law  National criteria to be applied in granting interim relief

Temporary measures in the jurisprudence of the CJEU (1) – the environmental aspect o C-41/11 – Inter-Environment Wallonie o Preliminary reference – implementation of the SEA Directive o Main facts of the case: adoption of a government order – infringing one, but respecting the other Directive (Nitrates) o Is it possible to keep in force temporarily a measure, eventhough it is in breach of EU law? o AG Kokott conclusions: o Reference to C-409/06 (Winner Wetten); differences in environmental field, primacy vs environmental protection =effectiveness o Existing measure to remain in force until replacement o (p. 34) Assessment of effectiveness: procedure as a whole, effect on EU law, before various national bodies, conduct of the procedure, special features, objective of the instrument

Temporary measures in the jurisprudence of the CJEU (2) – the environmental aspect Ruling delivered in April 2012 Certain measures (all general and practical) may be maintained (by national judges!) if: -the national measure correctly tranposes the other Directive -future measure would not avoid the damage caused to the env by eventual annulment - result of lower level of protection, counter to objectives of the Directive -Strictly temporary measure until the situation is adequately remedied

Injunctive relief in the jurisprudence of the CJEU - linking the Aarhus concept of access to justice (1) On-going Slovak case (Krizan) - Case C-416/10 on a Reference for a preliminary ruling from Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (NSSR) Main facts of the case: waste disposal site – series of appeals against planning decisions - involving 3 instances of courts Issues addressed: human rights vs environmental rights, injunctive relief, scope of Article 9 (4), temporal effect of authorisations, hierarchy of courts AG Kokott delivered opinion on 19th April 2012 Case is still on-going

Injunctive relief in the jurisprudence of the CJEU - linking the Aarhus concept of access to justice (2) C-416/10 AG Kokott main conclusions Linking the Aarhus conecpt and general principle of effective interim judicial protection in order to ensure full effectiveness of national judgments aimed at protecting rights Making explicit reference to Article 9 (4) of the Convention The Impact Assessment and IPPC Directives rules on access to justice include implicily injunctive relief, even without having to explicity refer to it in the text of the legislative instruments Charter of Fundamental Rights - Article 47 on access to justice and Art 19 TUE on effective legal remedies is also referred to

Access to justice – CJEU jurisprudence - concept of effective judicial protection in the environmental field Developing jurisprudence of the CJEU linking effective judicial protection in EU law and the Aarhus Convention - Latest developments in the CJEU case-law - the Irish case (C- 427/07), Slovak case (C-240/09), Swedish case (C-268/08), Trianel (German) case (C- 115/09), Belgian case (C-134/09), C-182/10 – 2nd Belgian case – Solvay, 2 UK cases on prohibitive costs C-260/11, C-530/11, C-72/11 German preliminary reference

Trends in the jurisprudence – Increasing role of national judges Recent case-law (Boxus, C-240/09), stronger control by national judges Taking forward the Kraaijeveld line of rulings, courts are to set aside non-compliant national rules Two main elements, effective judicial protection and ensuring that the CJEU exercises its role based on the preliminary references Role in contributing to the development of jurisprudence

Room left for further interpretation Scope of judicial review – substantial and procedural legality. Standing of foreign NGOs. Prohibitive costs – what is prohibitive, difference of notions from one MS to another – standard of living, GDP, personal capacity to pay the costs – subjective/objective test Should the procedural guarantees implemented by MSs to all levels of appeal? Standing rights – NGOs, what can be considered to be restrictive standing criteria? What exactly do we mean by timely, what are sufficient procedural guarantees put in place? Injunctive relief - is it inherent in the access to justice system (see Factortame) - see on-going C-416/10.

Conclusions Under consumer protection already existing secondary law - Directive 2009/22/EC on injunctions for the protection of consumer interests Concept of injunctive relief implicitly present in all pieces of legislation that provides rights to the public As jurisprudence developed the concept, it is inherent in the principle of effective judicial protection – effective interim protection Pending proposal on access to justice in environmental matters – see recent Communication on implementation Com/2012/095 ving.htm