Conditioners for Hay and Haylage Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Mower Conditioner Options Sickle Cutterbar - roll conditioner Disk Cutterbar - roll conditioner Disk Cutterbar - impeller conditioner
Cross Section of Crop Stem Stems have a waxy surface called cutin Conditioning should crack the stem surface for faster drying
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Conditioner width as percent of cutting width Maximum Swath Width Conditioner Width
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Maximum swath width versus cutting width Maximum Swath Width Cutting Width
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Put hay into wide swath Keep off of ground
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Conditioned hay
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Conditioner types Flail/impellers Rubber Rolls
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Rollers vs flail (impeller) conditioners
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Roll and Impeller Comparison Roll creates a crushing action Impeller creates a stripping action Impeller has greater capacity Impeller tends to have higher losses Roll with rotary mower will leave strips in light crops (Limited air through rear of machine)
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Drying Rate Comparisons CutterbarConditioner Drying Rate SickleRoll+.2 hr(2nd) RotaryRoll0(1st) RotaryImpeller+1.8 hr(3rd)
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Conditioner drying rates AlfalfaGrass
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Conditioner field losses Flail conditioners have 2 to 3 % higher field losses with alfalfa. The loss is all leaves so forage quality is significantly reduced. Stems Leaves
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Adjust conditioner properly Tension on rollers Spacing of rollers
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007 Adjust conditioner roller spacing Measure clearance where “Crimp” or smallest clearance occurs
Dan Undersander-Agronomy © 2007
Summary Flail conditioner designed for grasses Faster drying for grasses Greater leaf loss with alfalfa DM loss Forage Quality loss Roll conditioner designed for alfalfa Faster drying for alfalfa