Prioritising interventions using EXTRAPOLATE The Livestock and Fish Dairy Value Chain in Tanzania Model Elements Entry Points Workshop for the Tanzania.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for Project Interventions Livelihoods Skill building Food Security Assetization and Income Generation Access to financial services Fair terms.
Advertisements

Key Challenges and Opportunities for Reducing Vulnerability 1.Diversification - No Framework for Implementing and Evaluating Payments for Ecosystem Services.
Improving agricultural livelihoods Lessons for the Australia Afghanistan Community Resilience Scheme.
Planned FTF Projects to be launched in 2012 May 3, nd Quarterly Feed the Future Partners Coordination Meeting.
John Meyers Managing Director – North America Swisscontact.
Slum Situation Analysis
EUREPGAP The European Principles of Food Safety. Increasing awareness of food safety in consumers greater variety of foods available for the consumer.
Agribusiness in Pakistan Opportunities for Investment.
The Way we Live: Livelihood Systems in the Sahel AIACC_AF92 Presented at the Africa Regional Workshop, South Africa March 10-13, 2003.
Expectations and synergies with the CGIAR Livestock and Fish Research Program.
80 Impact evaluation of upgrading cassava value chains through post- harvest engineering and processing research-for-development in sub- Saharan Africa.
Entry points for extending the frontiers of dairy value chains in Tanzania EXTRAPOLATE Workshop 05 Mar 2014, Zanzibar, Tanzania A. Omore.
Urban Planning and Management Tools for Poverty Alleviation
Dairy Sector in Nepal Dairy sub-sector shares more than 60 % of livestock sector contribution to GDP. Annual production of milk is 1.35 million metric.
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Small-Scale Irrigation Alan Duncan Ethiopia Partner meeting, Mar From Plan to Action Field Studies and Ex Ante.
Liquid Milk and Feed Value Chain Analysis for Wolmera District
Directorate of e-Government1 e- Government Strategy for Kenya. By Peter Gakunu, Cabinet Office 23 rd March 2004.
Value chain stages  Input Supply  Production  Trading/Marketing (primary collector)  Processing  Trading/ Marketing (Wholesaler, Retailer)  Consumer.
ENSURING FOOD SECURITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA A WAY THROUGH World Farmers Organization Rome 7 th June 2012 Martin Eweg African Forum for Agricultural Advisory.
By Md. Ehsanul Bari Managing Director Grameen Motsho O Pashusampad Foundation Action Plan for Dairy Development in Bangladesh “Regional Expert Meeting.
Assessment of livestock production and feed resources at Robit Bata, Bahir Dar Zuria Zewdie Wondatir Holetta Research Center.
National Policy and Strategy for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 15 March, 2004.
Strengthening Rural Service Provision Approach and Experience of Innovision Consulting Pvt. Limited January 2013.
Dairy sub-sector in Zambia: How can it be productive Presentation by James Chinkubila Kasongo Heifer Zambia.
NIGERIA Developing CSA within the NAIP while reinforcing inter-sectoral consistency: progress, bottlenecks and support needs With technical facilitation.
1. Deliberate on the draft research framework and suggest improvements Resource for implementation Attention at regional level for cross- cutting issue.
Framework for Monitoring Learning & Evaluation
Promoting CARICOM/CARIFORUM Food Security (Project GTFS/RLA/141/ITA) (FAO Trust Fund for Food Security and Food Safety – Government of Italy Contribution)
Sustainable and productive farming systems The livestock sector --POINTS TO PONDER-- Jimmy Smith.
An Introduction to the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework
Stjepan Tanic Agribusiness and Infrastructure Officer Subregional Office for Central and Eastern Europe Annual meeting 2006 Round Table 2 Ukraine: IFIs/donors’
PARTNERSHIPS IN SUPPORT OF CAADP Progress Report Brief Progress Report AUC Page 1 of 14.
Paul Kiepe Regional Representative for East and Southern Africa
2 Most Marginalized Women EP people in Rural Areas People & comms affected by disaster & environmental change Most marginalized in urban areas CARE Bangladesh.
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY FOR STANDARDS CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT IN TANZANIA: THE CASE OF ORGANIC SPICES Paper presented in the final & book launching SAFE project.
Engendering Research in LIVES Value Chain Development Interventions Ephrem Tesema and Kathleen Colverson March 26-28, 2013 Addis Ababa/ ILRI Campus.
FARM Africa/SOS Sahel Ethiopia Strengthening Sustainable livelihoods and Forest Management Over view of the program April 6, 2013 Bahir dar.
Methodology for preparing national cotton strategies in Africa Alexander Sarris Director, Commodities and Trade Division Food and Agriculture Organization.
Trends and driving forces in livestock production and trade in Sub Saharan Africa C. Sere and M. Herrero The Role of Livestock for ACP countries: challenges.
Background Kerekicho kebele Kerekicho kebele is one of the 28 kebeles in Angacha woreda The area has an average elevation of 2280 masl main production.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES COMPREHENSIVE AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT PROGRAMME IMPACT EVALUATION 20 OCTOBER 2015.
Current Scenarios of Forage and Forage Seed Production and Use in Ethiopia Getnet Assefa November, 2015.
NAMC Business Plan 2005/2006 Presented by: Dora Ndaba (Vice-Chairperson) Peter Dall (Council Member)
Florence M. Turyashemererwa Lecturer- Makerere University
Linking Small Holder Farmers to Local and Regional Markets in Staple Foods Presentation of the CTA Organized Briefing on “Improving Investment and Stimulating.
ObjectivesResearch questionsActivities Nutrition, food safety and value addition 1.1 Improving HH food and nutrition security, particularly the vulnerable.
Prioritising interventions using EXTRAPOLATE The Livestock and Fish Dairy Value Chain in Tanzania Overview Entry Points Workshop for the Tanzania Dairy.
Scaling forages and forage seed in Ethiopia: suggested purpose and outcomes of this national stakeholder consultation Barry Shapiro, on behalf of a brainstorming.
Remarks on Demand-driven, Participatory Agricultural Extension Services for Cambodia William Bradley, Agriculture Officer USAID/Cambodia.
Technical workshop on dairy value chain development in Eastern Africa Michael Waithaka 29 March 2016 Nairobi 1 Regional dairy policy work.
Workshop on Regional Cooperation on Animal Welfare Amman October 2009.
Research Needs and Outcomes in Agro-enterprise Development Peter J. Batt.
Weather index insurance, climate variability and change and adoption of improved production technology among smallholder farmers in Ghana Francis Hypolite.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
International Livestock Research institute
Presentation for Plenary Session 2:
Design elements for gender-responsive breeding The breeding cycle
Project Overview Tassilo Tiemann
How to increase job creation in Uganda
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR AGRICULTURE SYNERGY
Objectives of Extension
Scaling up the delivery of the Infection and Treatment Method (ITM) in Tanzania --Theory of change by stakeholders and actors of the ITM delivery chain.
Compiled by: David Ngunga
EXTRAPOLATE Ex-ante tool for ranking policy alternatives
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
RESULTS FROM THE INNOVATION LAB FOR SMALL SCALE IRRIGATION
Catholic Relief Services
Animal Scientists role in EU
STRENGTHENING/IMPROVING THE CAPACITY OF
Developing and strengthening Dairy value chains in Tanzania:
Presentation transcript:

Prioritising interventions using EXTRAPOLATE The Livestock and Fish Dairy Value Chain in Tanzania Model Elements Entry Points Workshop for the Tanzania Dairy Value Chain Sea Cliff Resort and Spa, Zanzibar 4-6 March 2014 Timothy Robinson and Peter Thorne

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

Stakeholder Groups Divide into four groups Scope: Contribution of dairy to household income Task: Identify relevant, distinct stakeholder “groups” Directly affected by the model Not too many – unwieldy Each group to prepare list on flipchart paper Present back lists and consolidate on computer Preparation = 1hour Presentation and consolidation = 30 minutes Tim and Peter to circulate … Stakeholder groups should be a group of individuals who face similar constraints and have a similar livelihood status

Stakeholder Groups 1.Small scale intensive dairy producers (4) 2.Small scale extensive dairy producers (2) 3.Medium and large scale intensive dairy produce (6) 4.Medium and large scale extensive dairy producers (5) 5.Pastoralist dairy producers (4) 6.Small scale input and service providers (5) 7.Medium and large scale input and service providers (7) 8.Small scale milk traders (4) 9.Medium and large scale milk traders (7) 10.Small scale milk processors (5) 11.Medium and large scale milk processors (8) 12.Transporters (5) 13.Consumers (4) Livelihood status in brackets

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

Stakeholder livelihood status 1. Small scale intensive dairy producers 1.Low High Mean = 3.50 Variance = 3.25

Stakeholder livelihood status 2. Small scale extensive dairy producers 1.Low High Mean = 2.68 Variance = 3.06

Stakeholder livelihood status 3. Medium and large scale intensive dairy producers 1.Low High Mean = 6.36 Variance = 1.69

Stakeholder livelihood status 4. Medium and large scale extensive dairy producers 1.Low High Mean = 5.30 Variance = 1.91

Stakeholder livelihood status 5. Pastoralist dairy producers 1.Low High Mean = 4.06 Variance = 3.94

Stakeholder livelihood status 6. Small scale input and service providers 1.Low High Mean = 4.84 Variance = 3.29

Stakeholder livelihood status 7. Medium and large scale input and service providers 1.Low High Mean = 7.06 Variance = 0.50

Stakeholder livelihood status 8. Small scale milk traders 1.Low High Mean = 3.91 Variance = 2.36

Stakeholder livelihood status 9. Medium and large scale milk traders 1.Low High Mean = 6.76 Variance = 3.32

Stakeholder livelihood status 10. Small scale milk processors 1.Low High Mean = 4.50 Variance = 0.81

Stakeholder livelihood status 11. Large and medium scale milk processors 1.Low High Mean = 8.00 Variance = 1.30

Stakeholder livelihood status 12. Transporters 1.Low High Mean = 5.41 Variance = 3.42

Stakeholder livelihood status 13. Consumers 1.Low High Mean = 4.12 Variance = 3.16

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

Constraints Divide into four groups Scope: Contribution of dairy to household income Task: Identify relevant constraints Directly affected by the model Not too many – unwieldy Each group to prepare list on flipchart paper Present back lists and consolidate on computer Preparation = 1 hour Presentation and consolidation = 30 minutes Tim and Peter to circulate … Constraints are things that prevent outcomes being achieved

Constraints 1.Lack of improved breeds 2.Lack of affordable credit 3.Lack of knowledge and skills 4.Poor access to quality feeds 5.Lack of reliable markets 6.High cost of processing equipment 7.High transaction costs 8.Lack of business support services 9.Dry season water shortages 10.Prevalence of pests and diseases 11.Inappropriate government regulations 12.Lack of functional farmers organisations 13.Competition from external milk producers

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

Outcomes Divide into four groups Scope: Contribution of dairy to household income Task: Identify relevant outcomes Directly affected by the model Not too many – unwieldy Each group to prepare list on flipchart paper Present back lists and consolidate on computer Preparation = 1 hour Presentation and consolidation = 30 minutes Tim and Peter to circulate … Outcomes contribute to livelihood status and are influenced by changes in constraints

Outcomes 1.Increased income 2.Improved health 3.Improved social status 4.Improved access to basic services 5.Increased food security 6.Gender empowerment 7.Increased milk productivity 8.Increased employment

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

Entry Points Divide into four groups Scope: Contribution of dairy to household income Task: Identify relevant entry points Can be introduced one at a time Each group to prepare list on flipchart paper Present back lists and consolidate on computer Preparation = 1 hour Presentation and consolidation = 30 minutes Tim and Peter to circulate … Entry points include any intervention that is carried out to alleviate constraints. These may be policy, institutional or technical, for example.

Identified dairy policy issues in inputs and services ANIMAL HEALTH: 1.Certification of para-vet practitioners is overly restricted by regulations

Identified dairy policy issues in inputs and services GENETICS 1.Certification of artificial insemination (AI) technicians is too restricted (by the Veterinary Surgeons Act) for efficient delivery of services 2.The regulator of breeding services is also an active practitioner. What is the optimal public-private-partnership (PPP) for delivery of breeding services? 3.Animal registration, recording and evaluation are administered by too many bodies 4.Animal registration, performance recording and genetic evaluation are administered solely by a government agency with inadequate capacity to deliver on the service. What is the optimal PPP for this? 5.Animal Breeding Bill needs to be submitted to Attorney General 6.Brucellosis needs to be made a notifiable disease so testing and control are made mandatory and publicly funded 7.There is no information system capturing livestock identification, registration, recording for breeding improvement and traceability

Identified dairy policy issues in inputs and services FEEDS 1.Compounded feed standards are variable and are based on recommendation of cattle with high genetic composition. Related technical question is how to develop recommendations that take into account genetic potential of cattle 2.Feed quality is variable in spite of the standards i.e. poor enforcement of standards and lack of stakeholders participation 3.Sourcing and importation of forage seeds are heavily controlled by the government thus restricting free flow 4.Training and certification of small scale forage seed producers are currently restricted 5.Certification of small scale compounded feed producers who are currently considered illegal (this restricts opportunities to grow markets and improve quality)

Identified dairy policy issues in inputs and services VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT 1.Lack of stakeholder controlled small-scale dairy traders’ and business providers’ associations to contribute to empowerment of their members

Candidate Entry Points A.Establish innovation platforms for learning and sharing across the value chain B.Build capacity of farmers organisations to support improved feeding practices C.Government support for vertical integration in the dairy value chain D.Stimulating private sector participation in the provision of breeding services.

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to outcomes (plenary)

The process Define stakeholders Assign livelihoods (clicker) List constraints Identify outcomes Impact of outcomes on stakeholder livelihoods (table) Impact of constraints on outcomes (table) Relevance of constraints to stakeholders (table) Identify entry points / policy interventions Impact of interventions on constraints (plenary) Relevance of interventions to constraints (plenary)

Relevance: A to B 0 Not relevant Extremely relevant