Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Advertisements

PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION OF THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INITIATIVE 1 Transforming Education in Kentucky Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner Michael.
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Next Generation Professionals Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Interim Joint Committee on Education July 12, 2010.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
October 12, College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support.
Webcast April 23, Webcast Topics:  Overall Agency Updates  Standards Update  Course Codes  College & Career Readiness Delivery Plan Persistence.
Webcast April 22, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
DRAFT 4.0 PRESENTED TO THE OREGON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY 17, 2012 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems.
Webcast January 28, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
January 31 & February 1,  Why are we doing this?  What has been done up to now?  What is the timeline for moving forward? 2.
Maine Teacher Effectiveness Status.  Maine approved a teacher evaluation law during in the 2012 Legislative sessions.  The rules were determined in.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Florida’s Proposal November 14,
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Glen Ridge Public Schools Overview of Teacher/Principal Evaluation Changes EE4NJ (Excellent Educators for New Jersey)
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
No Child Left Behind Waivers: Promising Ideas from Second Round Applications By Jeremy Ayers and Isabel Owen with Glenda Partee and Theodora Chang.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
ESEA Flexibility Package Implications for State Teacher and Leader Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
CAA Options: Collection of Evidence CTE Connection December 8, 2006 Rod Duckworth, Director of Career and Technical Education OSPI.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Developed by Earl W. Hughes, KLA Regional Facilitator and PGES Integrated Design Team Member.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.
Evaluation: An Opportunity to leverage learning at all levels School Board Presentation – May 22, 2013.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Five Required Elements
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Implementing Race to the Top
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Presentation transcript:

Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012

Senate Bill 1 (2009)  New academic standards  New assessments  Program Reviews  Improved professional development  New accountability system  Unified plan for improving college/career readiness 2 Unbridled Learning 2

Senate Bill 1 (2009): Highlighting Model Legislation Bold legislation transforming education in Kentucky Council of State Governments Deeper Learning Focus Group Meeting Southern Legislative Conference Annual Meeting 3

ESEA Waiver Principles for Improving Student Achievement and Increasing the Quality of Instruction Kentucky was one of the first of eleven states to be granted a waiver from ESEA requirements. Principle 1: College-and career ready expectations for all students Principle 2: State-developed differentiated recognition, accountability, and support Principle 3: Supporting effective instruction and leadership Principle 4: Reducing duplication and unnecessary burden 4

Principal 3 Supporting Effective Instruction 3A. Develop and adopt SEA guidelines for local teacher and principal evaluation and support systems 3B. Ensure LEAs implement teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that are consistent with SEA guidelines 5

ESEA Waiver Requirements Continuous improvement of instruction Meaningful differentiation of teacher/principal performance using at least three performance levels Multiple measures of effectiveness including use of student growth data (both state standardized tests and formative growth measures that are rigorous and comparable across schools in a local district) as a significant factor Regular evaluation (most likely annual) Clear and timely feedback to include opportunities for professional development Use of the system to inform personnel decisions 6

Current & Proposed System Comparison (Teachers and Principals) Current System Proposed System Development of local plans by district and approval of local plans by KDE Frequency of evaluations of certified personnel √ Non-tenured – annually √ Tenured – at least every three years Training for evaluators √ Annual certification and recertification Monitoring of evaluation plans by KDE √ Annual certification and recertification Common statewide system; district plan option available Annual evaluations for all certified personnel √ Non-tenured (formative and summative) √ Tenured (formative specific to professional growth targets that impact student outcomes) Training for evaluators √ Significant changes to components of training based on components of evaluation system √ National support in development of validity and reliability studies Monitoring of evaluation plans by KDE √ Surveys, site visits, validity and reliability testing √ Annual reporting of teacher and principal effectiveness (federal requirement) √ Equitable distribution reporting (federal requirement) Relationship of evaluation to employment status √ Due process procedure for tenure and /or dismissal Relationship of evaluation to employment status √ Due process procedure for tenure and/or dismissal √ Career pathway opportunities √ Possible differentiated incentives based on demonstrated effectiveness 7

Kentucky Multiple Measures of Effectiveness Supported with Artifacts and Evidence (Proposed) Teacher Effectiveness Framework Observation Peer Observation Professional Growth Self Reflection Student Voice Student Growth Principal Effectiveness Framework Professional Growth Student Growth Self Reflection Observation Teacher Reflection ValEd 360 8

Phase 1 ( ) Field Test 54 participating districts identified Districts trained and implement field test protocols Multiple measures of effectiveness defined Districts participate in regional field test status meetings Feedback and revisions Phase 2 ( ) Extended Field Test 54 Districts trained in and implement protocols Districts participate in regional status meetings Teacher/Leader Feedback collected Gathering and collecting data to inform the system requirements Phase 3 (2013 & Beyond) Statewide Pilot & Implementation Statewide training Statewide system implementation Collect baseline data Gathering and collecting data to inform the system requirements Timeline for Teacher and Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Full accountability in Spring 2015

Detailed Timeline May 2012 Data Collection and Analysis District feedback -Revise Training June – July (Ext. Field Test) Evaluation System Training Observer training – Inter-rater reliability and certification Focus on meaningful feedback August - December 54 districts extended field test Full Evaluation System Cycle Scaling Criteria Training on the Principal Evaluation System Readiness and Preparation (remaining 120 districts) January 2013 Original 54 scaling to full implementation District leadership team meetings with remaining districts February – May districts continue scaling District leadership team training on PGES statewide June – July 2013 State leadership team and certification training for all districts August 2013 Statewide pilot implementation Local district scaling to full implementation 10

Legislative Implications Revisions to KRS to align with waiver requirements HB 140 SJR 88 Revisions to legislation to make professional learning more meaningful for teachers Time Professional Development 11

Next-Generation Science Standards (NGSS) 12

NGSS Based on a vision for science education established by the Framework for K-12 Science Education published by the National Research Council in Designed to prepare students for college and/or careers and enable them to pursue expanding employment opportunities in science-related fields. Led by Achieve, Inc., a non-partisan education non-profit organization. 13

NGSS Implications for Kentucky Senate Bill 1, passed in the 2009 session of the Kentucky General Assembly, required that subject-area standards taught in the public school system be revised. Kentucky is participating as one of 26 lead states in the development of the standards. NGSS will support Kentucky’s CCR focus thru an emphasis on critical thinking and scientific/engineering practices. 14

NGSS Timeline Lead states selected to work with Achieve, Inc. in fall First public draft of the NGSS released May Second public draft due for release in fall Final version of NGSS expected early NGSS will be shared with KBE in spring 2013 for adoption consideration per SB 1 (2009). Earliest implementation date possible for Kentucky schools in academic year. 15