Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EFDA meeting on EU contribution to JT60SA Research plan version 3 (ENEA Frascati may 2011 Aula B Brunelli ) 1 of 18 slides Research strategy of JT60SA.
Advertisements

EU PWI Task Force V. Philipps, SEWG mixed materials, JET ITER-like Wall Project : Material choice, issues to investigate and role of new SEWG ITER-like.
1/15 D. C. McDonald et al, Particle and Energy Transport in Dedicated  *,  and  * Scans in JET ELMy H-modes, IAEA - 20th Fusion Energy Conference, Vilamoura,
Thermal Load Specifications from ITER C. Kessel ARIES Project Meeting, May 19, 2010 UCSD.
A. Kirk, 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu, China, October 2006 Evolution of the pedestal on MAST and the implications for ELM power loadings.
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
The Physics Base for ITER and DEMO Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany EURATOM Association Hauptvortrag given at AKE DPG.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
2010 US-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies at UCSD CA, US, Feb.23-24, Commissioning scenario including divertor.
Burning Plasma Gap Between ITER and DEMO Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy US-Japan Workshop Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies.
Integrated Effects of Disruptions and ELMs on Divertor and Nearby Components Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering Center for Materials.
R. A. Pitts et al., O-8 18 th PSI, Toledo, Spain 27 May 2008 The Impact of large ELMs on JET Presented by R. A. Pitts CRPP-EPFL, Switzerland, Association.
Energy loss for grassy ELMs and effects of plasma rotation on the ELM characteristics in JT-60U N. Oyama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), M. Takechi 1), A. Isayama.
Examples of using Langevin equation to solve FP equation.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Prof. F.Troyon“JET: A major scientific contribution...”25th JET Anniversary 20 May 2004 JET: A major scientific contribution to the conception and design.
Key Issues in Plasma-Wall Interactions for ITER The European Approach V. Philipps, J. Roth, A. Loarte With Contributions G.F MatthewsH.G.EsserG. Federici.
Nils P. Basse Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA USA ABB seminar November 7th, 2005 Measurements.
Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Current Plans for ITER Hydrogen Phase Presented by A. Loarte with.
ITPA - IOS st Oct Kyoto E. Joffrin JET programme with the ILW in and relations with the IOS Joint experiments.
Divertor/SOL contribution IEA/ITPA meeting Naka Nov. 23, 2003 Status and proposals of IEA-LT/ITPA collaboration Multi-machine Experiments Presented by.
Edge Localized Modes propagation and fluctuations in the JET SOL region presented by Bruno Gonçalves EURATOM/IST, Portugal.
ITER Design Review Physics Issues by R. J. Hawryluk presented at Budget Planning Meeting March 11, 2008 With special acknowledgements to D. Campbell, G.
F Romanelli 1 (19)2 December 2010 Overview of JET experiments and EFDA plans Francesco Romanelli EFDA Leader and JET Leader 2 December 2010.
Tritium Retention in Graphite and Carbon Composites Sandia National Laboratories Rion Causey Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
W coating of CFC tiles for the JET new wall - Task Agreement: JW6-TA-EP2-ILC-05 Manufacturing and testing of W-coated CFC tiles for installation in JET.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Divertor Design Considerations for CFETR
T.A. Casper, ITPA IOS Kyoto, Japan 1 IOS-JA10: Scenario modeling for non-activation phase: a proposal ITPA IOS meeting October 18 – 21, 2011 Kyoto, Japan.
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
Implications of TFTR D-T Experiments for ITER R.J. Hawryluk May 23, 2014.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
Heat Loading in ARIES Power Plants: Steady State, Transient and Off-Normal C. E. Kessel 1, M. A. Tillack 2, and J. P. Blanchard 3 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc NSO Collaboration Implications.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.
Confinement & Transport Plan Classical theory of confinement and transport. o Diffusion equation Particle diffusion in a magnetic field.
Seminar in ASIPP, 11 Dec Page 1 Status of ITER Project and Issues of Plasma-Wall Interaction Michiya Shimada With contribution from Richard Pitts.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
Moving fast in fusion reactors: ASCOT – race track for fast ions
Click to edit Master title style Preparing JET for T and DT operation 26 th January 2016 George Sips Presented at: PPPL, Princeton, USA.
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
1 Estimating the upper wall loading in ITER Peter Stangeby with help from J Boedo 1, D Rudikov 1, A Leonard 1 and W Fundamenski 2 DIII-D 1 JET 2 10 th.
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Assessment of fuel retention in JET : Contingency – 2 shifts on 6 th of february E. Tsitrone.
The tritium breeding blanket in Tokamak fusion reactors T. Onjun1), S. Sangaroon2), J. Prasongkit3), A. Wisitsorasak4), R. Picha5), J. Promping5) 1) Thammasat.
JET Programme in preparation of ITER
Preparing next JET full D-T Campaign
Achievements of the first year of plasma operation with the
Surface Analysis of Graphite Limiter and W-coating Testing on HT-7
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
ITERに係わる原子分子過程 Atomic and Molecular Processes in ITER SHIMADA, Michiya ITER International Team Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear.
ITER consequences of JET 13C migration experiments Jim Strachan, PPPL Jan. 7, 2008 Modeled JET 13C migration for last 2 years- EPS 07 and NF paper in prep.
[EX / P7-8] 27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – J. Jang, et. al
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios G. Giruzzi et al
Beam Ion Performance and Power Loads in the ITER Pre-Fusion Power Operating Scenarios (PFPO) with Reduced Field and Current We have used ASCOT to simulate.
Presentation transcript:

Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension of ITER and twice DIII-D. JET has produced the highest plasma current, largest fusion power, longest confinement time, and has Tritium and Be capability JET first operated in 1983, making many contributions This talk will discuss some issues on: –Size scaling –DT results –Divertor/wall material studies Some references: –J. Wesson “Tokamaks” Oxford Sci. Publ. (2004) general –G. Federici, et al, Nuclear Fusion 41, 1967 (2001) wall processes –J. Jacquinot, et al, Nuclear Fusion 39, 235 (1999) DT physics

D. Meade

NBI Shinethrough protection Upper Dump plate Inner wall cladding Inner wall guard limiters Mushrooms Saddle coil protection Be Outer poloidal limiters LH + ICRH protection KC1 coil covers B&C tiles Total main wall tiles = 4404

The JET plasma has a shape and relationship to its vacuum vessel which is similar to ITER, making the JET discharges an indication of ITER plasmas JET plasmas have achieved many of the scaled parameters needed for ITER J. Pamela

JET results extend scaling to conditions closest to ITER J. Cordey Confinement scales like: I R n 1/3 (a/P) 1/2

J. Cordey New regimes often tested at JET to understand size scaling Confinement is complex: with interplay between pressure gradients, MHD, and transport irregularities

PTEDTE1TTEDTE2 Largest machines have the performance to make it worth tritium DT experiments study tritium technology, isotope and α particle effects D. Meade

Time Evolution of JET DT pluses Highest Fusion Power Highest Fusion Energy ITER prototype plasma P. Lomas

10% of heating was attributed to alpha heating P. Thomas

 Large enough for ITER relevance if I p ≥ 3MA & P inp = MW A top ~ 0.6 m 2 A limiters ~ m 2 Power density estimate:   W ELM wall ~( )  W ELM div  A ELM wall ~ A ELM div   ELM wall ~  ELM div ~  s  W ELM = 1MJ Be-wall loads 9 – 39 MJm -2 s -1/2 (melting ~ 16 MJm -2 s -1/2 ) One major effort is to mitigate ELMs and scale to ITER G. Matthews

IAEA summary 2004

Objectives are to study: Material migration / lifetime Tritium retention / inventory control Damage due to transients / control 350 MJ 20 MJ JET Wall Proposal: Option 1

Objectives Demonstrate low T retention Test de-tritiation techniques Study effect of Be on W erosion Study melt layer loss – wall + divertor  ELMs and disruptions Refine control / mitigation techniques  Limit disruption / ELM damage Operate without C - radiation Demonstrate routine / safe operation of fully integrated ITER compatible scenarios at 3-5MA  NBI power upgrade 350 MJ 20 MJ JET Wall Proposal: option 2.

Discussion JET being largest machine, and highest performance, and closest to ITER: tests size scaling JET DT capability tests tritium technology, isotope effects, alpha particle effects, and trace tritium transport Similarity to ITER shape and relation to walls means JET tests power handling and wall material issues