Farhad Jaberi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan A High Fidelity Model for Numerical Simulations of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energirelaterad fordonsforskning 2014, oktober 8-9, Göteborg Predictive modeling of combustion and emissions behavior in diesel and PPC engines Xue-Song.
Advertisements

University of Southampton Southampton, UK
A Computational Framework for Simulating Flow around Hypersonic Re-Entry Vehicles David Stroh, Anthony Marshik and Gautham Krishnamoorthy, UND Chemical.
Application of Bayesian Statistical Methods for the Analysis of DSMC Simulations of Hypersonic Shocks James S. Strand and David B. Goldstein The University.
Development of Simulation Methodologies for Forced Mixers Anastasios Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics & Astronautics Purdue University.
California State University MFDC Lab. Combustion- Propulsion Team Students: Amir Massoudi – Justin Rencher Andrew Clark – Uche Ofoma Professor: Darrell.
Novel Design of a Free-Piston Stirling Engine - Modelling and Simulation Researcher: Salem S. Ghozzi Supervisor: Dr. Boukhanouf R.
LES Combustion Modeling for Diesel Engine Simulations Bing Hu Professor Christopher J. Rutland Sponsors: DOE, Caterpillar.
Presented by High Fidelity Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Combustion Jacqueline H. Chen (PI) Chun S. Yoo David H. Lignell Combustion Research Facility.
LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 10 (ME EN )
Czestochowa University of Technology Areas of interest Energy and Aero Priorities 1.Mathematical modelling of flows in blade system of rotating machinery.
Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Spray Combustion in Internal Combustion Engines Farhad Jaberi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University.
Motivation The physics of inertial confinement fusion (ICF) combine hydrodynamics, plasma physics and radiation. One of the important hydrodynamic processes.
Ghent University - UGent Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics Simulations of hydrogen auto-ignition Ivana Stanković.
3-D Large Eddy Simulation for Jet Noise Prediction A.Uzun, G. Blaisdell, A. Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Purdue University Funded by.
MULTI-PHYSICS MODELING PSAAP Center, Stanford University V. Terrapon, R. Pecnik, J. Larsson, B. Morgan, A. Irvine, F. Ham, I. Boyd, G. Iaccarino, H. Pitsch,
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, Sep. 8-10, Pisa, Italy NUMERICAL STUDY OF A HIGHLY UNDER-EXPANDED HYDROGEN JET B P Xu, J P Zhang, J X WEN,
Knut Vaagsaether, Vegeir Knudsen and Dag Bjerketvedt
Numerical study of the blade cooling effect generated by multiple jets issuing at different angles and speed into a compressible horizontal cross flow.
National Center for Hypersonic Combined Cycle Propulsion Professor Jim McDaniel Principal Investigator University of Virginia AFOSR-NASA Hypersonics Research.
Large Eddy Simulation of Rotating Turbulence Hao Lu, Christopher J. Rutland and Leslie M. Smith Sponsored by NSF.
An experimental study of recirculation zones on a bluff-body stabilized nonpremixed flame Prapti Mahandari Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty,
CFD Modeling of Turbulent Flows
Zhaorui Li and Farhad Jaberi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan Large-Scale Simulations of High Speed.
1 CONCEPTION OF MINICHANNEL AS THE SOURCE OF SELF-IGNITION AT HIGH SUPERSONIC SPEED Goldfeld М.А., Starov А.V., Timofeev К.Yu. Khristianovich Institute.
A. Spentzos 1, G. Barakos 1, K. Badcock 1 P. Wernert 2, S. Schreck 3 & M. Raffel 4 1 CFD Laboratory, University of Glasgow, UK 2 Institute de Recherche.
Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions in Separation Components Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions.
ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport
Compressible Flow Introduction
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
Faculty of Engineering, Kingston University London
Page 1 SIMULATIONS OF HYDROGEN RELEASES FROM STORAGE TANKS: DISPERSION AND CONSEQUENCES OF IGNITION By Benjamin Angers 1, Ahmed Hourri 1 and Pierre Bénard.
4 th ICHS San Francisco, September 2011 Numerical Investigation of Subsonic Hydrogen Jet Release Boris Chernyavsky 1, Pierre Benard 1, Peter Oshkai.
Comparison of convective boundary layer velocity spectra calculated from large eddy simulation and WRF model data Jeremy A. Gibbs and Evgeni Fedorovich.
Improved Near Wall Treatment for CI Engine CFD Simulations Mika Nuutinen Helsinki University of Technology, Internal Combustion Engine Technology.
Applications of the Multi-Material DEM Model Presented by: David Stevens, Jaroslaw Knap, Timothy Dunn September 2007 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
1 LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 12 (ME EN ) Prof. Rob Stoll Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Spring 2011.
Mathematical Equations of CFD
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Modeling of Compressor and Combustor Flows Suresh Menon, Lakshmi N. Sankar Won Wook Kim S. Pannala, S.
Direct Numerical Simulation of Particle Settling in Model Estuaries R. Henniger (1), L. Kleiser (1), E. Meiburg (2) (1) Institute of Fluid Dynamics, ETH.
RPI Master’s Project Proposal Noel A. Modesto-Madera September 28, 2010 Numerical Investigation of Supersonic Flow Over a Blunt Body.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Computational Fluid Dynamics Lab Bin Zhao 1 LES Simulation of Transient Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in Continuous.
J.-Ph. Braeunig CEA DAM Ile-de-FrancePage 1 Jean-Philippe Braeunig CEA DAM Île-de-France, Bruyères-le-Châtel, LRC CEA-ENS Cachan
CONCLUSIONS 1. In curved ducts, the combination of advanced EARSM/EASFM allows to predict satisfactorily flow processes with heat transfer phenomena, in.
TURBULENT PREMIXED FLAMES AT HIGH KARLOVITZ NUMBERS UNDER OXY-FUEL CONDITIONS Yang Chen 1, K.H. Luo 1,2 1 Center for Combustion Energy, Tsinghua University,
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit
Jet With No Cross Flow RANS Simulations of Unstart Due to Mass Injection J. Fike, K. Duraisamy, J. Alonso Acknowledgments This work was supported by the.
Aerospace Engineering N. C. State University Air Terminal Wake Vortex Simulation D. Scott McRae, Hassan A. Hassan N.C. State University 4 September 2003.
LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 5 (ME EN )
AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 3
Heat release modeling FPVA-based model V. Terrapon and H. Pitsch 1 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft.
High Fidelity Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Combustion
Direct numerical simulation has to solve all the turbulence scales from the large eddies down to the smallest Kolmogorov scales. They are based on a three-dimensional.
Application of Compact- Reconstruction WENO Schemes to the Navier-Stokes Equations Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Aerospace Engineering Department University.
Avaraging Procedure. For an arbitrary quantity  the decomposition into a mean and fluctuating part can be written as.
Mixing Length of Hydrogen in an Air Intake Greg Lilik EGEE 520.
Ignition by hot jets Dr.-Ing. Detlev Markus. Ignition by hot turbulent jet Investigation of ignition process by hot jets (PTB, Braunschweig, Germany)
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Numerical Simulation of Premix Combustion with Recirculation
Combustor Model Simulation
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON AUTO-IGNITION OF HIGH PRESSURE HYDROGEN JETS
Axisymetric Inlet Design for Combined-Cycle Engines Jesse R
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
Studies of High-Pressure Acoustic Combustion Instabilities in Hydrocarbon-Oxygen Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines Based on Reduced Chemical-Kinetic Mechanisms.
Turbulent Mixing in the Presence of Liquid Droplets with Application to Spray Combustion Venkatramanan Raman Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering.
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
Generation and Control of Turbulent Flames in SI Engine
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit
Presentation transcript:

Farhad Jaberi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan A High Fidelity Model for Numerical Simulations of Complex Combustion/Propulsion Systems

Objectives  Develop a high-fidelity numerical model for high-speed turbulent reacting flows  Study “laboratory combustors'' of interest to NASA for various flow and combustion parameters with the new model  Improve basic understanding of turbulent combustion in supersonic and hypersonic flows Technical Approach  LES/FMDF: A hybrid (Eulerian-Langranian) model, applicable to subsonic and supersonic turbulent combustion in complex configurations  DNS data are used together with experimental data for validation and improvement of LES/FMDF submodels Progress  New high-order numerical schemes are developed/validated for supersonic turbulent flows,  Compressible subgrid stress and energy flux models are implemented and tested,  Scalar FMDF model is extended and applied to compressible (supersonic) reacting flows,  LES/FMDF predictions are compared with experimental data,  DNS data for supersonic mixing-layer are generated. LES results are compared with the DNS data. Impact  Numerical Simulations of a scramjet combustor is now possible but reliability and accuracy of predictions are dependent on compressible models  Numerical experimental: A systematic and detailed study of various flow/reaction parameters on combustion stability and efficiency  Better understanding of supersonic combustion  Feedback to experimentalists and designers DNS of Supersonic Mixing Layer LES of Supersonic Co-Annular Jet Publications: (1) Z. Li, A. Banaeizadeh, F. Jaberi, Large Eddy Simulation of High Speed Turbulent Reacting Flows, International Symposium on Recent Advances in Combustion., (2) A. Banaeizadeh, F. Jaberi, LES of Supersonic Turbulent Flows with the Scalar FMDF, APS-DFD, 2009, (3) Li and F. Jaberi, Numerical Investigations of Shock-Turbulence Interactions in Planar Mixing Layer, AIAA Annual Meeting, 2010.

 Eulerian: Transport equations for the SGS moments - Deterministic simulations  Lagrangian: Transport equation for the FMDF - Monte Carlo simulations  Coupling of Eulerian & Lagrangian fields and a certain degree of “redundancy” LES/FMDF of Complex Turbulent Reacting Flows A Hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian Mathematical/Computational Methodology

Filtered LES Equations -> Eulerian FMDF Equation -> Lagrangian Subgrid scalar FMDF: Reaction term Added to FMDF equation as a source/sink term For non-reacting flows: internal energy/enthalpy equation obtained from FMDF-MC is consistent with LES-FD equation For reacting flows: reaction terms are closed in FMDF Total derivative of pressure in enthalpy equation

LES of High Speed Turbulent Reacting Flows In LES, large-scale variables are correctly calculated when reliable and accurate numerical methods+BC, SGS models and chemical kinetics models are provided. For LES and DNS of non-reacting supersonic/hypersonic turbulent flows, high-order numerical schemes have been developed and tested. Compressible (Dynamic) Gradient, Similarity, Mixed and MKEV models have been employed for subgrid stresses and scalar fluxes. Better subgrid turbulence models for supersonic and hypersonic flows are needed. Compressibility effects are included in the scalar FMDF for supersonic turbulent combustion. Efficient Lagrangian Monte Carlo methods have been developed for flows with shock waves in complex geometries. Consistency/accuracy of LES/FMDF is established. Better mixing and SGS convection models for FMDF are desirable. DNS data for non-reacting supersonic mixing layer are generated and are being used for evaluation/improvement of subgrid models. DNS data for supersonic reacting (hydrogen- air) mixing-layer are being generated. Comparison of LES results with experimental data for supersonic reacting flows is essential. Reliable and efficient reduced chemistry models and solver are needed. However, no serious problem is expected in the implementation of chemical reaction in LES/FMDF.

Rapid Compression Machine – LES/FMDF Predictions In-Cylinder piston Piston groove TemperatureContours piston piston Non-Reacting RCM Simulations Temperature Pressure FD: finite-difference (LES) MC: Monte Carlo (FMDF)

FD MC MC FD Temperature Contours Fuel Mass Fraction Contours Rapid Compression Machine - LES/FMDF Predictions Reacting Simulations - Consistency between finite-difference (LES-FD) and Monte Carlo (FMDF-MC) values of Temperature and Mass Fractions

3D Shock Tube Problem– LES/FMDF Predictions 3D Shock Tube p 2 /p 1 =15 p1p1p1p1 p2p2p2p2 Two-Block Grid 5 MC per cell 20 MC per cell 50 MC per cell Compressibility effects are included in FMDF-MC. Without Compressible term FMDF-MC results are very erroneous. By varying the initial number of MC particles per cell, the filtered temperature does not noticeably change. By increasing the initial particle/cell number, MC particle number density becomes smoother and nearly the same as filtered density. Particle Number Density

63.5 mm diam center jet Small-scale facility 10 mm diameter Center jet Supersonic Mixing and Reaction - Co-Annular Jet Experiments Supported by NASA’s Hypersonic Program LES/FMDF of Co-Annular Jet Mixing and combustion Grid System for LES Cutler et al Large-scale facility 3D LES Calculations with Compact Scheme Iso-Levels of Mach Number

Vorticity Magnitude LES/FMDF of Supersonic Co-Annular Jet Mixing Case – No Combustion Pressure Temperature

LES of Supersonic Co-Annular Jet Mixing Case – No Combustion Experiment Smagorinsky MKEV 0.02 MKEV 0.03

LES/FMDF of Supersonic Co-Annular Jet – Mixing Case Experiment Smagorinsky MKEV 0.02 MKEV 0.03 Instantaneous Scalar

LES-FD FMDF-MC Experiment Instantaneous ScalarMean Scalar LES - FD FMDF - MC LES/FMDF of Supersonic Co-Annular Jet – Consistency of FD and MC

DNS and LES of Supersonic Turbulent Mixing Layer DNS and LES of Supersonic Turbulent Mixing Layer DNS Without Incident Shock Wave Vorticity Contours M2=1.8 M1=4.2 Pressure Contours Vorticity Contours

Vorticity LES of Supersonic Turbulent Mixing-Layer - No Shock

Mean Scalar Mean Axial Velocity

Vorticity Contours DNS of Supersonic Turbulent Mixing-Layer with Shock DNS of Supersonic Turbulent Mixing-Layer with Shock No-Shock Shock-Angle 16 o Shock-Angle 18 o Shock-Angle 20 o Shock-Angle 22 o Imposed Shock

LES of Supersonic Turbulent Mixing-Layer with Shock LES of Supersonic Turbulent Mixing-Layer with Shock Pressure Scalar Mean Axial Velocity Mean Scalar

LES of High Speed Turbulent Reacting Flows In LES, large-scale variables are correctly calculated when reliable and accurate numerical methods+BC, SGS models and chemical kinetics models are provided. For LES and DNS of non-reacting supersonic/hypersonic turbulent flows, high-order numerical schemes have been developed and tested. Compressible (Dynamic) Gradient, Similarity, Mixed and MKEV models have been employed for subgrid stresses and scalar fluxes. Better subgrid turbulence models for supersonic and hypersonic flows are needed. Compressibility effects are included in the scalar FMDF for supersonic turbulent combustion. Efficient Lagrangian Monte Carlo methods have been developed for flows with shock waves in complex geometries. Consistency/accuracy of LES/FMDF is established. Better mixing and SGS convection models for FMDF are desirable. DNS data for non-reacting supersonic mixing layer are generated and are being used for evaluation/improvement of subgrid models. DNS data for supersonic reacting (hydrogen- air) mixing-layer are being generated. Comparison of LES results with experimental data for supersonic reacting flows is essential. Reliable and efficient reduced chemistry models and solver are needed. However, no serious problem is expected in the implementation of chemical reaction in LES/FMDF.

Future Plans  Further improvement and validation of LES/FMDF: - DNS of supersonic turbulent reacting (H2) mixing layer - LES/FMDF of co-annular reacting (H2) jet - Improved SGS turbulence models for supersonic flows - Implementation/testing of reduced kinetics models  Reliable and accurate subgrid models for turbulence- shock-combustion interactions in strongly compressible reacting flows  ‘Correct ’ implementation of boundary/initial conditions  Efficient kinetics solver  Limited well-defined, detailed experimental data and DNS data for supersonic turbulent combustion Critical Challenges