1Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Th Loarer with contributions from C. Brosset 1, J. Bucalossi 1, P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – EU TF on PWI – 13 November 2006 Th Loarer with contributions from C. Brosset 1, J. Bucalossi 1, P Coad 2, G.
Advertisements

Report IPP Garching EU Task Force PWI Meeting, Cadarache Oct Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik compiled by Arne Kallenbach (IPP - EU-PWI.
1 Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – EU TF on PWI – 29 October 2007 Madrid Th Loarer with contributions from D Borodin, C Brosset, J Bucalossi,
Report on SEWG mixed materials EU PWI TF meeting Madrid 2007 V. Philipps on behalf of SEWG members Mixed material formation is a among the critical ITER.
A new look at the specification of ITER plasma wall interaction and tritium retention J. Roth a, J. Davis c, R. Doerner d, A. Haasz c, A. Kallenbach a,
Th Loarer - SEWG on Fuel retention – JET, July Th Loarer with special thanks to S Brezinsek, J Bucalossi, I Coffey, G Esser, S Gruenhagen.
WP10-PWI (02)/TEKES/BS(PS) Characterization of retention mechanisms in AUG Monitoring meeting of the EFDA PWI SEWG on Gas Balance and Fuel Retention,
SEWG Fuel Retention July 2008 © Matej Mayer Fuel retention in ASDEX Upgrade tungsten coatings M. Mayer, M. Balden, K. Krieger, S. Lindig, O. Ogorodnikova,
Kazuyoshi Sugiyama, SEWG meeting on Fuel retention, Garching, July Contribution of Boron on the D retention in the AUG full-W wall regime Max-Planck-Institut.
SEWG Gas Balance 2007 © Matej Mayer First results on deuterium depth profiling in W tiles M. Mayer 1, V.Kh. Alimov, V. Rohde 1, J. Roth 1, A. Herrmann.
Tungsten distribution on limiters after WF 6 injection in TEXTOR M. Rubel, D. Ivanova Alfv é n Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, Association EURATOM.
1TPL Dismantling Project Review 08/12/06 Bernard Pégourié TORE SUPRA Association EURATOM-CEA D program: Specific experiments before dismantling Purpose:
Joint SEWGs-TFE meeting S. Brezinsek22/07/2008 TF E Impact of N 2 on carbon chemistry in JET S. Brezinsek, Y. Corre and TFE.
EU PWI Task Force V. Philipps, SEWG mixed materials, JET ITER-like Wall Project : Material choice, issues to investigate and role of new SEWG ITER-like.
1 Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – EU TF on PWI – 13 November 2006 Th Loarer with contributions from C. Brosset 1, J. Bucalossi 1, P Coad 2, G.
1. Qualifying carbon as PFC Erosion (see report S. Brezinsek ) along plasma wetted areas, effect of substrate Local C migration to gaps Fuel retention.
V.Philipps, SEWG Gas balance and fuel removal, JET, , Association EURATOM – FZJ Effect of disruptions on fuel release from JET walls V. Philipps,
TFE Th Loarer – SEWG – 12 September Euratom Th Loarer V Philipps 2, J Bucalossi 1, D Brennan 3, J Brzozowski 4, N Balshaw 3, R Clarke 3, G Esser.
1B. PégouriéDITS progress report 27/04/07 Euratom EXPERIMENTAL CAMPAIGN No reliable estimation of the wall inventory WI ~ ??? D atoms (Tsitrone,
Mixed materials in JET 2006 J P Coad Present JET situation Deposited films at the inner divertor (plasma-facing surfaces) Films deposited in shadowed areas.
J. Roth, EU PWI TF, SEWG Fuel Retention, Garching, July 19, 2010 Report on: WP10-PWI /IPP/PS Multi machine scaling of fuel retention for ITER Validation.
P. Coad, J. Likonen, H. Bergsåker, M. Rubel, I. Uytdenhouwen, A. Widdowson JET mixed Be/C/O layers SEWG meeting on mixed materials, , JET.
1SEWG Fuel removal - Glow improvement for JET D. Douai22-23 July 2008 EFDA Task Glow discharge improvement for JET D. Douai 1, D. Garnier 1, S. Brémond.
Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen D retention in W and mixed systems in Pilot-PSI G. De Temmerman a, K. Bystrov a, L. Marot b, M. Mayer c, J.J. Zielinski.
6 th EU PWI TF Meeting Madrid, Oct Tritium Inventory in ITER: Laboratory data and extrapolation from tokamaks Th Loarer, J Roth, S Brezinsek, A.
121 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu TORE SUPRA Association Euratom-Cea M. Chatelier17 October 2006 Integration of High Power, Long Pulse Operation.
9 th ITPA Meeting on Divertor/SOL physics, May 7-10, 2007, Garching Improvements to the B2 wall model: coatings and layers X. Bonnin, M. Warrier, D. Coster.
Material Erosion and Redeposition during the JET MkIIGB-SRP Divertor Campaign A. Kirschner, V. Philipps, M. Balden, X. Bonnin, S. Brezinsek, J.P. Coad,
L.B. Begrambekov Plasma Physics Department, Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia Peculiarities, Sources and Driving Forces of.
Co-deposition of deuterium and impurities in plasma-wall interaction simulators Marek Rubel a, Per Petersson a, Arkadi Kreter b a Alfvén Laboratory, KTH,
Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)
T. Nakano, N. Asakura, H. Takenaga, H. Kubo, Y. Miura, S. Konoshima, K. Masaki, S. Higashijima and the JT-60Team Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute,
1E. Tsitrone20th IAEA Vilamoura 1-6/11/2004 Euratom Deuterium retention in Tore Supra long discharges Interpreting the particle balance Particle retention.
R. A. Pitts et al., O-8 18 th PSI, Toledo, Spain 27 May 2008 The Impact of large ELMs on JET Presented by R. A. Pitts CRPP-EPFL, Switzerland, Association.
Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension.
J.P. Coad 1 H Workshop, Salamanca 3 June 2008 Local deposition of 13C tracer at the JET MkII-SRP outer divertor J Paul Coad Hydrogen Workshop, Salamanca,
Key Issues in Plasma-Wall Interactions for ITER The European Approach V. Philipps, J. Roth, A. Loarte With Contributions G.F MatthewsH.G.EsserG. Federici.
ASIPP In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7 Y. YANG*, and HT-7 team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
K. Sugiyama, 9th International Workshop on Hydrogen Isotopes in Fusion Reactor Materials, Salamanca, June 2-3, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik.
Tritium Retention in Graphite and Carbon Composites Sandia National Laboratories Rion Causey Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA
Depth-profiling and thermal desorption of hydrogen isotopes for plasma facing carbon tiles in JT-60U (Long term hydrogen retention) T. Tanabe, Kyushu University.
1 Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement – DB ITPA - 1 October 2007 by Peter de Vries Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement Studies at JET P.C. de.
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 10th ITPA meeting on SOL/Divertor Physics, 8/1/08, Avila ELM resolved measurements of W sputtering MPI für Plasmaphysik.
Effects of tungsten surface condition on carbon deposition
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
PSI 2008 Toledo May 2008 © Matej Mayer Carbon balance and deuterium inventory from a carbon dominated to a full tungsten ASDEX Upgrade M. Mayer a, V. Rohde.
Photonic T removal techniques in the EU G Counsell 1, P Coad 1, C Grisolia 2, A. Semerok 3, A Widdowson 1 1 EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science.
ASIPP In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7 Y. YANG*, and HT-7 team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Background Long term tritium retention is one of the most critical issues for ITER during the tritium phase. It is mandatory to evaluate the long term.
1 Th LoarerFuel retention in tokamaks – PSI Conference May - Toledo Euratom Th Loarer with special thanks to N Bekris, S Brezinsek, C Brosset, J.
T Loarer – TFE meeting – 20 February TORE SUPRA Association Euratom-Cea Gas Balance - fuel retention in JET T Loarer, J Bucalossi, D Brennan*, G.
Session I-B – Overview Talks Lithium in Magnetic Confinement Experiments S. MirnovLi collection experiments on T-11M and T-10 in framework of Li closed.
O-36, p 1(10) G. Arnoux 18 th PSI, Toledo, 26-30/05/2008 Divertor heat load in ITER-like advanced tokamak scenarios on JET G.Arnoux 1,(3), P.Andrew 1,
Deposition in the MKII - Gas Box Divertor Deposition in Septum M. Rubel, P. Coad, J. Likonen OUTLINE General deposition pattern on MKII-GB tiles Septum.
ITPA May 2007 © Matej Mayer Carbon Erosion and Transport in ASDEX Upgrade M. Mayer 1, V. Rohde 1, J.L. Chen 1, X. Gong 1, J. Likonen 3, S. Lindig 1, G.
1 Deuterium retention and release in tungsten co- deposited layers G. De Temmerman a,b, and R.P. Doerner a a Center for Energy Research, University of.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
Overview of recent work on carbon erosion, migration and long-term fuel retention in the EU-fusion programme and conclusions for ITER V. Philipps a Institute.
R. A. Pitts et al th APS, Orlando, Florida, USA 12 November 2007 Progress in ITER relevant ELM exhaust physics at JET Presented by W.Fundamenski.
Fast response of the divertor plasma and PWI at ELMs in JT-60U 1. Temporal evolutions of electron temperature, density and carbon flux at ELMs (outer divertor)
J. Roth: ITPA SOL/DIV, Avila, Jan Prediction of ITER T retention levels with W PFCs J. Roth, and the SEWG Fuel retention of the EU Task Force on.
Dynamic fuel retention and release under ITER like wall conditions in JET V. Philipps 1, T. Loarer 2, M. Freisinger 1, H.G.Esser 1, S. Vartanian 2, U.
1 ITC-22, November 2012, Toki, Japan 1 Modelling of impurity transport, erosion and redeposition in fusion devices: applications of the ERO code A. Kirschner.
TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Assessment of fuel retention in JET : Contingency – 2 shifts on 6 th of february E. Tsitrone.
Deposition in the MKII - Gas Box Divertor Deposition in Septum
Surface Analysis of Graphite Limiter and W-coating Testing on HT-7
In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7
Global migration of carbon impurities in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak
Fuel Retention Studies with the ITER-like Wall in JET
ITERに係わる原子分子過程 Atomic and Molecular Processes in ITER SHIMADA, Michiya ITER International Team Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear.
Presentation transcript:

1Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Th Loarer with contributions from C. Brosset 1, J. Bucalossi 1, P Coad 2, G Esser 3, J. Hogan 4, J Likonen 5, M Mayer 6, Ph Morgan 2, V Philipps 3, V. Rohde 6, J Roth 6, M Rubel 7, E Tsitrone 1, A Widdowson 2, EU TF on PWI and JET EFDA contributors Gas balance and fuel retention in Fusion Devices 1) Association EURATOM-CEA, CEA-Cadarache,13108 St Paul lez Durance, France. 2) Culham Science Centre, EURATOM-UKAEA Fusion Association, OX14 3DB, UK 3) Institute of Plasma Physics, Association EURATOM-FZJ, Jülich, Germany 4) Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Fusion Energy Division, TN , USA 5) Association EURATOM-TEKES, VTT Processes, PO Box 1608, VTT Espoo, Finland. 6) Max-Planck IPP-EURATOM Association, Garching, Germany 7) Alfven Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, Association EURATOM-VR, Stockholm, Sweeden Outline: Gas balance and fuel retention  During a pulse, after/between pulses  Integrated over a day, a week and a full campaign  Fuel retention mechanisms Summary

2Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom - Evaluation of the hydrogenic retention in present tokamaks is of crucial importance for the long discharges foreseen in ITER (400 sec ~ 7min). A retention of 5% of the T injected would lead to the limit of 350g ( working guideline for initial operation) in 70 pulses. INTRODUCTION Results from different tokamaks Limiter machine Divertor machine TEXTOR Tore Supra Full carbon Full Carbon Actively cooled Long discharges ASDEX Upgrade JET First wall: WHigh performances Divertor: C Carbon, Berylium - In the frame of the EU TF on PWI, efforts are underway to investigate the gas balance and fuel retention during discharges and integrated over experimental campaign. The aim is to assess the dominant processes of the fuel retention and to extrapolate to ITER.

3Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Retention during pulse Significant retention unless : Low fuelling rate (Long L mode in JET) No influence of W observed between 2003 and 2005 in AUG (45 to 80% of W coverage) No influence of ELMs observed so far (W and/or C) Phase 2 : ~ constant retention rate Always a significant fraction of the injected flux (20-50%), but small fraction of the recycling flux (1-5%) Phase 2 Low fuelling AUG Common features on all devices : Phase 1 : decreasing retention rate ~ 1 to 50 s Machine (Limiter/Divertor), Scenario Conditioning and Material (Be - C – W)… Phase 1 TS

4Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Recovery after/between pulses Small fraction recovered after shot, but > plasma content (C, C-W and Be) Independent of inventory cumulated during the pulse (TS, JET, AUG) Except for disruptions, this amount is independent of I p, B T, density, input power, fuelling method. [V. Mertens et al., EPS 2003] AUG JET  wall Retention Short pulse ~ 10-30% Long pulse/Strong injection ~ 50% t  Recovery ~ retention in phase 1  Transient mechanism

5Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Integrated balance - Day --- Total Injected --- Total exhausted --- Outgased between pulses TS Short discharges Recovery between pulses is significant Cumulated inventory can be ~ recovered by conditionning (GDC…):  Overall balance ~0 Long discharges Same recovery between pulses but negligible compared to the overall balance  Significant inventory built up proportional to discharge duration

6Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Steady state retention – Saturation ? - “Wall saturation” is a “local” de-saturation of overheated PFCs. - BUT does not prevent and/or cancel retention (layers, gaps, below divertor…) - Wall saturation in the sense of “no retention” has not been observed yet. TS before “before upgrade”, “only” 80% actively cooled and no pumping Time (s) Central Line Density (10 19 m -2 ) MW MW MW MW MW MW - Result of overheated PFCs and as T surf increases  outgassing Eventually, Outgassing > Exhaust  loss of density control (also observed on JET w/o pumping and JT-60U w div. pumping) - Uncontrolled outgassing is no more observed in “fully” actively cooled devices (TS); the source is constant. - Same plasma  same retention rate, no “history effect” observed. C Grisolia et al., PSI 1999 TS

7Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Integrated gas balance – Day - Week Accuracy in gas balance studies likely limited by the requirement to substract pairs of large numbers, with inherent accuracy. For integrated balance of the order of week the accuracy strongly depends on - the “time” for the integration (pulse~10 sec, day~10 5 sec), - evaluation of the outgassing flux, D and C x H y released (disruptions)  Gas balance is an upper limit of the retention For integrated gas balance and fuel retention over periods longer than a day or a week, complementary methods are required:  Post-mortem analysis of samples from divertor/limiters, main chamber, deposition in gaps in between tiles, below the limiter/divertor… But this analysis cannot include all PFCs.  Post mortem analysis is a lower limit of the retention

8Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom D/C Fuel retention in JET (MKII GB) (NRA: D/C ratio, SIMS: layer thicknesses) Only plasma facing surfaces at divertor included (not tile gaps, inner limiters...) MkIIGB Divertor time: sec (16 hours) D injection: 766g Inner ion flux: 1.3x10 27 C deposition: 400g Rate: 3.4x10 20 Cs -1 Inner Divertor: D/C~0.2 Retention of 3% (25g) J Likonen, P Coad et al., - D retention in the divertor: 3% (Mk-IIGB), 2.4% (MKII-SRP).

9Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom 2002/2003 campaign: Mainly carbon machine (45% W)  Retention governed by trapping on inner tile surface (70% inner divertor tiles, 20% in remote ares (below roof baffle,...)  Total retention ~4% of input (10-20% from gas balance) 2004/2005 campaign: Full W machine except the divertor (Carbon)  No significant difference in retention between 2002/2003 and 2004/2005 AUG: 2002/2003: Deposition of D and C M Mayer et al., PSI 2004

10Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Retention mechanism Adsorption : phase 1 AUG, JET, TEXTOR, TS Implantation (saturates, sensitive to  T surf ) : TS, JET and JT60U Bulk diffusion (long pulse / high flux, high Te) Suspected to play a dominant role in long pulse in TS Codeposition (low Te, cold shadowed areas in direct line of sight of C source) : supposed to be the dominant process (AUG and JET) Density control Detritiation (depth in C) Detritiation (remote areas) ITER Limited (released after shot) Limited (reservoir >> plasma)  (fluence) 0.5 for CFC (Lab exp) (not for graphite)  (fluence) Fuel retention mechanisms (in C) Main open issue : Dominant retention mechanism with mixed materials (C/Be/W) ? Courtesy E Tsitrone

11Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Summary Gas balance and fuel retention: Large data base with carbon showing common features for the retention (AUG, JET, TEXTOR, Tore Supra) - During pulse: significant retention unless low fuelling - Long term: ~0 for short pulse, significant for long discharges (TS) - No “wall saturation” (sense of no retention) is observed for actively cooled devices - Recovery after pulse independent of the cumulated inventory Retention in carbon dominated devices: 10-20% (Gas balance: upper limit) 3-4% (Post-mortem: lower limit) Still no influence of W (AUG: 80%) on the retention (ELMs ? AUG & JET) Co-deposition dominant process (AUG and JET) ITER: 200 Pam 3 s -1, D-T 50% ( Ts -1, 400s), assuming retention similar to carbon devices 5%  limit to 70 pulses before reaching 350g  detritiation New results without C as PFC: Full W (AUG) and W-Be (JET)  Co-deposition cancelled with full metallic machine and therefore should significantly reduce the retention

12Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom

13Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom 38 g 73 g 55g 63g 300g 5g Total inner: 603 gTotal outer 380g Fuel retention in JET (MKII-SRP) - D retention in the divertor: 2.4% (MKII-SRP), 3% (Mk-IIGB), consistent with DTE1 results ~2% (Mk IIA, 0.2 g in tiles 0.5 g in 150 g flakes). - Lower limit: analysis does not include all PFCs (SRP, main chamber…) - Flakes in subdivertor after DTE1 ~1 kg : “seen” but not quantified ~ 3g MkII-SRP D injection: 1800g C dep: inner (outer): 603g (380g) C dep rate: s -1 ( s -1 ) Inner (outer) divertor D/C~0.3 (0.2) D retention inner: 1.6% (30g) D retention outer: 0.8% (12.6g) Total D retention 2.4% (42g), no SRP, no main chamber P Coad, A Windowson et al.,

14Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom GAS BALANCE JET TEXTOR Tore Supra AUG (Integrated over the pulse duration) Balance verified at any time during and between pulses Particle Injection Gas, NBI, Pellets INJECTIONPLASMA Scenario EXHAUST (Vessel and Divertor) WALL (Retention), Scenario, PFCs,… “WALL” PLASMA “Mid-plane” Particle Exhaust Divertor

15Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom W-coverage in ASDEX-Upgrade 2002/ /2005 Increasing coverage with W Regular boronizations about 8 per discharge period  Mainly effective in main chamber 6370 s 75.4 g D 3864 s 43.9 g D B-concentration in main chamber deposits % – 98%

16Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Comparison of 2002/2003 and 2004/ / /2005 No significant change in D retention despite replacement of C by W in main chamber

17Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Status of knowledge on D retention in carbon materials Retention of implanted D in graphite saturates at about D/m 2 depending on energy →G. Staudenmaier, J. Roth et al., JNM 84 (1979) 149 No complete saturation for fine grain graphites and CFC, depending on porosity →A.A. Haasz et al., JNM 209 (1994) 155 →B. Emmoth et al., Nucl. Fusion 30 (1990),1140 →M. Balden et al., Phys. Scripta T103 (2003) 38

18Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom DTE1 experiments in JET

19Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Poloidal distribution of T in JET JET T (DTE1) : 6.1 g left (17%) before ”Venting” 2.4 g removed with H 2 O from air 3.7 g left (10%) [N. Bekris et al., JNM 2005]  3 g remaining in subdivertor flakes (~1 kg : seen but not quantified) 0.2 g in tiles 0.5 g in 150 g flakes (D/C~1 in cold deposits) 0.7 g found (2 %)

20Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Sputtering of C by D : Temperature (K) Sputtering yield (atoms/ion) 1 keV D on C Implications of T surf  cte To be kept in mind when interpreteting experiments with evolving Tsurf [Nuc. Fus special issue 1, 1991] (°C) Temperature (°C) Saturated concentration of D in C : Fuel retention : implantation / desorption Net wall pumping  outgassing Fuel retention : codeposition T surf : key parameter for “chemistry” of carbon Chemical erosion Phys. Sputt RES Thermal sublimation T(°C)