IFCLA June 6 th, 2008 Paris State monopoly and online gambling update Thibault Verbiest, Attorney at law, partner at ULYS www.ulys.net www.gaminglaw.eu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
External Trade 1 The Trade Barriers Regulation (TBR): an instrument aimed at opening markets for EU exporters.
Advertisements

Advertising and sponsorship in Europe European Gambling Briefing 9 May 2007 Thibault Verbiest Partner ULYS
Competition law – the next major battleground for private operator challenges? Thibault Verbiest Senior Partner, ULYS law firm Member of the Paris and.
Italys decision to block gambling websites Casino Affiliate Convention Amsterdam, 9 April 2006 Thibault Verbiest Member of the Paris and Brussels Bar
Mobile gambling and European law: what is the outlook for operating in Europe? Thibault Verbiest Member of the Paris and Brussels Bars Senior Partner ULYS.
The European Commission and national gambling monopolies European Legal Update, October 5th 2006 Thibault Verbiest Attorney at law ULYS law firm.
European legal update IGCE, November 5th 2006, Dublin Evelyn Heffermehl ULYS law firm.
International Employment – latest Digital Employment issues Melanie Lane and Karine Audouze.
Gambling: recent developments & likely evolutions in Europe Evelyn Heffermehl ULYS law firm Member of the Brussels Bar.
Mark Abell Partner, Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP, London 5-6 November 2008.
Current legal situation of pharmacies in the EU Brussels, 15 April 2009 Dr. Edurne Navarro Varona.
France & Belgium gaming updates Legal Gaming in Europe Summit London, 22 January 2007 Thibault VERBIEST Partner – ULYS
Belgium Betmarkets conference 26th March 2007, Vienna Evelyn Heffermehl ULYS law firm.
France Remote e-Payments and Financial Transaction Blocking New regulatory risk under French law 21 st September 2007, London Etienne Wéry Attorney at.
International Gaming Exhibition 30-31st May 2007 Lake Como After Placanica: the case of France Thibault Verbiest Partner at Ulys Law Firm (Paris - Brussels)
Remote gambling The EU legal framework THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris Bars Founding Partner of ULYS LawFirm GREF Brussels,
Gambling and advertising European regulation Paul Van den Bulck Attorney at the Paris and Brussels Bars (Partner Ulys Law Firm) Lecturer at University.
Remote Gambling Regulatory Intensive EU overview London, 13 April 2006 Thibault Verbiest Partner ULYS law firm, Brussels
Canadian Gaming Summit April,29- May,1st Montréal, Québec Gaming in Europe, Thibault Verbiest, Attorney at law, partner at ULYS
European Gaming Issues Thibault Verbiest IAB, Chicago 22 September 2006.
Case C-446/03 Marks & Spencer
French gaming law: latest developments Anouk Hattab-Abrahams Avocate – ULYS
Remote gambling: the EU legal framework Evelyn Heffermehl Member of the Brussels Bar ULYS Warsaw Friday, 18 November 2005.
ONLINE GAMBLING BALANCING FREE TRADE & SOCIAL POLICY.
Advertising for remote gaming There is no such thing as bad publicity… There is only « illegal » publicity Thibault Verbiest Attorney at the Bars of Paris.
Gaming Laws and Advertising Laws in Europe Latest Developments Thibault VERBIEST Partner – ULYS Casino Affiliate.
BELGIAN AND FRENCH VIEWS OF EUROPEAN GAMBLING REGULATION Thibault Verbiest Attorney at the Paris and Brussels Bars University.
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR ONLINE GAMBLING: A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE Manuel Esparrago – RGA Brussels Manager Gaming Money Conference, Athens, 29 November 2011.
World Online Gambling Law Report Summer Retreat 2004 The European legal perspective prospects for the future Thibault Verbiest Attorney-at-law at the.
The Directive on temporary agency work: main provisions and implementation in the Member States Zagreb, 1 July 2013 Bertrand MULLER-SCHLEIDEN European.
Strategic Global Summit For E-Commerce The Regulation of Internet Gambling in Europe By THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris’Bar.
SPORTS BETTING IN FRANCE Thibault Verbiest Partner, Ulys 3rd Legal Gaming Summit 26 January 2009 London.
The French position European Legal Update, October 5th 2006 Thibault Verbiest Attorney at law ULYS law firm.
The Law of the European Union Information and Communication.
European Commission Taxation and Customs Union Brussels, 10 November Taxation of International Artistes and Community Law European Commission
European Commission – Directorate General for Competition Dr. K. Mehta, Director, Cartels A PRIMER ON ANTI-TRUST POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION UCL – Louvain-la-Neuve.
1 North American Gaming Regulators Association 2009 Annual Conference Washington, D.C. Hot Topics in Internet Gambling Michael D. Lipton, QC June 3, 2009.
Directive on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare Recent developments Jooske Vos European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations.
The case law of the CJEU in the gambling sector European Economic and Social Committee Hearing 6th September 2011 "On-line gambling - After the Green Paper.
Introduction to Europe & European Law
Emergency Briefing Remote Gambling - European Update THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris Bars Founding Partner of ULYS LawFirm.
Vaxholm – Laval Case European Court of Justice (ECJ) (Case No C-341/05, Judgement 18 December 2007)
ERA Academy of European Law Trier. Competition rules and regulation of legal professions – Case law of the ECJ 4 th Annual conference on EU Law Institute.
Directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law Anna Karamat European Commission DG Environment Unit A.2 ‘Infringements’
International conference on (problem) gambling The EU & Belgian legal framework THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris Bars Founding.
France: Controlled opening and recent case-law regarding remote gaming operators EIG, 24th September 2008 Thibault Verbiest, Partner, Ulys
The acquis Council Framework Decision of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings (2002/629/JHA). Council Directive 2004/81/EC of 24 April.
France: Contemplating a controlled liberalisation Thibault Verbiest, Partner, Ulys
1 Practical implications of the BWin judgment by: Justin Franssen.
Two Case Studies involving intra-EU BITs Christer Söderlund, Vinge, Stockholm, Sweden London, 4 December 2008 EUROPEAN LAW AND INVESTMENT TREATIES: EXPLORING.
Cje Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of Wrocław Lecture Harmonisation.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
European legal update Excellence in Gaming Law 29th November 2006 Evelyn Heffermehl ULYS law firm www/ulys.net.
Evaluation of restrictions: art. 15 and art TAIEX Seminar on the EU Service Directive, 3 May 2007 Carlos Almaraz.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 9 – Financial Services Bilateral.
1.State foreign trade regulation 2. Rules of Russian private international law applicable to international contracts.
Freedom to Provide Services Clause Why does the Country of Origin Principle not exist anymore? Martin Frohn.
Developments in international jurisprudence
Interactive Gaming Council Board Meeting I-Gaming Legal status
Remote gambling: the EU legal framework
Valentin Savov Attorney of Law (LL.M. Leiden)
University of Zagreb Law Faculty Doctoral Study in European Law Scientific Research Seminar: The Role of the Court Practice in the Evolution of EU Law.
Cybersecurity: the consumer perspective
European actions.
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
Trade - WTO.
Andrea Sundstrand Associate Professor
The Law of the European Union
European Commission DG Environment 18th meeting of CGBN
Link between Directive 98/34/EC and Regulation (EC) No 764/2008
Presentation transcript:

IFCLA June 6 th, 2008 Paris State monopoly and online gambling update Thibault Verbiest, Attorney at law, partner at ULYS

European Law brief EC Treaty : free movement of services (art.49) and freedom of establishment (art.43) Gambling = Service (art. 50) M.S. must modify national laws that restrict the freedom of establishment, or the freedom to provide services, and are therefore incompatible with these principles Exceptions where national regulations are:  justified by imperative overriding general interest (consumer protection, prevention of fraud etc.)  proportionate and necessary  Part of a systematic and consistent gaming policy (ECJ, Gambelli)

European Law brief Who controls if restrictions imposed by M.S. are justified?  The European Commission  The E.C.J  National courts

European Law brief The European commission: Infringement procedure  1 st stage: letter of formal notice.  2 nd stage: reasoned opinion.  3 rd stage: referral to the ECJ. Standstill clause: M.S. notify new draft technical regulations and apply standstill periods during which the Commission and all M.S. can react. (Directive 98/34)

France: before 2 State controlled monopolies (FDJ and PMU) Blanket prohibition of online gaming and betting with an exception for the two monopolies. The monopolies operate an aggressive strategy with marketing which even targets children: inconsistency with ECJ case-law Recent law (March 2007) reinforcing criminal sanctions against private gaming operators. Arrest of Peter Nylander ( October 2007)

France:after July 2007: PMU vs. Zeturf: Groundbreaking decision from the French supreme court.  Is the barrier to free provision of services justified and necessary ?  Questions proportionality of the blanket prohibition need to check if the MS of origin protects consumers. October 2007: France starts to negotiate with the European Commission after 2 nd stage of infringement procedure is launched. March 2008: Durieux report published French government announces the “regulated” opening of online gaming market

Internet Payments Ban This idea from the US inspires many M.S. such as France, Germany, Holland, Norway, Spain or Estonia. Commission’s reaction:  Draft French law deemed likely to be contrary to EU treaty. (art.56 EC Treaty granting free movement of capital).  German Interstate Treaty adopted in January 2008: Negative opinion of the Commission+ Since January referral to the ECJ.

Recent changes in the EU… …towards liberalization ITALY: After Gambelli, Placanica and infringement procedures = new decrees  Decree on remote skill games = where “skill predominates over chance”  Online Gambling draft proposal criticized by the Commission (on ) for 3 reasons  Cost of licenses (around € )  Obligation to connect to a national database for controls  Betting turnover threshold required to obtain a license.

Recent changes in the EU… …towards liberalization DENMARK: March 2007: 2 nd stage of infringement procedure launched by the Commission for restrictive practices in the sport betting market. April 2008: Government preparing to formally liberalize the market with a licensing system.

Recent changes in the EU… …towards liberalization SWEDEN: 2 ongoing infringement procedures (sport betting and poker) February 2008:The Supreme court questions the Swedish banning foreign gambling adds. March 2008: Prosecutors not allowed to prosecute cases of illegal foreign gambling adds until further notice.

Recent changes in the EU… …towards liberalization HOLLAND April 2008: Dutch Senate rejects a bill granting State Monopoly the right to be for 3 years the exclusive online gambling operator.

WTO: EU v. US September 2006: UIGEA is passed December 2007: RGA lodges a complaint before EU Commission since UIGEA causes a ban of gambling in violation of GATS between US and EU.(market access and national treatment.  Compensation deal for the future  Investigation from the EU Commission is pursued to assess past impact of UIGEA on trade.  Further to this report of the EU, WTO could launch proceedings.

Thank you for your attention! Thibault Verbiest Partner, Ulys