Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Ofsted say What Outstanding looks like: Walsall Adult and Community College are an Outstanding provider because: The proportions of learners who achieve.
Advertisements

Providing Inspection Services for Department of Education Department for Employment and Learning Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure An evaluation.
Providing Inspection Services for Department of Education Department for Employment and Learning Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure Evaluation of.
Reforms to School Accountability and Assessment
Learning and skills inspection outcomes LSIS Lorna Fitzjohn Divisional Manager, Learning and Skills January 2012.
Ofsted and the inspection of further education and skills
Parent Forum 10 th January Outline of session – Raising Standards How do we compare with other schools on results ? What are we doing to make progress.
Working Towards Success at and Beyond THE ROLE OF THE TUTOR February 2010.
Overview of key changes to Ofsted inspection of Initial Teacher Training (ITT) from September 2012.
Ofsted Feedback & Quality Dissemination W elcome June 10.
Destinations What do you aim to achieve through the publication of destination measures? We have made it very clear that we want to put more information.
National Forum for VCSE Learning and Skills Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector’s Annual Report 2013/14 The Further Education and Skills Report Marina Gaze,
Providing Inspection Services for Department of Education Department for Employment and Learning Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure Evaluation of.
Equality and Inspection – an Ofsted perspective of Impact NATSPEC/LSIS June 2011.
Slide 1 of 18 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 3: Developing effective work.
Hertfordshire County Council Music Service Briefing – Ofsted Inspections 2012.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
Slide 1 of 17 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 2: The development of English.
Module 2 Implementing Foundation Learning January 2011.
RPA/funding per student/Study Programmes – how it all fits together in 2013/14.
01. Welcome 02 Implementation of Foundation Learning Tier (FLT) Progression Pathways in the London Region.
SASH Conference The Ofsted perspective on Somerset secondary schools 15 May 2015 Tom Winskill, Senior HMI, Ofsted South West 15 May 2015.
Evaluating the impact of careers guidance for continuous improvement
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
24 June 2011 Raising standards, improving lives Moving to outstanding post-16 provision Tom Winskill HMI Principal Officer, Framework Development Ofsted.
Leading from the front – the role of English in developing literacy across the school 20 March 2015 Lesley Daniel Associate inspector.
Theory & Practice – the new Common Inspection Framework and what it means to governors UCU-LSIS-UNISON FE Staff Governors’ Conference 3 December 2012 Lorna.
TEACHING, LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT UPDATE 1 ST March 2013.
Progression Post 16 Ofsted Survey 2010 / 2011 Key Findings Joyce Deere HMI.
History PGCE Subject Development Panel Jan Feedback from Chief External Examiner 2013/14 KEY STRENGTHS: 1.Highly efficient and effective communication.
The impact of strategies in Workstep on increasing progressions to unsupported employment Presenters: Pat Higginbottom ADM June Cramman HMI.
Ofsted Parent Forum Welcome Please help yourself to tea/coffee. Ofsted Lead Inspector: “St. Andrew’s is an improving school, and improving quickly.” Aim.
Delivering excellent careers guidance in schools– an Ofsted perspective Karen Adriaanse HMI Special Adviser (Improvement) FE and skills March 2015.
FOUNDATION LEARNING: What is it and how does it benefit our learners? Sue Owen-Evans.
Slide 1 of 16 Critical issues in the provision of youth work for young disabled people Discussion materials Issue 4: Youth workers and other practitioners.
ACLS Teaching and Learning Development Day 2013 Let’s Be Outstanding! Andy Ashley Development Manager-Quality.
Partnership in ISCs and examples of good practice Sue Preece HMI February 10 th 2010.
Motivation Focus Aspirations Success Welcome to Broughton Hall “Success in the Sixth Form” Evening.
How will KCC support schools from September 2012? Skills & Employability Service Central Team: 3 Early Intervention Managers / Curriculum Officer 3 Area.
Helen Groves.  Ofsted’s view of the landsacpe  Main Elements of the Sept 2012 CIF & updates  Implications for Providers emskills.org.uk.
Welcome What question did you come with that you would like answering with regard to volunteering?
The New Ofsted Framework Pupil Achievement Quality of Leadership and Management Quality of Teaching Behaviour and Safety.
The National Improvement Framework - vision
National Improvement Framework Aims of this presentation: Share information on the draft National Improvement Framework To discuss and share views on.
Ofsted Common Inspection Framework Mapping to Career Ready September 2015.
Mindset 2000 LtdSlide 1 Train to Gain Provider Support Programme October 2007 Self assessment - introduction.
Slide 1 of 17 Critical issues in the provision of youth work for young disabled people Discussion materials Issue 1: Enjoyment and learning – curriculum.
Reepham Primary School School Improvement and Development At Reepham Primary School we aspire to be confident and ambitious learners who care for.
Kingston University Ofsted Inspection Highlights?.
Aspects of ‘outcomes for learners’ for learners with learning difficulties or disabilities, including provision in Independent Specialist Colleges Charlie.
Ysgol Gyfun Gwynllyw Year Curriculum,
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Educational Attainment in Hastings Presentation to the Hastings LSP Fiona Wright October 2014.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Add presentation title to master slide | 1 Improving Success Rates Phil Hatton HMI Ofsted National Adviser 24 March 2010 West Midlands ALP Conference Park.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Support for English, maths and ESOL Module 18: Preparing for inspection with an English and maths focus.
The State of the Nation Matthew Coffey Ofsted Regional Director Date 24 March 2010.
Parents’ Forum - Tuesday 7 th June 2016 Ofsted. Update from the last forum Parents views on the school planner… …A big review is in place, but the changes.
Annual report findings 2010/11 Lorna Fitzjohn, Divisional Manager, Learning and Skills 29 November 2011.
Helen Groves.  AZEYIXOWU _ ? ? ?? ?12? 7396  Ofsted’s view of the landscape  Main Elements of the Sept 2015 CIF & updates  Implications for providers.
OTLA Report Writing Training
Raising standards, improving lives
Delivering outstanding professional development for teaching
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Study Programmes: Modelling & Operation Project
Progress Whole organisation approach
Progress Whole organisation approach
OTLA Report Writing Training
OTLA Report Writing Training
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention, achievement and progression May 2013 Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey

Slide 2 of 19  This resource is based on a thematic survey on Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes carried out from September 2012 to March It contains summary findings of each of the three critical issues identified in the survey.  Each of the three packs suggests specific questions for discussion. These are of course not exhaustive, but it is hoped that providers will use the questions as prompts to evaluate and improve their provision. This may lead to identifying and sharing good practice, as well as priorities for improvement.  You can take the issues in any order and spend as long as you like on each one. However, we suggest that at some stage you find time to look at all three. About this resource Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey

Slide 3 of 19 These materials look at the three critical issues emerging from the survey. Issue 1: Attendance, retention, achievement and progression Issue 2: The development of English and mathematics skills Issue 3: Developing effective work experience opportunities Overview of the discussion materials Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey

Slide 4 of 19 Scope and methodology of the survey The survey covered Foundation Learning provision for learners aged 16 to 19 at independent learning providers and community learning and skills providers. Almost all the providers sampled had previously delivered Entry to Employment (E2E). The survey sample consisted of:  detailed evidence and data from 26 planned inspections  detailed evidence and data from 18 visits to providers who were not being inspected  detailed data from 15 planned inspection visits  a review of 31 published inspection reports. Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey

Key findings from the survey

Slide 6 of 19  Two thirds of the providers in the sample offered a wide range of employability and personal and social qualifications. Achievement rates were good for around half of the providers  Progression rates into full-time education or training, an apprenticeship or employment were too low  Achievement of qualifications in English and mathematics functional skills was low, especially for level 1. Survey findings: Outcomes for learners Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey

Slide 7 of 19  Overall, the quality of teaching and learning was not good enough  Learners received good care and support, and providers placed a high emphasis on learners’ welfare  The availability, use and quality of work experience placements were poor  Access to, and quality of, impartial advice and guidance on progression opportunities for learners varied too much. Survey findings: The quality of teaching, learning and assessment Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey

Slide 8 of 19  Providers worked very effectively with partners and other local organisations  Too few providers used data effectively to analyse performance and inform business planning  The planned number of hours for learners to attend the provision varied considerably from around 12 hours a week up to 30 hours. Survey findings: The effectiveness of leadership and management Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey

Raising the challenge: issues for consideration by providers Attendance, retention, achievement and progression Issue 1

Slide 10 of 19 Attendance, retention, achievement and progression: Survey findings (1) Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey  Progression rates into full-time education or training, an apprenticeship or employment for the total number of leavers from the providers who provided data for 2010/11 and 2011/12, were low at an average of 50% and 49%, respectively  Progression rates in 2011/12 varied from 8% to 87% and were below 50% for 25 of the 56 providers that provided data  Progression rates for leavers on Foundation Learning provision had dropped in comparison with those for E2E for 25 of the 48 providers who had data for this former programme.

Slide 11 of 19  Achievement rates for vocational qualifications were good for around half of the providers  Achievement rates for functional skills at entry levels were satisfactory  Achievement rates for functional skills at level 1 were unacceptable. (Achievement rates were based on leavers registered for qualifications but data returns showed low numbers of leavers registered for qualifications ) Attendance, retention, achievement and progression: Survey findings (2) Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey

Slide 12 of 19 Attendance, retention, achievement and progression: Survey findings (3) Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey  Too few providers used data effectively to analyse performance and inform business planning  Over half of the providers had not systematically recorded learners’ destinations since the start of the Foundation Learning provision when they no longer received payment for progression  In nearly half of the 18 providers visited, managers did not routinely analyse data on attendance, retention, achievement or progression to identify which areas of the provision or groups of learners were underperforming.

Slide 13 of 19 Attendance, retention, achievement and progression: Discussion points (1) Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey  What are our learners’ significant barriers to attending regularly and staying on the programme?  Who are the learners that have completed the programme in the past two years and have progressed? Are there any common circumstances?  What made a difference for them?  Are there any case studies of individuals that have overcome significant barriers to learning?  What made a difference?  What can we learn from these success stories?

Slide 14 of 19 Attendance, retention, achievement and progression: Discussion points (2) Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey Have we got the following right? (Part 1) Recruitment and induction: Do our learners understand the structure and purpose of the programme? Are we ‘selling’ the programme as a step to a positive future that can build on their skills and tap into their potential? Initial assessment: Are we emphasising our learners’ strengths enough to motivate them? Are we focusing on what they need to achieve for their next step?

Slide 15 of 19 Attendance, retention, achievement and progression: Discussion points (3) Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey Have we got the following right? (Part 2) The learning programme: Have we got the range and content of activities right to help our learners develop the skills and confidence each individual learner needs for the next step? Are the activities challenging and interesting enough? Progress reviews: Do we give our learners enough constructive feedback on their progress in relation to what they need to do to progress to the next step and be successful?

Slide 16 of 19 Attendance, retention, achievement and progression: Discussion points (4) Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey How can we use data on the following to improve retention, achievement and progression for all our learners?  The attendance patterns across different groups and individuals, classes and tutors  The retention patterns for different groups, work areas and sites  The achievement rates for different groups, vocational areas, functional skills and tutors  The progression rates for different groups and work areas.

Slide 17 of 19 Attendance, retention, achievement and progression: Discussion points (5) Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey How can we use data and other information, such as feedback, to:  identify problem areas?  analyse what the issues are?  identify, implement and review actions to improve?  set individual and team targets to encourage staff to take more responsibility for the success of their area?  analyse performance and inform business planning? Do we share and discuss data reports with our staff?

Conclusion

Slide 19 of 19 Conclusion We hope you have found this resource useful in helping you to evaluate and develop your Foundation Learning provision to improve your learners’ attendance, retention and achievement, as well as their progression to further education, training or employment. We welcome comments on this training resource. Please write to and ensure that you put ‘Ofsted discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey’ in the subject box of your Ofsted’s discussion materials: Foundation Learning survey