User Working Group 2013 Data Management System – Status 12 March 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCADM Report Working Paper 10. Overview SCAR Data and Information Management Strategy (DIMS) – endorsed Oct Introduction to the draft SCAR Data.
Advertisements

AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
Software change management
Configuration management
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
NASA Earth Science Data Preservation Content Specification H. K. (Rama) Ramapriyan John Moses 10 th ESDSWG Meeting – November 2, 2011 Newport News, VA.
UWG 2013 Meeting Science Direction Discussion. Thrusts Invigorate outreach Deploy DM infrastructure Modernize data access tools Enhance web presence Integrate.
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
Requirements Specification
1 Samples The following slides are provided as samples and references for the Quarterly Reviews Additional slides will be added.
Project Management Methodology (PMM)
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
December 3, 2010 SAIF Governance Framework A Brief Update on work to date.
UWG 2013 Meeting Science Information Services Status.
CSSE 375 Software Construction and Evolution: Configuration Management
Configuration Management Avoiding Costly Confusion mostly stolen from Chapter 27 of Pressman.
NOAA Metadata Update Ted Habermann. NOAA EDMC Documentation Directive This Procedural Directive establishes 1) a metadata content standard (International.
System Design/Implementation and Support for Build 2 PDS Management Council Face-to-Face Mountain View, CA Nov 30 - Dec 1, 2011 Sean Hardman.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
COMPGZ07 Project Management Presentations Graham Collins, UCL
05 December, 2002HDF & HDF-EOS Workshop VI1 SEEDS Standards Process Richard Ullman SEEDS Standards Formulation Team Lead
Cybersecurity: Engineering a Secure Information Technology Organization, 1st Edition Chapter 7 Software Supporting Processes and Software Reuse.
Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 4: Disciplines II.
Michelle Gierach, PO.DAAC Project Scientist 2012 PO.DAAC User Working Group (UWG) Meeting March 7-8, 2012.
ECHO DEPository Project: Highlight on tools & emerging issues The ECHO DEPository Project is a 3-year digital preservation research and development project.
System Establishing Your Management Reporting System.
Digital Preservation: Lessons learned through national action Digital Preservation Interoperability Framework Workshop April 2010.
Policy Review (Top-Down Methodology) Lesson 7. Policies From the Peltier Text, p. 81 “The cornerstones of effective information security programs are.
Introduction to Apache OODT Yang Li Mar 9, What is OODT Object Oriented Data Technology Science data management Archiving Systems that span scientific.
CEOS Disaster Risk Management Implementation Phase Status Ivan Petiteville (ESA) on behalf of CEOS DRM Team CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA.
How To Build a Testing Project 1 Onyx Gabriel Rodriguez.
Page 1 Informatics Pilot Project EDRN Knowledge System Working Group San Antonio, Texas January 21, 2001 Steve Hughes Thuy Tran Dan Crichton Jet Propulsion.
UWG 2013 Meeting PO.DAAC Web Services Demo. What are PO.DAAC Web Services?
UWG 2013 Meeting PO.DAAC Data Stewardship Status.
CS 3610: Software Engineering – Fall 2009 Dr. Hisham Haddad – CSIS Dept. Chapter 2 The Software Process Discussion of the Software Process: Process Framework,
“Guidance on the Selection and Appraisal of Geospatial Content of Enduring Value, April 2014 Draft” groups-subcommittees/hdwg/index_html.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Configuration Management QMS Training.
Audit in electronic records management - Filip Boudrez - - Antwerp City Archives - ErpaWorkshop Antwerpen 16 april 2004.
Label Design Tool Management Council F2F Washington, D.C. November 29-30, 2006
Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
Project Management Process Transition & Closure Project Management Process Project Description Team Mission/ Assignment Major Milestones Boundaries Team.
User Working Group 2013 Data Access Mechanisms – Status 12 March 2013
Cmpe 589 Spring 2006 Lecture 2. Software Engineering Definition –A strategy for producing high quality software.
Practice Standard for Scheduling Project Manager’s Meeting Status April 28, 2004 Project Manager – Douglas Clark, CEO of Métier.
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
UWG 2013 Meeting HITIDE Demo. High-Level Functions Archive Ingest Direct Data Access Web Portal Visualization Inventory Information Providers Data In.
Process Asad Ur Rehman Chief Technology Officer Feditec Enterprise.
EO Dataset Preservation Workflow Data Stewardship Interest Group WGISS-37 Meeting Cocoa Beach (Florida-US) - April 14-18, 2014.
Implementation Review1 Archive Ingest Redesign March 14, 2003.
PDS4 Project Report PDS MC F2F UCLA Dan Crichton November 28,
PDS4 Project Report PDS MC F2F University of Maryland Dan Crichton March 27,
Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center THUANG June 9-13, 20089th GHRSST-PP Science Team Meeting GHRSST GDAC and EOSDIS PO.DAAC.
Chang, Wen-Hsi Division Director National Archives Administration, 2011/3/18/16:15-17: TELDAP International Conference.
Data Management: Data Processing Types of Data Processing at USGS There are several ways to classify Data Processing activities at USGS, and here are some.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
OAIS (archive) OAIS (archive) Producer Management Consumer.
Managing the Project Lifecycle
Persistent Identifiers Implementation in EOSDIS
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Exploitation of ISS Scientific data - sustainability
CS 501: Software Engineering Fall 1999
WGISS Connected Data Assets Oct 24, 2018 Yonsook Enloe
Robin Dale RLG OAIS Functionality Robin Dale RLG
Presentation transcript:

User Working Group 2013 Data Management System – Status 12 March

Data Management & Stewardship Preserve NASA’s data for the benefit of future generations Data Access Provide intuitive services to discover, select, extract and utilize data Science Information Services Provide a knowledgebase to help a broad user community understand and interpret satellite ocean data and related information PO.DAAC Functional Areas

Data Access Provide intuitive services to discover, select, extract and utilize data Science Information Services Provide a knowledgebase to help a broad user community understand and interpret satellite ocean data and related information PO.DAAC Functional Areas Data Management & Stewardship Preserve NASA’s data for the benefit of future generations

High-Level Functions Consumers Archive Ingest Web Services & Publishing Direct Data Access High-Level Access Tools Web Portal Visualization Inventory Information Providers Data In Information In Data Out Information Out Data Providers Data Providers

High-Level Functions Consumers Archive Ingest Web Services & Publishing Direct Data Access High-Level Access Tools Web Portal Visualization Inventory Information Providers Data In Information In Data Out Information Out Data Providers Data Providers

 Recommendation 4 – Annual dataset gap analysis and prioritization Closed. (Just noting that the DGAP adoption process is referenced in the DSLP.)  Recommendation 6 – Create public webpage that documents PO.DAAC’s best practices: Open. (The Dataset Lifecycle Policy captures PO.DAAC best practices, but we have not yet gone public.)  Recommendation 7 – Creation of a dataset lifecycle policy: Closed. (Done, being applied to every new dataset, and refining / improving it as we uncover lessons-learned.)  Recommendation 8 – Work with GHRSST on metadata practices: Closed. (Just noting that GHRSST is aware of our Dataset Lifecycle Policy, and is incorporating its basic constructs into their own approach.) Applicable 2012 UWG Recommendations

Purpose of this Presentation: Status the Data Management System:  Business processes, and  IT infrastructure Presentation Outline:  Data Management System = BP + IT  Catching up  IT Infrastructure Status  Business Process Status Outline

Business Processes Includes policies, process descriptions, templates, procedures, etc. Examples:  Overarching Dataset Lifecycle Policy  Memorandum of Understanding template  Data Management Plan template  Database Audit procedure  File Audit procedure  Data Acceptance Policy  Data Dictionary management process  Dataset Types definitions  Remote Dataset Policy/Approach BP + IT IT Infrastructure Includes hardware, software, networks, interfaces, etc. Examples:  Site Crawler capability  Data Handler capability  Data Reader capability  Data Dictionary implementation  Data Catalog capability  Data Archive capability  Server Infrastructure  Network Infrastructure  Storage Infrastructure PO.DAAC Data Management System Business Processes IT Infrastructur e =+

System Integration: Business Process and IT Services BPBP ITIT BPBP ITIT BPBP ITIT BPBP ITIT BPBP ITIT BPBP ITIT Maturity

 Already put significant effort into IT  Solid baseline established in the first evolution  Major pieces are in place and working smoothly  That stability provides opportunities  Reaping the benefits of a solid foundation Infrastructure System Deliveries

 IT is stabilized, so…  Turning attention to business practices / processes  Began with the Dataset Lifecycle Policy  Working on tallying a list of all needed processes Business Practices

SDLC RemoteA&C 1 DB Audit DSLP 1 DSLP 2 Templates Dictionary UseCase A&C 2 Types DOIs Data Management System Business Processes (BPs) Overarching Dataset Lifecycle PolicyMemorandum of Understanding (template) Use Case / User Story ProcessDataset Gap Analysis and Prioritization DOI ProcessIntegrated Schedule Development Handling Remote datasetsData Management Plan (template) Data Dictionary ManagementInterface Control Document (template) Data Types (definition and flow)Operational Readiness Checklist (template) Database AuditingUser Guide (template) Assessment & CharacterizationSystem Impact Assessment (template) File AuditingReadMe (template) Standard Documentation ProcessRetirement Process and Plan template File Audit

SDLC RemoteA&C 1 DB Audit DSLP 1 DSLP 2 Templates Dictionary UseCase A&C 2 Types DOIs Note: Green = Defined processes. Orange = processes being actively worked. Data Management System Business Processes (BPs) Overarching Dataset Lifecycle PolicyMemorandum of Understanding (template) Use Case / User Story ProcessDataset Gap Analysis and Prioritization DOI ProcessIntegrated Schedule Development Handling Remote datasetsData Management Plan (template) Data Dictionary ManagementInterface Control Document (template) Data Types (definition and flow)Operational Readiness Checklist (template) Database AuditingUser Guide (template) Assessment & CharacterizationSystem Impact Assessment (template) File AuditingReadMe (template) Standard Documentation ProcessRetirement Process and Plan template File Audit

 Dataset Lifecycle Policy is written and active  Worked via iterative discussions  Document driven  Consistent approach + best practices  Follow the template, follow the policy.  A living document BP: Dataset Lifecycle Policy Best Practices Documents Templates assigned to… controlled by…

Lifecycle Phases and Documents Dataset Identification Prepare the System Integration Operations Retirement On New Version On Deprecation Dataset Approval DGA P ISSIAMOUICDDMPORCUGRP ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Draft ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

 Next BP we’re tackling is data types  Came up in discussions of DSLP  Clear we have a disconnect in both definition and flow BP: Data Types

Data Types Main Types* DefinitionSearchable?Access PreviewGive the public a sneak preview. Datasets should not be in this category beyond 18 months. WARNING file should be posted. YesAnonymous OpenFully supported datasets with unrestricted community access.YesAnonymous RetiredDatasets that have been superseded, are obsolete or have an error. Per UWG recommendation, these data sets are retrievable but come with a health warning. Varies by datasetAnonymous ReducedReduced or value-added data sets created by a PO.DAAC tool.Varies by datasetAnonymous SharedTemporary space for sharing non-operational datasets between science team members (e.g., vetting datasets). NoPassword ControlledITAR or mission sensitive data sets.YesPassword *Other miscellaneous types exist, for example: Dormant and Simulated

Current Type Progression Mission Datasets Shared Open Retired Controlled Community Datasets Preview Open Retired

 Types and Lifecycle Policy not aligned  Some types set visibility, others indicate progress  Flow / progression doesn’t align  Recognize there’s a problem, so working it  Beginning with Remote Data Types

End of Presentation