GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Days 4 and 5: Making Instructional Decisions ELA K-3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Advertisements

Bringing it all together!
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Days 4 and 5: Building Instruction
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
Understanding by Design 2012 Allen Parish March 12 & 13, 2012.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
Consistency of Assessment
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
Internet password: aea8success Conceptbasedinstruction.weebly.com Password: Consortium1.
An Approach to Creating and Facilitating Workshops Library Instructor College Fall 2010 Charles Dershimer Erping Zhu Center For Research on Learning and.
Developing Instructional Strategies
Instructional Strategies
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
UBD Backward Planning Understanding by Design - The Backward Planning Model Based on the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Plan Backwards!
Principles of Assessment
The Four-phase Lesson Plan
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
DESIGNING UNITS for SOCIAL STUDIES GPS Day 4: Lessons within a unit.
1 Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards Day 1: Standards-Based Education and the New GPS.
GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Days 4 and 5: Making Instructional Decisions Curriculum and Special Education Directors.
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Days 3 and 4: Making Instructional Decisions Science.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
1 Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards Day 1: Standards-Based Education and the New GPS.
GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Planning Instruction Mathematics K-2.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
1 GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Days 4 and 5: Making Instructional Decisions.
Standards-Based Planning Essential Question: What is good teaching? Rigor, Consistency and Cohesiveness in Unit Planning.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Jacque Melin, Facilitator 1.
GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Days 4 and 5: Making Instructional Decisions ELA 9-12.
GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Days 4 and 5: Making Instructional Decisions Science.
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Georgia Performance Standards
The Backward Design Process
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
Understanding by Design a.k.a. Backward Design
Designing a Training Program RATIONALE OF THE TRAINING Background or introduction of what the training is all about –Developments in the field/discipline/area.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Welcome to EDUC 461! Integrated Methods I: Processes Mercer University McDonough RAC.
Facilitate Group Learning
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
HOW IS “WHERETO” LIKE AMERICAN IDOL? All rights reserved. This PowerPoint is intended for use in face- to-face presentation for Parkway School District,
Program Design Chapter 5 6 th Edition Raymond A. Noe Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Planning for Instruction and Assessments. Matching Levels Ensure that your level of teaching matches your students’ levels of knowledge and thinking.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Understanding by Design
Days 3 and 4: Making Instructional Decisions
Understanding by Design
Days 4 and 5: Making Instructional Decisions
Project–Based Learning
Days 4 and 5: Making Instructional Decisions
GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Presentation transcript:

GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Days 4 and 5: Making Instructional Decisions ELA K-3

Quotation “For every complex problem there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." H. L. Menken

Second Order Change Shakes up the status quo Holds everyone’s feet to the fire Proposes new and often revolutionary ideas Involves a change in mindset Causes moments of frustration Invites ambiguity and dissent Involves research and theory

Review of Stage 1 Where do the Big Ideas and/or Established Goals originate? How are Enduring Understandings formed? Why do we need to formulate Essential Questions? Why do we need to identify Key Knowledge and Skills in Stage 1 of the SBE process? How might our unpacked standards be similar? How might they be different?

Review of Stage 2 Why should we develop an assessment plan before Stage 3, before we make instructional decisions? What questions might we want to consider as we develop an assessment plan? How can we tell if an assessment plan is balanced? Why is assessment for learning our goal?

Training Overview: Days Four & Five Introduction to Stage Three Designing an Instructional Unit (today into tomorrow) Examining Student Work Curriculum Mapping

Days 4 & 5 Objectives 1.Explain why instructional decision-making is stage three in the standards-based education process 2.Describe the WHERETO method of identifying the purpose of instructional strategies. 3.Identify a variety of instructional strategies for different achievement targets. 4.Evaluate a unit plan, focusing on the instructional plan detailed on the unit calendar, and develop a balanced plan for instruction, one that includes strategies appropriate to achievement targets and content. 5.Describe how to use a structured, collaborative process for examining student work. 6.Demonstrate how to use teacher commentary to increase student learning. 7.Explain different ways of curriculum mapping.

Essential Question 1 Why is instruction stage 3 in the backward design process?

Covering vs. Uncovering: What does it mean to “uncover?” Bringing the “big ideas” to life Focusing on learning, rather than teaching Helping students to understand, not just remember the understanding of others Incorporating a number of different teaching strategies that are driven by the achievement targets Teaching for breadth and depth

Teaching for Breadth and Depth Depth Unearth it Analyze it Question it Prove it Generalize it Breadth Connect it Picture it Extend it

Essential Question 1 Why is instruction stage 3 in the backward design process?

Essential Question 2 How can using the WHERETO model help us make appropriate instructional decisions?

WHERETO: Making Instructional Decisions WHERETO W Where are we going? Why? What is expected? H How will we hook and hold student interest? E How will we equip students to explore and experience? O How will we organize and sequence the learning? T How will we tailor learning to varied needs, interests, styles? E How will students self- evaluate and reflect on their learning? R How will we help students rethink, rehearse, revise, and refine?

Mini-Jigsaw Group 1: W : Pages 215 – 216 Group 2: H : Page 217 Group 3: E : Pages 218 – 219 Group 4: R : Pages 221 – 222 Group 5: E : Page 223 Group 6: T : Page 224 Group 7: O : Page 225

Essential Question 2 How can using the WHERETO model help us make appropriate instructional decisions?

Essential Question 3 What strategies are most appropriate for different types of achievement targets?

Matching Strategies to Achievement Targets Achievement Target Direct Instruction Experiential Learning Independent Learning Indirect Instruction Interactive Instruction Knowledge/ Information Skills/ Processes Thinking & Reasoning Communi- cation

Achievement Target: Knowledge and Information Direct InstructionExperiential Learning Independent Learning Indirect Instruction Interactive Instruction Strategies such as direct instruction, graphic organizers, structured overview, etc., can convey facts or information to students. Experiential strategies may be structured to allow students to arrive, inductively or deductively, at rules or principles. Strategies such as assigned questions, learning activity packages or centers, reports, or research projects allow students to obtain facts, etc. Strategies such as concept attainment or concept formation, reading for meaning, reciprocal teaching, and inquiry allow students to arrive at rules or principles. Strategies such as discussion, interviewing, or tutorial groups can provide students with information or help them to review rules, etc.

Achievement Target: Skills/Processes Direct InstructionExperiential Learning Independent Learning Indirect Instruction Interactive Instruction Modeling can introduce or demonstrate skills or processes, but other, more student-directed strategies are needed as well. Modeling, games, conducting experiments, etc., can introduce skills/processes or provide practice. Essays, learning activity packages or centers, or research projects, etc., can provide opportunities for application or practice. Instructional strategies that involve problem solving often provide the opportunity to acquire skills or practice processes. Cooperative learning groups, debates, role playing, or laboratory groups, etc., work well.

Achievement Target: Thinking and Reasoning Direct InstructionExperiential Learning Independent Learning Indirect Instruction Interactive Instruction Modeling can introduce or demonstrate thinking and reasoning processes, but other, more student-directed strategies are needed as well. Most experiential strategies work well here, especially roll playing, games, experiments, and simulations. Some, such as certain essay topics, learning activity packages or centers, or research projects, work better than others. Strategies such as working with case studies, concept mapping, inquiry, problem solving, etc., work well with thinking and reasoning targets. Most interactive instructional strategies work with these targets, but especially problem solving and Socratic Seminars.

Achievement Target: Communication Direct InstructionExperiential Learning Independent Learning Indirect Instruction Interactive Instruction Not the best strategies for providing students with opportunities to acquire or practice communication skills. Good when oral, written, or other forms of expression are included, such as reporting field observations, role playing, or simulations. Again, essays or other strategies that involve oral, written, or other forms or expression can provide the opportunity to learn communication skills. Reciprocal teaching, reflective discussion, or other strategies that involve oral, written, or other forms or expression work well. By definition, interactive instructional strategies include opportunities to learn or practice communication skills.

Essential Question 3 What strategies are most appropriate for different types of achievement targets?

Essential Question 4 How can we develop instructional plans that include an appropriate variety of instructional strategies that maximize student learning?

Marzano’s Strategies These nine strategies are foundations for best practices in classroom instruction. They are validated by findings of the National Reading Panel. They should guide instructional decision making in the classroom. We will connect the research-based strategies with the implementation of Georgia Performance Standards.

Follow Up Assignment Read assigned chapter from Classroom Instruction that Works. Prepare 10-minute presentation on the “best practices” outlined in your chapter. Presentation should include: How research supports the strategy General principles for using this strategy effectively Variations on the strategy

Evaluating an Assessment Plan Is this assessment plan balanced? How does the assessment plan relate to the standard(s)? How might we improve the individual assessments? Could the addition of other assessments provide a better, more complete picture of student learning? What other assessments might we use to obtain evidence of student learning for this unit?

Learning Plan What will need to be taught and coached? How should it be taught in light of performance goals? What sequence of activities best suits the desired results?

WHERETO W know where they are going, why, and what is required of them? H be hooked-engaged in digging into the Big Ideas? E have adequate opportunities to explore and experience Big Ideas and experience instruction to equip them for the required performances? R have sufficient opportunities to rethink, rehearse, revise and refine their work based upon timely feedback? E have an opportunity to evaluate their work and set future goals? Consider the extent to which the learning plan is T tailored and flexible to address the interests and learning styles of all students. O organized and sequenced to maximize engagement and effectiveness?

Essential Question 4 How can we develop unit plans that include an appropriate variety of instructional strategies that will lead to student learning?

Essential Question 5 Why is examining student work important for all educators? What are the benefits of looking collaboratively at student work?

Examining Student Work: What is it? A group of educators committed to improving their practice and improving curriculum, instruction, assessment, and the learning environment for students Requires bringing real student work to the group to be examined Uses a formal process for examining that work Requires follow-up after student work is examined so that the resulting knowledge is not lost

Examining Student Work: Why do it? To improve teaching and student learning To ensure learning activities and strategies align with standards To allow teachers to calibrate their understanding of what quality looks like To encourage appropriate rigor in learning activities To inform instructional decision-making To help identify trends

Why Use Protocols? Agreed upon guidelines for a conversation Build the skills and culture necessary for collaborative work Allows groups to build trust doing substantive work together Creates a structure that makes it safe to ask challenging questions Ensures equity and parity in terms of how each person’s issues are attended to Give a license to listen without having to continuously respond Helps make the most of the time available

Three Sample Protocols The Tuning Protocol Standards in Practice (SIP) Collaborative Assessment of Student Learning (CASL)

Jigsaw Directions Form groups: 1.Tuning Protocol (pages 17-20) 2.SIP (pages 21-30) 3.CASL (pages 31-33) Read the materials and be prepared to present: Why use this protocol? When would it be most helpful? What are some key guidelines for making the most from this protocol?

Essential Question 5 Why is examining student work important for all educators? What are the benefits of looking collaboratively at student work?

Essential Question 6 How can we use use teacher commentary to increase student learning?

Essential Question 6 How can we use use teacher commentary to increase student learning?

Essential Question 7 How can we map out our units over the course of a year?

What Mapping Does Provides a road map Gives teachers picture of students’ long-term experiences Serves as a communication tool Shows potential links Provides timeline for new teachers The above statements are only true if the maps are living documents that people use!

Grade Level Content Map 1 Grade Subject Area AugSepOctNovDec

Grade Level Content Map 2 Grade Subject Area ContentSkillsAssessment Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Work in small groups. Generate some possible map formats. For each one: Identify its purpose and audience Tell what type of information it would contain Identify the relative level of detail (high, medium, low) Show what it might look like Create a one-page description and thumbnail drawing to post on the wall. Put any new units that you have created into the map. What types of maps would serve you well?

Essential Question 7 How can we map out our units over the course of a year?

Wrapping Up What have you learned over the past two days?