Strategic Planning: Theme 1 – Develop and Inspire Creative Thinkers and Leaders and Life-long Success Lever 1.1 : Require all undergraduate students to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
Advertisements

STUDENT SUCCESS CENTERS : WORKING BETTER TOGETHER TO ENSURE STUDENT SUCCESS.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
SACS Criteria A well-defined issue related to enhancing student learning Embedded in university’s on-going planning and assessment Broad participation.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Standards 2.5, 3.3.1, & The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that.
Project-Based Learning
UBC Senate: Supporting an integrated approach to enhancing the mental health and wellbeing of students in the academic environment Lindsey Kovacevic Academic.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.
Connecting to Mission Lisa R. Carter Past Forward! Meeting Stakeholder Needs in 21st Century Special Collections June 3, 2013 This.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
1 By The Numbers. 2 One of largest programs of its kind at a major research institution Replication is underway at other universities. US Department of.
Inter/National Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research E-Portfolios at Thomas Thomas Edwards Colleen Burnham July 2007.
AN INITIATIVE OF FOUNDATIONS FOR A BETTER OREGON Corvallis School District Creative Leadership Achieves Student Success October 18, 2012.
Promotion Expectations and Preparation Dianne Delva.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
THE DRAFT MULTI-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN Toronto Catholic District School Board 1.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Full-Service Community Schools TASK FORCE Staff Lead: Jane Nicholson.
Trends in CTE Trends in CTE Dr. Patrick Ainsworth Rob Atterbury November 19, 2010.
Office of Academic Affairs January 12, 2007 Confirming Portland State’s Leadership Position and Defining Academic Priorities Campus Symposium 2007.
Objective: Reviewing the vision and restarting the work. Agenda 1.Design 21 overview 2.Accept Fall 09 timetable draft 6 3.Career Academies: Brainstorming.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Draft implementation plan for our new purposes and objectives for General Education. Interim report of the Task Force on General Education and the Faculty.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
The College of Education and Professional Studies Phase II Planning Committee November 19, 2015 Faculty Senate.
Draft of the Conceptual Framework for Evaluation & Assessment of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Alliance for Graduate Education & the Professoriate.
SACS Reaffirmation and the QEP Introduction and Welcome – Kay Jordan, Joe Scartelli Administrative Support: Personnel SACS Reaffirmation Overview – Rick.
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
EVSC New Tech Institute: Academies of Innovation and Entrepreneurial Leadership Preparing the Next Generation of Great Thinkers and Doers.
Faculty Senate Report September 24, 2009 Warren K. Wray Vice Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Copyright © 2012 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved
To Recap: The Broad Areas of Learning (BAL) are Lifelong Learning Sense of Self Community and Place Engaged Citizens Why the BAL are important Mandated.
Dr. Mary Ann Coughlin Associate Vice-President for Academic Affairs
University Strategic Plan
Phase One: Re-inventing the Flagship University, Fall 2006-Fall 2007
New Program Development and Program Reinvigoration
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
STRATEGIC PLAN Emerging Ideas in Support of Five Initiatives
Tippie RISE Colleen Opal Assistant Director, Experiential Learning
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Strategic Enrolment Management Planning OVERVIEW
Strategic Planning 30 Levers 19 Levers FY Actions
Warren K. Wray Provost Faculty Senate
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
College of Design Faculty Assembly
QUALITY OF EDUCATION PROPOSED ACTION PLAN FALL 2018
New Program Development and Program Reinvigoration
Assessment at Northeastern University
Share.Shape.Unite. Building our SSU Sonoma State University Academic Senate May 17, 2018 University Budget Office.
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Planning: Theme 1 – Develop and Inspire Creative Thinkers and Leaders and Life-long Success Lever 1.1 : Require all undergraduate students to participate in a significant experiential learning activity before graduation  Cawlfield is Lever Leader

Action and Create a definition and begin building a comprehensive list of activities that are supported by research as significant experiential activities (Target: completion by December 2013) Lever/Action : Incorporate experiential/service learning into the core curriculum in all degree programs at any level beginning in the freshmen year [Target: Faculty Senate approval of each curriculum by completion of second year of strategic plan (complete by June 2015)]

Completed to date and future work remaining: Research by UGS office: how do comparator institutions and TRU’s define “experiential learning”? First draft definition of “significant experiential learning activity” developed and presented to Provost direct reports at the Academic Affairs retreat in August. Circulated to Student Affairs for input. Second draft circulated to faculty for input by department chairs. Final definition and guidelines to be submitted to Provost by mid- November. Faculty in each degree program will develop/regulate their own comprehensive list of activities that will count as “significant experiential learning” within the spirit of the definition and guidelines approved by the Provost. Office of Undergraduate Studies will work with degree programs to develop mechanisms for tracking and assessing completion by each student as part of Degree Audit.

From the Current Draft Document: Definition and Implementation Guidelines Key Elements of Experiential Learning  Student centered rather than teacher centered  Active learning rather than passive learning  Application of learned principles to form realistic solutions to problems, issues and challenges  Reflection upon the learning experience. General Definition Experiential learning at Missouri S&T is an opportunity for students to engage in applying what they are learning through structured activities that differ significantly from the traditional lecture format. By creating varied experiential learning activities, it allows students to learn in an environment that aligns with their aptitude. These are hands-on activities that involve collaboration and reflective learning requiring students to go beyond mastering basic skills and content to the application of that material and engaging in problem solving challenges.

Implementation Guidelines for Missouri S&T To qualify: 1.The activity must be University sponsored or affiliated and the student must receive written approval of the activity from a faculty member or academic advisor in the student’s degree program. Approval of the initial activity does not automatically imply approval of the overall experience. 2.The faculty member or academic advisor will ensure that the activity is of significant duration, intensity and rigor to demonstrate successful application of learned principles appropriate to the expectations of the degree program faculty (it may be that more than one activity could be combined to create a suite of experiential learning activities for a single student that may be approved in satisfaction of this requirement). 3.The focus must be on “learning by doing” in a creative and innovative activity that generally falls outside the realm of the traditional structured classroom experience and contributes significantly to professional and personal development allowing students to reflect on contributions to the S&T or broader community in addition to the student’s development. 4.Finally, a significant experiential learning activity will include a written summary reflection piece that will document the experience from the student’s perspective; this written reflection piece should be of a quality suitable for inclusion as an attachment to a co- curricular transcript or in an e-portfolio that might be submitted by the student to potential employers or to graduate school admissions committees.