April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Jane Bird Acas Director Acas Acas’ role is to: encourage people to work together more effectively prevent or resolve disputes between employers and their.
Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Student Integrity and Misconduct Training for Administrative Staff supporting the Misconduct Process.
SITUATION RESPONSE FLOW CHART SUPERVISORS’S ACTIONS SITUATION OCCURS Direct observation, complainant reports, third party reports Document initial knowledge.
WorkSafe Victoria is a division of the Victorian WorkCover Authority Guidance Note on the Prevention of Bullying and Violence at Work Evaluation results.
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Federal Court Procedure – Aboriginal Law Case Study A.2 Federal Court Workshop CBA Legal Conference 2014 St. John’s Newfoundland.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
FOS’s Dispute Resolution Process Jack Furphy, ERT General Manager – Early Resolutions Bae Bastian, Legal Counsel – Banking & Finance.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Actuaries.
EVALUATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS. Strengths of Mediation  Strengths 1) Mediation is often less expensive. Mediation avoids the costs of a trial,
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
SESSION 2 Key points Module 4 covers consultation requirements under the WHS Act and relies on participants having completed Modules 1 – 3 of this course.
THE DFEH DISPUTE RESOLUTION DIVISION
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.
HUMAN RIGHTS Administering Human Rights Legislation.
Workers Compensation Commission Sian Leathem Registrar 29 September 2008.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Consumer Assistance Complaint Handling Process 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
DISCIPLINE & DUE PROCESS 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Laws and Regulations.
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
The Informal Complaint Process  The informal complaint process is the process most typically used by residential and small commercial customers.  It.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 4 INVESTIGATION.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES EXPEDITED CASE PROCESSING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT
Exploring the use of QSR Software for understanding quality - from a research funder’s perspective Janice Fong Research Officer Strategies in Qualitative.
October 13, W E WILL IDENTIFY, ANALYZE, AND ACT ON THE ROOT CAUSES OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS BY BUILDING UPON AND IMPROVING PRACTICES ALREADY IN PLACE.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
FILING AND DECIDING A HUMAN RIGHTS CASE PART A: DEFINITIONS PART A: DEFINITIONS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL PROCESS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL.
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
1 CERN “Ombuds”  What is the job  Covered persons  Source documents  Terms of reference and mandate  Creating awareness  Reporting  Steps in interpersonal.
Avoid Disputes, Not Complaints Presented by: Stuart Ayres and Derek Pullen Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
What is REDRESS? REDRESS® mediation is a transformative mediation program for Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) disputes at the informal stage of the.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
+ Human Rights Complaints. + Filing a Complaint A lawyer is not needed to file a complaint. Complaints can be withdrawn at any point. Complainant – person.
Department of Building and Housing Improvements to the way we provide our Service – and how you can help.
Dismissal Procedure Checklist. Initial Warning 1.Has the company acted immediately upon becoming aware of the unsatisfactory performance? 2.Was the employee.
Derbyshire County Council PUBLIC HANDLING GRIEVANCES - BRIEFING FOR MANAGERS.
IDEA FORMAL COMPLAINTS Administrative Accountability Branch Kentucky Department of Education Understanding the Self-Investigation Process.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
Welcome Managing concerns and complaints How should schools handle complaints? This session links to guidance from the DfE and local authorities, and looks.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
January 2009: PRS Template Presentation PRS for Music Code of Conduct.
Attendance Advisory Panels 1. Outcomes Understanding of the purpose of Attendance Advisory Panels (AAPs) as part of a plan for restoring attendance Familiarity.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Presented by: Antony N. Gichia Regional Audit Center Mombasa
Mediation 20/04/2018.
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Internal Complaint Process
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Enforcement and Policy Challenges in Health Information Privacy
Administering Human Rights Legislation
ACCESSIBILITY WORKS Webinar – March 25, 2014
University of Brighton
University of Brighton
Public Protector South Africa Deputy Public Protector of South Africa
What are a parent’s options when they and the school disagree?
Presentation transcript:

April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 2 INTRODUCTION  Ontario’s human rights system is changing  Eventually, complainants will file directly with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario  Until then, the Commission continues to have a duty to investigate & attempt settlement for each complaint

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 3 INTRODUCTION  Improve customer service in response to community concerns about the length of time it takes to process complaints  Need to increase parties’ engagement in the complaint management process (e.g. timely production)  Devise a system to better address the cases in the system

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 4 GOALS  To reduce the average case processing time  To increase the participation of the parties in the process  To enhance resolution possibilities  To improve customer service

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 5 STRATEGIES  Triage complaints for complexity  Provide fixed mediation (“MM”) & fact-finding meeting (“FFM”) dates  Provide timelines for complainants & respondents  Greater use of streamlined procedures  Targeted investigations

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 6 BENEFITS TO PARTIES  More transparent process  New complaints (filed on or after February 12, 2007) will be investigated in a shorter time frame  Systemic cases will be identified earlier  Increased public confidence in the system

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 7 BENEFITS TO PARTIES  Provides tools to move cases more quickly through the system  Bringing parties together may more often result in settlement, reducing the need for a full investigation  Sets timelines on the parties for production to move case along faster

April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission COMPLAINT PROCESS

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 9 INTAKE  Complaint received & assessed by Intake Officer & mediator/investigator  Complaint served within 60 days  Serving letter provides both mediation & fact- finding meeting dates  Rescheduling permitted on Code-related grounds/extreme personal hardship

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 10 MEDIATION  Mediation set a minimum of 6 weeks after complaint served  Mediator conducts formal mediation

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 11 MEDIATION If mediation fails, or the parties do not attend mediation:  the file is forwarded to Investigation OR  if Commission staff or the respondent have requested that the Commission exercise its discretion & ‘not deal’ with a complaint under s.34 of the Code, Commission staff may write this report & send it to the Commission for a decision

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 12 INVESTIGATION  Investigator creates production letter. Parties are given a maximum of 30 days to provide production  Letters to complainant & respondent set out exact documents or things that must be received before fact-finding meeting E.g. Record of Employment, names/addresses of witnesses, disciplinary records, “will-say” statements

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 13 INVESTIGATION  Failure to provide complete production upon request may result in the case being sent to the Commission for a decision with no further notice to the parties  Investigator then conducts fact-finding meeting a minimum of 6 weeks after mediation fails

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 14 FACT-FINDING MEETING  Two parts: Investigation & Conciliation  During the Investigation, the investigator questions relevant parties & any witnesses permitted to attend  Investigator narrows the issues, examines documents, identifies relevant Commission policies, & gives an assessment of the evidence Continued…

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 15 FACT-FINDING MEETING  During Conciliation, the investigator provides the parties with a further opportunity to reach an agreement  Conciliation discussions are ‘without prejudice’, unless waived

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 16 ROLE OF COUNSEL  Complainant or respondent can choose to have counsel represent them & assist with production requests  At the fact-finding meeting, counsel cannot give evidence or question witnesses or the other party  Fact-finding meeting will generally not be rescheduled if counsel is unavailable

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 17 INVESTIGATION  Where the fact-finding meeting does not resolve but the investigation is sufficient to recommend that the Commission refer or not refer the case to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Officer will write a Case Analysis report/ Disclosure Letter

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 18 INVESTIGATION  Where more evidence is needed, the investigator conducts further investigation & provides a verbal review of findings to parties  Investigator makes a recommendation to the Commission. The final decision rests with the Commissioners

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 19 POST-REFERRAL  After a case is referred, Commission staff may conduct further investigation if required to present the case at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 20 ENSURING COOPERATION Investigators can use their discretion to send cases to the Commission for a decision with no further notice to the parties if:  Complainant/respondent does not provide complete production without reasonable explanation (s.36(2), s.33(6)) Continued…

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 21 ENSURING COOPERATION  A party does not attend the fact-finding meeting & gives no reasonable explanation (s.36)  Parties cannot be located (s.36)

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 22 ENSURING COOPERATION  In these cases, a Case Analysis or Disclosure Letter may not be completed E.g. where a respondent fails to provide production, the complaint, answer, production letter, & any production provided can be put before the Commission for a decision under s.33(6) with no further notice to the parties

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 23 TRANSITION OF OLDER CASES  Complaints already filed will be integrated into the system by applying mediation & fact-finding meeting dates as they are assigned to mediators & investigators  By applying mediation & fact-finding meeting dates on files, it will free up resources to work on older cases to reduce the case inventory  Integrating all older cases into the system will take some months

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 24 PUBLIC INTEREST  Staff will continue to account for power imbalances when addressing the parties & conducting mediation & fact-finding meetings  Officers still represent the public interest in mediation & fact-finding meetings  Public interest remedies are still expected in each settlement  Earlier identification of systemic cases may mean more strategic involvement on cases that broadly affect the public interest

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 25 ACCOUNTABILITY  Ongoing monitoring of the system will occur by the Commission  We invite the public to provide their feedback at:  The Commission’s annual report will provide evaluation data

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 26 FURTHER RESOURCES Web site contains the following:  Internal Guide for Processing Complaints (launch will be at the end of April)  The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaint Process: Service Guide  Ontario Human Rights Commission Service Guide: Filing Complaints  Ontario Human Rights Commission Service Guide: Resolving Complaints

Ontario Human Rights Commission Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne 27 CONTACT INFORMATION Local Telephone Inquiry (416) Toll-Free Telephone Inquiry TTY (Local) (416) TTY (Toll Free) Inquiries