Perinatal and Infant Oral Health Quality Improvement National Learning Network Estimated Number Awards: One (1) Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement Estimated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAPP Process & Outcome Evaluation
Advertisements

A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Understanding Capacity Building Assistance
Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Beyond the Program Guide: Empowering Researchers to Succeed in the new SSHRC Architecture.
An Evaluation Model to promote linkages between community-based public health practice and academia.
VISION 2020 LATIN AMERICA STRATEGIC PLAN Planning process and March 2012 meeting in Lima, Peru sponsored by: ORBIS, CBM, and UNESCO ORBIS CBM UNESCO.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
Building the Foundations for Better Health Health Services Organization.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
ORC TA: Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Grant Program HRSA U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Health Resources & Services Administration.
Essential Service # 7:. Why learn about the 10 Essential Services?  Improve quality and performance.  Achieve better outcomes – improved health, less.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
1 FY 2010 Financial Education and Counseling Pilot Program for Hawaii Applicants Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund FY 2010 Financial.
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
| BLACK LUNG/COAL MINER CLINICS PROGRAM HRSA Black Lung Clinics Grant Program.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
Perinatal & Infant Oral Health Quality Improvement (PIOHQI) Pilot Grant Women’s Health Committee Meeting May 12, 2014.
Reviewer Conference Call March 12, 2014 Program Representative: LCDR Makeva Rhoden Division of Healthy Start and Perinatal Services Maternal and Child.
FY15 Rural Opioid Overdose Reversal Grant Program HRSA PRE-REVIEW CONFERENCE CALL.
What is the best purpose for VECF? What outcomes do we anticipate and want? How can these best be achieved, measured and communicated? What is our relationship.
USING MEDICAID AND BIRTH DATA FOR EVALUATION OF PERINATAL ORAL HEALTH INITIATIVE IN THE HUSKY PROGRAM PRESENTATION TO OVERSIGHT COUNCIL ON MEDICAL ASSISTANCE.
Veterans Health Administration Office of Rural Health VA Advisory Committee on Women Veterans Office of Rural Health Office of the ADUSH for Policy and.
SSHRC Partnership and Partnership Development Grants Rosemary Ommer 1.
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
12/07/20101 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top.
Hospital State Division Kristi Martinsen Hospital State Division Director HSD Overview September 2014 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
Grants to States to Support Oral Health Workforce Activities HRSA Pre-Review Conference Call April 14, 2015 U.S. Department of Health and Human.
Maternal and Child Health Public Health Catalyst Program HRSA FY 2015 Funding Opportunity Announcement Pre-Review Orientation Call Division of MCH.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Fiscal Year 2015 Health Infrastructure Investment Program (HIIP) Funding Opportunity Announcement: HRSA Objective Review Committee Application Technical.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
State and Regional Approaches to Improving Access to Services for Children and Youths with Epilepsy Technical Assistance Conference Call Sadie Silcott,
ITIL Drivers for Government Scott Spencer Vice President, Program Management, GTSI.
Strengthening Applications September BHPr Application Review Criteria Detailed instructions/information about specific funding priorities will always.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
Mental Health Services Act Oversight and Accountability Commission June, 2006.
ONC’s Proposed Strategy on Governance for the Nationwide Health Information Network Following Public Comments on RFI HIT Standards Committee Meeting September.
HRSA Frontier Community Health Integration Project (FCHIP) Technical Assistance, Tracking and Analysis Program Guidance Overview Sarah Bryce July.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
FY15 Rural Outreach Benefits Counseling Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA PRE-REVIEW CONFERENCE CALL.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
Delaware PCMH Initiative October Rationale for PCMH Better health quality and outcomes Better health quality and outcomes Lower health care costs.
RURAL HEALTH NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PROGRAM FUNDING OPPORTUNITY ANNOUNCEMENT HRSA PRE-REVIEW CONFERENCE CALL JANUARY 30, 2015 PRESENTER: AMBER.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Maternal and Child Health Pipeline Training Program HRSA FY 2016 Reviewer Orientation Madhavi M. Reddy, MSPH Division of MCH Workforce Development.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Advanced Education Nurse Traineeship (AENT) Program Funding Opportunity Announcement HRSA Technical Reviewer Orientation U.S. Department of Health.
Department of Social Development National Conference Early Childhood Development Conference “Tshwaragano Ka Bana” 29th March 2012 The National Integrated.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Putting people first, with the goal of helping all Michiganders lead healthier and more productive lives, no matter their stage in life. 1.
Agenda for Change Creating Stable Families Basic Needs Strategies and Guidelines.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
Federal Office of Rural Health Policy Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement Program Ann Ferrero, MPH US Department of Health and Human Services.
New Economy Breakfast Seminar – 13 July What Has Changed?
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Perinatal and Infant Oral Health Quality Improvement National Learning Network Estimated Number Awards: One (1) Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement Estimated Award Amount: Up to $450,000 per year Length of Project Period: Three (3) years

To coordinate the development and testing of an evidence-informed strategic framework that can inform statewide health care systems transformation. This new knowledge will guide systems change to more efficiently and effectively respond to the oral health needs of pregnant women and infants most at risk. Knowledge gained will comprise the National Strategic Framework for Improving Perinatal and Infant Oral Health through Systems Change. 1 PURPOSE

Understanding the change process so as to empower states as they develop their own approach for replicating evidence-informed strategies. This framework will identify the core elements of successful health care delivery systems change and the processes that drive its implementation, continuous improvement, and endurance. Concrete examples of success will include: increased utilization of preventive dental care by pregnant women, establishment of a dental for infants by age one, reduced prevalence of early childhood caries (ECC), and reduced dental expenditures. 2 PURPOSE

The National Learning Network is expected to fulfill four important functions: (1) Assist in state's efforts to strengthen statewide partnership and collaboration; (2) Enhance knowledge transfer between the participants, offering guidance and assistance to better leverage knowledge gained; (3) Provide a secure internet-based workspace for data tracking of the Network participants as they focus on strategy and implementation; and (4) Articulate a clear and comprehensive strategic framework built on the achievements and lessons learned from successful operationalization of innovative strategies for statewide systems change.

Implementation Phase Expansion Phase National Outreach Phase This National Learning Network supports the three phases of the MCHB Perinatal and Infant Oral Health National Initiative : (1) Facilitating statewide implementation of an oral health program that has demonstrated success at the community level, developing the foundation of the framework (the Implementation Phase); (2) Facilitating expansion of statewide implementation test-sites and refinement of the strategic framework (the Expansion Phase); and (3) Disseminating an evidence-informed national strategic framework (the National Outreach Phase). BACKGROUND

Perinatal and Infant Oral Health National Initiative Time Line BACKGROUND

Perinatal and Infant Oral Health National Initiative Logic Model [Schematic] BACKGROUND

Criterion 1: Need (10 points) The quality of and extent to which the applicant demonstrates the problem and associated contributing factors. Corresponds with Narrative Section: Need/Purpose Criterion 2: Response (30 points) The extent to which the proposed project responds to the initiative’s purpose. The degree to which the stated goals, objectives, strategies and activities (including response to barriers and challenges) and their relationship to the project. Corresponds with Narrative Section: Methodology & Work Plan REVIEW CRITERIA

Criterion 2: Response (continued) The applicant should clearly describe: METHODOLOGY Goals and Objectives Strategies and Activities Resolution of Challenges WORK PLAN with PROJECT TIMELINE REVIEW CRITERIA

Criterion 2: Response (continued) At a minimum, the 4 primary functions of the Network should be clearly recognized in the Methodology & Work Plan: (1) Assist in state’s efforts to strengthen statewide partnership and collaboration; (2) Enhance knowledge transfer between the Network participants (PIOHQI Pilot grantees); (3) Provide a secure internet-based workspace for data tracking of the Network participants as they focus on strategy and implementation; and (4) Articulate a clear and comprehensive strategic framework built on the achievements and lessons learned from the successful operationalization of statewide systems change. REVIEW CRITERIA

Criterion 2: Response (continued) Fundamental tasks the Network should be clearly articulated in the Methodology & Work Plan: (1) Preparation of the Network; (2) Participant orientation to the Network and subsequent technical assistance provided; and (3) Final product development REVIEW CRITERIA

Criterion 3: Evaluative Measures (20 points) The strength and effectiveness and of the method and measures proposed to monitor the EFFECTIVENESS and IMPACT of the Network. Corresponds with Narrative Section: Evaluation Criterion 4: Impact (10 points) The feasibility and extent to which the project can achieve impact on a national level, including the degree to which the results are replicable and sustainable. The effectiveness of dissemination plans. Corresponds with Narrative Section: Impact REVIEW CRITERIA

Criterion 5: Resources/Capabilities (20 points) The capability of the applicant and the quality and availability of facilities and personnel to fulfill the needs and requirements of the proposed project. A Network Management Team that clearly has (or easy access to) expertise in: (1) Public health systems improvement and state governance; (2) Systems administration and payment of care, specifically oral health care; and (3) Health care delivery systems performance and evaluation. Corresponds with Narrative Section: Organizational Information and Technical Capacity REVIEW CRITERIA

Criterion 6: Support Requested (10 points) The reasonableness of the proposed budget for each year of the project period in relation to the objectives, complexity of the activities and anticipated results. The extent to which key personnel have adequate time devoted to achieve project objectives. Corresponds with Narrative Section: Budget/Budget Justification REVIEW CRITERIA

THANK YOU!!