Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne Khayat Astrid Ablasser-Neuhuber 2014 UIA Florence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Channels of Distribution Channel Members
Advertisements

Vertical agreements and competition law Doc. dr. sc. Jasminka Pecotić Kaufman University of Zagreb-Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Law.
Le présent support ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation 1 Legal case « Pierre Fabre Laboratories»  Is it legal to require the permanent presence of.
Terminating a Franchise Agreement-
1 © 2008 Venable LLP STARTING AND GROWING A FRANCHISE: THE LEGAL NUTS AND BOLTS OF FRANCHISING Thomas W. France Venable LLP February 9, 2012.
Mark Abell Partner, Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP, London 5-6 November 2008.
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller Cross BUSINESS.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Chapter 46 Antitrust Law.
 Section 1 of Sherman Act regulates “horizontal” and “vertical” restraints.  Per Se vs. Rule of Reason.  Per Se violations are blatant and substantially.
EU Competition Policy. Internal Market One of the activities of the Community: “an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between member States,
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class I, 6th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
Joost Haans Antitrust Section Corp. Legal 22 May 2009 Resale Price Maintenance - Time for change? -
1 Is there a conflict between competition law and intellectual property rights? Edward Whitehorn Head, Competition Affairs Branch Carrie Tang Assistant.
Public Policy in Private Markets Vertical Market Restrictions.
Arbitration & Corporate law The French experience Legal issues & case law Benoit Le Bars.
European Commission, DG Competition, Directorate A 1 New EU Competition Rules for Purchase and Distribution agreements Luc Peeperkorn Principal Expert.
Vertical Restraints: An Introduction
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., McGraw-Hill/Irwin MANAGING MARKETING CHANNELS AND WHOLESALING 15 C HAPTER.
International Union of Commercial Agents and Brokers (IUCAB)
INNOVATION OR KNOW-HOW IN FRANCHISING ? Guy GRAS – Eurocommerce SME Day – 21/10/ Brussels 1.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising 2014 UIA Florence Corinne Khayat.
Vertical Restraints Dr. Patrick Krauskopf Swiss Competition Commission (COMCO) National Training Workshop on Competition Policy and Law organised by CUTS.
Is it easy to do business here? Regulations, laws, improvements Andrea Jadi Nemeth 22 March, Budapest Budapest International Business Center Conference.
Competition Law Definition and Scope Dr. A.K. Enamul Haque Professor of Economics United International University.
Practical Impact Of European Community Anti Trust Law On R&D Agreements Volker Linden, Rechtsanwalt, German-Australian-Pacific Lawyers Association International.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
Franchising and Internet. Is it appropirate to apply the same principles which have been established for selective distribution André Lombart CMS DeBacker.
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
Trends in Retail Competition: Private Labels, Brands and Competition Policy A Symposium on the Role of Private Labels in Competition between Retailers.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Competition Enforcement in the Recently Acceded Member States Vertical Agreements Michal Petr Office for the Protection of Competition, Czech Republic.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Chapter 35 Franchises and Special Business Forms.
EU Business Law: Anticompetitive agreements (Art. 101 TFEU) Dr. Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka.
Competition Policy in India: an Overview Pankaj Jain Faculty : Lovely Professional University.
Company Law NAGY, Csongor István
European Commission, DG Competition, Policy and Strategy, International Relations 1 New EU Competition Rules for Purchase and Distribution agreements Kris.
LEB Slide Set 14 Competition Law Matti Rudanko. LEB Slide Set 14 2 A Constitution of Market Economy Well-functioning markets – an unwritten fundamental.
Carl Zwisler Gray Plant Mooty Washington, DC
Distribution Problems for US Companies in Europe and How to Avoid Them
Markkinoiden juridinen toimintaympäristö Kalvot 15
DISTRIBUTION AND INTERNET
The protection of know-how in franchising networks
Sales promotion via the Internet by companies with a distribution network How to avoid conflicts with the network Marco Hero TIGGES Rechtsanwälte Zollhof.
European Union Law Week 10.
EU Competition Rules for Technology Transfer Agreements
Exclusivity and non-competition obligations
Chapter 39: Special Business Forms and Private Franchises
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
WHAT IS FRANCHISING? THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE USERS
Competition law Class 8-9
IPR AND CONCENTRATIONS
The new technology transfer regime More evolution than revolution
Indemnity for distributors Reimbursement of investments (art 454 UGB)
International Market Entry Modes
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
TYPOLOGY OF DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS
Horizontal Restraints
Fabio Bortolotti Buffa Bortolotti & Mathis, Torino-Milano
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Internet sales under the new block exemption regulation
Table 1. Comparison of know-how definitions
Presentation transcript:

Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising Corinne Khayat Astrid Ablasser-Neuhuber 2014 UIA Florence

21 February 2013 ROADMAP General Exclusive dealing (Non-complete obligations, Exclusive Supply clauses) Pricing (Price fixing and price recommendations) Use of the internet Post-term non-compete obligations Preferential and preemption rights l 2l 2

21 February 2013 Exceptions for franchise agreements Commission‘s Guidelines on Vertical Restraints on how to apply the BER to licencing IPRs (paras 24-26), concerning efficiency gains pursuant to Art 101(3) AEUV (para. 190(1)) and non-compete clauses (para. 190(2)). But otherwise no distiction for vertical restraints on the purchase, sale and resale of goods and services within franchising arrangements. l 3l 3

21 February 2013 A non-compete clause in franchise agreements is justified and may even exceed five years, where the obligation The transfer of substantial know-how usually justifies a non-compete obligation for the whole duration of the supply agreement, as for example in the context of franchising. (Commission‘s Guidelines on Vertical Restraints, para. 148) Non-compete obligations in franchising is necessary for common identity and reputation does not exceed the duration of FR agrmt. allows for cross-supply between franchisees l 4l 4

21 February 2013 Exclusive supply clauses together with territorital protection restrict competition, but can be justified, in case of Exclusive supply clauses in franchising efficiency gains customers’ fair share franchisee’s willingness to invest l 5l 5

21 February 2013 !! MIND THE NO-GOES !! no absolute territorital protection: don‘t eliminate possibility of cross- supply between franchisees don‘t restrict passive sales never in combination with determination of sales prices Exclusive supply clauses in franchising l 6l 6

21 February 2013 NO PRICE FIXING OK: recommendation of sales prices from franchisor to franchisees no collusion between franchisor and franchisee as well as between franchisees amongst each other l 7l 7 Pricing in franchising … as long as the franchisees remain entirely free to determine their own prices …

21 February 2013 Use of the internet in franchising « IT IS FORBIDDEN TO FORBID » General rule: no prohibition or restriction on the use of the internet by a franchisee to sell products The use of a website to sell products: a form of passive selling The use of an own website: not the same thing as the opening of a new outlet l 8l 8

21 February 2013 Use of the internet in franchising Authorised restrictions Active selling into other franchisees’ exclusive territories or customer groups through internet may be restrained within an exclusive distribution system Quality standards may be required for the use of the website A brick and mortar point of sale may, in principle, be required, excluding « pure players » l 9l 9

21 February 2013 Post-term non-compete obligations in franchising Definition Post-term non-compete obligation is any direct or indirect obligation causing the franchisee, after termination of the agreement, not to manufacture, purchase, sell or resell goods or services l 10

21 February 2013 Post-term non-compete obligations in franchising Conditions of validity Post-term non-compete obligation should be covered by the BER if it:  relates to goods or services which compete with the contract goods or services  is indispensable to protect know-how transferred by the franchisor to the franchisee  is limited to the premises and land from which the franchisee has operated during the contract period  is limited to a maximum period of one year after the termination of the agreement l 11

21 February 2013 Post-term non-compete obligations in franchising Definition of know-how “non-patented practical information, resulting from experience and testing by the franchisor, which is secret, substantial and identified”  “secret”: the know-how should not be generally known or easily accessible  “substantial”: the know-how should be significant and useful for the franchisee for the use, sale or resale of the contract goods or services  “identified”: the know-how should be described in a sufficiently comprehensive manner so as to make it possible to verify that it fulfils the criteria of secrecy and substantiality l 12

21 February 2013 Post-term non-compete obligations in franchising Geographic scope The words ‘premises and land from which the buyer has operated during the contract period’ used in Article 5(3) of the BER refer only to the place from which the contract goods or services are offered for sale and not to the whole of the territory in which those goods and services may be sold under a franchise agreement (Order of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 7 February 2013, Case C- 117/12 - La Retoucherie de Manuela) l 13

21 February 2013 Preferential and preemption rights in franchising Competition law aspects A right of priority (preferential right or preemption right) in favour of the franchisor to acquire the franchisee’s store:  may artificially reduce competition, notably by restricting the possibility for independent stores to be purchased by competing distribution groups  could, when combined with other elements (such as a minority shareholding), confer to the franchisor a decisive influence over the franchisee under merger control rules l 14

21 February 2013 Contact Details bpv Hügel Professional Experience University of Salzburg (1993 Mag. iur., 1997 Dr. iur.), University of Salzburg: Master in Journalism and French (1997 Mag. phil.), 1995 European Commission (Directorate General for Competition, stage in the Merger Task Force), 1998 court practice at the Cartel Court (Legal Assistant to the President), 1998 internship with Linklaters & Alliance (London), 1998–2002 Associate with an International Law Firm (Vienna), since 2002 Associated Partner with bpv Hügel, since 2004 Partner, Head of Competition & Antitrust Areas of Practice European and Austrian Competition Law, (Antitrust, Merger Control and Market Dominance) Distribution Law, European Law, International Business Transactions, Representation before Austrian and European courts and competition authorities Born 1969 Languages German, English, French, Italian, Spanish Memberships International Bar Association, Union Internationale des Avocats (President of the Competition Law Commission), Vienna Bar Association, Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht e.V. (Member of the Board), International League of Competition Law Additional Professional Information Frequent speaker at seminars and conferences, numerous nominations in national and international rankings and publications MMag. Dr. Astrid Ablasser- Neuhuber Rechtsanwalt/Attorney-at-Law Partner Contact: bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte OG Donau-City-Straße Wien Phone: Fax: huegel.com l 15

21 February 2013 Contact Details bpv Hügel bpv Jádi Németh Vörösmarty tér 4 HU-1051 Budapest Tel Fax bpv Grigorescu Stefanica 33 Dionisie Lupu Street RO Bukarest Tel Fax grigorescu.com bpv Braun Partners Ovocný trh 8 CZ Prag 1 Tel Fax bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte Donau-City-Straße 11, ARES-Tower AT-1220 Wien Tel Fax bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte Rond Point Schuman 9 Postfach 14 / 4. Stock BE-1040 Brüssel Tel Fax bpv Braun Partners Štefánikova 6/A SK Bratislava Tel. (+421) Fax.(+421) l 16

21 February 2013 Contact Details UGGC Avocats Corinne Khayat Avocat à la Cour Partner Contact: 47 rue de Monceau Paris Phone: Fax: Professional Experience Partner of UGGC Law Firm (2000) Lawyer, Robert Collin & Associés ( ) Admitted to the Paris Bar (1991) Civil Law Degree (International Law), Paris V-René Descartes Law School Areas of Practice French, Moroccan and European Union Competition Law (Antitrust, Merger Control and Market Dominance), Distribution Law, European Law, Intellectual Property Law, Contract Law Representation before French and European courts and competition authorities, representation before Moroccan competition authorities Languages French, English Memberships APDC (Association of the practitioners of Competion Law) Institut Art & Droit UIA (International Union of Lawyers) Additional Professional Information Lecturer in Competition Law at the University Paris I, Pantheon Sorbonne (2011) Professor of European Union Competition Law at the Institut Catholique ( ) Nominations in rankings (Legal 500, Decideurs…) and publications l 17

21 February 2013 Contact Details UGGC Avocats Tel: Fax: rue de Monceau Paris France l 18