The National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey Mary Lee Fay NASDDDS NCI Project Director Dorothy Hiersteiner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

National Core Indicators Overview for the State of Washington Lisa A. Weber, Ph.D. Division of Developmental Disabilities.
National Core Indicators: Employment Trends for Adults with ID/DD and Suggestions for Policy Development.
What Working in the Community Means Employment and Outcomes for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities from Across the United States Chas.
Reforming State Long-Term Care Services and Supports Through Participant Direction NASHP State Health Policy Conference October 2010 Suzanne Crisp Director.
Individuals With ID/DD Who Communicate Nonverbally Sarah Taub NCI Webinar Series: January 28 th, 2014.
Understanding NCI Reports Sarah Taub NCI Webinar Series April 29 th, 2014 National Core Indicators (NCI)
NCI Survey Respondents Who Are Verbal and Non-Verbal: A Profile.
The Access Center’s Technical Assistance Activities Amy Klekotka Technical Assistance Liaison Wisconsin Summer Institute 2006: Addressing Disproportionality.
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Preventive Care and Employment for Adults with ID/DD.
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS ADULT CONSUMER SURVEY
Percent of adults ages 19–64 Exhibit 1. More Than Half of Adults in Florida and Texas Were Uninsured or Underinsured in 2012 Uninsured during the year*
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
Who does Medicaid cover? How are Medicaid funds spent?
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Who does Medicaid cover? How are Medicaid funds spent?
National Core Indicators
Percent Change in Average Nongroup Premium Following Implementation of a State Individual Mandate, 2019 WA –15.1% NH: –13.7% ME –10.7% MT –11.1% ND –15.4%
WA –16.9% NH: –18.8% ME –14.1% MT –23.7% ND –22.0% VT: –12.6% OR
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
State Ranking on Equity Dimension
Average annual growth rate
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Notes Page Title Here NCI Data on Outcomes:
Presentation transcript:

The National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey Mary Lee Fay NASDDDS NCI Project Director Dorothy Hiersteiner

Agenda Why we expanded the Staff Stability Tool Process for revisions Why might your state want to participate? Survey directions and specifics Next steps Questions? National Core Indicators (NCI) Today

NCI State Participation HI WA AZ OK KY AL NC PA MA TX AR GA NM NJ MO NH OH* IL LA NY Wash DC FL CA* SD OR MN UT CO KS MS TN SC WI MI IN VA DE MD State contract awarded in through AIDD funding CA*- Includes 21 Regional Centers OH*- Also includes the Mid-East Ohio Regional Council 42 states including the District of Columbia and 22 sub-state regions ME VT CT RI

Why did we decide to expand the NCI Staff Stability Survey? National Core Indicators (NCI)

Why Did We Want A Tool To Look At Staff Stability? Escalating demand for LTC Services oriented towards home and community based settings  DSPs are critical to increasing services in least restrictive settings Growing body of research demonstrates that stability of workforce has direct impact on consumer outcomes Lack of data about direct service workforce  Data are needed to assess how state’s DSP workforce is changing or improving and where challenges lie

Prior NCI Staff Turnover Survey Asked about vacancy rates and turnover  Cumbersome instrument  Not utilized frequently  Didn’t provide info that states need in order to assess workforce stability National Core Indicators (NCI)

Examples of How States Can Use Staff Stability Data We wanted to create a tool that would help states:  Inform policy and program development regarding direct support workforce improvement initiatives  Monitor and evaluate the impact of workforce initiatives  Compare state workforce outcomes with those of other states  Provide context for consumer and family outcomes  Build systems to more effectively collect, analyze, and use DSP workforce data National Core Indicators (NCI)

How we designed the survey National Core Indicators (NCI)

Process Survey of state staff on old Staff Turnover tool  Assess interest in new survey Literature review Consulted with Provider Focus groups (ANCOR) Put together draft Got feedback from:  State DD Directors  DSPs  Provider agency management National Core Indicators (NCI)

Pilot Piloted the draft with two states. Received positive feedback on survey and survey administration methods.  Descriptions/directions are clear  ODESA survey entry system (discussed later) was easy to use  Took short amount of time to complete. National Core Indicators (NCI)

Why might your state want to participate?

Why are states interested in this Survey Inform policy and program development regarding direct service workforce (DSW) improvement initiatives Monitor and evaluate the impact of workforce initiatives Compare state workforce outcomes with those of other states Provide context for consumer and family outcomes Build systems to more effectively collect, analyze, and use DSW workforce data

The NCI Staff Stability Survey National Core Indicators (NCI)

Survey Assesses:  Types of service provided Residential (ICFs-ID, Group Homes, Supported Living, Residential Respite, etc.) In-Home (Homemaker/Personal Care, Personal Care Aides, In-Home Habilitation, In-Home Respite) Non-Residential (Employment Services, Non-Work Services, Facility-Based Services, Out-Of-Home Habilitation, Out-Of-Home Respite) National Core Indicators (NCI)

Survey Continued… Numbers of DSPs employed/separated in past year.  Length of tenure Wages  starting average hourly and current average hourly Benefits  health insurance, dental insurance, paid time off, etc. Recruitment and retention  incentives, realistic job previews, etc. National Core Indicators (NCI)

Directions: Direct support staff who were on payroll for any length of time during the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014:  Date of hire  Whether they are current staff or separated staff  Date of termination (if applicable)  Whether they work(ed) full-time or part-time  Hours and wages  Benefits, such as paid time off, health insurance, etc. National Core Indicators (NCI)

Types of Direct Support Professionals: The direct support workforce includes the following job titles and those in similar roles (this list is NOT exhaustive):  Personal Support Specialists (PSSs)  Home Health Aides (HHAs)  Direct Support Professionals (DSPs)  Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs)  Homemakers  Personal Attendants/Personal Care Aides  Direct Support Professionals working in job or vocational services  Direct Support Professionals working at day programs or community support programs National Core Indicators (NCI)

Whom to Include Please include in your responses:  All people whose primary job responsibility is to provide support, training, supervision, and personal assistance to adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities.  All full-time and part-time Direct Support Professionals.  All paid staff members who spend at least 50% of their hours doing direct service tasks. These people may do some supervisory tasks, but their primary job responsibility and more than 50% of their hours are spent doing direct service work. Only include supervisors if more than 50% of their hours are spent doing direct service tasks. Do not include:  licensed health care staff (nurses, social workers, psychologists, etc.),  administrative staff, or full-time managers or directors, unless they spend 50% or more of their hours providing direct hands-on support and personal assistance or supervision to individuals with disabilities National Core Indicators (NCI)

Whom to Include Please include in your responses Direct Support Professionals in the following settings:  Residential services  Supported living In-home  Day programs and community support  Job or vocational Do not include employees in the following settings:  People who are hired directly by the person or the person’s family for whom your agency’s role is limited to being a fiscal intermediary/employer of record.  People only working in school settings for children through 12 th grade.  People providing therapy services.  People providing seasonal services, such as summer camp counselors. National Core Indicators (NCI)

How it works All provider agencies, supporting adults in residential, work, day services and community integration are included.  State should send letter informing the agencies that the survey is coming. The state sends HSRI an address for each agency HSRI sends an ODESA link to each provider who will input data directly The final dataset has no identification. Data are reported in aggregate. National Core Indicators (NCI)

Example with Unique Link Can be personalized with your state’s logo Will come from an HSRI address, but responses will be directed to state contact. Will have access to paper copy of survey National Core Indicators (NCI)

Next steps National Core Indicators (NCI)

Next Steps Inform HSRI that your state will be participating – by March 13, 2015 Provide addresses of provider agencies Communicate with providers to inform them of survey. We will hold a webinar for providers to instruct how to use ODESA system All surveys are completed by June 30, 2015 National Core Indicators (NCI)

Regarding Addresses Please provide addresses to HSRI in an Excel Sheet with the following format: Should be for HR or Personnel Dept. Provide addresses ASAP. National Core Indicators (NCI) StateName of Provider Address MASunny Valley Residential MAFull of Hope

Example Letter to Providers/Stakeholder Community Should inform providers:  What is the Staff Stability Survey  How it will be used  Who should be included? (types of providers, types of DSPs)  Results will be reported in aggregate; org. will not be identified in any way and results will not affect standing as a provider.  What will happen next: HSRI will send with unique link. Should go to HR or Personnel. Survey will need to be completed by June 30, 2015 We can provide you with a sample National Core Indicators (NCI)

Next Steps (again) Inform HSRI that your state will be participating – by March 13, 2015 Provide HSRI with addresses of provider agencies Communicate with providers. We will discuss timeline regarding when s with unique survey log-ins will be sent to providers We will hold a webinar for providers to instruct how to use ODESA system All surveys are completed by June 30, 2015 National Core Indicators (NCI)

Questions? National Core Indicators (NCI) What did they say?

Contacts NASDDDS  Mary Lee Fay: HSRI  Dorothy Hiersteiner: NCI website: National Core Indicators (NCI)