Canadian Anti-SPAM Legislation February 25, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anti-Spam Requirements- Preparing to Comply with CASL
Advertisements

Bill c CASL Effects of the Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) at Skate Canada.
Virginia State Bar Annual Meeting Corporate Counsel Section Update on Do Not Call & Spam Michael Goodman Federal Trade Commission
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved. This presentation has been prepared by Sri U-Thong Limited and its holding company (collectively, “Sri.
IMPORTANT READ CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS PRODUCT LICENSE AGREEMENT AND LIMITED WARRANTY BY INSTALLING OR USING THE SOFTWARE, FILES OR OTHER ELECTRONIC.
HIPAA Basics Brian Fleetham Dickinson Wright PLLC.
Privacy Laws & Higher Education. Agenda 1.Five Privacy Laws a.FERPA b.HIPAA c.GLB d.FACTA Disposal Rule e.CAN-SPAM 2.Overview of the Laws a.What does.
marketing. o is directly marketing a commercial message to a group of people using . o every sent to a potential or current customer.
Texas Real Estate Contracts 4 th Edition © 2015 OnCourse Learning.
12 Misleading or Deceptive Conduct © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved.
Demystifying Canada’s New Anti-Spam Law for Charities and Nonprofits Wednesday, April 16, 2014.
Presentation to Spark NH July 27, 2012 Jack Lightfoot, Child and Family Services Based on materials from NH Center for Nonprofits Alliance for Justice.
Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (a guide and suggested steps) 1.
All images used in this presentation remain the property of the copyright holder(s) and are used for educational purposes only. Canada’s Anti-Spam Law.
Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) Presentation to Canadian Home Builders’ Association Calgary Region - Professional Development Series June 12, 2014.
Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation: What It Means to Hit Send Presented by: Robin Cassel (RBC) and Alice Tseng and Wendy Mee (Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP)
PROSPECTUS AND COMMENCEMENT OF BUSINESS
CANADA’S ANTI-SPAM LEGISLATION  An Act to promote the efficiency and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage.
Breaking New Ground Understanding CASL: the new anti-spam law Presented by Jonathan MacKenzie, LL.B on behalf of Kaleidoscope Consulting.
The Do Not Call Register Act 2006 and The Spam Act 2003 Jane Cole Manager, Telemarketing Investigations Section Julia Cornwell McKean Manager, Anti Spam.
New Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation Robert Lipson – April 8, 2014.
Introduction to the APPs and the OAIC’s regulatory approach Presented by: Este Darin-Cooper Director, Regulation and Strategy May 2015.
The role of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in telecommunications Andrew Solomon Director, Policy.
June TRECCCIM  May not discriminate on basis of protected class  May not steer  May not inquire about, respond to or facilitate inquiries which.
1 Unsolicited Electronic Messages Ordinance An Overview of Implementation and Enforcement 28 May 2007.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW Canada’s Anti-Spam Law and Privacy Compliance WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW Chris Oates, Associate, Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Lexpert.
MIT Info Group, January 19, 2005 Page 1 The CAN-SPAM Act and what it means for MIT communicators MIT Info Group, January 19, 2005 Marsha Sanders Senior.
CASL and Common Sense: Coming to Grips With Canada’s Anti-Spam Law professor michael geist university of ottawa, faculty of law.
Marketing - Best Practice from a Legal Point of View Yvonne Cunnane - Information Technology Law Group 30 November 2006.
Fair competition commission 1 Fifth Annual African Dialogue Consumer Protection Conference September 10-12, 2013 ● Livingstone, Zambia Consumer Protection.
22 Canada’s Anti Spam Law (CASL) March 2014 Jason Beauchamp RBC Insurance.
Legal Division Commercial and Property Law Unit Services Presentation by Regina Ewing Senior Lawyer, Commercial and Property Law Unit Legal Division.
Presented by Bishop & McKenzie LLP May 30, Vancouver Sun, “Anti-Spam Legislation Has Businesses Scrambling to Comply”, May 26, 2014.
Canada Consumer Product Safety Act An Overview Graham Stewart Health Canada.
1 Trade Descriptions (Unfair Trade Practices) (Amendment) Ordinance 2012 Readers should refer to the TDO for the relevant statutory provisions and seek.
E-Commerce Directive 2002 Overview. This Map It was derived from Complying with the E-Commerce Regulations 2002 by the DTI.
Chapter 5 Slide 1 Copyright – David A. McGowan All rights reserved. Revised Chapter 5: REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE Broker Salesperson Leasing Agent.
Chapter 4 Agency Law. Chapter Objectives After reading this chapter, you will know the following: How agency relationship work and the authority that.
Computerized Networking of HIV Providers Workshop Data Security, Privacy and HIPAA: Focus on Privacy Joy L. Pritts, J.D. Assistant Research Professor Health.
Canada’s Anti Spam Legislation. What is CASL? CASL was intended to combat negative online behaviour  spam  phishing  malware  spyware  It will create.
Part 6 – Special Legal Rights and Relationships Chapter 35 – Privacy Law Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 34-1.
Election Funding, Expenditure and Disclosure Forbes Shire Council Local Government By- Election (election of 1 Councillor) 9 May 2015.
Advising your Clients on the Effect of Competition Law Professor Mark Williams 11 March 2011.
Online banking security best practices Access via ‘transaction devices’
Federal Trade Commission FTC & Spam. Federal Trade Commission CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (“Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography.
PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA. OECD GUIDELINES: BASIC PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL APPLICATION Collection Limitation Principle There should be limits to the collection.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DIGITAL MEDIA ADVERTISING LAW : CANADIAN EDITION VALERIE WARNER DANIN, ESQ.
Competition Act Amendments 2009: Misleading Advertising By Bill Hearn, McMillan LLP Canadian Marketing Association Webinar April 14, 2009.
Terms of Service Agreements What does the fine print really contain?
Ecommerce Applications 2007/8 E-Commerce Applications UK e-Commerce Regulations.
Privacy and Anti-Spam Compliance in Social Media Chris Oates, Associate, Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Presented at the Fifth Annual Social Media Law Conference.
Serving the Public. Regulating the Profession. CANADA’S ANTI-SPAM LEGISLATION (CASL) Training for Chapters Based on Guidelines for Chapters First published.
Cyberlaw. “The moving finger writes; and, having writ Moves on: nor all thy piety nor wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a line. Nor all thy tears.
1 Consumer Protection & Anti- competitive conduct in Telecommunications Part V & Part XIB of the Trade Practices Act 1974 Australian Communications and.
1 ETHICAL LAWYERING Spring, 2006 Class MR 7.3(a) A lawyer shall not by in-person, live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional.
Introduction to the Australian Privacy Principles & the OAIC’s regulatory approach Privacy Awareness Week 2016.
[ Direct marketing – an introduction to data protection and privacy] For [insert name of organisation] presented by [insert name of presenter] on [date]
Advertising and Solicitation. MR 7.3(a) – p. 126 A lawyer shall not by in-person live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional employment.
Sophie Honohan Barrister-at-Law, Accredited Mediator 21 st April, 2016 Health Identifiers Act Conference.
SPAM I AM Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL)/Privacy Update Continuing Legal Education BC, Charities and Non Profit Conference November 27, 2014.
Anti-Spam Requirements- Preparing to Comply with CASL
© National Core Accounting Publications
DOL Employee Benefit Plan Audits & How to Prepare
PAC Constitution & Bylaws
CANADA’S ANTI-SPAM LEGISLATION (CASL)
CASL Agenda CASL 101 Complaints Enforcement Actions: CRTC
What is a Credit Bureau? A cooperative repository of information
Prepare Tax Documentation for Individuals
Canada’s Anti Spam Law (CASL)
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved
Presentation transcript:

Canadian Anti-SPAM Legislation February 25, 2014

Introductions and Outline Canada Anti-SPAM Legislation (CASL) Commercial Electronic Messages Spyware / Malware Penalties and enforcement What do we do now?

CASL - Scope Three broad prohibitions: SPAM > Commercial electronic messages require consent Malware > Illegal to install any computer program without express consent and means to remove Spyware > Illegal to install program that transmits data without express consent and means to remove

CASL – Scope Three additional prohibitions: Message routing > Illegal to alter transmission data or to rout a message to unintended destination Misrepresentations > Illegal to make false or misleading representations in headers, subject lines, etc. Automatic collection > Illegal to automatically collect electronic addresses

What is “SPAM”?

Unsolicited commercial electronic message Reasonable to conclude that one of the purposes is to encourage the recipient to engage in commercial activities

Commercial Electronic Messages s. 6 Prohibits sending a commercial electronic message to an electronic address unless: Recipient has consented – express, opt-in or defined “implied consent” category and Conforms with prescribed requirements > Identifies sender and contact information > Unsubscribe mechanism (including www site)

Unsubscribe

Complete Exclusions Personal or family relationship Enquiry or application Closed messaging systems Fundraising messages from registered charities Telco in providing transmission services Enforce a legal right or due to legal obligation Intra-organization Inter-organization (if existing relationship)

Consent Express consent Purpose Identification of person seeking consent Implied consent Existing business relationship or non B-R Published electronic address without disclaimer and related to capacity of recipient Referrals

“Existing Business Relationship” Implied consent where Engaged in commercial activity Existing written contract within previous 2 years

“Non-Business Relationship” Implied consent if Made donation, gift, provided volunteer work, member Prescribed by regulations In past 2 years

Consent Exclusions Quote responding to request Completes or confirms transaction Provides warranty, recall or safety info Provides factual info about ongoing use Provides employment info Delivers a product (incl. upgrades) requested

Jurisdiction and Onus S. 6 prohibitions - CEM If message sent or received in Canada Person alleging consent has onus of proof The “problem” of proof

Competition Act CASL adds to existing Competition Act provisions prohibiting false or misleading representations to promote a business interest of the supply or use of a product Numbering of Competition Act amendments is particularly confusing Investigation/enforcement by Competition Bureau Bureau has sought and obtained sizeable fines in the past for deceptive marketing practices e.g. $10m fine against Rogers for alleged misleading advertising

Competition Act new s and s prohibits representation that is false or misleading in a material respect in electronic message prohibits false or misleading representation in sender information in electronic message subject matter information in electronic message locater look at general impression and literal meaning only first prohibition states “in a material respect” no “to the public” concept no concept of exception for consent or existing business relationship

Competition Act: Discussion Examples Subject Matter Information Fly Ottawa to Calgary for $299 return Lose 20 Pounds in 3 Weeks Our best sale of the year Exclusive Upgrade Offer Aggressive subject matter language poses risk to senders

Practical Issues Are any existing consents still valid? How to get fresh consent Information management: what data / proof is required managing exclusions (i.e. business relationship) Message format compliance Vicarious liability

Enforcement Regulatory agencies: CRTC Competition Bureau OPC Spam Reporting Centre 2017: Private Right of Action

CRTC Enforcement Tools Purpose of the legislation is to promote compliance, not punish Education will play a significant role, particularly in the early stages Range of regulatory tools Letters of warning (not provided for in legislation) Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs) Undertakings (similar to consent agreements under the Competition Act) Notice of Violation

CRTC Enforcement Powers: AMPs Section 20 Persons who contravene sections 6 to 9 are liable to pay AMPs Similar to scheme for violations of the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules (including the Do-Not-Call-List provisions) under the Telecommunications Act

CRTC Enforcement Powers: AMPs Maximum penalty is $1M in the case of an individual and $10M for any other person such as a corporation Factors in determining amount include: Purpose of penalty Nature and scope of violation History of previous violations Financial benefits of the violation Ability to pay Whether voluntary compensation made

CRTC Enforcement Powers: Undertakings Target can enter into undertakings with the designated person No Notice of Violation (and hence AMPs) may be issued if undertaking entered into and any existing notice of violation is extinguished to the extent of the undertaking Undertakings may include conditions and a requirement to pay a specified amount

CRTC Enforcement Powers: Notices of Violation Limitation period: 3 years Mandatory information set out in ss. 22(2) Target has 30 days to make representations to CRTC If: (1) penalty is paid or (2) penalty is not paid and no representations are made, target is deemed to have committed the violation

CRTC Enforcement Powers: Notices of Violation No liability if due diligence demonstrated Common law defences apply to any violation If representations are made, CRTC must decide whether target committed the violation and, if so, can confirm, reduce or waive the penalty, or can suspend payment of the penalty subject to conditions CRTC may also issue an order directing target to cease contravening the provision(s) – s.26

Private Right of Action 2017: “Lights go out on Broadway” Persons affected can apply for compensation to a court of competent jurisdiction Compensation: Actual damages Statutory damages > $200 per contravention of Section 6, not exceeding $1M per day > $1M/day for contraventions of Sections 7 and 8 > Same maximum amounts for person who aids or abets contrary to section 9

Private Right of Action Statutory damages not available if undertaking or notice of violation has been issued Conversely, once private right of action is commenced, no undertaking or notice of violation can be made Due diligence and common law defences available Class actions ???

What do we do now?

1.Assess your electronic communications 2.Do you have consent? 3.Identify exclusions 4.Data management: assess and establish systems to manage and preserve records 5.Prepare unsubscribe mechanisms

What to do cont’d… 6.Obtain consents required 7.Format CEMs 8.Content oversight 9.Staff education 10.Review and audit

Questions? Discussion?

Sign up for BHT newsletters!!! Go to: