HQT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS OSPA Spring Conference Newport, Oregon May 8, 2007 Pat Burk, Oregon Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

Title II, Part A Allowable Expenses Middle Tennessee Federal Directors Conference September 24, 2009.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
The National Policy Landscape Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Professor Arizona State University.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents September 27, 2012.
REAP Districts Have Flexibility NCLB Strategist Training Spring 2006.
Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
Federal Programs Directors Conference Office of Professional Preparation WVDE.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
January 13, 2005 The Landscape of Arkansas' K-12 Education System: Responses to Questions Posed by the Koret Task Force University of Arkansas College.
December 15,  General Supervision of Public K-12 Schools ◦ Accrediting K-12 schools ◦ Administering & distributing state & federal funds ◦
ODE e-Learning Professional Development Series Highly Qualified Teachers Oregon Requirements Vickie Chamberlain TSPC Executive Director.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
TITLE II, Part A, Improving Teacher Quality PAFPC Conference April 6, 2011 Don McCrone Program Manager.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
KENTUCKY BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 1, 2015 Equitable Access To Effective Educators.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Charter School Leadership Institute October 7, 2015 Title IIA Improving Teacher Quality.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
1 Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Progress Report: Teacher Supply and Demand in School Year New York State Education Department May 2008 Full report at
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
PAFPC CONFERENCE MAY 4, 2015 DON MCCRONE PROGRAM MANAGER TITLE II, Part A, Improving Teacher Quality 1.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
March  Third annual 2141 Club meeting  Recognizing new members  Introductions  Developing a support network.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
EDU 4245 Class 5: Achievement Gap (cont) and Diagnostic Assessments.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 19,
Highly Qualified Teachers Who will be designated as HQT? What criteria will be used? When must districts be in compliance? Where will HQT be reported?
Oregon Department of Education Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Field Services Presenter:Bob Siewert, Associate Superintendent Presentation to the.
Strategies for Promoting Equity with Diverse Student Populations: Students in Rural Communities 1.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge. USDOE - Continued emphasis on equitable distribution OESE priority (of 3): Teacher quality, equity and.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Monitoring, Interventions, and Sanctions (CMIS)
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
The Every Student Succeeds Act
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Kansas Alliance for the Arts in Education
Michigan School Report Card Update
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
Presentation transcript:

HQT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS OSPA Spring Conference Newport, Oregon May 8, 2007 Pat Burk, Oregon Department of Education

Prepared in Oregon Prepared in Other States Total American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 22 Black or African American Hispanic Multi-ethnic17320 White Not identified or unavailable TOTAL Race/Ethnic Breakout by Newly Licensed Educators Prepared In Oregon and In Other States, Source: Teacher Standards and Practices Commission

Percentage Stayers, Movers and Leavers; StayersMoversLeavers Community Type Central City Urban Fringe/large town Rural/Small Town Poverty Less than 15% %-49% % or more Minority % Less than 10% %-34% % or more Source: Teacher Attrition and Mobility, National Center for Education Statistics, January, 2007

Percent of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers School Year Type of ClassPercent of All Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of All Classes NOT Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers* Percent of Classes in HIGH Poverty Schools Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of Classes in HIGH Poverty Schools NOT Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers* Percent of Classes in LOW Poverty Schools Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of Classes in LOW Poverty Schools NOT Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers* All91.4%8.6%89.7%10.3% Self-Contained96.4%3.6%95.1%4.9% English90.1%9.9%87.8%12.2% Foreign Languages 90.9%9.1%86.6%13.4% The Arts91.1%8.9%88.9%11.1% Science90.9%9.1%89.8%10.2% Math89.1%10.9%86.4%13.6% Social Sciences91.2%8.8%89.4%10.6% Source: NCLB Staff (Highly Qualified Teachers) Data Collection *Calculated by subtraction (100% - Percent of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers)

The Trends Achievement Gap Persists Classrooms Becoming More Diverse Demand for New Teachers Steady  Specialists  Content Areas Shortage of Teacher Diversity High Needs Schools Have Highest Turnover High Poverty Schools Have Lower Percentage of HQT

Oregon Developments Oregon Highly Qualified Teacher Plan  Each District Submits Title IIa HQT Plan This Fall in Continuous Improvement Plan  Budget Narrative Spending Workbooks  Monitor Every Three Years  Professional Development, Technical Assistance, Grants  Continue HOUSSE  Create an Integrated Data System with TSPC

Oregon Developments The Equity Plan—USDOE Priority  Specific Data on HQT and High Poverty Schools  Placement, Preparation and Retention  Teacher-level Data  District Plan to Address the Issue  License and Assignment Course Codes Linked  New Electronic Budget Narrative in CIP Contains HQT Data  Contact Bev Pratt for Help

Some Good News Mentoring Bill: $5 million Possible Regional Professional Development Centers: $1.2 million School Improvement Fund of $260 million Distribution via Formula Interim Accountability Linked to CIP ESDs Participate in SIF

Federal Developments Preparation Underway for Next Monitoring  HQT Definitions and Procedures  HQT Data Reporting—More Detail  Annual Report Cards  HQT State Plan  Plans for Equitable Distribution of Qualified, Experienced Teachers  Administration and Management of Title IIa Funds

Federal Developments HQT Plans  12. The SEA enters into an agreement on the use of funds with any LEA that has not made progress toward meeting its annual measurable objectives in meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge for three consecutive years and has also failed to make AYP for three years (c)

Reauthorization Spelling Letter of April 23, 2007: Building on Results Priorities: 1. Close the gap, standards, accountability 2. Assessment Flexibility-Growth 3. High School Rigor 4. Greater Resources for Teachers 5. Turn Around Tools and Improved Supplemental Education Services

Reauthorization Greater Resources for Teachers  Grants for teachers and principals in high needs schools. National Math Panel Teacher Incentive Fund- $43 million this round Teacher-to-teacher Initiative: eLearning web site

Reauthorization Things to Watch  Highly Qualified and Effective Teachers  HQT and Student Achievement Data  Elimination of HOUSSE…Times Up!  Equity Plans and Teacher Level Data  More Linkage to AYP Results…Possible Offset to HQT  More Flexibility for Rural Districts

Reauthorization Council of Chief State School Officers  Provide Multiple Pathways And More Incentives  Count New Hires As “HQT” In Primary Subject And Provide 3 Year Ramp Up To Additional Subjects Through HOUSSE.  Special Education And ELL Teachers HQT If Closely Linked (Partnered) With Other HQT  Use Achievement Growth As One, But Not Only, Indicator Of Performance  Provide Incentives For Challenging Schools.

Reauthorization National Association of State Boards of Education  State Board Authorizes Licensure  Preservice Articulates to K-12  Alternative Pathways Must Have a Teacher Preparation Program  Limit Emergency Certificates  State Approves Teacher Education Programs  Background Checks

Reauthorization National Governors Association  Support Professional Development  Oppose Any Attempt to Link Teacher Preparation to Student Performance  Provide More Flexibility for Teachers of Multiple Subjects in High Need Areas, e.g., Special Education and Rural Districts

THANK YOU TO OSPA! Regular Conversations between OSPA and ODE on HQT Issues Keep People Informed on Reauthorization Surface Questions and Problems Improving Communication Make the New Data System Work  Meeting on May ODE  Contact Jim Buck if Interested in Helping