Survey on the Bounds of the Threshold For Quantum Decoherence Chris Graves December 12, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Entanglement Boosts Quantum Turbo Codes Mark M. Wilde School of Computer Science McGill University Seminar for the Quantum Computing Group at McGill Montreal,
Advertisements

Improved Simulation of Stabilizer Circuits Scott Aaronson (UC Berkeley) Joint work with Daniel Gottesman (Perimeter)
How Much Information Is In Entangled Quantum States? Scott Aaronson MIT |
The Learnability of Quantum States Scott Aaronson University of Waterloo.
Lower Bounds for Local Search by Quantum Arguments Scott Aaronson.
Multilinear Formulas and Skepticism of Quantum Computing Scott Aaronson UC Berkeley IAS.
A Full Characterization of Quantum Advice Scott Aaronson Andrew Drucker.
Scott Aaronson (MIT) The Limits of Computation: Quantum Computers and Beyond.
Topological Subsystem Codes with Local Gauge Group Generators Martin Suchara in collaboration with: Sergey Bravyi and Barbara Terhal December 08, 2010.
10/26/2005CCW05 1 Resolving Greedy Users via Stateless AQM Murat Alanyali Boston University Joint work with Ashraf Al Daoud.
Toulouse, May 2011, Slide 1 20 x 20. Toulouse, May 2011, Slide 2 20 x 20.
Presenter Name(s) Issue date National Student.
Inequalities in the older population: Evidence from ELSA James Banks, Carl Emmerson, Alastair Muriel and Gemma Tetlow 18 th November 2008.
Computing with adversarial noise Aram Harrow (UW -> MIT) Matt Hastings (Duke/MSR) Anup Rao (UW)
By Christopher Coffman 11/7/2012. What are quantum computers? What are the physics concepts are at play? What are the basic components of a quantum computer.
Q U RE: T HE Q UANTUM R ESOURCE E STIMATOR T OOLBOX Martin Suchara (IBM Research) October 9, 2013 In collaboration with: Arvin Faruque, Ching-Yi Lai, Gerardo.
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
University of Queensland
Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductors Martin Eberl, TU Munich JASS 2008, St. Petersburg.
Three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 13 December 2012.
County-level Estimates of Diagnosed Diabetes Incidence among Adults aged ≥ 20 years old Trends
AP CALCULUS AB 2012 Question 6 Form A Name_________________ Date __________Period___.
Mark Tame QTeQ - Quantum Technology at Queen’s Queen’s University, Belfast Fault-tolerant one-way quantum computation using minimal resources - Decoherence-free.
The Threshold for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute.
Mark Tame QTeQ - Quantum Technology at Queen’s Queen’s University, Belfast Fault-tolerant One-way quantum computation using minimal resources.
Source: Financial Times of London Global Banks 1999 – 2009 “Changing of the Guard”
Name ____________________ Date ___________ Period ____.
County-level Estimates of Diagnosed Diabetes among Adults aged ≥ 20 years: United States 2004
Efficient Discrete-Time Simulations of Continuous- Time Quantum Query Algorithms QIP 2009 January 14, 2009 Santa Fe, NM Rolando D. Somma Joint work with.
F AULT T OLERANT Q UANTUM C OMPUTATION December 21 st, 2009 Mirmojtaba Gharibi.
A Universal Operator Theoretic Framework for Quantum Fault Tolerance Yaakov S. Weinstein MITRE Quantum Information Science Group MITRE Quantum Error Correction.
Quantum Error Correction SOURCES: Michele Mosca Daniel Gottesman Richard Spillman Andrew Landahl.
Chien Hsing James Wu David Gottesman Andrew Landahl.
Quantum Error Correction and Fault Tolerance Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute.
Gate robustness: How much noise will ruin a quantum gate? Aram Harrow and Michael Nielsen, quant-ph/0212???
Quantum Computation and Error Correction Ali Soleimani.
Local Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation Krysta Svore Columbia University FTQC 29 August 2005 Collaborators: Barbara Terhal and David DiVincenzo, IBM quant-ph/
Beyond the DiVincenzo Criteria: Requirements and Desiderata for Fault-Tolerance Daniel Gottesman.
Error-correcting the IBM qubit error-correcting the IBM qubit panos aliferis IBM.
Quantum Error Correction: Andrew Landahl David Gottesman Dr. Wu And others.
Schrödinger’s Elephants & Quantum Slide Rules A.M. Zagoskin (FRS RIKEN & UBC) S. Savel’ev (FRS RIKEN & Loughborough U.) F. Nori (FRS RIKEN & U. of Michigan)
Memory Hierarchies for Quantum Data Dean Copsey, Mark Oskin, Frederic T. Chong, Isaac Chaung and Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar Presented by Greg Gerou.
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation in Multi-Qubit Block Codes Todd A. Brun University of Southern California QEC 2014, Zurich, Switzerland With Ching-Yi.
In Search of a Magic Bottle of Error-Be-Gone Dave Bacon Caltech Department of Physics Institute for Quantum Information Decoherence errosol.
Threshold for Life MIT Media Laboratory Prof. Isaac Chuang.
Requirements and Desiderata for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics Beyond the DiVincenzo Criteria.
Quantum Error Correction Jian-Wei Pan Lecture Note 9.
Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerance Todd A. Brun, Daniel A. Lidar, Ben Reichardt, Paolo Zanardi University of Southern California.
Quantum Error Correction Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute.
Michael A. Nielsen Fault-tolerant quantum computation with cluster states School of Physical Sciences Chris Dawson (UQ) Henry Haselgrove (UQ) The University.
1 hardware of quantum computer 1. quantum registers 2. quantum gates.
September 12, 2014 Martin Suchara Andrew Cross Jay Gambetta Supported by ARO W911NF S IMULATING AND C ORRECTING Q UBIT L EAKAGE.
Copyright © 2006 Keio University Distributed Quantum Error Correction First International Conference on Quantum Error Correction December 19, 2007 Rodney.
Quantum Computing Reversibility & Quantum Computing.
© 2015 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual.
Coherent Classical Communication Aram Harrow, MIT Quantum Computing Graduate Research Fellow Objective Objective ApproachStatus Determine.
Fidelity of a Quantum ARQ Protocol Alexei Ashikhmin Bell Labs  Classical Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) Protocol  Quantum Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ)
Coherent Communication of Classical Messages Aram Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 467 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Richard Cleve DC 3524 Course.
Quantum Shift Register Circuits Mark M. Wilde arXiv: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Wednesday, June 10, 2009 To appear in Physical.
The complexity of the Separable Hamiltonian Problem
Linear Quantum Error Correction
A low cost quantum factoring algorithm
Threshold for Life Prof. Isaac Chuang MIT Media Laboratory.
Quantum Error Correction
Quantum Computing Dorca Lee.
Improving Quantum Circuit Dependability
Quantum Error Correction
Magic-State Functional Units
Presentation transcript:

Survey on the Bounds of the Threshold For Quantum Decoherence Chris Graves December 12, 2012

Goals For Studying Quantum Computation A) Build a Large Scale Quantum Computer B) Figure Out What We Can Do Once We Get One (Experimentalists) (Theorists)

Threshold Theorem Theorem: There exists an error rate threshold ƞ th > 0 such that any ideal polynomial sized quantum circuit can be accurately simulated by a robust polynomial time quantum circuit that is resistant to any error rate ƞ < ƞ th Proven by Aharonov & Ben-Or (1996) Assumes: Ability to generate fresh ancilla qubits when needed Ability to perform operations in parallel

Threshold Bounds 10 0 Lower BoundsUpper Bounds ƞ th *Shown on a pseudo-logarithmic scale Universal quantum computing is possible if we can get the error rates below these bounds Any quantum computer subject to an error rate above these bounds will become useless

Threshold Lower Bounds Concatenated QEC Codes + Reasonable overhead - Relatively low thresholds - Ignores physical distance between qubits 7-qubit codes 2.73 x (Alferis, Gottesman, Preskill 2005) Bacon-Shor codes 1.9 x (Alferis, Cross 2006) Golay codes 1.32 x (Paetznick, Reichardt 2011)

Threshold Lower Bounds Quantum Error Detection Estimated 1%-3% (Knill 2004) Rigorously Proved.1% (Alferis, Gottesman 2007) + Relatively high thresholds - Prohibitively expensive overhead - Ignores physical distance between qubits

Threshold Lower Bounds Surface Codes + More accurately deals with locality + High simulated thresholds - Harder to analyze rigorously - Seems to be more complicated to implement 1% simulated (Wang, Fowler, Hollenberg 2010) 18.9% !!! simulated (Wootton, Loss, 2012)

Threshold Upper Bounds Can be simulated by classical computer 74% entanglement between two and one qubit gates becomes impossible (Harrow, Nielsen 2003) 45.3% for perfect Clifford gates and arbitrary noisy 1- qubit gates (Buhrman et al 2006) Output becomes random after logarithmic depth

References Gottesman (2009) arXiv: v1 Aharonov, Ben-Or (1996) arXiv:quant-ph/ Alferis, Gottesman, Preskill (2005) arXiv:quant-ph/ v3 Alferis, Cross (2006) arXiv:quant-ph/ Paetznick, Reichardt (2011) arXiv: v1 Knill (2004) arXiv:quant-ph/ v2 Alferis, Gottesman (2007) arXiv:quant-ph/ v2 Wang, Fowler, Hollenberg (2010) arXiv: v1 Wootton, Loss (2012) arXiv: v3 Harrow, Nielsen 2003) arXiv:quant-ph/ v1 Buhrman et al (2006) arXiv:quant-ph/ v2 Razborov (2003) arXiv:quant-ph/ v1 Kempe et al (2008) arXiv: v1 Cleve, Watrous (2000) arXiv:quant-ph/ v1