Copyright Management for Scholarship Julia Blixrud, Association of Research Libraries/SPARC Rodney Petersen, EDUCAUSE John Vaughn, Association of American.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

Capacity Building for Repositories Dr. Helena Asamoah-Hassan University Librarian, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana at BioMed Open Access Africa Conference held at.
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Growing Repositories The role of advocacy and support in growing repositories and achieving the DRIVER vision Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager, University of.
ARL Authors’ Rights and the Library’s Role Karla Hahn Director, Office of Scholarly Communication Association of Research Libraries
DSpace: the MIT Libraries Institutional Repository MacKenzie Smith, MIT EDUCAUSE 2003, November 5 th Copyright MacKenzie Smith, This work is the.
Security, Privacy, Copyright, and Other Institutional Policy Implications of Online Learning Rodney J. Petersen, J.D. Policy Analyst & Security Task Force.
© moments in the life of an author scholarly publications and relevant legal actions Wilma Mossink 21 October 2005.
Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Copyright management in open access projects Iryna Kuchma Open Access Programme Manager Attribution 3.0 Unported.
DARE: building a networked academic repository in the Netherlands ICOLC October 25 Ronald Dekker Delft University of Technology Library.
Institutional repositories and libraries : being visible Nor Edzan Che Nasir Library University of Malaya.
BRDI U.S. – China Roundtable on Scientific Data Cooperation: An Overview of Objectives and Activities October 2008 Paul F. Uhlir, Director Subhash Kuvelker,
Open Access and Scholarly Communications Tyler Walters Julie G. Speer Library Faculty Advisory Board November 20, 2009.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
Copyright, Authors Agreements and Institutional Repositories Angela Riggio Digital Collection Management and Licensing, UCLA Libraries Institutional Repositories.
SC in UC July Cynthia Shelton UCLA’s Scholarly Communication Program Talk at One; Walk at Two.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Age Series “Don’t I Own My Own Work?” Negotiating to Keep Your Copyright Intellectual Property in the Digital Age:
Protecting Your Scholarship: Copyrights, Publication Agreements, and Open Access Harvard University Office for Scholarly Communication May 11, 2009 Kenneth.
Distribution of rights or the fall and resurrection of scholarly communication Sijbolt Noorda SURF / Universiteit van Amsterdam.
1 The Practical Commons: Viability and Next Steps Saturday November 20, 2004 University of Maine Saturday November 20,
July 15, 2006Copyright and Scholarly Communication Sharon E. Farb UCLA Library Intellectual Property Outreach to Faculty: A Case Study.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Challenges & New Opportunities Laurel Haycock, U Libraries February 2007 Author’s Rights:
Institutional Perspective on Credit Systems for Research Data MacKenzie Smith Research Director, MIT Libraries.
Function of the School Library Media Center
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
The Influence of Intellectual Property Rights Over Distance Education Jonathan Alger University of Michigan April 17, 2002 Copyright Jonathan Alger, 2002.
1/17/07 1SCC-SSM Supporting Academic Needs: A Strategic Customer Care Sustainable Support Model Educause Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference 2007 Paul Halpine.
Licence to publish: science ajar wilma mossink open scholarship 2006.
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Kay Vyhnanek WSU Libraries Learning Break December 14, 2006 Issues and Actions and Alphabet Soup.
Presented by Vladimir Yossifov Consultant, IP Services “IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Z A Authors and Zealots: Transforming Scholarly Communication Mary E. Youngkin, Valeri Craigle, Joan M. Gregory, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library,
AVU International Conference, Nairobi, Kenya, Nov. 20, 2013 James Glapa-Grossklag, College of the Canyons Kathleen Ludewig Omollo, University of Michigan.
ROBIN BUNNELL AUGUST 10, 2011 Copyright at Work in a Community College.
Open Access and Open Source LIS-505 Introduction to Library & Information Studies March 22, 2010.
THE ROAD TO OPEN ACCESS A guide to the implementation of the Berlin Declaration Frederick J. Friend OSI Open Access Advocate JISC Consultant Honorary Director.
1 Libraries and Open Access to Scientific Information Ivana Hebrang Grgić, PhD Department of Information Science Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences.
OSI and eIFL’s Work to Spread Open Access in Developing Countries International Seminar Open Access for Developing Countries Salvador-Bahia, Brazil September.
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Kay Vyhnanek Faculty Senate Library Committee Presentation April 5, 2007 The Ongoing Transformation.
NIH Funding Recipient Responsibilities February, 2004 Office of Technology Transfer Office of the Director National Institutes of Health.
Vision Library Media Center serves as an integral part of the school ’ s educational program and is the information hub of the school. All students will.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF DIGITAL LIBRARIES By TALWANT SINGH ADDL DISTT. & SESSIONS JUDGE; DELHI.
Every library and librarian supports development LIBRARY COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT Prepared by: Hala Marzouka.
 A Primer for Higher Education in disseminating Management Research Data Arnold Mwanzu Rodney Malesi.
Dartmouth College Library COL 1 Scholarly Communication: Threats, Problems and Opportunities Presentation to the Council on Libraries Dartmouth.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Copyright transfer in a transitional time: Karla Hahn, Ph.D. Collection Management Team Leader University of Maryland Libraries A perspective.
Biotechnology / Life Sciences Ensuring Access Christina Sampogna July 2005 CASRIP – University of Washington, Seattle *Views expressed are those of the.
1 WORKSHOP ON SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 1 June 2004 Columbia University James G. Neal Remarks During Open Session.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J HOW RESEARCHERS FIND INFORMATION IN THE NEW DIGITAL AGE Gaynor Austen Director, Library Services.
Research and Scholarly Communication in the Humanities New Partnerships Between Librarians and Scholars Presented to the Humanities Research Institute.
Legal Issues in the “E-Learning Business” Jonathan Alger University of Michigan October 29, 2001 Copyright Jonathan Alger This work is the intellectual.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
WIPO Global Meeting | 28 February 2016 Global Meeting on Emerging Copyright Licensing Modalities - Facilitating Access to Culture in the Digital Age World.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Institutional Repository “A university-based institutional repository is a set of services that a university offers to the members of its community for.
BENEFITS OF AN INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY THE REPOSITORY AT ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY.
Bepress Session – ALA Midwinter, Philadelphia Supporting Undergraduate Success; Institutional Repositories as curricular tools Teresa A. Fishel January.
Copyright Considerations for Undergraduates Undergraduate Research Symposium October 3, 2015 Sarah A. Norris, Scholarly Communication Librarian, University.
Technology as a Service: Using an Institutional Repository for Faculty Education Andrew Wesolek Head of Digital Scholarship Clemson University Libraries.
Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.
The New Now: Institutional Repositories and Academia Institutional Repository USM April 17, 2015 Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian.
Emphasize “scholarly” and “universities” to distinguish TDL from other efforts. A digital infrastructure for the scholarly activities of Texas universities.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
Digital Repositories (Marilyn Billings)
Expanding Knowledge: Introduction to Scholarly Communication
Authors’ Rights: Use the Law, Share Your Scholarship, Change the World
Presentation transcript:

Copyright Management for Scholarship Julia Blixrud, Association of Research Libraries/SPARC Rodney Petersen, EDUCAUSE John Vaughn, Association of American Universities

Introduction Copyright Management Copyright Management copyright “ownership” and “use” copyright “ownership” and “use” management of intellectual property rights management of intellectual property rights for Scholarship for Scholarship mission: education and research mission: education and research access: not free but maximum use access: not free but maximum use Balancing Rights of Stakeholders Balancing Rights of Stakeholders addressing interests of stakeholders addressing interests of stakeholders

Stakeholders Authors Authors Faculty Faculty Publishers Publishers Commercial, for-profit Commercial, for-profit Academic or not-for-profit Academic or not-for-profit Universities Universities Administrators Administrators Librarians Librarians Public Public

Zwolle Working Conferences An Initiative of SURF and the Zwolle Group An Initiative of SURF and the Zwolle Group 1 st Conference: June st Conference: June 2001 “Working Conference on Copyright and Universities” “Working Conference on Copyright and Universities” 2 nd Conference: December nd Conference: December 2002 “Copyright and Universities: from Principles to Practice” “Copyright and Universities: from Principles to Practice” 3 rd Conference: February rd Conference: February 2004 “Optimal Management of Copyright: Making it Happen” “Optimal Management of Copyright: Making it Happen”

Copyright and Universities Who Should Own the Copyright? Who Should Own the Copyright? Policy Position – faculty owns vs. institution owns Policy Position – faculty owns vs. institution owns Principled Negotiation – focus on interests Principled Negotiation – focus on interests Issues for Policy Clarification Issues for Policy Clarification Distance Education Distance Education Scholarly Communication Scholarly Communication Commercialization of Research/Tech Transfer Commercialization of Research/Tech Transfer Copyright Policies Copyright Policies Intellectual Property Policies Intellectual Property Policies Copyright Policies Copyright Policies Other Policy Issues Other Policy Issues Conflict of Interest/Commitment, Use of University Name, Use of Resources, Student Works Conflict of Interest/Commitment, Use of University Name, Use of Resources, Student Works

Issues and Challenges Maximize access to scholarly information Maximize access to scholarly information Balance rights between authors, publishers, and universities Balance rights between authors, publishers, and universities Educate academic community to the need to manage copyright Educate academic community to the need to manage copyright Increased use of electronic technology and dissemination of information over the internet Increased use of electronic technology and dissemination of information over the internet Copyright Legislation Copyright Legislation Digital Millennium Copyright Law Digital Millennium Copyright Law Copyright Term Extension Act Copyright Term Extension Act Work Made for Hire and Copyright Corrections Act Work Made for Hire and Copyright Corrections Act Technology, Education, and Copyright Harmonization (TEACH) Act Technology, Education, and Copyright Harmonization (TEACH) Act

Position Statements (1) ARL Statement of Intellectual Property Principles (1994) ARL Statement of Intellectual Property Principles (1994) NHA Basic Principles for Managing Intellectual Property in the Digital Environment (1997, rev. 2002) NHA Basic Principles for Managing Intellectual Property in the Digital Environment (1997, rev. 2002) Roundtable on Managing Intellectual Property in Higher Education (1997) Roundtable on Managing Intellectual Property in Higher Education (1997) 3) Get a handle on property rights 3) Get a handle on property rights

Position Statements (2) Fair Use in the Electronic Age: Serving the Public Interest (1998) Fair Use in the Electronic Age: Serving the Public Interest (1998) Intellectual Property and New Media Technologies: A Framework for Policy Development at AAU Institutions (1999) Intellectual Property and New Media Technologies: A Framework for Policy Development at AAU Institutions (1999)

Position Statements (3) Tempe Principles (Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing, 2000) Tempe Principles (Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing, 2000) 5) Balance and management 5) Balance and management 6) Negotiation of publishing agreements 6) Negotiation of publishing agreements SPARC SPARC Create Change (2000) Create Change (2000) Seizing the Moment: Scientists' Authorship Rights in the Digital Age (2002) Seizing the Moment: Scientists' Authorship Rights in the Digital Age (2002)

Maximizing Access Budapest Open Access Initiative Budapest Open Access Initiative Open access journals Open access journals Digital (institutional) repositories Digital (institutional) repositories

Zwolle Principles: Purpose Statement To assist stakeholders—including authors, publishers, librarians, universities and the public—to achieve maximum access to scholarship without compromising quality or academic freedom and without denying aspects of costs and rewards involved.

Zwolle Principles 1.Achievement of this objective requires the optimal management of copyright in scholarly works to secure clear allocation of rights that balance the interests of all stakeholders. 2.Optimal management may be achieved through thoughtful development and implementation of policies, contracts, and other tools, as well as processes and educational programs, (collectively “Copyright Management”) that articulate the allocation of rights and responsibilities with respect to scholarly works.

Zwolle Principles 3.Appropriate Copyright Management and the interests of various stakeholders will vary according to numerous factors, including the nature of the work; for example, computer programs, journal articles, databases and multimedia instructional works may require different treatment. 4.In the development of Copyright Management, the primary focus should be on the allocation to various stakeholders of specific rights.

Zwolle Principles 5.Copyright Management should strive to respect the interests of all stakeholders involved in the use and management of scholarly works; those interests may at times diverge, but will in many cases coincide. 6.All stakeholders in the management of the copyright in scholarly works have an interest in attaining the highest standards of quality, maximizing current and future access, and ensuring preservation; stakeholders should work together on an international basis to best achieve these common goals and to develop a mutually supportive community of interest.

Zwolle Principles 7.All stakeholders should actively promote an understanding of the important implications of copyright management of scholarly work and encourage engagement with the development and implementation of Copyright Management tools to achieve the overarching objective.

Implementing the Zwolle Principles Copyright Toolkit Copyright Toolkit Publisher Agreements with Authors Publisher Agreements with Authors University Copyright Policies University Copyright Policies Ownership and Rights of Use of Works Created at the University: A Survey of American University Copyright Policies Ownership and Rights of Use of Works Created at the University: A Survey of American University Copyright Policies Comparative Chart of International Copyright Law Comparative Chart of International Copyright Law

For more information: Visit the Copyright Management for Scholarship Web site at