The Cost of Clopidogrel Use in Atrial Fibrillation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACTIVE Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Advertisements

Stavros Apostolakis, MD, PhD
Apixaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
JOURNAL REVIEW Newer Antithrombotics in AF 1 Dr Ranjith MP Senior Resident Department of Cardiology Government Medical college Kozhikode.
Patients Are Undertreated NABOR Warfarin/Warfarin + Aspirin No Treatment Patients, % Waldo AL, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46: [3] Retrospective.
Apixaban versus Aspirin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients ≥ 75 years old: An Analysis from the AVERROES Trial Kuan H Ng, Olga O Shestakovska, John W. Eikelboom,
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events Purpose To assess the relative efficacy of the antiplatelet drugs clopidogrel.
ARISTOTLE TRIAL Dr R Nyabadza GPST1 Ward 32. Structure AF, stroke and CHA 2 -DS 2 VASC Anticoagulant choices ARISTOTLE trial Cost NICE guidance and the.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Improving Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
OVBIAGELE B, DIENER H-C, YUSUF S, ET AL., PROFESS INVESTIGATORS. LEVEL OF SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE WITHIN THE NORMAL RANGE AND RISK OF RECURRENT STROKE.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
Guillaume Pare MD Genetic determinants of dabigatran plasma levels and their relation to bleeding On behalf of RE-LY Genetics: Guillaume Pare MD, Niclas.
Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:
ARISTOTLE Objectives Primary: test for noninferiority of apixaban, a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, versus warfarin Secondary: test for superiority.
The ACTIVE Investigators. N Engl J Med 2009 Apr 3 [Epub]
Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration An updated collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy among high-risk patients.
PJ Devereaux, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada on behalf of POISE-2 Investigators PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-2 Trial POISE-2POISE-2.
N Engl J Med 2009;361: Stuart J. Connolly, M.D., Michael D. Ezekowitz, M.B., Ch.B., D.Phil., Salim Yusuf, F.R.C.P.C., D.Phil., John Eikelboom,
Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D., Daniel E. Singer, M.D., Werner Hacke, M.D., Ph.D., Gunter Breithardt,
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy for Stroke Prevention.
Comparison of Dabigatran and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart DiseaseClinical Perspective by Michael D. Ezekowitz, Rangadham.
Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated with Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
From: Adjusted-Dose Warfarin versus Aspirin for Preventing Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8): doi: /
Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation
An approach to using risk scores for stroke and bleeding in clinical practice. An approach to using risk scores for stroke and bleeding in clinical practice.
Polypharmacy Anticoagulation: AF meets PCI
Figure 1 Flow chart diagram of high-risk group AF patients
in Argentina Giorgi MA1, Caroli C2, Micone P3, Giglio ND4, Aiello EC5,
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Andre Lamy on behalf of the COMPASS Investigators
Burden of Atrial Fibrillation The Percentage of Strokes Attributable to AF Increases With Age.
RE-CIRCUIT Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation were randomized to uninterrupted dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
US Guidelines US Guidelines Low-risk Patients.
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
When Is Adding Aspirin to NOACs Worth the Risk?
Barriers to Oral Anticoagulant Use for Stroke Prevention in AF
Overall burden of AF associated with higher risk of thromboembolism and ischemic stroke An analysis of the KP-RHYTHM study, in patients with paroxysmal.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
EUCLID Trial design: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were randomized to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 6,930) vs. clopidogrel 75 mg.
Natural History of Atherothrombosis Finding the Right Risk-Benefit Balance.
Clarifying Optimal Patient Selection for Long-Term DAPT Post-MI
Stroke and AF.
Assessing the Risk for Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Applying Real-World Evidence in Atrial Fibrillation Into Clinical Care:
Dabigatran vs Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation – Results
Net Clinical Benefit of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Phase III Atrial Fibrillation Trials  Giulia Renda, MD, PhD, Marta.
Aspirin in the prevention of cancer – Author's reply
Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding Often Is Caused by Occult Malignancy in Patients Receiving Warfarin or Dabigatran to Prevent Stroke and Systemic Embolism.
Atrial Fibrillation.
Aspirin and Cardioprevention in 2018
Factor Xa Inhibitors in PAD
Apixaban vs VKA and Aspirin vs Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and ACS/PCI: The AUGUSTUS Trial Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD on behalf of the.
ACC 2003 Late Breaking Trials
5 Good Minutes on Atrial Fibrillation-related Stroke
Women’s Health Study: Baseline Characteristics Part 1
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines 2010: Prevention of Stroke and Systemic Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter 
OPTIDUAL Trial design: Patients who received a drug-eluting stent and were event-free at 12 months were randomized to an additional 36 months of DAPT with.
Combining Antiplatelet and Antithrombotic Therapy (Triple Therapy): What Are the Risks and Benefits?  Luis Alejandro Asencio, MD, Jennifer J. Huang, DO,
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
Erratum Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Overall burden of AF associated with higher risk of thromboembolism and ischemic stroke An analysis of the KP-RHYTHM study, in patients with paroxysmal.
Figure 8. Stroke prevention strategy in patients with AF
Figure 1. Decision-making process of stroke prevention in patients with AF from Asia. The decision-making process includes stroke risk evaluation, OAC.
Gianluigi Savarese et al. JCHF 2016;4:
Presenter Disclosure Information
Extraordinary Cases in Stroke Prevention
The CHA(2)DS2-(VASc) stroke risk and HAS-BLED bleeding risk index are calculated by totalling the scores for each risk factor present.68–71 The lower graph.
Presentation transcript:

The Cost of Clopidogrel Use in Atrial Fibrillation A Health Economic Analysis of ACTIVE-A Andre Lamy Wesley Tong Peggy Gao Susan Chrolavicius Salim Yusuf Stuart J Connolly

Role of the Sponsor The ACTIVE A trial and this economic analysis were funded by grants from sanofi-aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The authors had free access to the complete study data and performed all of the analyses independently.

The ACTIVE A trial The Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events – Aspirin trial Clopidogrel with aspirin (C+A) vs aspirin alone For patients with atrial fibrillation unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist 7554 patients in 33 countries AF patients at high risk of stroke N Eng J Med 2009; 360:2066-78

Stroke Graph courtesy of the ACTIVE group

Stroke Types and Severity Outcome Clopidogrel + Aspirin Aspirin Clopidogrel + Aspirin versus Aspirin # rate/ year rate/ year RR 95% CI P Ischemic/Uncertain 268 2.1 388 3.2 0.68 0.59-0.80 <0.001 Hemorrhagic 30 0.2 22 1.37 0.79-2.37 0.27 Non-disabling (mod. Rankin 0-2) 107 0.9 153 1.2 0.70 0.54-0.89 0.004 Disabling or fatal (mod. Rankin 3-6) 198 1.6 267 0.74 0.62-0.89 0.001 Table courtesy of the ACTIVE group

Summary of Clinical Findings The risk of stroke was reduced by 28% However the risk of major bleeding increased by 57% Most common site was the GI tract. In 1000 patients treated for 3 years, clopidogrel with aspirin will: Prevent 28 strokes (17 fatal/disabling) Prevent 6 Myocardial Infarctions Result in 20 major bleeds (3 fatal)

ACTIVE-A Economic Analysis Clopidogrel + aspirin shown to reduce stroke risk but increase risk of bleeding Objective: To determine the economic impact of adding clopidogrel to aspirin in the ACTIVE-A population

Design In-trial analysis Study time horizon used (average follow-up: 3.6 years) Only direct medical costs Based on utilization data from CRFs Canadian healthcare perspective All costs in 2008 CAD Discounted at 3% per year Hypothesis: Clopidogrel + aspirin is cost neutral compared to aspirin alone.

Average Cost Per Patient Cost Components Average Cost Per Patient Procedures Non-study drugs Events Study drug List Price ODB Formulary Treatments Length of Stay Investigations Drugs HHS OCCP

Cost of Stroke Stroke costs include: Hospital Assistive devices Cost (2008 CAD) Ischemic Stroke $58,277 Hemorrhagic Stroke $61,537 TIA $8,104 Stroke costs include: Hospital Assistive devices Ambulatory care Allied health professionals Physician fees Home modifications Tests and procedures Caregiver expenses All medications Goeree R, Blackhouse G, Petrovic R, Salama S. J Med Econ 2005;8:147-67

Unit Costs Cost Myocardial Infarction $9,405 PCI with Stent $19,002 CHF $11,262 Catheter/coronary angiography $5,544 non-CNS systemic embolism $10,162 CABG $17,951 Unstable angina $4,814 Pulmonary embolism $7,006 Minor bleed requiring at least 1 unit of blood $7,235 Atrial fibrillation $5,526 GI bleeding with transfusion

Bootstrap method (5000 samples) for SE and 95% CI. Statistical Analysis Bootstrap method (5000 samples) for SE and 95% CI. Bias corrected and accelerated method for confidence intervals Sensitivity Analyses Clopidogrel cost ($2.52/day 2008 CAD) 50% of base 200% of base

Results Placebo + Aspirin Mean Cost (CI) Clopidogrel + Aspirin Incremental Cost Events $11,464 $9,839 −$1,625 Procedures $815 $729 −$86 Non-study Medication $1,478 $1,450 −$28 Study Medication $0 $2,114 Total $13,756 ($13,032, $14,544) $14,132 ($13,445, $14,842) $376 (−$645, $1,397) Total, discounted $12,961 ($12,274, $13,697) $13,308 ($12,664, $13,978) $347 (−$613, $1,307)

Results $14,132 $13,756

$16,289 $13,756 $14,132 $13,054

Limitations Only direct health care costs (mostly hospitalizations) Indirect costs for C+A vs A alone presumably lower due to fewer strokes Wide Confidence Intervals (CI) Due to large standard error in event cost Bootstrapping and jackknife showed similar results Absolute difference in cost is within predefined margins for cost neutrality (+/- 5%)

Applicable to the United States? Resource Utilization No likely significant difference as treatments of AF patients are similar. Unit costs Canadian costs are comparable to Medicare costs. Cost of clopidogrel will be the determinant factor between cost-saving, cost-neutral or cost-effective

Conclusion Cost of clopidogrel + aspirin not significantly different from aspirin alone Supports the use of clopidogrel + aspirin in patients unsuitable for Vitamin K antagonist therapy in the ACTIVE-A trial

Results with CIs Base Case Clopidogrel Cost 50% of Base Events -$1,625 (-$2,614 - ‑$637) -$1,625 (-$2,613 - ‑$637) Procedures -$86 (-$28 - $109) Non-study medications -$28 (-$80 - $24) -$27 (-$77 - $23) -$31 (-$88 - $26) Study medications $2,114 ($2,073 - $2,155) $1,057 ($1,036 - $1,078) $4,228 ($4,146 – $4,311) Total $376 (-$645 - $1,397) -$680 (-$1,702 - $342) $2,488 ($1,467 – $3,509)

Sensitvity Analysis – Drug Cost Base Case Clopidogrel Cost 50% of Base Clopidogrel Cost 200% of Base Events -$1,625 (-$2,613, -$637) Procedures -$86 (-$281, $109) Non-study medications -$28 (-$281, $109) -$27 (-$77, $23) -$31 (-$88, $26) Study medications $2,114 ($2,073, $2,155) $1,057 ($1,036, $1,078) $4,228 ($4,146, $4,310) Total $376 (-$645, $1,397) -$680 (-$1,702, $342) $2,488 ($1,467, $3,509) Total, discounted $347 (-$613, $1,307) -$645 (-$1,606, $312) $2,332 ($1,372, $3,292)

Clopidogrel + Aspirin versus Aspirin Bleeding Outcome Clopidogrel + Aspirin Aspirin Clopidogrel + Aspirin versus Aspirin # rate/ year rate/ year RR 95% CI P Major 251 2.0 162 1.3 1.57 1.29-1.92 <0.001 Severe 190 1.5 122 1.0 1.25-1.98 Fatal 42 0.3 27 0.2 1.56 0.96-2.53 0.07 Intra-cranial 54 0.4 29 1.87 1.19-1.94 0.006 Extra-cranial 200 1.6 134 1.1 1.51 1.21-1.88 Table courtesy of the ACTIVE group

Benefits and Risks: Compared to Warfarin Effects Warfarin versus Aspirin Clopidogrel & Aspirin versus Aspirin Meta-analysis* (RRR) ACTIVE A (RRR) Reduction in stroke - 38% -28% Increase in intra-cranial bleed +128% +87% Increase in extra-cranial bleed +70% +51% *Hart RC et al. Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have non-valvular AF . Ann Intern Med 2007: 146: 857-67 Table courtesy of the ACTIVE group