FY13 Reporting Requirements Steven Young, DMHAP Director Keisha Johnson, DMHAP Project Officer Mark Peppler, DMHAP Project Officer Adeola Fawehinmi, DMHAP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Concepts for AmeriCorps. Session Objectives Provide an opportunity for participants to network in program specific group Discuss key fiscal and grant.
Advertisements

SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
COURTNEY MCELHANEY, M.P.H. PLANNER, BVCOG Core Medical Services and Reallocations.
Early Identification of Individuals with HIV/AIDS (EIIHA)
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Effort Certification and.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Step by Step Process. Checklist and Form Instructions A checklist is provided on the website to help applicants track their progress in completing the.
Renewals Review January Why are We Here Today ? During today’s web-conference, we’ll : Review the renewals “package” Discuss the process for.
2013 Assessment of the Administrative Mechanism Results Thursday, September 4 th, 2014 Phoenix EMA Ryan White Planning Council Executive Committee 1.
Grants Management Ryan White Part A Grantees
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
Making Sense of the National Monitoring Standards CDR Matthew Newland Mae Rupert Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
FY 2015 Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A HIV Emergency Relief Grant Program Technical Assistance Call August 12, 2014 Department of Health and Human.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
SNRAS-AFES / CES Operations Budget FISCAL YEAR 2011 April 2010.
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational.
Reporting for Part A Grantees: Review of Requirements E. Amaka Nwankwo-Igomu Acting Chief, Data Management, Program Analysis and Technical Assistance Branches.
Webinar April 19, 2011 HazMat Grant Program: HMEP Application Guidance Overview and Explanation of the Sample Application for the HMEP Grant Program for.
First 5 LA Invoicing & Budget Modification Workshop OHCD Contractors FY
Reporting on the Federal Financial Report “SF-425” Presented by HOMELESS GRANT AND PER DIEM PROGRAM and The Financial Service Center 1.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Programmatic and Fiscal Accountability Adeola Fawehinmi, DMHAP Project Officer Frances Hodge, DMHAP Project Officer Department of Health and Human Services.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
FY 2011 Part A Program Updates May 17, 2011 The HIV/AIDS Bureau Division of Service Systems.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
Post Award Grantee Technical Assistance Call: FY 2012 Supplemental Funding for Quality Improvement in Health Centers U.S. Department of Health and Human.
FY 2014 Reporting Requirements Luigi S. Procopio, Project Officer, DMHAP Steven Young, Director, DMHAP Adeola Fawehinmi, Project Officer, DMHAP Keisha.
Part A Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) Reporting Requirements Chrissy Abrahms Senior Policy Advisor Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
Care Network of the Treasure Coast.  The mission of the Care Network of the Treasure Coast (CNTC) is to serve as the advisory body for the Ryan White.
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Financial Section Training FY2006.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
FY 2013 Part B FOA Announcement Number: HRSA October 23, 2012 Ryan White Part B Technical Assistance Webinar HIV/AIDS Bureau Division of State HIV/AIDS.
Update and Clarifications Regarding Local Pharmaceutical Assistance Programs Susan Robilotto, D.O. Clinical Consultant/ Medical Officer Department of Health.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.
Fiscal Year 2016 Health Center Program Substance Abuse Service Expansion Competing Supplement Funding Opportunity Number: HRSA Technical Assistance.
Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau Policy Clarification Notices 15-03: Clarification Regarding the RWHAP and Program Income and.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar October 30, 2015
The Aging Network. Who Pays for the Services? OAAMedicaid State Only Funding Targeted Tax Private Funding Other Federal Funding Local Gov’t Funding.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
MODULE 4 FHIP NOFA – FACTOR 3. What will be covered in Module 3: Factor 3 - Maximum Points and Distribution for each sub-factor Factor 3 – Sub-factor:
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar April 8, 2016.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Training Module 5: Budget Modifications Connecticut Advanced Manufacturing Initiative (CAMI) October 12, 2015 Meg Niewinski, Finance Officer Meg Niewinski.
Requirements For Receiving GRANT Funds Jimmie Curtis and Duane Hall
Ryan White Part A & Minority AIDS Initiative Service Utilization in the Indianapolis Transitional Grant Area: FY June 1, 2017 Tammie L. Nelson,
The Council Budget Understanding the Budget Process
Rehabilitation Services Administration
Program Terms Report and Program Submission
Budget Realignments and Budget Amendments
Funding Opportunity Announcement Number: HRSA
Effort Certification and Cost Sharing
EFFORT REPORTING TRAINING
Program Terms Report and Program Submission Overview May 31, 2018
Universal Review: Fiscal Requirements
Fiscal Compliance for Title III
Zora Cobb USDA Food and Nutrition Service
Fiscal Regional Training
University of Pittsburgh
Presentation transcript:

FY13 Reporting Requirements Steven Young, DMHAP Director Keisha Johnson, DMHAP Project Officer Mark Peppler, DMHAP Project Officer Adeola Fawehinmi, DMHAP Project Officer Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau

Housekeeping Rules Please mute your lines Please hold all questions until the designated sections breaks The screenshots are not very visible; a template of each screenshot is available for download on your screen.

Announcements Administrative Overview Training, July 29 – 31st Funding Opportunity Announcement 2014 National Monitoring Standards Upcoming Trainings Part A Manual Carryover/FFR Final Award ACA update

Questions

Agenda Program Terms Components Part A & MAI Planned Allocations Table; Planning Council Membership Roster; Revised SF 424A and Budget Narrative; FY 2013 Implementation Plan; Consolidated List of Contractors (CLC); Contract Review Certification (CRC) WICY Expenditure Table Final Expenditure Table MOE Expenditure

Program Terms Report Components

Part A & MAI Planned Allocation Table Purpose: Serves as a reporting tool used by grantees to report their allocation of Ryan White funds, in accordance with the conditions of the award. The allocation table: Identifies categories of services that are being funded, Compares allocation table with prior year’s for trends and changes in the type of services being funded.

Part A & MAI Planned Allocation Table What does an Allocation Table depict? Dollar amounts allocated for the RW program for the current fiscal year (FY 2013), including MAI amounts Prioritized funding set by the planning council/planning body with regard to the 75/25 rule (applies to both Part A & MAI), Administrative and CQM dollars.

Allocations Table Verify Grantee Information Verify Award Amount = Total Grant Award Verify Total Amts & %’s are Accurate Verify Svc Categories & Amounts Match Implementation Plan Verify 75% Requirement Met (unless waiver), after 10% Admin and 5% CQM Deducted. Verify 25% Requirement Met (unless waiver) CQM Amt = CQM Amt on SF-424A and Narrative and is ≤ 5% or $3 million, whichever is less Administration ≤ 10% Total Svcs Allocation = Total Contractual HIV Svcs in Budget Narrative & SF-424A Total Allocation = Total Award Amt

Part A & MAI Planned Allocation Table - Checkpoints Before submitting your Allocation Table, ensure compliance with the following: Verifies that the Total Part A Funds (section B) equals the Total Allocations under Combined Total (section C5) on the table. Total award amount by type of funding can be found on the Final NOA

Part A & MAI Planned Allocation Table - Checkpoints (cont’d) Verifies that total and percentages are accurate 75/25 Rule was applied. If not, Core Medical Services Waiver was obtained. Administration cost ≤10% of total award Clinical Quality management (CQM) ≤ 5% or 3 million (whichever is less) Make sure to use current year template.

Planning Council Membership Roster Purpose: Lists membership of the Planning Council (PC) to reports on representation and its reflectiveness of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the EMA/TGAs. Key Criteria of the PC Roster: Membership category/Agency Affiliation Name Race/Ethnicity Term Gender

Planning Council Membership Roster Section 2602(b)(1) of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Extension Act of The chief elected official shall establish or designate an HIV health services planning council that shall reflect in its composition the demographics of the population of individuals with HIV/AIDS in the eligible area involved, with particular consideration given to disproportionately affected and historically underserved groups and subpopulations. See Section 2602(b)(2) for an entire list of membership categories.

Planning Council Membership Roster Membership nominations on the council must be done through an open process and candidates shall be selected based on locally delineated and publicized criteria. The selection process shall include a conflict-of-interest standard, see Section 2602(b)(1) for a detailed list of standards.

Planning Council Membership Roster - Checkpoints Before submitting your PC Roster, ensure compliance with the following: Roster accurately reflects key PC membership criteria 33% of PC are non-aligned PLWHA consumer, accessing Part A Services, Non-aligned – means there is no benefitting party affiliation with the PLWHA consumer. PC as a whole, including the 33% PLWHA non-aligned consumers must reflect HIV/AIDS demographics, and

Planning Council Membership Roster – Checkpoints (cont’d) The mandated membership categories are fulfilled. If membership categories are not fulfilled, Grantee must document their plan to compile with this requirement. Conflict of interest standard is applied to the administration of the PC.

SF 424A Purpose – a reporting tool that captures award amounts in the appropriate budget categories and object class categories for the current FY year. Budget Categories - Administration, Clinical Quality Management, HIV Services, MAI Object Class Categories - Personnel, Fringe Benefits, Travel, Equipment, Supplies, Contracts, Other, Indirect Costs, and Program income.

SF 424A

SF 424A - Checkpoints Before submitting your SF 424A, ensure compliance with the following: Appropriate budget categories are used. SF 424A Amounts Correspond with: Notice of Award (NoA) Amount on the Budget Narrative Amount on Contract Review Certification Allocations Report To access the SF 424A form, use the US PHS Grant Application Packet (Form PHS )

Budget Narrative Purpose: Is a reporting tool that provides justification for all budgeted line items with regard to: Administration, Clinical Quality Management, HIV services, and MAI

Budget Narrative Includes a “Justification Column”- grantee should be specific in response and clearly state how the efforts/activities for each object class category make a contributing impact to support the Part A HIV service delivery system. The Justification column is an integral part of the table.

Budget Narrative Total amounts listed must match the revised 424A Personnel cost include percent of time and effort, as documented in the djustification column IMPORTANT! Clearly explain how each activity impact the Part A HIV service delivery system

Budget Narrative – Checkpoints Before submitting your Budget Narrative, ensure compliance with the following: Admin Cost ≤10%, Clinical Quality Management ≤ 5% or $3 million whichever is less, and Cross reference with Allocations Table and SF424A. Personnel Personnel cost include percent of time and effort as documented in the justification column Award funds were not used to pay the salary of an individual at a rate in excess of Executive Level II or $179,700 or $86/hr

Questions

Implementation Plan Purpose: Identifies core medical and support services categories prioritized and funded by the planning council or through local community planning processes. It also contains goals and objectives that describe how funded services are implemented to achieve program outcomes.

Implementation Plan Key Components Goals Objectives Outcomes Service Category Name Priority Number Allocation Amount Service Unit Definition # of Units Provided # of People Served Time Frame Funding / Objective

Implementation Plan Goals Goals are broad statements that: define what you want to accomplish are concise and easy to understand provide the framework for the objectives

Implementation Plan Objectives pecific easurable ttainable ealistic ime Sensitive An objective describes how you will accomplish your goal.

Implementation Plan Outcomes An Outcome: is the results or consequences of the implemented objective(s) reflects the results of a program compared to its intended purpose quantifies or measures the results of service delivered

Example of Goal, Objective, and Outcome Goal (what you want to accomplish): Increase access to care for people living with HIV Objective (how you accomplish the goal): By 2/28/14, 100% of case managers will have bus passes & taxi vouchers available for distribution to clients requiring assistance with transportation to medical appointments. Outcome (the result of providing service): Decrease the % of clients who identify transportation as a barrier to accessing medical care from 70% to 30%. Increase the % of Ryan White eligible clients living with HIV in the jurisdiction with at least two medical visits with a provider with prescribing privileges from 70% to 85%.

Header Section (see Instructions p. 7, Section 4.5) Enter Grantee Name Enter Service Priority Name, No., & Allocation Corresponds to Allocations Table Ensure Part A funding source is checked Within the grant period Sum of Funds = Total Priority allocation Ensure Number of People Served & Units are reasonable based on funds allocated Ensure Objectives are SMART Enter HRSA Service Unit Definition Relates to a Comprehensive Plan strategy

Implementation Plan - Checkpoints Before submitting your Implementation Plan, ensure compliance with the following: Services are allowable per the service category definitions Service category goals are linked to current Comprehensive Plan strategies Objectives describe how the service goal for the specified service category is accomplished Budget Narrative and Allocations Table are cross referenced Costs are reasonable

Consolidated List of Contracts (CLC) Purpose: Identifies all Part A and MAI service providers receiving funds for the current grant year. The CLC form is the only form that identifies minority and faith based providers. To be considered a minority provider, the organization must; have more than 50 percent of the positions on the executive board or governing body filled by persons of the racial/ethnic minority group to served; and have more that 50 percent of key management, supervisory, and administrative positions filled by persons of the racial/ethnic populations to be served.

CLC Components For each service provider include the following: Address Tax Payer Identification # (EIN) Contact information of contractor Service Type Code The codes can be found under the instructions section of the CLC Table Contract Amount Minority Provider Status Faith Based Provider Status

CLC Table Part A Current Year CLC

CLC - Checkpoints Before submitting your CLC, ensure compliance with the following: Agencies funded for multiple service categories are listed separately for each contracted service, with corresponding amounts. Confirm that the Minority and Faith based sections are filled. Allocations Table and Implementation Plan are cross referenced.

Contract Review Certification (CRC) Purpose: Is a reporting tool used by grantees to certify all service contracts awarded by the grantee for the current grant year, were reviewed and comply with OMB and other Ryan White requirements.

CRC - Checkpoints Before submitting your CRC report, ensure compliance with the following: Certify that the procedures used to advertise and award funds meet the minimum standards required by the Office of Management and budget (OMB) in applicable circulars Certifies the budgeted costs in all Direct Service contracts have been determined allowable according to principles and standards established by OMB in applicable Circulars. All contracts are direct service contracts, including MAI. Certify that there are no mathematical errors in the budget of all Direct Service contracts. Signed by both the Program Director and Grantee’s Budget (Fiscal) Officer. Cross reference with SF 424A and Budget Narrative.

End of Program Terms Report Components. ___________________________

Questions

WICY Expenditures Table Purpose: a reporting tool which demonstrates allocation of resources for women, infants, children and youth (WICY), at no less than the percentage reflected by women, infants, children and youth with AIDS to the general population with AIDS. An estimate of the percentage of WICY with HIV/AIDS is provided annually to Part A from CDC. WICY waivers are approved for grantees that can verify that required expenditure amounts were met through other fed/state programs Prospective Waivers Retrospective Waivers

WICY Waivers Prospective Waivers - due within 90 days of receiving Part A grant award, recognizes that the grantee expects to satisfy the WICY expenditures for one or more priority populations through other Federal/state programs funds. Retrospective Waivers - due within 120 days after the end of the budget period, should demonstrate that the required minimum expenditures for one or more WICY population were satisfied, using other federal/state program funds.

Current Year WICY Expenditures Worksheet If you requested a Retrospective Waiver, complete Section C: WICY Waiver Expenditures. Enter the total amount of funds expended on services per funding source for WICY on Lines (where applicable). Enter the percent of estimated living HIV/AIDS cases in your State/jurisdiction for WICY in cells C12, E12, G12 and I12 respectively. (This information, prepared by the CDC, has been provided in a separate spreadsheet.) Enter Preparer's Name and number WICY Expenditures Table

WICY Expenditures Table - Checkpoints Before submitting your WICY report, ensure compliance with the following: Compare required percentages with actual expenditure percentages for each population In the presence of a waiver, use the prospective or retrospective waiver review checklist. Be sure that funds being used for calculations are only service dollars

Final Part A & MAI Expenditure Report Purpose: A reporting tool used to document the amount expended in services provided during the prior grant year. The report identifies the amount spent in each service category and also helps track if amount allocated for services changed during the grant year. Accounts for prioritized funding set by the planning council with regard to the 75/25 rule (applies to both Part A and MAI funds), and Accounts for Administrative and Clinical Quality Management expenditures Accounts for prior year carry over expenditure amount

CURRENT YEAR PART A & MAI Expenditures Report

Final Part A & MAI Expenditure Report - Checkpoints Before submitting your Expenditure report, ensure compliance with the following: Award amount equals the total grant award, Total amount and percentages are accurate, though tables are preset with calculations, 75/25 Core/Support services rules are applied If not, a waiver was approved, Administration ≤ 10% of total award, Clinical Quality Management ≤ 5% or 3 million dollar, whichever is less, Compare carryover expenditure amount, and Compare final amount expended with FFR.

Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Purpose: A monitoring tool used to verify funds spent by Grantee’s political subdivision on HIV/AIDS related Core medical services are at a level equal to the one (1) year preceding the FY for which the grantee is applying to receive a Part A grant. “As we communicated during the Part A Directors' Meeting at the All Grantees Meeting last November, grantees will not be required to resubmit their FY 2013 Maintenance of Effort information as a separate reporting requirement. We will accept the MOE information reported in the FY 2013 application as satisfying the MOE reporting requirement.”

Reporting Requirements Calendar

Questions

Contact Information Division of Metropolitan HIV/AIDS Programs 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville MD Room 7A