Organizational Excellence Assessment Overview Anthony A. Arnolie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
TQA CONCEPTS & CORE VALUES
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Business & Operations Advisory Committee -- March 31, Performance Assessment.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
SEM Planning Model.
“How” We Do It An Introduction to NSLIJ’s Behavioral Expectations Model.
Do You Know ???.
Contractor Assurance Discussion Forrestal Building Washington, D.C. December 14, 2011.
The Balanced Scorecard. Developed by Robert Kaplan and David Norton. Introduced in the early 1990s. Motivated in part by Wall Street’s focus on quarterly.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
AFROSAI-E COOPERATION WITH WGITA African Organisation of English-speaking Supreme Audit Institutions.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Employee Opinion Survey Human Resources CAUBO Presentation June 2007 University of Saskatchewan.
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
“How” We Do It An Introduction to NSLIJ’s Behavioral Expectations Model.
P e r f o r m a n c e Measuring Results of Organizational Performance Lesson 4 Performance Methodology: The Balanced Scorecard.
Human Capital Management Assessment Joe Burt Director, HRM March 31, 2004.
Human Capital Management Assessment of Organizational Excellence NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 5-6, 2005 Joseph F. Burt Director,
Draft Unified Planning Work Program for SFY April 1, 2015-March 31, 2016 Program Dashboard Released for PFAC Action on January 22, 2015 Program Dashboard.
Integrated PPM Governance Leveraging Org Change Management for PPM Process Implementations Presented by: Allan Mills.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 2 Asset Management January 15, 2013.
STRATEGIC PLANS An Overview of Plans Within Maricopa.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
)Talk about Pat Kinlaw- Transition back to the Baldrige framework- focusing on the leadership category something like:) Now that we have the right people.
1 OIRM Updates National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Anthony Arnolie Director, OIRM.
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
Commitment plus INVESTORS IN PEOPLE In association with Business Link Surrey & Surrey County Council The Investors in People Standard New Version – New.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
NCOA/RespectAbility From Promising to Best Practices in the Civic Engagement Presented by Thomas Endres V.P. Civic Engagement & Director of RespectAbility.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
MaineHousing Organizational Assessment Strategic Plan engaged our external partners, stakeholders, and staff and set broad goals for the agency Organizational.
Performance Assessment Assessment of Organizational Excellence NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 5-6, 2005.
0 Teaching Students Self Assessment Skills Vern Johnson Measuring Success: Taking Responsibility for learning at the University of Arizona Tucson, AZ March.
1 Clinger Cohen Act (CCA) (Title 40): An Emerging New Approach to Oversight – Overview and Program Pilot June 27, 2006 Mr. Edward Wingfield Commercial.
CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Confidential 1 Susan Ferber WW Leadership Development Cisco Leadership Fellows Program- Criteria for.
1 Report on Premises Assurance Model self-assessment questions XXX Trust Day Month Year.
Factor0–5%10–25%30–45%50–65%70–85%90–100% Approach No systematic approach to Item requirements is evident; information is anecdotal. The beginning of a.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
Journey to Excellence An Introduction to the Malcolm Baldrige Framework for Excellence.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
Arlington, VA March 31, 2004 Presentation for the Advisory Committee for Business & Operations Effective Practices Research Overview For Merit Review This.
Framework for Assessing Organizational Excellence Introduction.
Module Road Safety Program Management Identify strategies for establishing and sustaining effective multidisciplinary collaborative relationships.
NSF FY 2006 Assessment: Organizational Excellence Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 18, 2006.
New Framework for Strategic Goal Assessment NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 8-9, 2006 Tom Cooley, Director, BFA.
Dr.Nasser mohammadi : Balanced Score Card BSC as a board of directors tools Balanced Score Card (BSC) Using the Balanced Score Card (BSC) to empower the.
Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning PLANNING FOR SUCCESS.
Mauritius Excellence Awards for Cooperatives 2013 Criteria and Model designed By International Business Excellence Mauritius.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
In the Framework of: Financed by: Developed by: Business Planning for Water Associations Prepared by Water Supply and Sewerage Association of Albania SHUKALB.
DEVELOPING YOUR STRATEGY Cultivating Our Competitive Advantage.
Collaborative in Conservation An Initial Framework and Example Nick Salafsky Foundations of Success & Conservation Measures Partnership *** Note: This.
1 Top Challenges To Your PMO Success “You May Be Surprised” PMI-SVC PMO Forum April 2007.
Stony Brook University Data Strategy
Highline Community College Assessment Training
Minnesota State University, Mankato
John Latham, PhD Director, The Monfort Institute
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Organizational Excellence Assessment Overview Anthony A. Arnolie

Organizational Excellence An agile, innovative organization that fulfills its mission through leadership in state-of-the- art business practices

Organizational Excellence Goals Merit Review: Operate a credible, efficient merit review system (will be assessed by the Advisory Committee for GPRA Performance Assessment). Human Capital Management: Develop a diverse, capable, motivated staff that operates with efficiency and integrity. Technology-Enabled Business Processes: Utilize and sustain broad access to new and emerging technologies for business application. Performance Assessment: Develop and use performance assessment tools and measures to provide an environment of continuous improvement in NSF’s intellectual investments as well as its management effectiveness.

This Year’s Assessment Provided more information on why a given area is the focus of the assessment Indicated the “degree of success” for a given activity

Structure of Assessment 1.Identify the set of activities that provide the framework for this year’s assessment. 2.Describe why these activities received increased attention/emphasis this past year. What made them priorities for NSF? 3.Describe the key accomplishments of the past year. 4.Describe how we determined success and the supporting evidence --- metrics and indicators. 5.Describe any planned actions to maintain success or achieve improvement

Rating System Fully successful (glass full to the brim). Partially successful (glass half full/half empty). Not successful (glass empty). Future Activities

Committee Focus 1.Does the evidence presented support NSF’s determination that it has (or has not) “demonstrated significant achievement” for the indicator? 2.Should any changes in approach or methodology be considered for future OE assessments?