Florida Regional Meeting Broward County Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 25, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Academics and CTE at a Crossroads June 21, 2007.
Advertisements

International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Why Should We Consider School Reform? April 11, 2008.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Community Choices for Wisconsins Young Children March 17, 2010.
Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett What Makes Successful Schools Work June 18, 2008.
Understanding the Classroom Implications of the Transition to the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 10, 2012.
Where Best Practices Meet Next Practices
The Need and Urgency to Personalize Education Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman December 6, 2012.
Verona Area School District Willard R. Daggett, CEO July 18, 2012.
Take Charge of Preparing Students for their Future Willard R. Daggett, CEO November 18, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor & Relevance August 22, 2007.
Rigor and Relevance for ALL Students.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Nations Most Successful Secondary Schools Lessons Learned January 9, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, CEO April 18, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Leadership Strategies for Integrating CTE and Academic Education Using the R &
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Milan Special School District February 16, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Next Three Years June 16,
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman December 6, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Granite School District January 15, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Granite School District January 16, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for Their Future, Not our Past – What They Need for Todays Technological.
Preparing Students for the 21 st Century Willard R. Daggett, CEO August 11, 2011.
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Three Years Willard R. Daggett, CEO November 21, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Agricultural Education Leaders Summit February 5, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett CTE – The Nations Best Rigor & Relevance Programs April 16, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students April 15, 2009.
A Comprehensive Solution to School Improvement Willard R. Daggett, CEO October 7, 2011.
Preparing Students for Their Future Opportunities and Challenges Dr. Willard R. Daggett September 12, 2011.
Creating Culture of High Expectations Common Core State Standards Rigor, Relevance, Relationships Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman August 21, 2012.
Building a System-Wide Focus on Student Achievement Willard R. Daggett Joe Shannon September 27-28, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett What Makes Successful Schools Work November 8, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Leadership Skills for the 21 st Century February 1, 2011.
Preparing Students for the 21 st Century Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman May 15, 2013.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor and Relevance.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for Their Future April 19, 2009.
Daggett System for Effective Instruction: Creating an Action Plan Willard R. Daggett Raymond McNulty.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Our Changing Education Landscape December 2, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Components and Characteristics of the Most Successful U.S. Schools October 14,
Daggett System for Effective Instruction: Where Research and Best Practices Meet Willard R. Daggett, Ed.D. Founder and CEO.
Preparing Pennsylvanias 21 st Century Workforce: An Education & Workforce Development Symposium Willard R. Daggett, CEO February 21, 2012.
Leading Change During Challenging Times Lessons Learned from our Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman May 2, 2013.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students August 17, 2010.
Daggett System for Effective Instruction Deep Dive
Common Core State Standards High Expectations 21 st Century Willard R. Daggett, CEO March 15, 2012.
Preparing Title I Eligible Students for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman March.
Brunson Elementary – Mr. Jeff Faullin, Principal
Leon County Schools Next Generation Content Area Reading Professional Development (NGCARPD) Summer 2012 Using Common Core to Enhance your Instruction 1.
The 5S numbers game..
Common Core Standards: What they havent told you! Mel Riddile Associate Director High School Services
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Scholastic Superintendents Leadership Summit October 9, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Merced Union School District May 18, 2011.
4 R Future Relationships, Relevance, Rigor, Respect/Responsibility Preparing the 21 st century student for their role in a Global Economy.
Lynn Radicello, Lisa Schlegel, Patrick Shaw
Middle School Math Initiative for Florida Rigor Relevance Reading Florida and the Islands Comprehensive Center at ETS International Center for Leadership.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett High Schools & Careers: The New Value Proposition April 29, 2008.
Preparing Students for Their Future Preparing Students for Their Future Teaching for Rigor & Relevance An Introduction CTE Technical Assistance Center.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Our Changing Education Landscape.
International Center for Leadership in Education Tom Welch Greyhills Academy High School August 8, 2008.
Leading Change in Schools Today Willard R. Daggett, CEO October, 2011.
Hebrew proverb Do not confine your children to your own learning, for they were born in another time.
Today’s Theme is… RigorRelevance Relationships. Look into the future through the eyes of a child?
Many Languages: One Core Mr. Stephen R. Adamson and Dr. Freddie A. Bowles ACTFL Annual Conference Many Languages: One United Voice November 16-18, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Madison County Business League Salute to Excellence in Education Education = Economic.
Classroom Management: Teaching for Rigor and Relevance.
Successful Practices Network Connecting CTE to the Common Core State Standards And Next Generation Assessments Dale Eggebraaten, Senior.
Presentation transcript:

Florida Regional Meeting Broward County Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 25, 2012

Point of Departure Common Core State Standards

Point of Departure Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments (PARCC)

Point of Departure Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessment (PARCC) Educators Evaluation System

Point of Departure Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments (PARCC) Educators Evaluation System Fiscal Challenges

Cause and Effect

1983

Cause and Effect 1983 NCLB

Cause and Effect 1983 NCLB NGA/Business Roundtable Apple

Cause and Effect Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments (PARCC) Educators Evaluation System Fiscal Challenges Research Base

School Improvement Schools are Improving

School Improvement Changing World

Skills Gap

School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

WHY – WHAT - HOW

WHY

Cause and Effect

Point of Departure Common Core State Standard (PARCC) Educators Evaluation System Fiscal Challenges

Focus Mechanics

Focus Mechanics Past vs. Future

Focus Mechanics Past vs. Future Adults vs. Students

Cause

Reading Study Summary Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

Common Core State Standards Fewer Clearer Higher

2005 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Mississippi 88 % Georgia 87 % Wisconsin 83 % Texas 81 % Ohio 77 % Florida 71% Arkansas 53 % Massachusetts 48 %

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 % Texas 84 % Ohio 82 % Wisconsin 82 % Florida 74% Arkansas 70 % Massachusetts 54 % Mississippi 52 %

2005 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Mississippi 88 %161 Georgia 87 %175 Wisconsin 82 %189 Texas 81 %190 Ohio 77 %199 Florida 71%202 Arkansas 53 %217 Massachusetts 48 %234

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 %178 Texas 84 %188 Ohio 82 %192 Wisconsin 82 %189 Florida 74%206 Arkansas 70 %200 Massachusetts 54 %234 Mississippi 52 %210

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 % (0)178 (+3) Texas 84 % (+3)188 (-2) Ohio 82 % (+5)192 (-7) Wisconsin 82 % (-1)189 (0) Florida 74% (+3)206 (+4) Arkansas 70 % (+17)200 (-17) Massachusetts 54 % (+6)234 (0) Mississippi 52 % (-36)210 (+49)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 94 % (+11)201 (-24) Wisconsin 85 % (-1)232 (+3) Georgia 77 % (-6)209 (-15) Ohio 72 % (-8)251 (+10) Arkansas 71 % (+14)241 (-13) Florida 54 % (+10)262 (-3) Mississippi 48 % (-10)254 (+7) California 48 % (+9)259 (-3)

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 85 % (+3)214 (-5) Wisconsin 81 % (+7)219 (16) Mississippi 58 % (-21)223 (+17) Georgia 75 % (0)218 (+3) Ohio 78 % (+13)219 (-14) Florida 75 % (+12)225 (-5) Arkansas 78 % (+25)216 (-20) Massachusetts 48 % (+9)255 (0)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 83 % (+22)254 (-19) Georgia 81 % (+12)247 (-8) Wisconsin 79 % (+4)262 (-1) Florida 66 % (+8)266 (-3) Ohio 59 % (+8)269 (-9) Arkansas 61 % (+27)267 (-21) Mississippi 54 % (+1)264 (+2) Massachusetts 49 % (+7)300 (-1)

Common Core State Standards Fewer Clearer Higher Different

Application Model 1.Knowledge in one discipline 2.Application within discipline 3.Application across disciplines 4.Application to real-world predictable situations 5.Application to real-world unpredictable situations

Knowledge Taxonomy 1.Awareness 2.Comprehension 3.Application 4.Analysis 5.Synthesis 6.Evaluation

Application Model 1.Knowledge in one discipline 2.Application within discipline 3.Application across disciplines 4.Application to real-world predictable situations 5.Application to real-world unpredictable situations

Blooms CDCDABABCDCDABAB Application Levels

A B D C Rigor/Relevance Framework Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.

A B D C Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs. Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. Rigor/Relevance Framework

A B D C Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram. Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs. Rigor/Relevance Framework

Blooms CDCDABABCDCDABAB Application Levels

A B D C Calculate with numbers, including decimals, ratios, percents, and fractions. Understand two- dimensional motion and trajectories by separating the motion of an object into x and y components. Rigor/Relevance Framework

A B D C Know the characteristics and phenomena of sound waves and light waves. Understand the effect of sounds, words, and imagery on a listening audience. Rigor/Relevance Framework

Where are the Jobs Non-Routine Routine Rules Driven Problem Solving Less Innovation/Creativity Results Driven Decision Making More Innovation / Creativity

Where are the Jobs Write an Algorithm Can be Digitized Can be Outsourced Cannot Write an Algorithm Cannot be Digitized Cannot be Outsourced Non-Routine Routine

A B D C Rigor/Relevance Framework State Assessment College Prep Rules Driven Problem Solving Less Innovation/Creativity Less People Intensive Business Operations Results Driven Decision Making More Innovation / Creativity More People Intensive Business Development

Quad D Skills and Knowledge Decision Making Innovation/Creativity Goal Setting/Results Driven Multi Tasking Work with others

Shift in Testing Existing Test – A to C PARCC from A/C to B/D

Lawn Mower Effect

Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments (PARCC) Educators Evaluation System Fiscal Challenges

why – WHAT - how

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS ACTION PLAN BEST PRACTICES STRUCTURE

Research Base

John Hatti – Visible Learning

Research Base John Hatti – Visible Learning CCSSO/ICLE/Gates – Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools – Daggett (June 2012)

Research Base John Hatti – Visible Learning CCSSO/ICLE/Gates – Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools – Daggett (June 2012) Getting Beneath the Veil of Effective Schools – Dobbie and Fryer (Dec. 2011)

Focus What is effective?

Research on Effectiveness Data-rich, analysis-poor –52,637

Research on Effectiveness Data-rich, analysis-poor –Meta-analysis

Research on Effectiveness Data-rich, analysis-poor –Meta-analysis Visible Learning by John Hattie –52,637 –800 meta-analyses

Research on Effectiveness Data-rich, analysis-poor –Meta-analysis Visible Learning by John Hattie –52,637 –800 meta-analyses

Focus What is effective?

Application of Knowledge Effective 1.30 Years Growth per Year

Student Teacher Relationship Effective 1.44 Years Growth per Year

Literacy Strategies Effective 1.22 Years Growth per Year

Focus What is effective? What is most efficient?

Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework High Cost Low Cost

Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst

Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance CDCDABABCDCDABAB EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst

Application of Knowledge EffectiveEfficient

Student Teacher Relationship Effective Efficient

Teacher Expectations and Clarity EffectiveEfficient

Literacy Strategies Effective Efficient

Student Teacher PD Prior Achieve Form. Eval. Teacher Clarity Meta Strats. Literacy Strats. Peer Tutor Class Size Ability Group Teach Test Summer School

Challenges Educators Evaluation

Greatest Impact Culture of High Expectations Relevance of Instruction Strong Relationships System-wide Focus on Literacy Focused and Sustained PD

Does NOT Correlate with Effectiveness % Certified % Advanced Degrees Years of Service Per Pupil Expenditure (within reason) Class Size (within reason)

Office of the Professions Physicians Lawyers

Office of the Professions Physicians Lawyers Teachers

Office of the Professions Unions

Office of the Professions Unions Continuum

Evaluation System Data (Input vs. Output)

Evaluation System Data Effective Methods/Practices

Evaluation System Data Effective Methods/Practices Content

Challenges Educators Evaluation Common Core State Standards

Challenges Educators Evaluation Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments (PARCC)

Challenges Educators Evaluation Common Core State Standards Next Generation Assessments (PARCC) Fiscal Pressures

What Works RESEARCH

School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS STRUCTURE

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS BEST PRACTICES STRUCTURE

What Works RESEARCH MODEL SCHOOLS ACTION PLAN BEST PRACTICES STRUCTURE

Systems Focus Doctor

Systems Focus Doctor Pilot

Systems Focus Doctor Pilot Teacher

why – what - HOW

HOW Looping Department Chairs 9 th Grade Electives

Read 180

A B D C

Next Navigator

12345

Road Map State Standards to State Test

FCAT English LA Benchmarks Tested

State Tests State Standards A A

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research

National Essential Skills Study (NESS)

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings ELA Skill: Write clear and concise directions or procedures. GroupRank Overall9 Business/Industry2 Other Non-educators10 English Language Arts Teachers25 Other Educators8

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings ELA Skill: Give clear and concise oral directions. GroupRank Overall7 Business/Industry3 Other Non-educators9 English Language Arts Teachers28 Other Educators7

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings Math Skill: Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to right triangles. GroupRank Overall20 Business/Industry29 Other Non-educators31 Mathematics Teachers4 Other Educators24

NESS Study Subgroup Rankings Math Skill: Understand accuracy and precision of measurement, round off numbers according to the correct number of significant figures, and determine percent error. GroupRank Overall12 Business/Industry3 Other Non-educators10 Mathematics Teachers30 Other Educators8

Proficiency

Reading Study Summary Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards C A C

Common Core Standards NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards C A

Fla. Standards CCSS

CCSS Fla. Standards

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard State Test to CCSS Samples to NGA

Road Map State Standards to State Test State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standard State Test to CCSS Samples to NGA

State Test NGA Create a large spinner for a game that has at least eight sectors. Each sector should be assigned a different prize. Prizes should range in value from most appealing to least appealing. Vary the sectors so that the probability to win a desired prize is much less that the probability to win a lesser desired prize. Calculate the theoretical probability of landing on each prize. Conduct multiple trials with the spinner and determine the experimental probability of landing on each prize. Which price has the greatest probability and which prize has the least probability?

Common Core Standards NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards Consortium Assessment DA

A B D C

Gold Seal Lessons

Florida Career and Technical Education Florida Language Arts Strands/Standards/ Benchmarks/Expectation s Grades 9-10 NESSNESS F C AT Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources Architecture & Constructio n Arts, A/V Technology & Communications Food Products &Processing System AgribusinessSystems Power, Structural &Technical Systems EnvironmentalService Systems Plant Systems Natural ResourceSystems Animal Systems Design/Pre-Construction Construction Maintenance/Operations Performing Arts Visual Arts PrintingTechnology Journalism &Broadcasting A/V Technology& Film Telecommunications LA The student will adjust reading rate based on purpose, text difficulty, form, and style. E2L LA use context clues to determine meanings of unfamiliar words; E5H LA categorize key vocabulary and identify salient features; E5H LA relate new vocabulary to familiar words; E5L LA distinguish denotative and connotative meanings of words; E5L LA identify and understand the meaning of conceptually advanced prefixes, suffixes, and root words; E5L

Florida Arts Education Florida Language Arts Strands/Standards/Benchmarks/Expectati ons Grade 7 NESS FCAT 7th Grade Visual ArtsDanceMusicTheatre LA The student will adjust reading rate based on purpose, text difficulty, form, and style. E2HH LA use new vocabulary that is introduced and taught directly; E5L LA listen to, read, and discuss familiar and conceptually challenging text; E2L LA use context clues to determine meanings of unfamiliar words; E5HHHHH LA categorize key vocabulary and identify salient features; E5HHHHH LA relate new vocabulary to familiar words; E5L LA distinguish denotative and connotative meanings of words; E5L

Needs Assessment

What is Your Strategic Vision?

WHY – WHAT - HOW

WHY

The Changing Landscape Technology

Semantic Web Analyze Documents Key words and headers (Google) Meaning / Concepts Wolfram Alpha Complete Task

Implications Homework Term Paper

-Wolfram Alpha- Will search all language and give you response in your language Will respond in writing or verbally (in your language)

SPOT Integrated ProjectionIntegrated Projection Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard

Projection Keyboard

Projection Keyboard and Projector

Consumer Electronics Confernce Contacts Chips in devices to external to devices Medical examples

The Changing Landscape Technology Financial

2011 US Federal Budget -borrowing 41% of every dollar it is spending

The Changing Landscape Technology Financial Globalization

Equity and Excellence

Wal Mart Largest Corporation 8 times Size of Microsoft 2 % of GDP 1.4 Million Employees More Employees than: GM, Ford, G.E. and IBM Combined

China today exports in a single day more than it exported in all of Source: The Rise of India and China...

U.S. – 2 nd Half of 20 th Century Only Superpower Highest per Capita Income 1 st in Economic Growth 5% of Population > 24% of Consumption Source: National Academy of Science

1587 Route 146 Rexford, NY Phone (518) Fax (518)