What should RECs be reviewing? Criteria Define minimal risk Who decides Student research Health care vs social research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Responsible Conduct in Human Research (Fall undergraduate) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH University of Utah.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Institutional Review Board Guidance.  Independent Ethics Committee  Ethical Review Board  Research Ethics Committee 2.
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of Pediatric Advisory Committee, September 10, 2004 Analysis of Research Protocols Involving Children: Combining Subparts.
Protecting Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Research Involving Human Subjects Review of Risk and Protection from Harm.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada2-1 Chapter 2: Child Development 2.1 Doing Child-Development Research 2.2 Child-Development Research and Family.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
The Role of IRBs in Ensuring Ethical Conduct of QI Activities Mary Ann Baily, PhD Columbia IRB Conference April 1, 2011.
Fair participant selection Dr Enoka Corea. Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Where the study will be conducted How the participants will be recruited.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
TRAIN IMPROVE REDUCE PROJECT EVALUATION Jo Lucas Fibonacci Associates UK.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Chairperson Ethical Review Board
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
Committee on Human Research Processes Clinical Translational Research Fellowship Program Curriculum Core.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
The Human Subjects Institutional Review Board Workshop Part 1: An Introduction to Human Subjects Research Ethics and the IRB Process Presented by Alena.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics September 29 - October 2, 2013.
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
5-6-1 Unit 6: Ethical considerations After completing this unit, you should be able to: Understand the basic ethical principles of working with.
Lecture 6: More on Ethics. Respect for Dignity of Persons Respecting the rights of individuals Respecting the rights of individuals Non-discriminatory.
Lecture 6: More on Ethics. Respect for Dignity of Persons Respecting the rights of individuals Respecting the rights of individuals Non-discriminatory.
Senta Baker Sharon Moran IU Human Subjects Office Human Subjects Office IRB Submissions and KC Demostration School of Music November 13, 2015.
Design of Clinical Research Studies ASAP Session by: Robert McCarter, ScD Dir. Biostatistics and Informatics, CNMC
EXPEDITED PROTOCOL REVIEW AN IRB INFOSHORT APRIL 2013.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
EVALUATION RESEARCH To know if Social programs, training programs, medical treatments, or other interventions work, we have to evaluate the outcomes systematically.
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
0 Ethics Lecture Research. ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY Disclosures  The speaker has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
CSBS Faculty Workshop: The IRB – Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects PRESENTED BY: FRANCES SOLANO WITH SPECIAL GUEST: DR. DANIEL.
Scientific and Scholarly Validity
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Brief Overview of IRB and Human Subject Protections Issues at the University of Richmond Dr. R. Kirk Jonas Chair, University of Richmond Institutional.
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Criteria for Assessing MHPSS Proposals Submitted through the CAP, CERF and HRF Funding Mechanisms to the Protection Cluster.
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Lana Gevorkyan Corporate Director Human Research Protection Program
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Human Participants Research
Valdosta State University
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Presentation transcript:

What should RECs be reviewing? Criteria Define minimal risk Who decides Student research Health care vs social research

Criteria? Research is designed to produce generalisable knowledge Exemptions? –Minimal risk defined Expedited review as a third category Vulnerable groups e.g. children N.B. publication requires prior ethical review

Define minimal risk Not only involving physical contact? All vulnerable groups Include behavioural studies? Not only internal controls/ self-regulation? Depends on topic especially mental health Risk is the risk that a person is exposed to in their usual environment and activities. Different for different subjects e.g. healthy and sick child

Who decides Elaborate review only for more than minimal : decided by initial process (e.g. ethics advisors or chairperson)

examples South Africa two layers expedited and full Council of Europe additional protocol: all health care interventions, risk of psychological harm Kenya: no categories. Surveys a problem (PEPFAR) El Salvador: expedited and full reviews. But no clear guidelines

Student research Same criteria. Also because of training role of REC (incorporate into existing research) Not all reviewed in all countries (Lithuania, Nigeria) Classify level (undergraduate etc.) expedite minimal risk (exclude vulnerable groups) Include supervisors / faculty in review process Support and feedback for students? Is this the role of the REC? Probably not Can REC members provide individual advice or support?

Same standards for students? Fair ? Appropriate for the type of research performed eg retrospective chart review Essential as educational exercise/ experience Ethical review is for subjects! Supervisors role Time pressures?

Fair that students collect data for their supervisors? Part of their research experience, but must always be evaluated according to project

Specific qualifications for student reviewers? No distinction from other researchers But recurring errors in groups Student members of REC?

Distinctions between health research vs social (behavioural) research Categories of research important Consider community impact in behavioural research Research methodology e.g. qualitative different review process? Unusual projects e.g. oral histories Mental health research