Understanding Depth of Knowledge

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Solutions An Overview of FCAT Writing+ Grades
Advertisements

An Introduction to Test Construction
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Process Skill Writing / Writing Process. Students use elements of the writing process (planning, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing) to compose.
TEKS : Write multiple brief responses to teacher-provided, open-ended questions to make connections within and across genres (e.g., literary-literary,
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
+ 21 st Century Skills and Academic Standards Kimberly Hetrick Berry Creek Middle School Eagle County School District.
Faculty Senate Writing Skills Committee Scott Lazerus, ChairChristy Jespersen Jessica YoungJoAnn Arai-Brown Nancy GaussAnne Ryter Julie LukengaCourtney.
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Everett Public Schools DOK to Unit Planning LMS Department August 28, 2014.
August 2007 Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Understanding Depth of Knowledge in the Curriculum Frameworks and Assessment Cindy Simmons.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
CORY GILLETTE LITERACY COORDINATOR JANUARY 2014 Reading and Writing Curriculum in Darien Public Schools.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) An Overview. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin.
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
What Can My ELLs Do? Grade Level Cluster 3-5 A Quick Reference Guide for Planning Instructional Tasks for English Language Learners.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Quick Write Reflection How will you implement the Engineering Design Process with your students in your classes?
1 TEXT-BASED SYNTHESIS WRITING: INFORMATIVE / ARGUMENT OPINION NARRATIVE Silver Shores Elementary.
Process Skill Reading / Fluency. Students read grade-level text with fluency and comprehension.[1] October 20147th Grade ELAR.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge as it Relates to Unpacking the WV CSOs Adapted from the Office of Instruction’s Presentations posted on Teach st.
Pearl River Central School District October 2008 Stacy Baudoin Curriculum Coordinator.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
IREAD3 ISTEP+ ISTEP+ Applied Skills: March 2-13 ISTEP+ Multiple Choice: April 27-May 8 PARENT MEETING Stony Creek Elementary IREAD3: March
Mathematics Common Core Standards and Depth of Knowledge Presented February 8, 2012.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
Advanced English 6 November 1-2, 2017
Stone Lakes Elementary
Preplanning Presentation
Advanced English 6 November 10, 14
Norman L Webb.
Developing Quality Assessments
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Depth of Knowledge Pearl River Central School District October 2007 Stacy Baudoin Curriculum Coordinator

DOK DOK stands for “Depth of Knowledge.” DOK is one way administrators, teachers, and parents can understand the objectives in terms of the complexity of what students are expected to know and do. DOK is a system for categorizing cognitive demand (Bloom is a system we are all familiar with). Developed by Norman L. Webb.

Why is DOK important? The more you understand DOK, the better you will be able to prepare your students for statewide tests. You must feel comfortable with DOK in order to model this way of thinking. Feedback for students should involve the thinking process involved in getting to the correct answer.

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure, rote response, follow a set procedure, typically involves one step Level 2 Basic Reasoning Use information or conceptual knowledge, make decisions about how to approach the question or problem, use two or more steps that go beyond recall or simple procedure Level 3 Strategic Thinking Requires reasoning, developing a plan or sequence of steps, has some complexity, more than one possible answer based on more demanding reasoning Level 4 Extended Thinking Requires an investigation, time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem or task, relate ideas within and among content

Teaching with DOK Every objective in our frameworks has been assigned a DOK level. State assessments are designed so that the test items match the DOK levels of the objectives. DOK 1, 2, and 3 items are on the state assessments. Instruction needs to be designed at the same level as the DOK specified by the objective if students are to be adequately prepared for the state assessments. Teachers need to examine each objective to ensure that they are teaching at the appropriate DOK level.

Depth of Knowledge is Not DOK is not just a verb. DOK is not a Performance Level Descriptor.

DOK is Not a Verb Verbs are not always used correctly. Compare the following: *Describe how many houses are in the picture. DOK 1 Recall *Describe how two historical events are alike. DOK 2 Basic Reasoning *Describe your analysis of the literary elements in Walk Two Moons citing evidence from the text. DOK 3 Strategic Thinking

DOK is About What Follows the Verb What comes after the verb is more important than the verb itself. *Analyze this sentence to decide if semicolons have been used correctly. Students are merely recalling a rule. DOK 1 Recall

DOK is Not About Difficulty Difficulty only tells us how many students can answer a question correctly. *How many of you know the definition of the word knowledge? DOK 1 Recall If most of you know the definition, it is an easy question. *How many of you know the definition of the words panegyrize? DOK 1 Recall If most of you do not know the definition, it is a difficult question.

DOK is About Complexity Level 1 requires students to use simple skills or abilities. Level 2 includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling. Level 3 requires some higher level mental processing like reasoning, planning, and using evidence. Level 4 requires complex reasoning, planning, developing, and thinking over an extended period of time.

Performance Level Descriptors Advanced Proficient Basic Minimal NCLB requires PLD’s for at least three levels, including Basic, Proficient, and Advanced. Our fourth and lowest level is Minimal.

PLD is about Difficulty Advanced: Students at the advanced level are able to perform at a high level of difficulty, complexity, or fluency as specified by the grade-level content standards. Proficient: Students at the proficient level are able to perform at the level of difficulty, complexity, or fluency specified by the grade-level content standards. Basic: Students at the basic level are able to perform some of the content standards at a low level of difficulty, complexity, or fluency as specified by the grade-level content standards.

6th Grade Vocabulary PLD Advanced: Justify the use of context clues used to determine meaning of multiple meaning words or to infer meaning of figurative language. Justify vocabulary usage based on appropriateness for context and purpose. Justify selection of word choice based on use of reference materials. Proficient: Apply knowledge of roots and affixes (com-, ex-, il-, mid-, under-, sub-, -ance, -ence, -ive, -en) to determine the meaning of multi-syllabic words. Apply expansive knowledge of words and word meanings to communicate. Use context clues to determine the meanings of multiple meaning words and the figurative meanings of text. Use reference materials to evaluate word choice in a variety of texts and to determine meaning. Analyze and evaluate vocabulary usage based on appropriateness for context and purpose. Basic: Identify of roots and affixes in multi-syllabic words; identify and produce grade-level appropriate synonyms, antonyms, and homonyms; identify figurative language in text of increasing length, complexity and difficulty.

These are only myths. Myths of DOK *Advanced means DOK 3. *Proficient means DOK 2. *Basic means DOK 1. These are only myths. Advanced PLD requires more thinking, but does not always increase the DOK level.

PLD’s and DOK’s Language Arts, Grade 3, 2b: The student will analyze texts in order to identify, understand, infer, or synthesize information. (DOK 3) Sub-objective: Answer literal and inferential questions about main characters, setting, plot, and theme. Grade 3 Basic PLD: In reading comprehension: Use texts to identify literal and simple inferential questions about story elements . . .

Why DOK is important MCT2, Algebra I Test, and English II Test are tied to specific Depth of Knowledge Levels. DOK on these tests will range from Levels 1-3. Teachers at all grade levels need to understand all DOK levels. Instruction, assignments, and classroom assessment must incorporate the expectation of rigor for students associated with the DOK levels of all objectives for that grade and content area.

DOK and Reading Level 1: RECALL requires students to recite facts or to use simple skills or abilities requiring only a shallow understanding of the text presented. Level 2: BASIC REASONING requires both comprehension and subsequent processing of text or portions of text. DOK 2 items require closer understanding of text; DOK 2 multiple-choice answer options may reflect paraphrasing of the text rather than verbatim wording.

More DOK and Reading Level 3: STRATEGIC THINKING involves reasoning and planning; students must be able to support their thinking. Justifying answers is a DOK 3 activity. Level 4: EXTENDED THINKING requires extended activity and application of significant conceptual understanding and higher-order thinking. Note: The extended time period does not automatically raise the DOK level if students merely repeat a rote process.

DOK and Writing Level 1: RECALL expects students to write, speak, and edit using the conventions of Standard English. This level includes having students use appropriate grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling. Level 2: BASIC REASONING expects students to begin connecting ideas, using a simple organizational structure. Applying more complex sentence structure meets the DOK 2 criteria.

More DOK and Writing Level 3: STRATEGIC THINKING expects students to compose text that demonstrates some synthesis and analysis with multiple paragraphs and complex sentence structure. Students show awareness of their audience and purpose. Level 4: EXTENDED THINKING requires students to compose multi-paragraph text based upon their ability to synthesize and analyze complex ideas or themes (from multiple sources).

DOK – Reading and Writing Examples DOK ____: Identify cause and effect, and understand main idea and purpose implied by text. DOK ____: Evaluate the relative accuracy and usefulness of information from different sources. DOK ____: Locate, gather, and analyze written information for the purpose of drafting a reasoned report that supports a position.

DOK Levels May Change From Grade to Grade Grade 6 LA, 2b: The student will analyze text to understand, infer, draw conclusions, or synthesize information. (DOK 2) (DOK 2) – PLD Proficient Grade 7 LA, 2b: The student will analyze text to infer, justify, draw conclusions, synthesize, or evaluate information. (DOK 3) (DOK 3) – PLD Proficient

Grade 6 Language Arts, 2b Sample Item

Grade 7 Language Arts, 2b Sample Item

DOK Levels May Remain Constant From Grade to Grade Grade 3 LA, 3b: The student will compose descriptive text using specific details and vivid language. (DOK 3) (DOK 3) – PLD Proficient Grade 6 LA, 3b: The student will compose descriptive texts using sensory details and vivid language. (DOK 3) Grade 7 LA, 3b: The student will incorporate descriptive details into texts including but not limited to narrative, expository, or persuasive text. (DOK 3)

Grade 3 Language Arts, 3b Sample Item

Grade 3, 3b DOK, PLD, Sample Item This objective assigned a DOK 3. This task was placed in the Basic PLD based on this language: Use the composing process to generate descriptive text using specific details. Notice that “vivid language” is not in this statement. The sample items lacks the “vivid language” necessary to move the item to a DOK 3; therefore, the sample item is labeled with DOK 2. The Advanced PLD addresses descriptive writing in this way: Evaluate the use of specific details and vivid language in descriptive text.

DOK and Mathematics Level 1: RECALL includes knowing information such as facts, definitions, terms, or simple procedures. Level 2: BASIC REASONING includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond habitual response. Students must make decisions about what they are presented. Note: A two-step process in a math calculation is NOT automatically a DOK 2 if the steps require only rote or mechanical knowledge or skills.

More DOK and Mathematics Level 3: STRATEGIC THINKING requires demanding reasoning, using evidence, and a high level of thinking. Justifying answers is a DOK 3 activity. Level 4: EXTENDED THINKING requires complex reasoning and development of a product, often over an extended period of time. Note: The extended time period does not automatically raise the DOK level if students merely repeat a rote process.

DOK – Math Examples DOK ____: Read, write, and compare decimals in scientific notation. DOK ____: Design a statistical experiment to study a problem and communicate the outcomes. DOK ____: Construct two-dimensional patterns for three-dimensional models, such as cylinders and cones. DOK ____: Compute with numbers (that is, add, subtract, multiply, divide).

Where do we start? Examine the framework for your subject area and/or grade level. Note the DOK levels for each objective. Examine the PLD for your subject area and/or grade level. Note the differences among advance, proficient, and basic. Examine the Test Items Specifications for your subject area and/or grade level. Note the way each objective is assessed.

DOK in your Classroom Start with the objectives Create assessments using DOK that are modeled after Test Item Specifications Design instruction based on DOK and PLD Assess at regular intervals Use assessment results to focus instruction and to make interventions

Resources Curriculum Framework http://wwwmde.k12.ms.us/acad1 Test Blueprints http://www.mde.k12.ms.us/ACAD/osa/blueprints Performance Level Descriptors http://wwwmde.k12.ms.us//ACAD/osa/pld Test Item Specifications http://www.mde.k12.ms.us/ACAD/osa/itemspecs Practice Tests http://www.mde.k12.ms.us/ACAD/osa/practicetests/