Spatial Survey Designs Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541) 754-4790 Web Page:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sampling Design, Spatial Allocation, and Proposed Analyses Don Stevens Department of Statistics Oregon State University.
Advertisements

Western Ecology Division Web Page:
Introduction Simple Random Sampling Stratified Random Sampling
Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
Geographic Information Systems GIS Data Models. 1. Components of Geographic Data Spatial locations Attributes Topology Time.
Geographic Information Systems
A spatial design for monitoring the health of a large-scale freshwater system Melissa Dobbie, Charis Burridge (CMIS) and Bill Senior (Qld Environment and.
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Idaho’s Experience with Random Design using NHD Intermittent streams and other considerations Mary Anne Nelson, Michael McIntyre, Michael Edmondson, Glen.
Sampling Strategy for Establishment Surveys International Workshop on Industrial Statistics Beijing, China, 8-10 July 2013.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
Minnesota’s Depressional Wetland Condition Assessment (a.k.a. ‘Status & Trends of Wetland Quality in Minnesota’) John Genet 6 th Annual Minnesota Wetlands.
Robust sampling of natural resources using a GIS implementation of GRTS David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Dept of Recreation & Tourism Colorado.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn Spring 2012
Who and How And How to Mess It up
Sampling.
PROCESS IN DATA SYSTEMS PLANNING DATA INPUT DATA STORAGE DATA ANALYSIS DATA OUTPUT ACTIVITIES USER NEEDS.
Example For simplicity, assume Z i |F i are independent. Let the relative frame size of the incomplete frame as well as the expected cost vary. Relative.
Ratio estimation with stratified samples Consider the agriculture stratified sample. In addition to the data of 1992, we also have data of Suppose.
"Developing statistically-valid and -defensible frameworks to assess status and trends of ecosystem condition at national scales" "Developing statistically-valid.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Formalizing the Concepts: Simple Random Sampling.
Sampling Designs Avery and Burkhart, Chapter 3 Source: J. Hollenbeck.
1 Adjustment Procedures to Account for Nonignorable Missing Data in Environmental Surveys Breda Munoz Virginia Lesser R
Attribute based and Spatial Operations Section III Part 1: Attribute Based Operations.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Standards and Assessment Linear Vegetation Survey (LVS) Sampling Method October 2012.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
Sampling Design  M. Burgman & J. Carey Types of Samples Point samples (including neighbour distance samples) Transects line intercept sampling.
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
1 Sampling for EHES Principles and Guidelines Johan Heldal & Susie Cooper Statistics Norway.
Definitions Observation unit Target population Sample Sampled population Sampling unit Sampling frame.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Project and Ambient Assessments.
Comparison of Variance Estimators for Two-dimensional, Spatially-structured Sample Designs. Don L. Stevens, Jr. Susan F. Hornsby* Department of Statistics.
Nicole Hill*, E Lawrence, J Dambacher, A Williams, N Barrett, J Hulls, B Barker, S Nichol, V Lucieer, F Althaus, J Kool and K R Hayes Designing long-term.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
1 National Stream and River Assessment Monitoring Design Anthony R. Olsen 1, David V. Peck 1, Steven G. Paulsen 1, John L. Stoddard 1, and Susan Holdsworth.
Sampling Plan for the Marshbird Monitoring Program.
South Carolina Surface Water Monitoring: Different Designs for Different Objectives Presented by David Chestnut.
5-4-1 Unit 4: Sampling approaches After completing this unit you should be able to: Outline the purpose of sampling Understand key theoretical.
N atural R esource I nformation S ystems. ObjectivesObjectives  NRIS Water Overview  Spatial Data in NRIS Water  Integration of NHD data.
Extent and Mask Extent of original data Extent of analysis area Mask – areas of interest Remember all rasters are rectangles.
The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example An Update Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis,
Spatial Survey Designs for Aquatic Resource Monitoring Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen Western Ecology Division US Environmental Protection Agency Corvallis, Oregon.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Sampling Sources: -EPIET Introductory course, Thomas Grein, Denis Coulombier, Philippe Sudre, Mike Catchpole -IDEA Brigitte Helynck, Philippe Malfait,
The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis, OR.
Can you teach a long-term benthic monitoring program new tricks? Marc Vayssières, Karen Gehrts and Cindy Messer - CA Dept. of Water Resources Assessment.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Basic Business Statistics, 8e © 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 1-1 Inferential Statistics for Forecasting Dr. Ghada Abo-zaid Inferential Statistics for.
Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon Voice: (541) Generalized Random Tessellation.
Sampling technique  It is a procedure where we select a group of subjects (a sample) for study from a larger group (a population)
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
Sampling Designs Outline
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Survey sampling Outline (1 hr) Survey sampling (sources of variation) Sampling design features Replication Randomization Control of variation Some designs.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
Statistical Concepts Breda Munoz RTI International.
National Hydro Data Programs
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Spatial Survey Designs Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541) Web Page:

National Water Quality Monitoring Council: Monitoring Framework View any study as information system Study pieces must be designed and implemented to fit together Reference: Water Resources IMPACT, September 2003 issue

Survey Components Objectives-Design-Analysis-Report Survey objectives Institutional constraints Target population Sample frame Indicators and response design Design requirements Specification of survey design Site selection (psurvey.design) Site evaluation Conduct field and lab measurements Indicator results database Sample frame summary Target population estimation (psurvey.analysis) Report results

Indiana Stream Example Objective: Within Upper Wabash basin for streams with flowing water estimate km that are impaired and non- impaired for aquatic life use Target population: All flowing waters during summer index period within Upper Wabash Sample frame: NHD perennial coded streams Rotating basins across state

Indiana Stream Example Sample size: 50 sites with equal number in 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd, and 4 th + Strahler order Survey Design: GRTS for a linear network (spatially- balanced random sample) Oversample: 50 sites Site Evaluation  TS: Target Sampled  NT: Non-target  LD: Landowner denied access  PB: Physically barrier Adjust weights Estimate perennial stream extent Estimate stream km impaired

Indiana Upper Wabash Basin: Perennial Stream Length (km) Stream Length CategoryLength (km) Percent Total NHD GIS coverage Estimated perennial5707 ± ± 9.8 Estimated sampled3414 ± ± 9.9

Indiana Upper Wabash Basin: Biological and Habitat Assessment IndicatorStatusLength (km)Percent Total IBINot Impaired4128 ± ± 13.0 Impaired1579 ± ± 13.0 Total QHEINot Impaired3373 ± ± 16.3 Impaired2334 ± ± 16.3 Total

Mid-Atlantic Integrated Assessment (MAIA) Streams and Rivers

MAIA: Fish Assemblage Condition

MAIA: Relative Risk Assessment “The risk of Poor BMI is 1.6 times greater in streams with Poor SED than in streams with OK SED.”

Features in Space as GIS objects FeaturePointsLinesPolygons LakesIndividual lakesLake area StreamsSegmentsLinear network EstuariesEstuarine area Wetlands Depressional wetlands Wetland area Marine watersareas Hydrologic Units Yes BuildingsYes

Sampling an area Assume know nothing about the region How would select a set of sites to characterize the region? Sites should be “representative” of region Systematic point grid is appealing Triangular point grid is optimal when have a known isotropic semi-variogram in spatial statistics

TWO DIMENSIONAL RANDOM POINTS, n = 25

TWO DIMENSIONAL RANDOM POINTS, n = 100

TWO DIMENSIONAL RANDOM POINTS, n = 500

Desirable Properties of Environmental Resource Samples (1) Accommodate varying spatial sample intensity (2) Spread the sample points evenly and regularly over the domain, subject to (1) (3) Allow augmentation of the sample after-the-fact, while maintaining (2) (4) Accommodate varying population spatial density for finite & linear populations, subject to (1) & (2). (2) + (4)  Sample spatial pattern should reflect the (finite or linear) population spatial pattern

GRTS Implementation Steps Concept of selecting a probability sample from a sampling line for the resource Create a hierarchical grid with hierarchical addressing Randomize hierarchical addresses Construct sampling line using randomized hierarchical addresses Select a systematic sample with a random start from sampling line Place sample in reverse hierarchical address order

Selecting a Probability Sample from a Sampling Line: Linear Network Case Place all stream segments in frame on a linear line  Preserve segment length  Identify segments by ID In what order do place segments on line?  Randomly  Systematically (minimal spanning tree)  Randomized hierarchical grid Systematic sample with random start  k=L/n, L=length of line, n=sample size  Random start d between [0,k)  Sample: d + (i-1)*k for i=1,…,n

Selecting a Probability Sample from a Sampling Line: Point and Area Cases Point Case:  Identify all points in frame  Assign each point unit length  Place on sample line Area Case: Create grid covering region of interest Generate random points within each grid cell Keep random points within resource (A) Assign each point unit length Place on sample line

Randomized Hierarchical Grid Step 1: Frame: Large lakes: blue; Small lakes: pink; Randomly place grid over the region Step 2: Sub-divide region and randomly assign numbers to sub-regions Step 3: Sub-divide sub-regions; randomly assign numbers independently to each new sub-region; create hierarchical address. Continue sub-dividing until only one lake per cell. Step 4: Identify each lake with cell address; assign each lake length 1; place lakes on line in numerical cell address order. Step 1Step 2Step 3Step 4

Hierarchical Grid Addressing 213: hierarchical address

Population of 120 points

Reverse Hierarchical Order Construct reverse hierarchical order  Order the sites from 1 to n  Create base 4 address for numbers  Reverse base 4 address  Sort by reverse base 4 address  Renumber sites in RHO Why use reverse hierarchical order?  Results in any contiguous set of sample sites being spatially-balanced  Consequence: can begin at the beginning of list and continue using sites until have required number of sites sampled in field RHO Reverse Base4Base4 Original Order

Unequal Probability of Selection Assume want large lakes to be twice as likely to be selected as small lakes Instead of giving all lakes same unit length, give large lakes twice unit length of small lakes To select 5 sites divide line length by 5 (11/5 units); randomly select a starting point within first interval; select 4 additional sites at intervals of 11/5 units Same process is used for points and areas (using random points in area)

Complex Survey Designs based on GRTS Stratified GRTS: apply GRTS to each stratum Unequal probability GRTS: adjust unit length based on auxiliary information (eg lake area, strahler order, basin, ecoregion) Oversample GRTS:  Design calls for n sites; some expected non-target, landowner denial, etc; select additional sites to guarantee n field sampled  Apply GRTS for sample size 2n; place sites in RHO; use sites in RHO Panels for surveys over time Nested subsampling Two-stage sampling using GRTS at each stage  Example: Select USGS 4 th field Hucs; then stream sites within Hucs

Two GRTS samples: Size 30

Spatial Balance: 256 points

Ratio of GRTS to IRS Voronoi polygon size variance

Impact on Variance Estimators of Totals

Perennial Streams GRTS sample

RF3 Sample Frame: Lakes

Sample Selected: Lakes

GRTS Sample of Streams

Software Implementation Create GIS shapefile of sampling frame  Must be a point, line, or polygon shapefile (one type only)  Attribute file must contain information used to define strata or unequal probability categories R statistical software program  R is free  Load psurvey.design library  Specify survey design  Select sites using GRTS  Output is point shapefile with all required design information